1
|
Alnaqbi KA, Al Adhoubi N, Aldallal S, Al Emadi S, Al-Herz A, El Shamy AM, Hannawi S, Omair MA, Saad SA, Kvien TK. Consensus-Based Overarching Principles and Recommendations on the Use of Biosimilars in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis in the Gulf Region. BioDrugs 2024; 38:449-463. [PMID: 38402494 PMCID: PMC11055752 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00642-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Though biologic agents have significantly improved the treatment of inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis), high costs, stringent regulations, strict reimbursement criteria, and existing patents have limited patient access to treatments. While being highly similar in quality, safety, and efficacy to biologic reference products, biosimilars can reduce the financial burden and prevent underutilization of medication. OBJECTIVE The objective of this initiative was to develop an evidence-based consensus of overarching principles and recommendations aimed at standardizing the use of biosimilars in treating inflammatory arthritis in the Gulf region. METHODS A task force of practicing rheumatologists, a clinical pharmacist, a health economist, patients, regulators, and payors from across the Gulf region developed recommendations and overarching principles based on the outputs of a systematic literature review conducted to address Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) questions specific to key challenges regarding the use of biosimilars for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis in the region. As the data before 2017 have been previously reviewed in another publication, the current review focused on data published between January 2017 and August 2022 (PROSPERO ID CRD42022364002). Consensus on each statement required a level of agreement of 70% or greater. RESULTS Consensus was reached for five overarching principles and nine recommendations by the task force. The principles emphasize the importance of improving the awareness, understanding, and perception of biosimilars, as well as the need for regulated regional real-world data generation and protocols to make biosimilars a viable and affordable treatment option for all patients. The consensus recommendations advocate the need for shared treatment decisions between rheumatologists and patients when considering biosimilars. They further recommend that confirmation of a biosimilar's efficacy and safety in a single indication is sufficient for extrapolation to other diseases for which the reference product has been approved. Finally, there is a need for pharmacovigilance and national health policies governing the adoption and prescription of biosimilars in clinical practice across the region. CONCLUSIONS These are the first consensus recommendations for the Gulf region based on a systematic literature review and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, integrating clinical evidence with clinical expertise to optimize decision making for the use of biosimilars in patients with inflammatory arthritis. They were formulated based on predominantly international data because of the limited regional data and therefore can be generalized to serve as recommendations for healthcare professionals in other parts of the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid A Alnaqbi
- Rheumatology Division, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE.
- Internal Medicine Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE.
| | | | - Sara Aldallal
- Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, UAE
- Emirates Health Economics Society, Dubai, UAE
| | - Samar Al Emadi
- Medicine Department, Rheumatology Division, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Adeeba Al-Herz
- Rheumatology Department, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | | | | | - Mohammed A Omair
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sahar A Saad
- King Hamad University Hospital, Busaiteen, Kingdom of Bahrain
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mirza AH, Alqasomi A, El-Dahiyat F, Babar ZUD. Access to Medicines and Pharmaceutical Policy in Saudi Arabia: A Scoping Review. INTEGRATED PHARMACY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2023; 12:137-155. [PMID: 37484573 PMCID: PMC10356550 DOI: 10.2147/iprp.s410262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This scoping review includes studies on pharmaceutical access, shortages, generics, availability, pharmacoeconomics, and pricing restrictions. The study's findings may aid in developing excellent pharmaceutical and access policies in the country. Objective To conduct a scoping review documenting access to medicines and Pharmaceutical Policy in Saudi Arabia. Methodology The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to perform a scoping review. The articles were screened using databases from Google Scholar, EBSCO, Science Direct, and the University of Huddersfield Library. The selection, aims, results, and conclusion of each original research publication published between 2010 and 2022 were evaluated. To categorize the articles, a theme analysis was done. Results This study includes nineteen publications. The chosen articles revealed four themes. Among these topics were: Access to medications 36.84% Pharmacoeconomic 36.84%), which were the predominant theme followed by Generic Medicines 15.80%, and Cancer drug financing 10.54%. There are myriad challenges related to high-cost medicines. Access restrictions to medications have significant effects on patient morbidity and mortality; as a result, policy decision-makers frequently consider this issue. Access to medicines suffers budgetary limitations and the increasing cost of innovative medicines. Access to medicines for all patients could be significantly impacted by delays in patient access to new therapies. Conclusion The available evidence revealed that Saudi Arabia's healthcare system has numerous issues ranging from cancer drug financing, medicine shortages, and access issue. In order to achieve the highest health standards possible, it is crucial that each individual has access to medicines and has the financial, physical, and social means to do so. However, the price of some medications can be prohibitive for people who need to obtain them. The study's outcomes could help the country develop pharmaceutical and access policies related to medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmer Hameed Mirza
