Comorbidity effect on speed of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

What are the common factors that lead to the failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference after shoulder surgery? A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

The goal of this research is to identify the factors that negatively impact the achievement of the minimum clinically significant change (MCID) for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score within the realm of various orthopedic shoulder procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of studies published from 2002 to 2023, utilizing OvidMedline and PubMed databases. Our search criteria included terms such as "minimal clinically important difference" or "MCID" along with associated MeSH terms, in addition to "American shoulder and elbow surgeon" or "ASES." We selectively included primary investigations that assessed factors linked to the failure to achieve MCID for the ASES score subsequent to orthopedic shoulder procedures, while excluding papers addressing anatomical, surgical, or injury-related aspects.

RESULTS

Our analysis identified 149 full-text articles, leading to the inclusion of 12 studies for detailed analysis. The selected studies investigated outcomes following various orthopedic shoulder procedures, encompassing biceps tenodesis, total shoulder arthroplasty, and rotator cuff repair. Notably, factors, such as gender, body mass index, diabetes, smoking habits, opioid usage, depression, anxiety, workers' compensation, occupational satisfaction, and the preoperative ASES score, were all associated with the inability to attain MCID.

CONCLUSION

In summary, numerous factors exert a negative influence on the attainment of MCID following shoulder procedures, and these factors appear to be irrespective of the specific surgical technique employed. Patients presenting with these factors may perceive their surgical outcomes as less successful when compared to those without these factors. Identifying these factors can enable healthcare providers to provide more effective counseling to patients regarding their expected outcomes and rehabilitation course. Furthermore, these findings can aid in the development of a screening tool to better identify these risk factors and optimize them before surgery.

Preoperative handgrip strength can predict early postoperative shoulder function in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are a common musculoskeletal disorder, and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is widely performed for tendon repair. Handgrip strength correlates with rotator cuff function; however, whether preoperative grip strength can predict functional outcomes in patients undergoing ARCR remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between preoperative grip strength and postoperative shoulder function following ARCR.

METHODS

A total of 52 patients with full-thickness repairable RCTs were prospectively enrolled. Baseline parameters, namely patient characteristics and intraoperative findings, were included for analysis. Postoperative shoulder functional outcomes were assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) questionnaire and Constant-Murley scores (CMSs). Patients were followed up and evaluated at three and six months after ARCR. The effects of baseline parameters on postoperative outcomes were measured using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

At three and six months postoperatively, all clinical outcomes evaluated exhibited significant improvement from baseline following ARCR. Within 6 months postoperatively, higher preoperative grip strength was significantly correlated with higher CMSs (β = 0.470, p = 0.022), whereas increased numbers of total suture anchors were significantly correlated with decreased CMSs (β =  - 4.361, p = 0.03). Higher body mass index was significantly correlated with higher postoperative QDASH scores (β = 1.561, p = 0.03) during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher baseline grip strength predicts more favorable postoperative shoulder function following ARCR. A preoperative grip strength test in orthopedic clinics may serve as a predictor for postoperative shoulder functional recovery in patients undergoing ARCR.

Variation in Utilization of Physical Therapist and Occupational Therapist Services After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the utilization of physical therapist and occupational therapist services after rotator cuff repair (RCR) and examine variation in rehabilitation characteristics by profession.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database. Eligible patients were 18 to 64 years old and had undergone outpatient RCR between 2017 and 2020. Physical therapist and occupational therapist services were identified using evaluation and treatment codes with profession-specific modifiers ("GP" or "GO"). Factors predicting utilization of formal rehabilitation and physical therapist versus occupational therapist services were examined; and univariable and multivariable analyses of days to initiate therapy, number of visits, and episode length by profession were completed.

RESULTS

Among 53,497 patients with an RCR, 81.2% initiated formal rehabilitation (93.8% physical therapist, 5.2% occupational therapist, 1.0% both services). Patients in the Northeast and West (vs the South) were less likely to receive rehabilitation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67 to 0.70) and less likely to receive occupational therapist services (OR = 0.39). Patients living in the Midwest (versus the South) were less likely to receive rehabilitation (OR = 0.79) but more likely to receive occupational therapist services (OR = 1.51). Similarly, those living in a rural (versus urban) area were less likely to utilize rehabilitation (OR = 0.89) but more likely to receive occupational therapist services (OR = 2.21). Additionally, receiving occupational therapist instead of physical therapist services was associated with decreased therapist visits (-16.89%), days to initiate therapy (-13.43%), and episode length (-13.78%).

CONCLUSION

Most patients in our commercially insured cohort utilized rehabilitation services, with a small percentage receiving occupational therapist services. We identified profession-specific variation in utilization characteristics that warrants further examination to understand predictors and associated outcomes.

IMPACT

Variation in rehabilitation utilization after RCR, including profession-specific and regional differences, may indicate opportunities to improve standardization and quality of care.

The Influence of Obesity on Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 118,331 Patients Internationally

Background

Given the rising prevalence of obesity, the number of patients with obesity undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) will likely increase; however, there have been mixed results in the existing literature with regard to the effect of elevated body mass index (BMI) on functional outcomes and complications.

Methods

The patient-reported outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, range of motion, and adverse events.

Results

Fourteen studies (118,331 patients) were included. There were significant decreases in VAS pain scores for both patients with obesity (mean difference, -3.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), -3.9 to -3.7]; p < 0.001) and patients without obesity (mean difference, -3.2 [95% CI, -3.3 to -3.1]; p < 0.001). There were also significant increases in ASES scores for both patients with obesity (mean difference, 24.3 [95% CI, 22.5 to 26.1]; p < 0.001) and patients without obesity (mean difference, 24.3 [95% CI, 21.4 to 26.0]; p < 0.001). There were also significant increases in ASES scores for both patients with obesity (mean difference, 24.3 [95% CI, 22.5 to 26.1]; p < 0.001) and patients without obesity (mean difference, 24.3 [95% CI, 21.4 to 26.0]; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in final VAS pain scores, ASES scores, or range of motion between the groups. The mean rates of complications were higher among patients with obesity (1.2% ± 1.7%) than among patients without obesity (0.59% ± 0.11%) (p < 0.0001), and the mean rates of postoperative admissions were also higher among patients with obesity (5.9%) than patients without obesity (3.7%) (p < 0.0001). Although the mean rates of reoperation were similar between groups (5.2% ± 2.8% compared with 5.2% ± 4.2%), the meta-analysis revealed lower odds of reoperation in patients without obesity (odds ratio [OR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.82]).

