Clinical and radiographic outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age and younger

SMR TT Augmented 360 baseplates: how do they compare to standard baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Minimum 2 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a popular surgical option for end-stage arthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, or proximal humerus fractures. The treatment of patients with glenoid bone loss and deformity, however, remains challenging. Modern implant systems now have the option of wedge-shaped augmented baseplates to supplement deficient glenoid bone and omit the need for excessive glenoid reaming or the use of bone graft. This study set out to determine if the new augmented baseplates were clinically and radiologically comparable to standard baseplates.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted on all patients who received the SMR TT Augmented 360 baseplate (Lima Corporate) between January 2020 and March 2022. All data were collected as part of the hospital prospective database from which a comparative sample of patients who received a standard baseplate was obtained. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. Preoperative clinical information was recorded using pain score (1-5), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, and range of motion. The same clinical scores were collected at 2-year follow-up with radiologic assessments.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were included in this study, with 52 in the augmented baseplate group and 52 in the standard baseplate group. At the minimum 2-year follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in OSS, pain score, or range of motion at 2 years. Postoperative ASES scores were 73 ± 22 in the augmented baseplate group and 82 ± 15 in the standard baseplate group; this difference was statistically, but not clinically, significant. There was a statistically significant difference in the size of overhang, with the augmented baseplate group having a mean glenoid overhang of 5.0 ± 1.9 mm and the standard baseplate group a mean of 6.5 ± 1.8 mm. There was no other statistically or clinically significant difference in any other radiologic outcome.

DISCUSSION

In both groups, it was possible to achieve a well-fixed stable rTSA with improved functional and radiologic outcomes at the 2-year follow-up. Augmented baseplates were not clinically inferior to standard baseplates across any measure. This study demonstrates that augmented baseplates appear to be a safe alternative to other techniques such as eccentric reaming or bony increased-offset rTSA with reliable patient outcomes.

Instability and the Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Instability of the anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is a challenging problem. With an incidence of 1% to 5% reported in the literature, it is critical for shoulder surgeons to understand and be capable of addressing this complication. Etiology is multifactorial and related to soft-tissue imbalance, osseous pathology, implant malposition, or more commonly, a combination of these various causes. Historically, high rates of failure have been reported after revision procedures, prompting a movement toward the more inherently stable reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a reliable form of management. However, this may not be the ideal solution for all patients, particularly the young and active population. Consequently, the purpose of this article was to provide a review of the literature on the management of postoperative instability and intraoperative strategies to prevent this complication during the index procedure.

Trends in the surgical management of proximal humerus fractures in Ireland from 2009 to 2022: An increasing usage of reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures are a common injury accounting for a significant workload across orthopaedic departments. Though often managed non-operatively, surgical management is indicated for a proportion of patients.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to examine the trends in the management of proximal humeral fractures within Ireland over the past 13 years.

METHODS

A retrospective review of Irish Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) data was performed between January 2009 and December 2022. Information regarding demographics including age and gender, along with procedure type were collated after patients with proximal humerus fractures, were identified using relevant ICD 10 codes.

RESULTS

Demographic details remained stable with females and those within the 55-69 year age bracket accounting for the highest proportion of patients. The mean annual number of procedures performed across the study period was 365 (273-508), with an increase from 288 cases in 2009 to 441 in 2022. Open reduction and internal fixation were the most common procedures accounting for 76.4% of cases. There has been a rising usage of total shoulder arthroplasty for fixation with an increase from < 5 cases in 2016 to 84 in 2022. A decrease in the usage of hemiarthroplasty and closed reduction internal fixation was also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been an increasing volume of operatively managed proximal humeral fractures in Ireland, which sustained despite the 2015 publication of the highly publicised PROPHER trial. The increasing utilisation of total shoulder arthroplasty in acute trauma management is notable and necessitates appropriate training for trauma theatre personnel.

Clinical Outcomes Do Not Deteriorate Over Time Following Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up of 135 Shoulders

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) offers satisfactory mid-term outcomes for a variety of pathologies, but long-term follow-up data are limited. This study demonstrates the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as the predictive factors for an inferior outcome following RTSA.

Methods

Using the prospective database of a single, tertiary referral center, we included all primary RTSAs that were performed during the study period and had a minimum 10-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes included the absolute Constant-Murley score (CS), relative CS, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), range of motion, pain, complication rate, and reintervention rate. Radiographic measurements included the critical shoulder angle (CSA), lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), distalization shoulder angle (DSA), reverse shoulder angle (RSA), acromiohumeral distance (ACHD), center of rotation, glenoid component height, notching, radiolucent lines, heterotopic ossification, and tuberosity resorption.

Results

A total of 135 shoulders (133 patients) were available for analysis at a mean follow-up of 10.9 ± 1.6 years. The mean age was 69 ± 8 years, and 76 shoulders (76 patients; 56%) were female. For most of the clinical outcomes, initial improvements were observed in the short term and were sustained in the long term without notable deterioration, with >10-year follow-up values of 64 ± 16 for the absolute CS, 79% ± 18% for the relative CS, 79% ± 21% for the SSV, and 14 ± 3 for the CS for pain. However, after initial improvement, deterioration was seen for flexion and external rotation, with values of 117° ± 26° and 25° ± 18°, respectively, at the final follow-up. Scapular notching, heterotopic ossification, and radiolucent lines of <2 mm progressed during the study period. Younger age (p = 0.040), grade-II notching (p = 0.048), tuberosity resorption (p = 0.015), and radiolucent lines of <2 mm around the glenoid (p = 0.015) were predictive of an inferior outcome. The complication rate was 28%, with a reintervention rate of 11%.

