Shear wave elastography of the ulnar collateral ligament in division IA pitchers across a competitive collegiate season

Shear wave elastography ultrasound assessment of the ulnar collateral ligament in the elbow of college baseball players

BACKGROUND

The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) stabilizes the elbow during overhead throwing activities. Repetitive throwing can cause valgus laxity even without injury. Shear-wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) is a novel imaging technique that assesses tissue elasticity. This study aimed to assess UCL elasticity in college baseball players using SWE under resting and valgus stress conditions.

METHODS

The study included 30 healthy male college baseball players (mean age 20.48 ± 1.34 years). The dominant and nondominant arms of participants were examined, excluding those with a history of UCL injury. UCL thickness was measured using conventional ultrasound, and elastography was conducted at the same sites. Measurements were repeated under valgus stress, and the ulnohumeral joint gap was recorded. Participants were categorized into throwing and nonthrowing arm groups. A subgroup analysis of the throwing arm was conducted based on joint laxity, defined as an increase of >1 mm in the ulnohumeral joint gap under valgus stress, which is associated with UCL injury and joint laxity. Correlations between UCL evaluation parameters and changes in ulnohumeral gap were analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 54 elbows, 26 were classified as throwing and 28 as nonthrowing. The throwing group had a significant increase in the ulnohumeral gap compared to the nonthrowing group. The ulnohumeral gap under valgus stress increased from 0.59 to 0.72 cm (P = .01). There was no significant difference in shear-wave velocity (SWV) between the 2 groups. Within the throwing group, 13 elbows were classified as lax arms and 15 as nonlax arms. The SWV of the lax arms (6.71 ± 4.59 m/s) was significantly lower than that of the nonlax arms (8.54 ± 5.17 m/s) (P = .045). Multiple regression analysis showed that UCL thickness and SWV were independently correlated with the rate of change in the ulnohumeral gap (ß = 0.335, P = .018 and ß = -0.319, P = .013, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Valgus laxity of the elbow joint can be evaluated based on the elasticity of the UCL measured above the joint line using SWE at rest. Thickened UCL may exhibit a decrease in function; therefore, physicians should not evaluate the joint status solely on the basis of the structural properties on conventional ultrasound.

Applications of ultrasound elastography to hand and upper limb disorders

Ultrasound elastography is a recently developed method for accurate measurement of soft tissue stiffness in addition to the clinician's subjective evaluation. The present review briefly describes the ultrasound elastography techniques and outlines clinical applications for tendon, muscle, nerve, skin and other soft tissues of the hand and upper limb. Strain elastography provides a qualitative evaluation of the stiffness, and shear-wave elastography generates quantitative elastograms superimposed on a B-mode image. The stiffness in degenerative tendinopathy and/or tendon injury was significantly lower than in a normal tendon in several studies. Elastography is also a reliable method to evaluate functional muscle activity, compared to conventional surface electromyography. The median nerve is consistently stiffer in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome than in healthy subjects, on whatever ultrasound elastography technique. Elastography distinguishes normal skin from scars and can be used to evaluate scar severity and treatment. Elastography has huge clinical applications in musculoskeletal tissues. Continued development of systems and increased training of clinicians will expand our knowledge of elastography and its clinical applications in the future.

Evaluation of the knee joint with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

The knee joint relies on a combination of deep and superficial structures for stability and function. Both ultrasound and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging are extremely useful in evaluating these structures and associated pathology. This article reviews a combination of critical anatomic structures, joint abnormalities, and pathologic conditions at the knee joint, while highlighting the merits, limitations, and pitfalls of the two imaging modalities. A clear appreciation of each method paired with its relative strengths will aid in expediting diagnosis and appropriate treatment for a wide range of knee joint conditions.