Conclusions

No significant or clinically important differences in postoperative pain, ASES scores, or range of motion were found between patients with and without obesity following arthroscopic RCR. However, populations with obesity had higher rates of complications, postoperative admissions, and reoperation following arthroscopic RCR.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

One- and 2-Year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores Do Not Vary Significantly After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of 1,567 Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether there are clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcomes between 1 and 2 years' postoperatively after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospective, multicenter registry was queried for all patients who underwent RCR. Patients with preoperative, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were included. We evaluated mean postoperative ASES scores, Δ (change from preoperative) ASES, and the %MOI (% maximum outcome improvement). We also evaluated achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) for the ASES score, including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit, and patient-acceptable symptom state.

RESULTS

There were 1,567 patients with complete data through 2-year follow-up. There were small differences in achievement of CSOs from 1 to 2 years: 88% to 91% for MCID, 81% to 83% for substantial clinical benefit, and 65% to 71% for patient-acceptable symptom state. There were statistically significant differences from 1 to 2 years in mean ASES (87 to 88, P < .001), Δ ASES (37 to 39, P < .001), and %MOI (72% to 76%, P < .001); however, these changes were well below the MCID of 11.1. From 1 to 2 years, the mean ASES improved only 1.7 points (P < .001). At 1 year, patients achieved, on average, 97% of their 2-year ASES.

CONCLUSIONS

Both patient-reported outcomes and achievement of CSOs show small differences at 1 and 2 years after RCR. Given the large sample size, there were statistical differences, but these are unlikely to be clinically relevant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Editorial Commentary: One- and 2-Year Outcomes Are Clinically Similar After Rotator Cuff Repair: What Are We Waiting For?

Research standards require reliable data from which we can draw accurate conclusions. For short-term outcome studies, one measure recommended by journals is preferring at least 2 years' minimum follow-up. In some cases, this is important to avoid false conclusions because of follow-up too short to detect either failure or complete improvement. However, although intended to prevent an incomplete picture, this mandate may not always add clinical utility. Recent data suggest that for rotator cuff repair outcomes, 1-year follow-up is clinically sufficient, making the 2-year recommendation an inconvenient and unnecessary standard. The widely accepted 2-year benchmark may be arbitrary and promotes a one-size-fits all approach; the approach can be evidence-based refined.

Association of obesity with high retears and complication rates, and low functional scores after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity influences the outcomes of orthopedic surgeries such as total knee arthroplasty and spinal surgery. However, the effect of obesity on the outcomes of rotator cuff repair is unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effect of obesity on rotator cuff repair outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify relevant studies published from their inception till July 2022. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts using the specified criteria. Articles were included if they indicated the effect of obesity on rotator cuff repair and the related outcomes after surgery. Review Manager 5.4.1 software was used to perform statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles involving 85,497 patients were included. Obese patients had higher retear rates than nonobese patients (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-5.41, P = .01), lower American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (mean difference [MD]: -3.59, 95% CI: -5.45 to [-1.74]; P = .0001), higher visual analog scale for pain (mean difference: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.29-1.17; P = .001), higher reoperation rates (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.21-1.42, P < .00001), and higher rates of complications (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.31-1.87, P = .000). Obesity did not affect the duration of surgery (MD: 6.03, 95% CI: -7.63 to 19.69; P = .39) or external rotation of the shoulder (MD: -1.79, 95% CI: -5.30 to 1.72; P = .32).

CONCLUSION

Obesity is a significant risk factor for retear and reoperation after rotator cuff repair. Furthermore, obesity increases the risk of postoperative complications and leads to lower postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores and higher shoulder visual analog scale for pain.

The Association between Dietary Habits and Rapid Postoperative Recovery of Rotator Cuff Repair

Some nutritional factors have been suggested to improve postoperative outcomes in rotator cuff (RC) repair, but dietary effects on the recovery speed after the surgery remain undefined. To investigate the potential roles of dietary habits in this context, we analyzed the 12-month follow-up data of 55 patients with RC repair and found that these patients could be categorized into a rapid recovery group (n = 35) and slow recovery group (n = 20) according to their postoperative recovery patterns. Group-based logistic analysis revealed that habitual intakes of meat (OR = 1.84, 95%CI, 1.22-2.76, p = 0.003), fruits (OR = 2.33, 95%CI, 1.26-5.67, p = 0.01), and wheat-flour foods (OR = 1.62, 95%CI, 1.2-2.25, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with rapid recovery. Moreover, among all intakes of wheat-flour foods, intakes of steamed and boiled flour products were also associated with rapid recovery. Further mediation analysis showed that eosinophilic granulocytes (EOs) significantly mediated the association between rapid RC recovery and the habitual intakes of meat (mediation proportion = 17.5%, P-mediation < 0.0001), fruits (17.9%, p < 0.0001), and wheat-flour foods (11.4%, p < 0.0001). Thus, our study suggests that certain dietary habits play beneficial roles in the context of postoperative recovery for RC repair.