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulmajeed Alqasomi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Almutairi AR, Al-Samil AM, Alsayyari A, Yousef CC, Khan MA, Alhamdan HS, Al-Jedai A. The landscape of biosimilars in Saudi Arabia: preparing for the next decade. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2023; 23:679-688. [PMID: 37503858 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2023.2235277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has developed a well-defined strategy to restructure the health sector and operate on value-based principles. Biosimilars are a viable option for increasing accessibility while lowering health-care costs. AREAS COVERED We describe the current and future biosimilar landscape in KSA. We discuss the growth of the biosimilar market, the regulatory approval process, biosimilar adoption, and the potential impact on health-care systems and patient outcomes. EXPERT OPINION The biosimilar market in KSA is expanding and expected to continue this trajectory in the coming decade. The growth of the market is influenced by the KSA health transformation initiative, the well-defined regulatory framework for biosimilars set by the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), and the adoption of biosimilars by health-care providers. Overall, the biosimilar regulation is evolving and the future of biosimilars looks promising in KSA. Biosimilars offer a more cost-effective alternative, which can help to expand access to more treatment options for patients and contribute to cost saving for the health-care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ali M Al-Samil
- Drug Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Consuela Cheriece Yousef
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mansoor Ahmed Khan
- PharmaceuticalCare Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hani S Alhamdan
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Allied Health, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Al-Jedai
- Therapeutic Affairs, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Colleges of Pharmacy and Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Omair MA, Al Rayes H, Khabsa J, Yaacoub S, Abdulaziz S, Al Janobi GA, Al Khalaf A, Al Mehmadi B, Al Nassar M, AlBalawi F, AlFurayj AS, Al-Jedai AH, Almalag HM, Almudaiheem HY, AlRehaily A, Attar MA, El Kibbi L, Halabi H, Hasan M, Singh JA, Fraenkel L, Akl EA. Recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Saudi Arabia: adolopment of the 2021 American College of Rheumatology guidelines. BMC Rheumatol 2022; 6:70. [PMID: 36414983 PMCID: PMC9682746 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-022-00301-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2021 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) guideline considers the specific context of the United States which differs from that of Saudi Arabia in many aspects that may impact recommendations. The objective of this project was to adapt a set of prioritized recommendations from the 2021 ACR guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis RA for the context of Saudi Arabia, by the Saudi Society for Rheumatology (SSR). METHODS The process followed the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT methodology, and the reporting adhered to the RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist. Working groups included a coordination group and a 19-member panel representing different stakeholder groups. The Evidence to Decision (EtD) tables included evidence on health effects from the source guideline and contextual information from the Saudi setting. RESULTS The panel prioritized and adapted five recommendations from the source guideline. The process led to modifying two out of the five prioritized recommendations, all listed here. In naive patients with low disease activity, methotrexate (MTX) is conditionally recommended over sulfasalazine (SSZ) (modified direction); hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is conditionally recommended over SSZ (unmodified). Initiation of csDMARDs with short-term glucocorticoids is conditionally recommended over csDMARDs alone in naive patients with moderate to high disease activity (modified direction). Switch to subcutaneous MTX is conditionally recommended over addition/switch to alternative DMARD(s) in patients taking oral MTX who are not at target (unmodified). Discontinuation of MTX is conditionally recommended over gradual discontinuation of the bDMARD or tsDMARD for patients taking MTX plus a bDMARD or tsDMARD who wish to discontinue a DMARD (unmodified). CONCLUSION Rheumatologists practicing in Saudi Arabia can use the adoloped recommendations generated by this project while adopting the rest of the recommendations from the 2021 ACR guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed A. Omair
- grid.56302.320000 0004 1773 5396Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh, 11461 Saudi Arabia
| | - Hanan Al Rayes
- grid.415989.80000 0000 9759 8141Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Joanne Khabsa
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406AUB Grade Center, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Sally Yaacoub
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406AUB Grade Center, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- grid.411654.30000 0004 0581 3406Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Sultana Abdulaziz
- grid.415296.d0000 0004 0607 1539Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, King Fahad Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ghada A. Al Janobi
- grid.415458.90000 0004 1790 6706Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Qatif Central Hospital, Qatif, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz Al Khalaf
- grid.56302.320000 0004 1773 5396Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh, 11461 Saudi Arabia
| | - Bader Al Mehmadi
- grid.449051.d0000 0004 0441 5633Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, 11952 Saudi Arabia
| | - Mahasin Al Nassar
- grid.56302.320000 0004 1773 5396Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal AlBalawi
- grid.415277.20000 0004 0593 1832Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah S. AlFurayj
