Patients with limited health literacy have worse preoperative function and pain control and experience prolonged hospitalizations following shoulder arthroplasty

Randomized controlled trials in the shoulder arthroplasty literature rarely include key demographic and socioeconomic patient data

BACKGROUND

It is well known that socioeconomic and demographic variables can greatly affect health outcomes. Previous studies across medical and surgical subspecialties have demonstrated that these variables are frequently under-reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). No such study currently exists that examines rates of reporting of sociodemographic variables in shoulder arthroplasty RCTs. This study aims to present these rates and explore the impact of failing to report socioeconomic variables in shoulder arthroplasty RCTs.

METHODS

The PubMed database was queried for the term shoulder arthroplasty. Sixty-five RCTs from the past 10 years were identified for inclusion from 5 high-impact orthopedic surgery journals. Each RCT was analyzed for patient age and sex or gender as well as the following sociodemographic variables: race, ethnicity, insurance status, income, work status, and education. It was also noted whether each of the above variable was mentioned in the results section of the article. Data were presented in a descriptive fashion as well as analyzed using χ2 and Fisher exact tests where appropriate.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2023, the 65 shoulder arthroplasty RCTs published reported age in 40 of 65 (61.5%) in their results sections and 61 of 65 (93.8%) in any section. Sex or gender was reported in 27 of 65 (41.5%) in their results sections and 61 of 65 (93.8%) in any section. No articles included any sociodemographic variables in the results section. Reporting rates for sociodemographic variables in any section were as follows: race, 6 of 65 (9.2%); ethnicity, 5 of 65 (7.7%); work status, 4 of 65 (6.2%); and insurance status, 1 of 65 (1.5%). No studies included income or education of the enrolled patients. There was no difference in reporting sociodemographic variables by journal (P = .45) or by year of publication (P = .57). However, no study prior to 2020 included any sociodemographic variable (0 of 27, 0%), whereas from 2020 onward 6 studies included at least 1 (6 of 38, 15.8%). Sociodemographic variables were reported significantly less frequently than age and sex or gender (P = .001).

DISCUSSION

Our study found sociodemographic variables are rarely reported in shoulder arthroplasty RCTs, whereas age and sex or gender are reported with great frequency. In order to understand the results of shoulder arthroplasty RCTs, apply their findings to the care of our patients, and address health disparities, we must ensure these studies include patient sociodemographic data.

Social Determinants of Health Disparities Increase the Rate of Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated whether social determinants of health disparities (SDHD), which include economic, social, education, health care, and environmental factors, identified through International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are associated with increased odds for poor health outcomes. We aimed to investigate the association between SDHD, identified through this novel methodology, as well as postoperative complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Using a national insurance claims database, a retrospective cohort analysis was performed. Patients were selected using Current Procedural Terminology and ICD codes for primary TKA between 2010 and 2019. Patients were stratified into 2 groups using ICD codes, those who had SDHD and those who did not, and propensity matched 1:1 for age, sex, a comorbidity score, and other comorbidities. After matching, 207,844 patients were included, with 103,922 patients in each cohort. Odds ratios (ORs) for 90-day medical and 2-year surgical complications were obtained using multivariable logistical regressions.

RESULTS

In patients who have SDHD, multivariable analysis demonstrated higher odds of readmission (OR): 1.12; P = .013) and major and minor medical complications (OR: 2.09; P < .001) within 90-days as well as higher odds of revision surgery (OR: 1.77; P < .001) and periprosthetic joint infection (OR: 1.30; P < .001) within 2-years.

CONCLUSION

The SDHD are an independent risk factor for revision surgery and periprosthetic joint infection after TKA. In addition, SDHD is also an independent risk factor for all-cause hospital readmissions and both minor and major complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

"Where is the spleen? Where are the lungs?"-An investigation of the level of anatomical knowledge of the Hong Kong public

This article investigates the level of anatomical knowledge of the Hong Kong public and uses the data to help suggest public engagement activities and health campaigns to raise health literacy in the general population. In the annual public engagement event organized by the University of Hong Kong, 250 attendees took a survey assessing basic anatomical knowledge by putting organs/structures in their correct positions. Description analysis, correlation analysis, independent sample t-test, and one-way ANOVA analysis were conducted by SPSS 27.0. Overall, a mean score of 6.5 out of 20 was achieved. Differences between various demographic parameters were analyzed, and the results showed that better performance on the survey was associated with younger age, higher educational levels, and having healthcare experience. There was also a statistically significant difference in correctly positioning the thyroid between males and females. Interestingly, some misconceptions were thought to arise from the bespoke use of the Chinese language in the survey. The data reflected room for improvement in the level of anatomical knowledge among the public, notably in the older age groups. This was attributed partially to a lack of public outreach initiatives and established anatomy-focused programs, which has restricted public exposure to anatomical knowledge and hindered the development of anatomical sciences in Hong Kong. In conclusion, the knowledge of the public on the human body needs to be improved and possible solutions to improve public awareness of health were raised.

Reliability of self-reported health literacy screening in spine patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Limited health literacy has previously been associated with increased health care utilization, worse general health status and self-reported health, and increased mortality. Identifying and accommodating patients with limited health literacy may offer an avenue towards mitigating adverse health outcomes and reduce unnecessary health care expenditure. Due to the challenges associated with implementation of lengthy health literacy assessments, the Brief Health Literacy Screening Instrument was developed. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports on the accuracy of this screening questionnaire, with or without the inclusion of sociodemographic characteristics, when predicting limited health literacy in orthopaedic spine patients.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability and predictive accuracy of self-reported health literacy screening questions with and without the inclusion of sociodemographic variables in orthopaedic spine patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients seen at a tertiary urban academic hospital-based multi-surgeon spine center OUTCOME MEASURES: Brief Health Literacy Screening Instrument (BRIEF), and the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment tool.

METHODS

Between December 2021 and February 2022, consecutive English-speaking patients over the age of 18 presenting as new patients to an urban, hospital-based outpatient spine clinic were approached for participation. A sociodemographic survey, the BRIEF, and the NVS Health Literacy Assessment Tool were administered verbally. Simple and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess the accuracy of each BRIEF question individually, and collectively, at predicting limited health literacy as defined by the NVS. Further regression analysis included sociodemographic variables (age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, highest educational degree, employment status, marital status, annual household income, insurance status, and self-reported health.

RESULTS

A total of 262 patients [mean age (years), 57 ± 17] were included in this study. One hundred thirty-four (51%) were male, 223 (85%) were White, and 151 (58%) were married. Patient BRIEF scores were as follows: 23 (9%) limited, 43 (16%) marginal, and 196 (75%) adequate. NVS scores identified 87 (33%) patients with possible limited health literacy. BRIEF items collectively demonstrated fair accuracy in the prediction of limited health literacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.82). Individually, the fourth BRIEF item ("How confident are you in filling out medical forms by yourself?") was the best predictor of limited health literacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.73). The predictive accuracy of the BRIEF items, both individually and collectively, increased with the inclusion of sociodemographic variables within the logistic regression. Specific characteristics independently associated with limited health literacy were self-identified Black race, retired or disabled employment status, single or divorced marital status, high school education or below, and self-reported "poor" health.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited health literacy has implications for patient outcomes and health care costs. Our results show that the BRIEF questionnaire is a low-cost screening tool that demonstrates fair predictability in determining limited health literacy within a population of spine patients. Self-reported health literacy assessments may be more feasible in daily practice and easier to implement into clinical workflow.