Preoperative factors affecting the quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective study

Background

Rotator cuff tears are well known to cause significant pain and disability, having a marked impact on an individual's quality of life. This prospective study aimed to analyze the various patient factors and their impact on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) post arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Material and Methods

We prospectively analyzed 95 patients at one year and 81 patients at two years, with complete rotator cuff tear, who underwent arthroscopic repair of the same. The 36-Item Short Form Survey (physical and mental component score), visual analog scale (pain, function), and QuickDASH questionnaires were administered to all the patients preoperatively and at one- and two-year follow-ups. Relationships between various patient factors (age, gender, side, duration of symptoms, pseudoparalysis, diabetes mellitus [DM], type, and size of tear) and outcome measures were analyzed.

Results

All outcome parameters showed significant improvement at one- and two-year follow-ups. Patient factors, such as gender, tear type (traumatic vs degenerative), and DM, affected all outcome parameters and were significant even in the regression analysis model at a 2-year follow-up. Factors such as age and symptoms duration were significant only at 1-year follow-up, with older age and patients with symptoms > 6 weeks showing more disability. Side (dominant or nondominant), tear size, and pseudoparalysis do not affect outcomes.

Conclusions

This study showed that arthroscopic RCR significantly improved HrQoL post arthroscopic RCRs. Factors independently affecting HrQoL were noted as gender, tear type, and DM. On the other hand, age, side involved, duration of symptoms, pseudoparalysis, and tear size had no independent effect on HrQoL at a two-year follow-up.

The Effect of the Overweight Condition on Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Outcomes

This study sought to investigate the influence of a preexisting overweight condition (body mass index [BMI], 25-29.9 kg/m2) on functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. A retrospective review was performed examining the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a normal-weight (BMI, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) and an overweight (BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m2) population. Functional outcomes were assessed to include the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, as well as range of motion in forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation. A total of 52 normal-weight patients (mean BMI, 23.7±2.1 kg/m2) and 57 overweight patients (mean BMI, 28.4±1.4 kg/m2) were included. Both groups demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements in VAS score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and ASES score at final follow-up (P<.0001), with no difference in range of motion (P>.05). Overall, when comparing outcomes between the groups, there were significantly better outcomes in the normal-weight group's VAS scores (mean, 0.56±0.96 vs 1.3±1.7; P=.0064), ASES scores (mean, 96.1±5.8 vs 92.4±9.7; P=.0187), and internal rotation (mean thoracic vertebrae, 9.2±3.0 vs 10.4±2.6; P=.0289). However, these differences did not reach clinical significance regarding the threshold of patients meeting standard minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient-acceptable symptomatic state for rotator cuff repairs. Over-weight patients have improved outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery with noninferior clinical results when compared with normal-weight patients. More data regarding outcomes of overweight patients will help physicians make better-informed decisions when considering rotator cuff repair. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):242-249.].

Traumatic rotator cuff tears with concomitant shoulder dislocation: tear characteristics and postsurgical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has been shown to have favorable outcomes following traumatic rotator cuff tear with concomitant shoulder dislocation. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and tear characteristics between patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair following traumatic tear with shoulder dislocation to those without dislocation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 226 consecutive patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic repair between 2013 and 2017 with a minimum of 1-year follow-up was performed. Patients with traumatic dislocations and concomitant rotator cuff tears were placed in the Dislocation & Tear cohort (DT cohort) and were matched 1:2 with a second cohort sustaining traumatic cuff tears without dislocation (T cohort). Primary outcomes were injury characteristics including tendon involvement and atrophy and tear size and thickness. Secondary outcomes were postoperative strength and range of motion (ROM) in forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), and internal rotation (IR); patient-reported outcomes including Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog scale, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form; complications including repair failure (defined as symptomatic retear confirmed on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging), infection, adhesive capsulitis, and impingement; and rates of revision surgery.

RESULTS

There were 18 patients in the DT Cohort and 36 patients in the T Cohort with no significant differences in time to final follow-up (50.4 ± 24.5 months vs. 49.0 ± 30.4 months, P = .73). The DT cohort displayed a larger mean tear size (34 ± 12 mm vs. 19 ± 12 mm, P = .01) and had greater infraspinatus involvement (78% vs. 36%, P = .004) and subscapularis involvement (72% vs. 39%, P = .02) than the T cohort. With regard to strength, postoperative ER strength was less likely to be 5/5 in the DT Cohort (53% vs. 94% of patients with 5/5 strength, P = .002) compared with the T cohort. With regard to ROM, the DT cohort had significantly lower preoperative FF (90° ± 55° vs. 149° ± 33°, P < .001), ER (36 ± 21° vs. 52° ± 14°, P = .02), and IR (5.4 ± 2.1 vs. 7.5 ± 1.2, P = .002) compared with the T cohort but had similar FF, ER, and IR outcomes postoperatively. There were no differences between the groups for complications and postoperative patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Traumatic rotator cuff tears with concomitant dislocations are associated with larger tear size and greater infraspinatus and subscapularis involvement than traumatic tears without dislocation. Arthroscopic repair of this injury is associated with lower preoperative ROM in FF, ER, and IR, as well as lower postoperative ER strength compared with traumatic tears without dislocation. Nonetheless, excellent patient-reported outcomes can be achieved following arthroscopic repair similar to patients without dislocation.

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs

PURPOSE

To calculate and determine what factors are associated with achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and the Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Testing v2.0 (UE), Pain Interference (P-Interference), and Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR).

METHODS

The change in PROMIS scores representing the optimal cutoff for a ROC curve with an area under the curve analysis was used to calculate the anchor-based MCID and SCB. To assess the responsiveness of each PROM, effect sizes and standardized response means (SRM) were calculated. To identify factors associated with attaining the MCID and SCB, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 323 patients with an average age of 59.9 ± 9.5 were enrolled in this study, of which, 187/323 [57.9%] were male and 136/323 [42.1%] were female. The anchor-based MCID for PROMIS UE, P-Interference, and P-Intensity was: 9.0, 7.5, and 11.2, respectively. The respective SCB was 10.9, 9.3, and 12.7. Effect size and SRM were: PROMIS UE (1.4, 1.3), P-Interference (1.8, 1.5), and P-Intensity (2.3, 2.0). Lower preoperative P-Intensity scores (p = 0.02), dominant arm involvement (p = 0.03), and concomitant biceps tenodesis (p = 0.03) were associated with patients achieving the SCB for PROMIS UE.

