Transforaminal Anterior Release for the Treatment of Fixed Sagittal Imbalance and Segmental Kyphosis, Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with or without release of the anterior longitudinal ligament: A single-center, retrospective observational cohort study

Background

Transforaminal anterior release (TFAR) is a technical extension of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure with deliberate release of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL).

Methods

In a retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, consecutive adult patients undergoing TLIF surgery at L4/L5 and/or L5/S1 between 01/2018 and 12/2022 for degenerative disc disease or deformity were considered. The TFAR group (with ALL release) was compared to a standard TLIF group (without ALL release), matched in a 1:3 ratio. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were built to estimate the likelihood of any adverse event (AE), reoperation, and excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months.

Results

Of 438 patients, 18 undergoing TFAR were matched to 53 undergoing standard TLIF. TFAR procedures were frequently part of extensive, anterior-posterior or multilevel fusion procedures with longer surgery time and higher blood loss. The rates of intraoperative surgical AEs were similar (16.7 vs. 11.3%, p=.789). The rates and severities of surgical AEs, as well as reoperation rates and clinical outcomes were similar at time of discharge, 90 days, and 12 months postoperatively (all p>.05). TFAR allowed for an increase in total lumbar lordosis of 16.1° and in lumbar lordosis between L4 and S1 of 16.3° at discharge, which was maintained during follow-up. In both the uni- and multivariable models, patients undergoing TFAR were as likely as patients undergoing standard TLIF to experience any AE (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.21-2.94), any reoperation (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.11-1.90) or excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 0.52-7.74).

Conclusions

The TFAR technique has a safety profile which is comparable to the standard TLIF procedure, but it allows for a greater restoration of lumbar lordosis at L4-S1. We suggest considering the TFAR technique in selected patients with sagittal imbalance and mobile segments for restoration of lumbar lordosis.

Treatment of rigid post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis by a novel technique of spinal joints release

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel technique named spinal joints release (SJR) and observe its efficacy in treating rigid post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis (RPTK).

METHODS

RPTK patients who were treated by SJR with facet resection, limited laminotomy, clearance of the intervertebral space, and release of the anterior longitudinal ligament through the intervertebral foramen and disc of injury segment from August 2015 to August 2021 were reviewed. Intervertebral space release, internal fixation segment, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The intraoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up complications were observed. An improvement in the VAS score and ODI index was observed. Spinal cord functional recovery was evaluated by American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS). Improvement of local kyphosis (Cobb angle) was evaluated by radiography.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were successfully treated by the SJR surgical technique. Open-wedge anterior intervertebral disc space was performed in 31 cases, and repeated release and dissection of the anterior longitudinal ligament and callus were performed in 12 cases. There was no lateral annulus fibrosis release in 11 cases, the anterior half release of lateral annulus fibrosis in 27 cases, and complete release in five cases. There were five cases of screw placement failure in one or two side pedicles of the injured vertebrae due to excessive resection of the facets and improper pre-bending of the rod. Sagittal displacement occurred in four cases at the released segment due to the complete release of bilateral lateral annulus fibrosus. Autologous granular bone + Cage was implanted in 32 cases, and autologous granular bone was implanted in 11 cases. There were no serious complications. The average operation time was 224 ± 31 min, and intraoperative blood loss was 450 ± 225 mL. All the patients were followed up with an average of 26 ± 8.5 months. The VAS scores and ODI index improved significantly at the final follow-up. All of the 17 patients with incomplete spinal cord injury achieved more than one grade of neurological recovery at the final follow-up. An 87% correction rate of kyphosis was achieved and maintained, with the Cobb angle decreasing from 27.7° preoperatively to 5.4° at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Posterior SJR surgery for patients with RPTK has the advantages of less trauma and less blood loss, and kyphosis correction is satisfactory.

The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis: a consecutive case series with minimum 2 years follow up

Background

Surgical treatment for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) is a complex undertaking and is associated with a high complication rate. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes, mortality and morbidity of multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MPLIF) in the treatment in ADS based on the experience of a single tertiary referral center for spinal surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients who had undergone multi-level posterior interbody fusion for degenerative scoliosis. We prospectively recorded patients' demographics, co-morbidities; coronal and sagittal plane deformity assessment and surgical details: number of instrumented levels, and intra-operative and postoperative complications. Functional outcomes and patient-reported complications were entered in our local spine surgery database (part of the Eurospine Spine Tango Registry) and used to collect data on functional scores and patient-reported complications preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months' follow-up.