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Buraidah Central Hospital, B.C.H, Buraidah, Qassim Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Hamdan Al-Jedai
- grid.415696.90000 0004 0573 9824Deputyship of Therapeutic Affairs, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- grid.411335.10000 0004 1758 7207College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Haya Mohammed Almalag
- grid.56302.320000 0004 1773 5396Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hajer Yousef Almudaiheem
- grid.415696.90000 0004 0573 9824Deputyship of Therapeutic Affairs, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali AlRehaily
- grid.415462.00000 0004 0607 3614Department of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Security Forces Hospital Program, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed A. Attar
- grid.413494.f0000 0004 0490 2749Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Al Hada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia
| | - Lina El Kibbi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Specialized Medical Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hussein Halabi
- grid.415310.20000 0001 2191 4301Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center-Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Manal Hasan
- grid.411975.f0000 0004 0607 035XDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jasvinder A. Singh
- grid.280808.a0000 0004 0419 1326Medicine Service, VA Medical Center, 700 19th St S, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
- grid.265892.20000000106344187Department of Medicine at the School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022 USA
- grid.265892.20000000106344187Department of Epidemiology at the UAB School of Public Health, Ryals Public Health Building, 1665 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022 USA
| | - Liana Fraenkel
- grid.414445.4Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, MA USA
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Elie A. Akl
- grid.22903.3a0000 0004 1936 9801Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- grid.25073.330000 0004 1936 8227Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rahalkar H, Sheppard A, Salek S. Biosimilar development and review process in the BRICS-TM countries: proposal for a standardized model to improve regulatory performance. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:215-236. [PMID: 35078378 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2034498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The current study is aimed at proposing a standardized regulatory model for biosimilar development and approval for adoption by BRICS-TM agencies, based on evaluation of regulatory guidelines and potential solutions to challenges. METHODS An established validated questionnaire was used and the recommendations were collated. Propositions deemed critical for improving the regulatory pathway for biosimilar development were synthesized to design a new regulatory model. RESULTS The key areas for improvement in BRICS-TM countries were: effective implementation of a step-wise approach; adoption of science-based regulatory evaluation for clinical efficacy studies and acceptance of analytical comparability studies in lieu of confirmatory clinical trials; a streamlined biosimilar development program for RBP sourcing; regulatory reliance for joint or shared review of the applications; and enhanced transparency and communication between the regulatory agencies and biosimilar developers. Based on these identified critical aspects, a simplified and standard regulatory model was developed to enable standardization of biosimilar guidelines across BRICS-TM countries for a common development program. CONCLUSIONS Effective implementation of the proposed standardized model for biosimilar development and approval processes across the BRICS-TM agencies will eliminate unwarranted studies, reduce the development costs and enhance process efficiency thereby expediting patients' access to new affordable biosimilar medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasumati Rahalkar
- Metina PharmConsulting Pvt Ltd, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.,School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | | | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Omair MA, Almadany R, Omair MA, Al Rayes H, Almalag HM, Alshamsan A. Perception of Biosimilar Biologics and Non-Medical Prescription Switching among Rheumatologists: A Saudi Society for Rheumatology Initiative. Saudi Pharm J 2021; 30:39-44. [PMID: 35145344 PMCID: PMC8802094 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate rheumatologists’ perceptions of biosimilar biologics and Non-Medical Switching (NMS). Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among registered members of the Saudi Society for Rheumatology. The questionnaire focused on biosimilars and NMS. Logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effect of demographics and practice characteristics on the use of biosimilars and NMS. Results Out of 249 SSR members, 143 completed the survey, generating a response rate of 57.4%. Of those (59.44%) were men with a mean (±SD) age and years of practice of 42.3 ± 9.13 and 10.3 ± 8.9, respectively. Rheumatologists managing adult patients (81.82%) and Ministry of Health practice (43.36 %) were the majority of respondents. Previous experience in prescribing a biosimilar was reported by 43 (30.07%) participants, with a higher probability among women (p = 0.015). A total of 26 (18.18%) participants had performed NMS on eligible patients. Adequate knowledge on biosimilars was reported by 69 (48.25%) participants. The adequacy of evidence to grant biosimilar approval for the studied indication and extrapolation to treat other conditions was reported by 88 (61.5%) and 69 (48.3%), respectively. The concept of totality-of-the-evidence was well understood by 37.1%. Biosimilars had been previously used by 43 (30.07) participants in their practice. NMS had been attempted by 26 (18.18), while 86 (60.1%) participants believed that NMS might harm patients. Conclusion There is a clear knowledge gap about the biosimilar approval process among adult and pediatric rheumatologists who took part in the survey. In addition, a large number of participants reported having negative opinions about NMS. There is a need to organize SSR-led educational activities, and develop national guidelines regarding biosimilars and NMS.
Collapse
|