CONCLUSION

A large responsiveness for each of the PROMIS instruments due to the majority of patients reporting great improvement after aRCR and a small standard deviation across all outcome measures was shown in our study. Lower preoperative P-Intensity scores and concomitant biceps tenodesis were associated with higher odds of achieving the SCB for PROMIS UE. The knowledge of MCID and SCB values for PROMIS instruments will allow the surgeon to determine whether the improvements in the PROMIS scores after aRCR are clinically meaningful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Tear size, general health status and smoking influence functional outcome at 5 years following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Introduction

There is limited medium-term outcome data regarding the predictors of functional outcome and patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods

287 patients that underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under a high-volume single surgeon were contacted at a minimum of 4 years following surgery. Patient demographics, tear size and co-morbidities were pre-operatively recorded. The Oxford shoulder score, EuroQol 5-dimensional score and patient satisfaction were recorded at final follow-up.

Results

234 (81.5%) patients completed follow-up at a mean of 5.5 (4-9) years. There were 126 males and 108 females with a mean age of 60 (range 25-83) years. The majority of patients (n = 211, 90%) were satisfied with their final outcome. Multivariate linear regression analysis (R 2 = 0.64) identified that increasing tear size (p = 0.04), worsening general health assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimensional (p < 0.001), and smoking (p = 0.049) were associated with a worse Oxford shoulder score. Logistic regression analysis (R 2 = 0.13) identified that worsening general health assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimensional (p < 0.001), and smoking (p = 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of patient dissatisfaction.

Conclusion

General health status and smoking are independent predictors of functional outcome and patient satisfaction at medium-term follow-up following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Arthritis Severity and Medical Comorbidities Are Prognostic of Worse Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients With Concomitant Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Purpose

To assess demographic factors, comorbidities, radiographic variables, and injury patterns as potential prognostic indicators of poor functional and patient-reported outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients with concomitant glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Methods

A retrospective review of consecutive patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis who underwent arthroscopic supraspinatus repairs between 2013 and 2018 with a minimum of 1-year follow up was performed. Demographic variables included age, tobacco use, alcohol use, diabetes, sex, hypercholesterolemia, and body mass index while injury patterns included partial- versus full-thickness tear, bicep tendon involvement, and osteoarthritis severity. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of visual analog pain scale (VAS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score as well as active range of motion (ROM) in forward flexion (FF) and external rotation (ER). Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of repair failure as well as postoperative strength in FF and ER.

Results

In total, 91 patients (mean age 61.48 ± 9.4 years) were identified with an average follow up of 26.3 ± 5.7 months. Repair failures occurred in 9.9% (9/91 patients) of the total cohort. Postoperative outcomes were significantly improved with regards to visual analog pain scale, subjective shoulder value, ASES score, ROM in FF, FF strength, and external rotation strength compared with preoperative baseline. Obesity (P = .023) and diabetes (P = .010) were significant independent predictors of greater pain scores postoperatively. Obesity (P = .029) and tobacco use (P = .007) were significant predictors of lower ASES scores postoperatively. Finally, moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis was a significant risk factor for poor ROM and strength in FF postoperatively compared to mild osteoarthritis (P = .029). No variables were predictive of repair failure.

Conclusions

Tobacco use, obesity, and diabetes are associated with worse pain and patient-reported outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the context of glenohumeral OA. In addition, moderate-to-severe OA is associated with worse strength and forward flexion compared to those with mild OA.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Severe Obesity Is Not Associated With Worse Functional Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a severely obese population (body mass index [BMI] > 0 kg/m²) compared to a healthy weight population (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m²).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data examining the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in both severely obese patients and healthy weight patients. Primary outcome measures analyzed include the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), range of motion, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria: 52 healthy weight patients (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m²) and 37 severely obese patients (BMI >40 kg/m²). Patient-reported pain and functional outcomes had significantly improved after surgery in both groups with regard to the visual analog score (VAS) scores, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) scores (P < .0001). When directly comparing the outcomes in the healthy weight group to the severely obese group, the latter had significantly inferior outcomes in VAS scores (P = .0048), SANE scores (P = .0118), ASES scores (P = .0031), and postoperative internal rotation (P =.0132). At large, these outcomes did not have clinically significant differences. The severely obese group also had higher total numbers of comorbid conditions and longer operative times (P =.0041).

CONCLUSIONS

Severely obese patients and their associated comorbid conditions pose unique challenges in rotator cuff tear management, but they still achieve overall excellent outcomes after repair and noninferior clinical differences when compared to healthy weight patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Dyslipidemia is associated with risk for rotator cuff repair failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Lipid deposition secondary to dyslipidemia (DLD) is shown to have a significant impact on tendon pathology, including tendon elasticity, fatty infiltration, and healing properties. Rotator cuff repair is a common procedure, susceptible to influence from many tear-related and patient-related characteristics. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between DLD and rotator cuff repair outcomes with analysis of retear risk and function.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus were searched for all English-language, peer-reviewed studies between 2000 and the present, which analyzed relationships between patient-related factors and outcomes of rotator cuff repair. Studies that explicitly examined the effect of DLD on rotator cuff repair outcomes were chosen for inclusion. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality, and data were extracted for meta-analysis.

Results

Of the 3087 titles, 424 were screened by abstract, and 67 were reviewed in full. Inclusion criteria were met by 11 studies. Of these studies, 5 studies assessed retear, 2 studies measured function, 3 studies reported both retear and function, and 1 study evaluated the risk of retear necessitating a revision surgery. The studies report no significant difference in functional outcomes. Meta-analysis revealed that DLD patients had a significantly higher risk of retear after primary rotator cuff repair (odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.64).

