Simultaneous bilateral shoulder arthroplasty: a case series

Humeral Metadiaphyseal Fracture With Severe Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder and Simultaneous Contralateral Proximal Humeral Fracture Treated With Bilateral Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Rare Case Report

Simultaneous bilateral proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are infrequent. Particularly rare are cases of PHFs extending to the metadiaphysis accompanied by severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder. To our knowledge, there have been no reports of bilateral fractures that include metadiaphyseal fractures with severe OA on one side and a PHF on the contralateral side, treated with bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). We present a case of an 84-year-old woman with a right humeral metadiaphyseal fracture with severe OA and a left proximal humeral fracture, both treated with bilateral RSA. The surgical technique for the humerus metadiaphyseal fracture involved adjusting soft-tissue tension for RSA, where the proximal bone fragment was opened and wrapped around the humeral component. The clinical outcomes of this case suggest that this surgical technique can be a viable option to restore function in rare cases of humeral metadiaphyseal fractures with severe OA of the shoulder and simultaneous contralateral proximal humeral fractures.

Early outcomes after first reverse total shoulder arthroplasty better prognosticate contralateral success compared with early outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The ideal timing between bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is unclear. The purpose of this study is to determine whether early outcomes after first TSA can be used to predict clinical outcomes after TSA of the contralateral shoulder and to evaluate the ideal time after TSA to perform the contralateral shoulder.

METHODS

A single-institution prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was reviewed. Patients who underwent bilateral primary anatomic or reverse TSA (aTSA + rTSA) without an indication of fracture, tumor, or infection were identified. Included patients had minimum 2-year follow-up on their second TSA and postoperative follow-up after their first TSA at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years. Our primary outcome was whether outcome scores and motion at 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up after first TSA predicted clinical success after second TSA at final follow-up, defined as achieving the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS = the highest level of symptoms beyond which patients consider themselves well). Outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores, abduction, forward elevation, and external/internal-rotation. Multivariable logistic regression determined whether postoperative outcomes after first TSA were predictive of achieving the PASS after second TSA independent of age, sex, and body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined cutoffs of postoperative outcomes after first TSA at each time point that best predicted achieving the prosthesis-specific PASS after second TSA.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four patients were included in the final analysis (110 aTSA and 158 rTSA). Range of motion and outcome scores at late (1- or 2-year) follow-up after first aTSA were more predictive of achieving the second TSA PASS compared with early (3- or 6-month) outcomes. In contrast, outcomes after early and late follow-up after first rTSA were similarly predictive of achieving the second TSA PASS. Specifically, the Constant score threshold at 2 years after first aTSA (79.4; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.804) better differentiated achieving the second TSA PASS vs. the 6-month threshold (72.0; AUC = 0.600). In contrast, the Constant score threshold at 2 years after first rTSA (76.4; AUC = 0.703) was similarly discriminant of achieving the second TSA PASS compared with the 6-month threshold (65.8; AUC = 0.711).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with good outcomes after first rTSA can be counseled on contralateral TSA as early as 3 months postoperatively with confidence of a similar result on the contralateral side. In contrast, success after first aTSA does not reliably predict contralateral success until ≥1 year.

Applications of Latissimus Dorsi Grafts in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

The shoulder joint is a multiaxial joint in the upper body known for its high degree of motion. It is also infamously known for recurrent dislocations compared to other joints. These dislocations are mainly fixed by closed reduction methods like the Hippocrates technique, Stimpson's gravity technique, and the most commonly used modified Kocher's technique. The modified Kocher's technique uses traction followed by external rotation, adduction, and internal rotation. Rotator cuff tears are associated with shoulder joint dislocations. Rotator cuff tears slowly heal and persist for 10-20 years, irrespective of their etiology. When left untreated, fibrosis can set in the joint. After fibrosis, it is repaired with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty allows a greater degree of movement compared to the conventional arthroplasty. In reverse shoulder arthroplasty, the latissimus dorsi tendon is removed from its original insertion and attached to the humerus around the insertion of the deltoid muscle. This change increases the torque and external rotation of the joint and provides better results than the surgeries where the tendon transfer is not done. This article compiles the various etiologies of shoulder dislocation and its treatment, shoulder arthroplasty. It discusses the indications and contraindications of total and reverse total arthroplasty. This article aims to compare conventional shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. It highlights the advantages of using latissimus dorsi grafts in reverse shoulder arthroplasty in shoulder joint dislocations.