Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: are corrective osteotomies still a taboo? The role of three-dimensional preoperative planning and patient-specific surgical guides for proximal humerus corrective osteotomy in combination with reverse shoulder arthroplasty

[Fracture sequelae-when, how, what?]

The treatment of fracture sequelae following proximal humeral fractures presents a significant challenge, as they range from necrosis and pseudarthrosis to malunions. Classifications such as Boileau's facilitate diagnosis and treatment planning. Type 1 sequelae, characterized by necrosis, can be treated with either anatomical or reverse prostheses depending on the condition of the rotator cuff. Type 2 sequelae involve locked dislocations and may require bony reconstructions. Type 3 pseudarthrosis is managed either with joint-preserving techniques or prosthetic replacement, depending on the degree of degenerative changes. Type 4 malunions often benefit from corrective osteotomies and/or prosthesis implantation. Studies have demonstrated significant functional improvements following surgical intervention, with individual factors such as deformities or rotator cuff condition influencing treatment strategies.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty to Treat Proximal Humerus Fracture Sequelae: A Review

While several proximal humerus fractures treated nonsurgically reach satisfactory outcomes, some become symptomatic malunions or nonunions with pain and dysfunction. When joint-preserving options such as malunion or nonunion repair are not optimal because of poor remaining bone stock or glenohumeral arthritis, shoulder arthroplasty is a good option. Because of the semiconstrained design of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, it is effective at improving function when there is notable bony deformity or a torn rotator cuff. Clinical studies have demonstrated reliable outcomes, and a classification system exists that is helpful for predicting prognosis and complications. By understanding the associated pearls and pitfalls and with careful management of the tuberosities, reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a powerful tool for managing proximal humerus fracture sequelae.

The Role of 3D Custom Implants in Upper Extremity Surgery

SUMMARY

As the technology of three-dimensional (3D) printing becomes more refined and accessible, multiple applications of its use are becoming more commonplace in upper extremity surgery. 3D-printed models have been beneficial in preoperative planning of complex cases of acute trauma or malunions, contributing to spatial understanding or even contouring of implants. Custom guides can also be created to assist intraoperatively with precise placement of osteotomies or arthroplasty implants. Finally, custom 3D implants have been described for cases of bone loss in the upper extremity. This can be for relatively small gaps after malunion correction or extensive defects, typically for trauma or tumor. Articular defects can also be addressed with this technology, although special considerations should be given to the implant design and longevity in these situations. Because of the relatively recent nature of 3D implants, long-term data are lacking. However, they show great promise in an expanding range of challenging clinical indications.