Conclusion

DLD leads to an increased risk of retear after rotator cuff repair, although function appears to be unimpaired. DLD should be considered among other risk factors when counseling patients regarding expected rotator cuff repair outcomes.

Changes From Baseline in Patient- Reported Outcomes at 1 Year Versus 2 Years After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most orthopaedic journals currently require reporting outcomes of surgical interventions for at least 2 postoperative years, but there have been no rigorous studies on this matter. Various patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) have been used to assess the status of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair (RCR).

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the mean shoulder-specific PROMs at 1 year improve substantially over baseline but that there is no clinically meaningful difference between the mean 1- and 2-year PROMs after RCR.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (level of evidence 1 and 2) reporting the shoulder-specific American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the Constant, or the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index scores at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years after RCR. The methodologic quality of studies was assessed. Also, the random effects meta-analyses of changes in PROMs for each of the first and second postoperative years were conducted.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (n = 11 RCTs; n = 4 cohort studies) with a total of 1371 patients were included. Studies were highly heterogeneous, but no visual evidence of major publication bias was observed. The weighted means of the baseline PROMs were 46.2 points for the ASES score, 46.4 points for the Constant score, and 38.8 points for the WORC Index. The first-year summary increments were 41.1 (95% CI, 36.0-46.2) points for the ASES score, 34.2 (95% CI, 28.8-39.6) points for the Constant score, and 42.9 (95% CI, 37.3-48.4) points for the WORC Index. In contrast, the second-year summary increments were 2.3 (95% CI, 1-3.6) points for the ASES score, 3.2 (95% CI, 1.9-4.4) points for the Constant score, and 2 (95% CI, -0.1 to 4) points for the WORC Index.

CONCLUSION

All PROMs improved considerably from baseline to 1 year, but only very small gains that were below the minimal clinically important differences were observed between 1 year and 2 years after RCR. This study did not find any evidence for requiring a minimum of 2 years of follow-up for publication of PROs after RCR. Our results suggest that focusing on 1-year PROMs after RCR would foster more timely reporting, better control of selection bias, and better allocation of research resources.

The Effects Of Obesity On 1 Year Functional Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Tear Repair

Background

The purpose of our study was to examine the impact that an increased body mass index (BMI) has on arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR) outcomes.

Methods

We identified a sample of 313 patients who underwent aRCR at our institution from 2017 to 2020. Patients were classified into cohorts by BMI: normal BMI (<25), overweight (25-30), and obese (≥30). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores (Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, and Upper Extremity) and Clinical Global Impressions scale rating of pain and functional improvement after surgery were obtained at 1 year postoperatively. The significance of the BMI category as a predictor for outcomes was evaluated using multiple linear and multivariable logistic regressions. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with Youden’s J-statistic was used to determine optimal BMI cutoff for predicting likelihood of achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) on the Clinical Global Impressions scales.

Results

Obesity was a significant predictor of reduced preoperative-to-postoperative improvement in the PROMIS Upper Extremity score (P = .04). However, BMI was not predictive of other preoperative-to-postoperative differences in outcome scores or the size and number of cuff tendons torn (P > .05). Optimal BMI cutoffs were determined for pain MCID (40.8), pain SCB (26.8), function MCID (27.4), and function SCB (26.8), but all cutoffs had low correct classification rates (≤13%).

Discussion and Conclusion

Obesity was not found to be an independent risk factor for increased rotator cuff tear size or tendon involvement but was nonetheless associated with worse upper extremity function and pain after aRCR.

Patients with diabetes mellitus experience poorer outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to identify potential differences using validated clinical outcome instruments between patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Methods

Six-hundred eighty-four patients (32 with and 652 without DM) who underwent arthroscopic RCR were prospectively followed using the visual analog pain scale, Simple Shoulder Test, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (mental and physical component scores) preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

Patients with DM experienced significantly more pain (P = .0172) and had lower Simple Shoulder Test (P = .0458) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (P = .0200) scores than patients without DM 6 months after surgery. Although differences between groups are seen at other postoperative time points, none are statistically significant.

They also exhibited lower self-rated mental health status at 12 months (P = .0034) and 24 months (P = .0077), as well as lower self-rated physical health status at 12 months (P = .0223) and 24 months (P = .0077). Changes in scores from preoperatively to postoperatively were not different for patients with DM vs. without DM.

Conclusion

Patients with DM experience significantly more pain, exhibit significantly poorer shoulder function, and report persistently diminished mental and physical health status compared with their counterparts without DM after undergoing arthroscopic RCR. Although these differences did not reach the minimal clinically important difference, orthopedic surgeons should be cognizant of DM as an outcome-modifying variable when selecting, counseling, and treating patients with rotator cuff tears. Glycemic control should be scrutinized and optimized during the perioperative medical evaluation and ultimately factored into the surgical risk profile and prognosis.

Impact of smoking on pain and function in rotator cuff repair: A prospective 5-year cohort follow-up of 1383 patients

BACKGROUND

This multicentre cohort study investigates the effect of smoking on the outcome of rotator cuff repair (RCR), with attention to age at presentation for surgery, pre-operative and post-operative pain and function and intra-operative findings.

METHODS

Patient information was collected pre-operatively, including Flex Shoulder Function (Flex SF) and visual analogue scale pain, then at 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively. Intra-operative technical data were collected by the operating surgeon. Current smokers were classified by daily cigarette consumption.

