Comparative analysis of superior capsule reconstruction between long head of biceps tendon autograft and human dermis allograft

Outcomes of Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

(1) Background: Addressing large to massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs) poses complex challenges. This systematic review investigated outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) compared to conventional rotator cuff repair (RCR) for LMRCTs. (2) Methods: A systematic search across the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases until 1 October 2023 identified studies that directly compared SCR with LHBT with conventional RCR in patients with LMRCTs and included a minimum of a 12-month follow-up period. The assessed outcome measures encompassed retear rates, functional outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and acromiohumeral interval (AHI). Risk of bias assessment was conducted via the Robins-I tool. (3) Results: In six studies with 456 cases (210 SCR using LHBT and 246 using RCR), SCR with LHBT significantly reduced retear rates (OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.12-0.36; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%). Furthermore, SCR with LHBT showed significant improvement in range of forward flexion (SMD 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09-0.55, p < 0.01, I2 = 39%) and AHI (SMD 0.61, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) postoperatively. (4) Conclusion: SCR with LHBT is a safe and effective treatment for LMRCTs, reducing retear rates, maintaining greater postoperative AHI, and improving ROM compared to conventional RCR. Additional high-quality interventional studies are needed to confirm these results.

Superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears

Although the superior portion of the shoulder joint capsule is a clearly distinct structure, its ability to prevent vertical humeral head translation in irreparable rotator cuff tears remains controversial. The clinical results of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in this context are satisfactory but the radiological outcomes are poor in up to two-thirds of patients. Moreover, there is no proof that SCR is more beneficial than simply doing a subacromial debridement, a partial repair or a tenotomy of the long head of biceps. Furthermore, graft healing is not predictive of success. Given the lack of comparative studies with high level of evidence (level 1 or 2), we cannot conclude that this surgical technique (and its many variants) has a place in our treatment paradigm. Also, it seems that xenografts are no longer being used given the high rate of structural failure seen on MRI and the large number of complications. If the long head of biceps tendon is still intact at the time of surgery, it is a feasible option for SCR given the reasonable cost and minimal complications. If it is not - but the subscapularis tendon is intact or repairable - an allograft or a non-local autograft should be considered, despite its unpredictable clinical results. Surgeons should inform patients of the high rate of radiological repair failure and the worse results if a reverse shoulder arthroplasty should be needed subsequently. Level of evidence: 4.