1
|
Zhong Q, Zhi J, Xu Y, Gao P, Feng S. Assessing driver distraction from in-vehicle information system: an on-road study exploring the effects of input modalities and secondary task types. Sci Rep 2024; 14:20289. [PMID: 39217232 PMCID: PMC11366028 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71226-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
In-vehicle information system (IVIS) use is prevalent among young adults. However, their interaction with IVIS needs to be better understood. Therefore, an on-road study aims to explore the effects of input modalities and secondary task types on young drivers' secondary task performance, driving performance, and visual glance behavior. A 2 × 4 within-subject design was undertaken. The independent variables are input modalities (auditory-speech and visual-manual) and secondary task types (calls, music, navigation, and radio). The dependent variables include secondary task performance (task completion time, number of errors, and SUS), driving performance (average speed, number of lane departure warnings, and NASA-TLX), and visual glance behavior (average glance duration, number of glances, total glance duration, and number of glances over 1.6 s). The statistical analysis result showed that the main effect of input modalities is significant, with more distraction during visual-manual than auditory-speech. The main impact of secondary task types was also substantial across most metrics, aside from average speed and average glance duration. Navigation and music were the most distracting, followed by calls, and radio came in last. The distracting effect of input modalities is relatively stable and generally not moderated by the secondary task types, except radio tasks. The findings practically benefit the driver-friendly human-machine interface design, preventing IVIS-related distraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Zhong
- Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 611756, China.
| | - Jinyi Zhi
- Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 611756, China.
| | - Yongsheng Xu
- Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 611756, China
| | - Pengfei Gao
- Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 611756, China
| | - Shu Feng
- Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 611756, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Castro C, Pablo Doncel P, Ledesma RD, Montes SA, Daniela Barragan D, Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Bianchi A, Kauer N, Qu W, Padilla JL. Measurement invariance of the driving inattention scale (ARDES) across 7 countries. ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 2024; 195:107412. [PMID: 38043215 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
The Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale (ARDES) is a self-report measure of individual differences in driving inattention. ARDES was originally developed in Spanish (Argentina), and later adapted to other countries and languages. Evidence supporting the reliability and validity of ARDES scores has been obtained in various different countries. However, no study has been conducted to specifically examine the measurement invariance of ARDES measures across countries, thus limiting their comparability. Can different language versions of ARDES provide comparable measures across countries with different traffic regulations and cultural norms? To what extent might cultural differences prevent researchers from making valid inferences based on ARDES measures? Using Alignment Analysis, the present study assessed the approximate invariance of ARDES measures in seven countries: Argentina (n = 603), Australia (n = 378), Brazil (n = 220), China (n = 308). Spain (n = 310), UK (n = 298), and USA (n = 278). The three-factor structure of ARDES scores (differentiating driving errors occurring at Navigation, Manoeuvring and Control levels) was used as the target theoretical model. A fixed alignment analysis was conducted to examine approximate measurement invariance. 12.3 % of the intercepts and 0.8 % of the item-factor loadings were identified as non-invariant, averaging 8.6 % of non-invariance. Despite substantial differences among the countries, sample recruitment or representativeness, study results support resorting to ARDES measures to make comparisons across the country samples. Thus, the range of cultures, laws and collision risk across these 7 countries provides a demanding assessment for a cultural-free inattention while-driving. The alignment analysis results suggest that ARDES measures reach near equivalence among the countries in the study. We hope this study will serve as a basis for future cross-cultural research on driving inattention using ARDES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candida Castro
- CIMCYC (Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Centre), Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Spain.