RESULTS

A total of 1383 RCRs in as many patients were included with an 84% 5-year follow-up. Smokers were on average 6.7 years younger than non-smokers (51.8 vs. 58.5, P < 0.001). There was no difference in intra-operatively assessed tear size both in anteroposterior dimension (P = 0.5) and retraction (P = 0.9). Pre-operative Flex SF score in smokers was below that of non-smokers (23.0 vs. 24.5, P = 0.002) and at 6 months (P = 0.02) but no different at 5 years (P = 0.7). Pain scores were higher in smokers than non-smokers both pre-operatively (5.34 vs. 4.67, P < 0.001) and up to 2 years (P < 0.001) but not at 5 years (P = 0.073).

CONCLUSION

Smokers undergoing RCR were younger than non-smokers, and had worse pre-operative pain scores and shoulder function. Poorer post-operative function persisted to 6 months, and with higher reported pain to 2 years in smokers. However, at 5-year follow-up, patient-reported outcomes were not affected by smoking status.

Patients who have undergone rotator cuff repair experience around 75% functional recovery at 6 months after surgery

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate changes in recovery patterns [i.e., clinical outcomes, range of motion (ROM)] in the first 12 months following surgery, (2) identify potential prognostic factors of early clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair (RCR).

METHODS

The study cohort included 344 consecutive patients treated with RCR. Data were collected prospectively and included pre- and perioperative variables. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses for various parameters including demographics, pre- and perioperative variables were used to predict shoulder function at 12-month follow-up, as measured by clinical outcomes and ROM.

RESULTS

Significant improvement in all clinical scores and ROM were noted during serial follow-ups after RCR (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex, older age, more anchors, diabetes mellitus, and preoperative stiffness were independently associated with worse shoulder function 3 months after RCR. Including the 3 months factors, heavy labor, use of the suture-bridge technique, and large tears were also independently associated with worse outcomes 6 months after surgery. Heavy labor, suture-bridge technique, diabetes mellitus, and preoperative stiffness were associated with significantly worse functional outcomes at 12 months after surgery (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Functional recovery based on clinical outcomes (i.e., UCLA, ASES scores) showed approximately 60% of ultimate recovery at 3 months and approximately 75% recovery at 6 months after RCR. Female sex, diabetes mellitus, preoperative stiffness, a larger number of anchors, suture bridge technique, heavy labor, old age and, larger tears were prognostic factors of poor clinical results or ROM in the short-term follow-up intervals. Knowledge of these prognostic factors may lead to improved insight for physicians to predict the pattern of the recovery and patient expectations accordingly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, A cohort study.

Direct and indirect economic burden associated with rotator cuff tears and repairs in the US

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study examined treatment characteristics and the economic burden associated with rotator cuff tears (RCT) and rotator cuff repairs (RCR). Additionally, this study aimed to explore the economic implications associated with delayed surgical intervention.

METHODS

Adult RCT patients meeting eligibility criteria were identified from 1/1/2013-6/30/2017 using the IBM Watson Health MarketScan Commercial database. Patients with incident RCR within 12 months post-index and 12 months continuous enrollment after the RCR date were also analyzed. Early surgery was defined as RCR within 6 months and 1 month from the partial-thickness tear and full-thickness tear diagnoses, respectively. Patient characteristics, all-cause direct costs (plan paid and patient out-of-pocket), RCT-related costs, pre-surgical costs, post-surgical costs, and healthcare resource utilization were reported by RCT type. Attributable indirect costs, absenteeism and short-term disability (STD), were also estimated.

RESULTS

102,488 RCT patients were identified (partial-thickness tears: 46,856 [45.7%]; full-thickness tears: 55,632 [54.3%]). Fifty per cent RCT patients underwent RCR within 12-months of diagnosis. Full-thickness RCT patients had an average total baseline (one year pre-diagnosis) and post-index costs of $17,096 and $32,110, respectively. Similarly, partial thickness patients had baseline costs of $16,385 and post-index costs of $27,017. Mean all-cause annual post-surgery costs were $34,086 for patients with partial-thickness tears and $34,249 for patients with full-thickness tears, of which 40% and 38% of costs were RCT-related, respectively. Productivity losses due to absenteeism and STD in the 12-month post-surgery period averaged $5843 and $4493, respectively, for partial-thickness tear patients and $5770 and $4382, respectively, for full-thickness tear patients. Average additional spending per delayed surgical patient between diagnosis and surgery was $8524 and $3213 (both p <0.001) for partial- and full-thickness tear patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory analysis indicates considerable RCT and RCR economic burden to the healthcare system. High healthcare utilization and costs highlight the importance of efficiently managing patients with RCT diagnosis. Data also suggest that early surgical intervention may be economically beneficial if surgical intervention is anticipated post-RCT.

Level of obesity is directly associated with complications following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between increasing levels of obesity and postoperative complications within 30 days of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).

METHODS

We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for all patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2017. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts according to their body mass index (BMI). Patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m² were placed in the non-obese cohort, patients with a BMI between 30 and 40 kg/m² were placed in the obese cohort, and patients with a BMI > 40 kg/m² were placed in the morbidly obese cohort. Postoperative complications within 30 days of the procedure were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between increasing levels of obesity and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were 18,521 patients included in this study. Of these patients, 9548 (51.6%) were non-obese, 7438 (40.2%) were obese, and 1535 (8.3%) were morbidly obese. A comparison among non-obese, obese, and morbidly obese patients showed increasing rates of medical complications (0.5% vs. 1.0% vs. 1.4%), pulmonary complications (0.1% vs. 0.3% vs. 0.5%), renal complications (0.0% vs. 0.1% vs. 0.2%), readmission (0.9% vs. 1.2% vs. 1.6%), nonhome discharge (0.4% vs. 0.5% vs. 1.2%), and overall complications (0.8% vs. 1.3% vs. 1.8%). In comparison to non-obesity, both obesity and morbid obesity were identified by multivariate analysis as significant predictors of medical complications (odds ratio [ORs] of 1.72 and 2.16, respectively), pulmonary complications (ORs of 2.66 and 4.06, respectively), and overall complications (ORs of 1.52 and 1.77, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study used a large national database to identify increasing levels of obesity as a risk factor for medical complications, pulmonary complications, and overall complications within 30 days of ARCR.