Results

Our study involved 13 males and 51 females with a mean age of 70.26 (range 49-90, SD 8.9). MPLIF was performed at five levels in one patient, four levels in 29 patients, three levels in 20 patients, and two levels in 14 patients. There were a total of 14 (21.87%) major, minor and mechanical complications. There were no procedure-related mortalities. The average COMI and Eq5d scores improved significantly post-surgery, and this improvement was maintained at a mean follow-up of up to two years.

Conclusions

Multilevel posterior interbody fusion is a safe procedure, and in selected cases can result in good clinical and radiological outcomes with improvement in patient quality of life.

Comparative study of multilevel posterior interbody fusion plus anterior longitudinal ligament release versus classic multilevel posterior interbody fusion in the treatment of adult spinal deformities

OBJECTIVE

Sagittal imbalance and loss of lumbar lordosis are the main drivers of functional disability in adult degenerative scoliosis. The main limitations of the classic posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique are increased risk of neurological injury and suboptimal correction of the segmental lordosis. Here, the authors describe the radiological results of a modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion and compare the results with a historical cohort of patients.

METHODS

Eighty-two consecutive patients underwent surgical treatment for degenerative scoliosis/kyphosis in a single tertiary referral center for complex spinal surgery. Fifty-five patients were treated using the classic multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MPLIF) technique and 27 were treated using the modified MPLIF technique to include a release of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) and the annulus. A radiographic review of both series of patients was performed by two independent observers. Functional outcomes were obtained, and patients were registered in the European Spine Tango registry.

RESULTS

The mean L4-5 disc angle increased by 3.14° in the classic MPLIF group and by 12.83° in MPLIF plus ALL and annulus release group. The mean lumbar lordosis increased by 15.23° in the first group and by 25.17° in the second group. The L4-S1 lordosis increased on average by 4.92° in the classic MPLIF group and increased by a mean of 23.7° in the MPLIF plus ALL release group when both L4-5 and L5-S1 segments were addressed. There were significant improvements in the Core Outcome Measures Index and EQ-5D score in both groups (p < 0.001). There were no vascular or neurological injuries observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' preliminary results suggest that more correction can be achieved at the disc level using posterior-based ALL and annulus release in conjunction with posterior lumbar interbody fusion. They demonstrate that ALL and annulus release can be performed safely using a posterior-only approach with minimal risk of vascular injury. However, the authors recommend that this approach should only be used by surgeons with considerable experience in anterior and posterior spinal surgery.

The prevalence of complications associated with lumbar and thoracic spinal deformity surgery in the elderly population: a meta-analysis

Background

The prevalence of spinal deformities increases with age, affecting between 30% and 68% of the elderly population (ages ≥65). The reported prevalence of complications associated with surgery for spinal deformities in this population ranges between 37% and 71%. Given the wide range of reported complication rates, the decision to perform surgery remains controversial.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify studies reporting complications for spinal deformity surgery in the elderly population. Pooled prevalence estimates for individual complication types were calculated using the random-effects model.

Results

Of 5,586 articles, 14 met inclusion criteria. Fourteen complication types were reported, with at least 2 studies for each complication with the following pooled prevalence: reoperation (prevalence 19%; 95% CI, 9-36%; 107 patients); hardware failure (11%; 95% CI, 5-25%; 52 patients); infection (7%; 95% CI, 4-12%; 262 patients); pseudarthrosis (6%; 95% CI, 3-12%; 149 patients); radiculopathy (6%; 95% CI, 1-33%; 116 patients); cardiovascular event (5%; 95% CI, 1-32%; 121 patients); neurological deficit (5%; 95% CI, 2-15%; 248 patients); deep vein thrombosis (3%; 95% CI, 1-7%; 230 patients); pulmonary embolism (3%; 95% CI, 1-7%; 210 patients); pneumonia (3%; 95% CI, 1-11%; 210 patients); cerebrovascular or stroke event (2%; 95% CI, 0-9%; 85 patients); death (2%; 95% CI, 1-9%; 113 patients); myocardial infarction (2%; 95% CI, 1-6%; 210 patients); and postoperative hemorrhage (1%; 95% CI, 0-10%; 85 patients).

Conclusions

Most complication types following spinal deformity surgery in the elderly had prevalence point estimates of <6%, while all were at least ≤19%. Additional studies are needed to further explore composite prevalence estimates and prevalence associated with traditional surgical approaches as compared to minimally-invasive procedures in the elderly.