Conclusions

RTSA provided improved long-term results that did not significantly deteriorate over time for most of the clinical parameters. Negative clinical outcome predictors were younger age, grade-II notching, tuberosity resorption, and radiolucent lines of <2 mm around the glenoid.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Preoperative Risk Factors for Pain After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Despite being a generally successful procedure, pain following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a known complication. The aim of this systematic review is to identify preoperative risk factors for pain following rTSA to encourage evidence-based interventions, inform clinicians, and aid in surgical planning. Studies that reported preoperative risk factors and pain after rTSA were included. Studies which reported outcome measures that incorporated pain scores yet did not display them independently, studies which only reported intraoperative risk factors, and studies involving participants under 18 were excluded. The search was conducted on May 31, 2023, across the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Four independent researchers conducted this systematic review, and a descriptive analysis was subsequently performed. Twenty-five studies were included following the evaluation of full-text articles, involving a total of 9,470 shoulders. Preoperative risk factors identified were categorised into the following groups: BMI, smoking, radiographic findings, age and sex, prior surgery, functional ability and pain, and psychosocial. The strongest associations identified were preoperative opioid use and smoking, which were both associated with worse pain outcomes following rTSA; other preoperative risk factors highlighted in this review showed either weak or no correlation. Preoperative opioid use and smoking are likely risk factors for the development of pain after rTSA. Although the studies included varying levels of quality, the identification of modifiable risk factors is useful in optimising management prior to surgery and guiding patient expectations. The lack of evidence regarding associations with non-modifiable risk factors further reinforces the potential benefits of the procedure on diverse population groups and is useful in itself for assessing the candidacy of patients for the procedure, particularly when postoperative pain is a factor being considered.

Traumatic and Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears Have the Same Rates of Healing

Background

To examine whether traumatic rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) differ in postoperative rotator cuff tendon integrity and functional outcomes from degenerative RCRs.

Methods

RCRs performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively identified. The inclusion criteria were repairable Goutallier grades 0 to 2 full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Demographic and clinical data as well as radiological results were compared. A multivariate logistic regression of the of patient acceptable symptom state for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was performed to evaluate whether the origin of tear led to a different relative risk (RR) independently from tear and surgical characteristics.

Results

A total of 616 consecutive shoulders (304 traumatic and 312 degenerative) were finally included. Traumatic ruptures presented a greater distribution of male (72% vs 51%, P < .001) and younger patients (53 vs 57 years, P < .001), as well as earlier onset of symptoms (3 vs 15 months, P < .001), reduced range of motion in preoperative assessment for forward elevation (130° vs 150°, P < .001), and slightly greater preoperative ASES (46.5 ± 19.7 vs 50.0 ± 18.0, P = .022) and Constant (47.0 ± 20.2 vs 52.0 ± 18.9, P = .001) scores. Degenerative tears presented a lower proportion of grade 3 tendon coronal retraction (11% vs 18%, P = .031). Postoperative tendon integrity at 6 months was comparable for both groups, predominantly Sugaya types 1 and 2 (91% traumatic; 92% degenerative, P = .371). Both groups exhibited favorable outcomes in range of motion and postoperative functional scores at last follow-up. The multivariate regression confirmed that the tear origin was not significantly associated with patient acceptable symptom state achievement (P = .201) but rather with greater preoperative ASES score (RR, 1.01), men (RR, 1.16) and workers' compensation (RR, 0.65) (P < .05).

Conclusions

Traumatic cases were frequent, involved younger patients, more frequently affected the anterior rotator cuff, and were associated with more severe tendon retraction. Traumatic and degenerative RCRs lead to comparable clinical and radiologic results.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Does age affect patient outcomes after humeral head replacement in the treatment of acute proximal humeral fractures? A comparative cohort study with a minimum 10 years long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Humeral head replacement (HHR) is now rarely recommended for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) in older patients. However, in relatively young and active patients with unreconstructable complex PHFs, controversy still exists regarding the treatment options of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and HHR. The goal of this study was to compare the survival, functional, and radiographic outcomes of HHR in patients aged <70 years and those aged ≥70 years after a minimum 10 years follow-up.

METHODS

Eighty-seven out of 135 patients undergoing primary HHR were enrolled and then divided into 2 groups based on age: <70 years and ≥70 years. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

RESULTS

There were 64 patients (mean, 54.9 years) in the younger group and 23 patients (mean, 73.5 years) in the older group. The younger and older groups had comparable 10-year implant survivorship (98.4% vs. 91.3%). Patients aged ≥70 years had worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (74.2 vs. 81.0, P = .042) and lower satisfaction rates (12% vs. 64%, P < .001) than younger patients. At the final follow-up, older patients had worse forward flexion (117° vs. 129°, P = .047) and internal rotation (17 vs. 15, P = .036). More greater tuberosity complications (39% vs. 16%, P = .019), glenoid erosion (100% vs. 59%, P = .077), and humeral head superior migration (80% vs. 31%, P = .037) were also identified in patients aged ≥70 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike the increased risk for revision and functional deterioration over time after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for PHFs in younger patients, a high implant survival rate with lasting pain relief and stable functional outcomes could be observed in younger patients after HHR during long-term follow-up. Patients aged ≥70 years had worse clinical outcomes, lower patient satisfaction, more greater tuberosity complications, and more glenoid erosion and humeral head superior migration than those aged <70 years. HHR should not be recommended for the treatment of unreconstructable complex acute PHFs in older patient populations.