Factors associated with the development of re-tear following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors for the development of re-tear following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair (aRCR).

METHODS

This retrospective clinical study included 196 consecutive aRCRs with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Pre- and postoperative clinical and functional outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), the University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) questzionnaire. The Goutallier staging of fatty infiltration, Occupational Ratio (OR), the Acromiohumeral Interval (AHI), Acromioclavicular Joint (ACJ) arthritis, acromion type, Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA), and tangent sign (tan- sign) were evaluated as radiological parameters. Different subgroup parameters were evaluated after dividing the patients into re-tear (-) and re-tear (+) groups, according to clinical and radiological outcomes as well as patient and intraoperative characteristics.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 72.0 ± 15.8 months. The mean age at the time of surgery was 58.4 ± 8.9 years. A significant improvement was found in clinical and functional scores in the re-tear (-) group (P < 0.001 for all). However, the retear (+) group had poorer outcome scores than the re-tear (-) group. Twenty patients (10.2%) had re-tear at the last follow-up. There was a significant difference between groups regarding pre-and postoperative clinical scores, with worse scores in the retear (+) group (P < 0.001 for all). Also, pre-and postoperative pseudoparalysis (P = 0.001 for both), acromioclavicular joint arthritis (ACJ) (P = 0.001), intraoperative rotator cuff wear (P = 0.007) or stiffness (P = 0.025), a longer time period between symptom onset and surgery (P = 0.031), larger tear size (P = 0.010), preoperative shoulder stiffness (P = 0.001), higher duration of postoperative analgesia use (P < 0.001), higher degrees of preoperative Occupational Ratio (OR) (P < 0.001), and higher degrees of fatty degeneration (P < 0.001) were found to be associated with re- tear development.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should consider the preoperative degree of fatty degeneration, clinical and functional scores, presence of ACJ arthritis, intraoperative tendon quality, tear size and chronicity as well as postoperative prolong analgesic requirement, and development of pseudoparalysis as factors regarding re-tear development risk following aRCR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Speed of recovery of the most commonly performed shoulder surgeries

Background

Shoulder surgery results in several months of rehabilitation, which is often underestimated by patients preoperatively. Currently, there is little written about this process of recovery. Information on this would help patients to anticipate the trajectory of their recovery. This would also provide a reference point allowing surgeons to compare a patient's progress in their recovery. The purpose of our study was to analyze and document the expected rate of recovery for the most common shoulder operations.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis (BT) using prospectively collected data from the Surgical Outcomes System registry was performed. All patients included had a complete 2-year follow-up data set. The pain score (visual analog scale) was measured preoperatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 6, 12, and 24 months. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score were recorded preoperatively and after 6, 12, and 24 months. The speed of recovery, defined as the percentage of total improvement, for each procedure was assessed as the primary outcome parameter at all time points.

Results

All shoulder interventions resulted in significant improvement of the pain, SANE, and ASES scores 2 years after shoulder surgery. The speed of recovery of all 3 scores was highest after TSA at all measured time points and slowest after ARCR and BT. Measured by the pain score, 90% and 82% of the total improvement after TSA and RTSA was completed after 6 weeks compared to 58% and 59% after ARCR and BT, respectively. Six months postoperatively the ASES recovery rate was significantly higher after arthroplasty (TSA 96% and RTSA 85%) compared to ARCR and BT (76% and 77%, respectively). The SANE score recovery rate was between 82% and 92% (TSA 92%, RTSA 89%, ARCR 87%, BT 82%) 6 months after surgery. After 1 year all patient groups reached 89% or more of the total improvement in all scores, except for the pain after ARCR (89%).

Conclusion

The improvement in pain is fastest after TSA and slowest after ARCR and BT. After TSA and RTSA, >80% of the total pain reduction is achieved 6 weeks postoperatively, whereas after ARCR and BT, >80% of the pain reduction is achieved only 6 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively, the differences in recovery curves were not significant.

Smoking as a risk factor for complications following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between smoking status and postoperative complications within 30 days of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify all patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2017. Smokers were defined as patients who reported smoking cigarettes in the year prior to rotator cuff repair. Patients who used chewing tobacco, cigars, or electronic cigarettes were not included in the smoking cohort. Postoperative complications were reported within 30 days of the procedure. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the relationship between smoking status and postoperative complications.

Results

There were 18,594 patients included in this study. Of these patients, 2834 (15.2%) were current smokers. Smokers were more likely to be men, to be aged < 65 years, and to have a body mass index < 30. Smokers were also more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, to be functionally dependent, and to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥ 3. After adjustment for all significantly associated patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities, smoking was identified as a significant predictor of surgical complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.955; P = .022), return to the operating room (OR, 2.547; P = .003), readmission (OR, 1.570; P = .014), and sepsis or septic shock (OR, 4.737; P = .021). Smoking was not a significant predictor of medical complications (OR, 1.105; P = .687) or surgical-site infections (OR, 1.216; P = .713).

Conclusion

Smoking may be a risk factor for surgical complications, readmission, and sepsis or septic shock within 30 days of ARCR.

Clinical and Structural Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients With Diabetes: A Meta-analysis

Background:

The impact of diabetes on clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair remains controversial.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and retear rates after rotator cuff repair in patients with and without diabetes. Our hypotheses were that adequate control of diabetes would decrease the retear rate after rotator cuff repair and that patients with diabetes would have worse clinical outcomes.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing outcomes in patients with and without diabetes after full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Clinical outcome analysis included the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the University of California–Los Angeles shoulder rating scale; we compared preoperative, postoperative, and change in functional scores from baseline to final follow-up among the included studies. The pooled relative risk was calculated using a random-effects model for retear rates. Clinical outcomes were also pooled using a random-effects model.