The prevalence of complications associated with lumbar and thoracic spinal deformity surgery in the elderly population: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of spinal deformities increases with age, affecting between 30% and 68% of the elderly population (ages ≥65). The reported prevalence of complications associated with surgery for spinal deformities in this population ranges between 37% and 71%. Given the wide range of reported complication rates, the decision to perform surgery remains controversial.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify studies reporting complications for spinal deformity surgery in the elderly population. Pooled prevalence estimates for individual complication types were calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of 5,586 articles, 14 met inclusion criteria. Fourteen complication types were reported, with at least 2 studies for each complication with the following pooled prevalence: reoperation (prevalence 19%; 95% CI, 9-36%; 107 patients); hardware failure (11%; 95% CI, 5-25%; 52 patients); infection (7%; 95% CI, 4-12%; 262 patients); pseudarthrosis (6%; 95% CI, 3-12%; 149 patients); radiculopathy (6%; 95% CI, 1-33%; 116 patients); cardiovascular event (5%; 95% CI, 1-32%; 121 patients); neurological deficit (5%; 95% CI, 2-15%; 248 patients); deep vein thrombosis (3%; 95% CI, 1-7%; 230 patients); pulmonary embolism (3%; 95% CI, 1-7%; 210 patients); pneumonia (3%; 95% CI, 1-11%; 210 patients); cerebrovascular or stroke event (2%; 95% CI, 0-9%; 85 patients); death (2%; 95% CI, 1-9%; 113 patients); myocardial infarction (2%; 95% CI, 1-6%; 210 patients); and postoperative hemorrhage (1%; 95% CI, 0-10%; 85 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Most complication types following spinal deformity surgery in the elderly had prevalence point estimates of <6%, while all were at least ≤19%. Additional studies are needed to further explore composite prevalence estimates and prevalence associated with traditional surgical approaches as compared to minimally-invasive procedures in the elderly.

The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification

OBJECTIVESpinal osteotomies and anterior column realignment (ACR) are procedures that allow preservation or restoration of spine lordosis. Variations of these techniques enable different degrees of segmental, regional, and global sagittal realignment. The authors propose a comprehensive anatomical classification system for ACR and its variants based on the level of technical complexity and invasiveness. This serves as a common language and platform to standardize clinical and radiographic outcomes for the utilization of ACR.METHODSThe proposed classification is based on 6 anatomical grades of ACR, including anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) release, with varying degrees of posterior column release or osteotomies. Additionally, a surgical approach (anterior, lateral, or posterior) was added. Reliability of the classification was evaluated by an analysis of 16 clinical cases, rated twice by 14 different spine surgeons, and calculation of Fleiss kappa coefficients.RESULTSThe 6 grades of ACR are as follows: grade A, ALL release with hyperlordotic cage, intact posterior elements; grade 1 (ACR + Schwab grade 1), additional resection of the inferior facet and joint capsule; grade 2 (ACR + Schwab grade 2), additional resection of both superior and inferior facets, interspinous ligament, ligamentum flavum, lamina, and spinous process; grade 3 (ACR + Schwab grade 3), additional adjacent-level 3-column osteotomy including pedicle subtraction osteotomy; grade 4 (ACR + Schwab grade 4), 2-level distal 3-column osteotomy including pedicle subtraction osteotomy and disc space resection; and grade 5 (ACR + Schwab grade 5), complete or partial removal of a vertebral body and both adjacent discs with or without posterior element resection. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were 97% and 98%, respectively, across the 14-reviewer cohort.CONCLUSIONSThe proposed anatomical realignment classification provides a consistent description of the various posterior and anterior column release/osteotomies. This reliability study confirmed that the classification is consistent and reproducible across a diverse group of spine surgeons.

[Correction of kyphotic fixed lumbar segments and hypolordosis with the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique]

OBJECTIVE

Correction of a segmental or global lumbar hypolordosis to improve a sagittal imbalance.

INDICATIONS

Lumbar segments fixed in kyphosis; degenerative or posttraumatic hypolordotic deformity of the lumbar spine with sagittal imbalance.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Bechterew disease; extended adhesions in the retroperitoneum.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Segmental correction of a kyphotic fixed segment using a unilateral transforaminal approach to release the annulus and anterior longitudinal ligament. With an additional posterior V‑shaped osteotomy, a segmental correction of more than 20° could be achieved to improve a global sagittal imbalance.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Back-friendly mobilisation starting the first day after surgery with support of a physiotherapist. No sports for 3-4 months.

RESULTS

In all, 25 patients with 33 kyphotic fixed lumbar segments were treated using a complete anterior release of the annulus and anterior longitudinal ligament via a unilateral transforaminal approach. This enabled a lordosizing correction of the segment between 5° and 29° (mean 11.4°) without any neurological or vascular complications. A total of 10 patients treated with an additional posterior osteotomy were corrected 14-29° (mean 19°). There was a loss of reduction of the lordotic correction (mean 1°; range 0-3°) in the X‑ray control at a minimum follow-up of 6 months (range 6-33 months).