| | - P Pablo Doncel
- CIMCYC (Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Centre), Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Spain
| | - Rubén D Ledesma
- IPSIBAT, Instituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada y Tecnología, CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council) and Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina
| | - Silvana A Montes
- IPSIBAT, Instituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada y Tecnología, CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council) and Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | - Weina Qu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioural Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jose-Luis Padilla
- CIMCYC (Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Centre), Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cox AE, Cicchino JB, Reagan IJ, Zuby DS. Prevalence of distracted driving by driver characteristics in the United States. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH 2023; 86:346-356. [PMID: 37718062 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Distracted driving is a long-standing traffic safety concern, though common secondary tasks continually evolve. The goal of this study was to measure the prevalence of self-reported distracted driving behaviors, including activities made possible in recent years by smartphones. METHODS We conducted a nationwide survey of 2,013 U.S. licensed drivers (ages 16 +). We created four aggregate distraction categories from 18 individual secondary tasks to estimate the proportion of drivers study-wide and by demographic characteristics belonging to each category, defined as those who regularly did (during most or all drives in the previous 30 days) one or more secondary task within each category. Logistic regression estimated the adjusted odds of drivers belonging to each aggregate distraction category by demographic characteristics. RESULTS Sixty-five percent of drivers reported doing at least one of the 18 secondary tasks regularly, and half did at least one device-based task regularly in the past 30 days. Non-device task prevalence trended downward with age, while device-based task prevalence was consistent among younger drivers before declining beginning with age 35. Males (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16, 2.02), parents of children ages 18 and younger (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.10, 1.96), and participants who drive in the gig economy (OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.73, 5.43) had higher adjusted odds of engaging in "modern" device-based distractions enabled by smartphones (e.g., making video calls, watching videos, using social media) than other drivers. Many drivers are using hands-free capabilities when available for tasks, but for some tasks more than others. CONCLUSIONS Regular distracted driving is widespread with most behavior concentrated among drivers younger than age 50, though no age group or other demographic studied abstains. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Stakeholders can use these findings to develop countermeasures for distracted driving by targeting specific secondary tasks and the demographics most likely to report regularly doing them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee E Cox
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, United States.
| | | | - Ian J Reagan
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, United States
| | - David S Zuby
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu W, Feng L, Ma J. Understanding the domain of driving distraction with knowledge graphs. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278822. [PMID: 36490240 PMCID: PMC9733871 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to provide insight into the driving distraction domain systematically on the basis of scientific knowledge graphs. For this purpose, 3,790 documents were taken into consideration after retrieving from Web of Science Core Collection and screening, and two types of knowledge graphs were constructed to demonstrate bibliometric information and domain-specific research content respectively. In terms of bibliometric analysis, the evolution of publication and citation numbers reveals the accelerated development of this domain, and trends of multidisciplinary and global participation could be identified according to knowledge graphs from Vosviewer. In terms of research content analysis, a new framework consisting of five dimensions was clarified, including "objective factors", "human factors", "research methods", "data" and "data science". The main entities of this domain were identified and relations between entities were extracted using Natural Language Processing methods with Python 3.9. In addition to the knowledge graph composed of all the keywords and relationships, entities and relations under each dimension were visualized, and relations between relevant dimensions were demonstrated in the form of heat maps. Furthermore, the trend and significance of driving distraction research were discussed, and special attention was given to future directions of this domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxia Xu
- School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Feng
- School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Ma
- School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lym Y, Kim S, Kim KJ. Identifying regions of excess injury risks associated with distracted driving: A case study in Central Ohio, USA. SSM Popul Health 2022; 20:101293. [PMID: 36438079 PMCID: PMC9682346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examines the latent influence of spatial locations on the relative risks of crash injuries associated with distracted driving (DD) and identifies regions of excess risks for policy intervention. Using a sample of aggregated injury and fatal DD crash records for the period 2015–2019 across 1,024 census block groups in Central Ohio (i.e., the Columbus Metropolitan Area) in the United States, we investigate the role of latent effects along with several covariates such as land-use mix, sociodemographic features, and the built environment. To this end, we specifically leverage a full Bayesian hierarchical formulation with conditional autoregressive priors to account for uncertainty (i.e., spatially structured random effects) stemming from adjacent census block groups. Furthermore, we consider uncorrelated random effects from upper-level administrative units within which each block group is nested (i.e., census tracts and counties). Our analysis reveals that (1) addressing spatial correlation improves the model's performance, (2) block-group-level variability substantially explains the residual random fluctuation, and (3) intersection density appears negatively associated with the relative risks of crash injuries, while more diversified land use can increase injury risk. Based on these findings, we present spatial clusters with twice the relative risks compared to other block groups, suggesting that policies be devised to mitigate severe injuries due to DD and therefore enhance public health. Crash injuries associated with distracted driving are investigated. Spatial correlation accounts for residual variation in relative injury risks. Intersection density appears to reduce the risks of crash injuries. Diversified land use leads to an elevated injury risk. We identify small areas with excess injury risks.