Results:

Overall, 10 studies were included. Compared with patients without diabetes, patients with diabetes had a worse preoperative ASES score (P = .009) as well as worse postoperative Constant score (final follow-up range, 9-103 months; P = .0003). However, there was no significant difference in the absolute mean change in clinical outcomes between patients with and without diabetes. Diabetes was associated with a higher retear rate (19.3% in patients without diabetes vs 28.2% in patients with diabetes; P < .0001). The retear rate according to the severity of sustained hyperglycemia in the subgroup analysis was 14.6% in patients without diabetes, versus 22.7% in patients with well-controlled diabetes (<7.0% of preoperative serum HbA1c level; P = .12) and 40.0% in patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c level ≥7.0%; P < .00001).

Conclusion:

This meta-analysis suggests that diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of retears after rotator cuff repair, and improved blood glucose control may reduce the risk of retears in patients with diabetes mellitus. Although effective glycemic control was associated with a decreased risk of retears in patients with diabetes, we could not prove causation because of potential bias and confounding in the included studies.

Effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions for managing diabetic shoulder pain: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluated and compared the effectiveness of non-surgical and surgical interventions for managing shoulder pain in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, Sport Discus, and Cochrane library were searched for studies published in the last 20 years. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that assessed shoulder pain in patients with diabetes and implemented one or a combination of non-surgical and surgical interventions were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES) tool. Data extracted from the eligible studies included study design, patient characteristics, duration of symptoms, type of interventions, outcome measures used to assess pain, follow-up intervals, and research findings.

RESULTS

A narrative synthesis with effect sizes (ES) or between-group differences was conducted. A total of 25 (14 non-surgical and 11 surgical) studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies addressed physiotherapeutic interventions (three RCTs and three cohorts - ES = 0.07-1.3), three studies assessed the effect of steroid injections (two RCTs and one cohort - ES = 0.2-0.4), two cohorts addressed arthrographic capsular distension (between-group difference of 1.1 on Visual Analogue Scale), two cohorts addressed MUA, and one RCT addressed suprascapular nerve block (ES = 1-6). For the surgical studies, six cohorts addressed arthroscopic capsular release (ES = 0.2), three cohorts addressed arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ES = 0.05-0.5), and one cohort addressed arthroplasty (ES = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

Moderate- to very-low-quality evidence suggests large effects of physiotherapy modalities plus exercise and suprascapular nerve block, and trivial to small effects for surgical interventions for improving shoulder pain in patients with diabetes. Future well-designed studies are needed to provide accurate estimates of the true effects of these interventions on improving shoulder pain in patients with diabetes.Implications For RehabilitationShoulder pain may lead to disability in patients with diabetes.We recommend the use of physiotherapy interventions to reduce shoulder pain.Corticosteroid injections are recommended for short-term shoulder pain relief.

Postoperative penile prosthesis pain: is it worse in diabetic patients?

Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is an effective, safe and satisfactory treatment option for medication-refractory erectile dysfunction. Postoperative complications include infection, mechanical failure, erosion, and pain. Current literature suggests the need for a better approach to postoperative pain management after IPP surgery. Clinical studies have demonstrated that postoperative pain is different in diabetic patients. We sought to determine if there is a difference in pain after IPP placement in diabetics. This is a single-institution retrospective review. The main outcome measure was the number of 30-day postoperative visits for pain. The secondary outcome included differences in how pain was managed. The top HbA1c quartile was compared with the other HbA1c quartiles. Diabetes was present in 92 (54.4%) patients and 96% of these had HbA1c > 8. Significant postoperative pain was more common in patients with HbA1c > 8 (41% vs 13%, p = 0.047) and resulted in more unplanned visits (27% vs 11%, p = 0.042). Patients with HbA1c > 8 with significant postoperative pain were more likely to be managed with opioids and gabapentin (30% vs 14%, p = 0.05). There were no statistical differences in age between diabetics and non-diabetics (mean 59 vs 61, p = 0.193). Hispanic and African-American patients represented 87% of the poorly controlled diabetics compared with only 13% of white patients (p < 0.001). Poorly controlled diabetics had more medical comorbidities (p < 0.001). On logistic regression, a HbA1c > 8 was predictive of an unplanned visit for pain with an OR of 2.83 (p = 0.04). Significant pain after IPP surgery was higher in diabetics with HbA1c > 8, which resulted in more unplanned 30-day postoperative visits. Patients with significant postoperative pain were managed with a combination of opioids and gabapentin. Future studies are required to optimize pain management in diabetics following IPP placement.

Effectiveness of supervised early exercise program in patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Study protocol clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Based on the available evidence, it is difficult to make a clinical decision about the best exercise program and to establish the most favorable time to start postoperative treatment after rotator cuff (RC) repair. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effects of adding a supervised early exercise program to standard treatment for functional improvement and pain relief compared with standard treatment alone in patients with arthroscopic RC repair.

METHOD/DESIGN

A total of 118 patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years with arthroscopic RC repair will be randomized to 2 treatment arms. The control group will receive a standard exercise program based on a consensus statement on shoulder rehabilitation developed by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists. The intervention group will receive a supervised early exercise program in combination with standard treatment. This supervised exercise program will be based on electromyographic evidence. Three evaluations will be performed: before surgery, at 6 weeks, and at 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the shoulder function by the Constant-Murley questionnaire, and the secondary outcome measures will be the upper limb function by the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire; pain by the visual analog scale; and the shoulder range of motion by a goniometer.

DISCUSSION

We hypothesize that patients who receive a supervised early exercise program in combination with standard treatment will benefit more in respect to shoulder function, pain reduction, and range of motion than those who receive a standard exercise program. If this is confirmed, our study can be used clinically to enhance the recovery of patients with arthroscopic RC repair.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Brazilian registry of clinical trials UTN number U1111-1224-4143. Registered December 18, 2018.