Apico-Aortic Conduit for severe aortic stenosis: Technique, applications, and systematic review

Aortic root widening: “pro et contra”

In patients with a small aortic annulus, the clinical benefits of aortic valve replacement depend on avoidance of patient-prosthesis mismatch as it is associated with reduced overall survival. Aortic root widening or enlargement is a useful technique to implant larger valve prosthesis to prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch. Posterior annular enlargement is the commonest technique used for aortic root enlargement. Consistent enlargement of the aortic root requires more extensive procedures like Manouguian or Konno-Rastan techniques. The patients commonly selected are younger patients with good life expectancy. However, caution is advised in applying this procedure in elderly patients, patients with heavily calcified annulus and when performing concomitant procedures. There is no definitive conclusion on the best material to use for the reconstruction of aortic annulus and aorta in aortic root enlargement procedures.

Computational fluid dynamics simulations of flow distribution and graft designs in apicoaortic bypass

OBJECTIVE

Apicoaortic bypass has double outlets and its graft design is similar to that of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The left ventricular apex to the descending aorta (LV-DsAo) bypass is widely used in apicoaortic bypass. In contrast, the left ventricular apex to the ascending aorta (LV-AsAo) bypass is standard in LVAD surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the graft designs of apicoaortic bypass and their effects on flow distribution and energy loss (EL).

METHODS

A simulation study using computational fluid dynamics was performed on the geometry and hemodynamics data obtained from a 30-year-old patient who underwent a LV-DsAo bypass. The ratio of the cardiac output (CO) through the ascending aorta (AsAo) and apicoaortic conduit was set at 50:50, 30:70, and 10:90. Regional blood flow (RBF) and EL were calculated for the different distribution ratios. As an alternative to the LV-DsAo bypass, a virtual LV-AsAo bypass surgery was performed, and each parameter was compared with that of the LV-DsAo bypass.

RESULTS

At a distribution ratio of 50:50, the RBF to the head and EL were 16.4% of the total CO and 62.0 mW in the LV-DsAo bypass, and 32.3% and 81.5 mW in the LV-AsAo bypass, respectively. The RBF to the head decreased with the CO through the AsAo in the LV-DsAo bypass, but it was constant in the LV-AsAo bypass. The EL increased inversely with the CO through the AsAo in both graft designs.

CONCLUSION

The regional blood flow distribution was different, but the trend of the EL which increased inversely with the CO through the AsAo was similar between the LV-DsAo and LV-AsAo bypasses.

Hemodynamic changes following aortic valve bypass: a mathematical approach

Aortic valve bypass (AVB) has been shown to be a viable solution for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Under this circumstance, the left ventricle (LV) has a double outlet. The objective was to develop a mathematical model capable of evaluating the hemodynamic performance following the AVB surgery. A mathematical model that captures the interaction between LV, AS, arterial system, and AVB was developed. This model uses a limited number of parameters that all can be non-invasively measured using patient data. The model was validated using in vivo data from the literature. The model was used to determine the effect of different AVB and AS configurations on flow proportion and pressure of the aortic valve and the AVB. Results showed that the AVB leads to a significant reduction in transvalvular pressure gradient. The percentage of flow through the AVB can range from 55.47% to 69.43% following AVB with a severe AS. LV stroke work was also significantly reduced following the AVB surgery and reached a value of around 1.2 J for several AS severities. Findings of this study suggest: 1) the AVB leads to a significant reduction in transvalvular pressure gradients; 2) flow distribution between the AS and the AVB is significantly affected by the conduit valve size; 3) the AVB leads to a significant reduction in LV stroke work; and 4) hemodynamic performance variations can be estimated using the model.