Collapse
|
6
|
Seacrist T, Maheshwari J, Sarfare S, Chingas G, Thirkill M, Loeb HS. In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION 2021; 22:S68-S73. [PMID: 34663136 DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1979529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Motor vehicle crashes remain a significant problem. Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) have the potential to reduce crash incidence and severity, but their optimization requires a comprehensive understanding of driver-specific errors and environmental hazards in real-world crash scenarios. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to quantify contributing factors using the Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP 2) Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS), identify potential ADAS interventions, and make suggestions to optimize ADAS for real-world crash scenarios. METHODS A subset of the SHRP 2 NDS consisting of at-fault crashes (n = 369) among teens (16-19 yrs), young adults (20-24 yrs), adults (35-54 yrs) and older adults (70+ yrs) were reviewed to identify contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions. Contributing factors were classified according to National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey pre-crash assessment variable elements. A single critical factor was selected among the contributing factors for each crash. Case reviews with a multidisciplinary panel of industry experts were conducted to develop suggestions for ADAS optimization. Critical factors were compared across at-risk driving groups, gender, and incident type using chi-square statistics and multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS Driver error was the critical factor in 94% of crashes. Recognition error (56%), including internal distraction and inadequate surveillance, was the most common driver error sub-type. Teens and young adults exhibited greater decision errors compared to older adults (p < 0.01). Older adults exhibited greater performance errors (p < 0.05) compared to teens and young adults. Automatic emergency braking (AEB) had the greatest potential to mitigate crashes (48%), followed by vehicle-to-vehicle communication (38%) and driver monitoring (24%). ADAS suggestions for optimization included (1) implementing adaptive forward collision warning, AEB, high-speed warning, and curve-speed warning to account for road surface conditions (2) ensuring detection of nonstandard road objects, (3) vehicle-to-vehicle communication alerting drivers to cross-traffic, (4) vehicle-to-infrastructure communication alerting drivers to the presence of pedestrians in crosswalks, and (5) optimizing lane keeping assist for end-departures and pedal confusion. CONCLUSIONS These data provide stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of critical factors among at-risk drivers as well as suggestions for ADAS improvements based on naturalistic data. Such data can be used to optimize ADAS for driver-specific errors and help develop more robust vehicle test procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Seacrist
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Shreyas Sarfare
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gregory Chingas
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Maya Thirkill
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Spelman College, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Helen S Loeb
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lyon C, Brown S, Vanlaar W, Robertson R. Prevalence and trends of distracted driving in Canada. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH 2021; 76:118-126. [PMID: 33653542 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study evaluates prevalence and trends in distracted driving in Canada based on multiple indicators collected from the Road Safety Monitor (RSM) and Canada's National Fatality Database maintained by the Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF). METHOD Data from the RSM on self-reported distracted driving behaviors were analyzed using multivariate techniques including logistic regression analysis in various years spanning from 2004 to 2019. Data from TIRF's National Fatality Database from 2000 to 2016 were also analyzed using piecewise regression analysis to evaluate trends and prevalence of driver distraction. RESULTS Significantly more Canadians reported talking on their phone hands-free or handheld phone while driving in 2019 compared to 2010. There was a 102% increase in the percentage that reported texting while driving in 2019 (9.7%) compared to 2010 (4.8%). For every 10-year increase in age, drivers were 44% less likely to text, 38% less likely to use a handheld phone, and 28% less likely to use a hands-free phone. Males were 62% more likely to use a handheld phone and 50% more likely to use a hands-free phone than females. Findings related to drivers' perceived danger of distracted driving and attitudes are also presented. Although the number of distraction-related fatalities has not increased substantially from 2000 to 2016, the percentage of all fatalities where distraction was a contributing factor has increased. Unlike drinking drivers, distracted drivers more often kill other road users in crashes than kill themselves. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, while most Canadians appear to understand that one of the high-risk forms of distracted driving (i.e., texting while driving) is indeed dangerous, there is a minority who are unaware of, or resistant to, this fact. Practical Applications: Enforcement activities and education initiatives to combat distracted driving ought to be tailored to the target audience based on the patterns uncovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Lyon
- Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 171 Nepean Street, Ottawa, ON K2P 0B4, Canada.
| | - Steve Brown
- Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 171 Nepean Street, Ottawa, ON K2P 0B4, Canada.
| | - Ward Vanlaar
- Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 171 Nepean Street, Ottawa, ON K2P 0B4, Canada.
| | - Robyn Robertson
- Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 171 Nepean Street, Ottawa, ON K2P 0B4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|