Steroid immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: a passing era

Cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular events, and metabolic syndrome in renal transplantation: comparison of early steroid withdrawal and chronic steroids

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death with a functioning graft in renal transplant recipients. The purpose of this study was to compare Framingham Risk Score (FRS), metabolic syndrome (MS), and cardiovascular events (CVE) in patients receiving early corticosteroid withdrawal (ECSWD), or chronic corticosteroid therapy (CCS).

METHODS

In all, 251 ECSWD and 146 CCS patients were evaluated. FRS and MS were identified at baseline, six, 12, and 24 months post-transplant. A total of 124 patients with diabetes mellitus prior to transplantation were excluded from MS analysis. CVE were defined as sudden-death, MI, angina, or CVA/TIA. Repeat-measure logistic regression was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients experienced 72 CVE. Mean follow-up was 755 +/- 312 d and time to CVE was 14.8 +/- 8.3 months. Demographics were similar between groups. FRS was not different between groups. CVE were significantly greater in CCS patients then ECSWD (20% vs. 10%, p = 0.024). New-onset MS occurred more frequently in patients receiving CCS then ECSWD (45% vs. 22%, p < 0.001) and was associated with more CVE (p < 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving ECSWD regimens have significantly decreased CVE and new onset MS compared with CCS. MS is associated with increased CV risk and CVE.

Corticosteroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation: the present status

Corticosteroids (CS) have played a vital role in organ transplantation, both for prevention and treatment of allograft rejection. However, the use of CS is associated with a wide range of adverse effects. With advances in immunosuppressive drug therapy, attempts have been made to minimize the use of CS to avoid or alleviate their side effects. Withdrawal of CS months after transplantation has transitioned to days. In low to intermediate risk renal allograft recipients, use of induction therapy and modern maintenance drug combinations allows safe withdrawal of CS within the first week of transplantation. In other groups, existing potent maintenance agents permit tapering of CS to low doses over the first few months. Withdrawal of these small doses may not add to the benefits.

Incidence of and risk factors for diabetes mellitus in cats that have undergone renal transplantation: 187 cases (1986–2005)

OBJECTIVE

To compare incidence of diabetes mellitus in cats that had undergone renal transplantation with incidence in cats with chronic renal failure, compare mortality rates in cats that underwent renal transplantation and did or did not develop diabetes mellitus, and identify potential risk factors for development of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in cats.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

ANIMALS

187 cats that underwent renal transplantation.

PROCEDURES

Medical records were reviewed.

RESULTS

26 of the 187 (13.9%) cats developed PTDM, with the incidence of PTDM being 66 cases/1,000 cat years at risk. By contrast, the incidence of diabetes mellitus among a comparison population of 178 cats with chronic renal failure that did not undergo renal transplantation was 17.9 cases/1,000 cat years at risk, and cats that underwent renal trans-plantation were 5.45 times as likely to develop diabetes mellitus as were control cats with chronic renal failure. The mortality rate among cats with PTDM was 2.38 times the rate among cats that underwent renal transplantation but did not develop PTDM. Age, sex, body weight, and percentage change in body weight were not found to be significantly associated with development of PTDM.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results suggest that cats that undergo renal transplantation have an increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus, compared with cats with chronic renal failure, and that mortality rate is higher for cats that develop PTDM than for cats that do not.

Steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and future developments

Owing to the increasing disparity of organ demand and organ supply the search for optimal immunosuppressive strategies has become a central issue in kidney transplantation (KTX). In the focus today are modifications of the use of calcineurin-inhibitors (CNIs, Cyclosporine A/Tacrolimus) and steroids, as they are nephrotoxic and promote cardiovascular risk factors like arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. These modifications can either be withdrawal or avoidance of these substances in combination with new and/or established immunosuppressants. Because about half of all KTXs are performed by or with the help of urologists' knowledge of modern immunosuppressive regimens is crucial also for urologists. We performed a literature research (PubMed, DIMDI, medline) for CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols and studies to elucidate their influence on graft-function and graft- and patient-survival. New substances and actual studies were also evaluated. Several published reports on CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols after KTX exist, including withdrawal, reduction or avoidance. The time of reduction seems to be crucial: an initially increased immune response should be counterbalanced by an initially intensified immunosuppression. Therefore, late steroid withdrawal seems to be safer than early withdrawal especially in Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Steroid avoidance also seems feasible on a CNI based regimen, especially in context with induction therapy. Withdrawal or avoidance of CNIs seems feasible with mycophenolate acid and/or induction therapy with IL 2-receptor antibodies as co-immunosuppressants. This is of interest in grafts with deteriorating function or from donors with extended criteria. Also, CNI- and steroid-free immunosuppression can be successfully performed with new immunosuppressants but results are yet premature. CNI- and/or steroid reduction, withdrawal or even avoidance is feasible. As long-term graft function is the goal of KTX and as more kidneys from donors with extended criteria are transplanted "tailored immunosuppression" will replace standards in the future.

The effects of dexamethasone and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on cytokines and receptor expression in a human osteoblastic cell line: potential steroid-sparing role for DHEA

Osteoporosis and associated fractures are the most common and debilitating complication of glucocorticoid use. The use of alternative anti-inflammatory agents without the deleterious skeletal effects of glucocorticoids is needed. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) may have immunomodulatory as well as positive effects on bone. For our further understanding of the mechanisms of action of DHEA, as a steroid-sparing agent, we investigated and compared the effects of dexamethasone (DEX) and DHEA on the regulation of the downstream effector pathway of osteoclastogenesis; RANKL/OPG and a range of inflammatory/pro-resorbing cytokines and receptors using a human clonal osteoblastic cell line. The cells were treated with DEX, DHEA, and androstenedione (ANDI). The mRNA expression of RANKL and OPG was determined by real-time PCR after overnight incubation. The regulation of a broad spectrum of cytokines by DEX and DHEA was also investigated using a human cytokine/growth factor and receptor gene array consisting of 268 cytokine-related cDNAs. To confirm some of the gene expression changes, protein production was measured by ELISA. RANKL expression and RANKL/OPG ratio were increased by DEX. This effect was reversed by co-treatment with both DHEA or ANDI. Several pro-inflammatory/resorptive cytokines including IL-6, IL-4, IFN-gamma, macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF) were down-regulated not only by DEX but also by DHEA. In contrast to DEX, DHEA did not lead to suppression of growth factors including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor-5 (FGF-5), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein3 (IGF-BP3). Several new target genes previously documented to influence bone formation were up-regulated by DHEA such as Notch 2, insulin receptor, thrombin receptor (PAR1). The data suggest that DHEA has immunomodulatory properties without the catabolic effects on bone remodeling, observed with glucocorticoid use. DHEA may thus prove useful as a steroid-sparing agent in the management of inflammatory disorders such as SLE or rheumatoid arthritis. Further in vivo studies are indicated.

Efficacy of conventional immunosuppressive therapy in related and unrelated living renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The application of antibody induction therapy in adult living-related kidney transplantation remains under discussion. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of living-related (LRT) and unrelated renal transplant recipients (LURT) using standardized immunosuppressive protocols. From October 2000 to October 2004, 72 adult LRT (TX) were performed at our institution. Thirty-nine LRT (group A) and 33 LURT (group B) recipients received a standardized immunosuppressive therapy consisting of tacrolimus (Tac), steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) without antibody induction therapy. This prolective analysis included immediate graft function, rejection rate and loss of the transplanted organ. The incidence of post-operative good graft function (>90%) was similar for both groups, as well as the rejection rate showed 57.8% for patients of group A and 58.8% for patients of group B (p < 0.5). However, the number of rejections (>1 rejection) was significantly higher in group B (11.8%) compared to patients in group A (4.4%). No difference concerning loss of transplanted kidney was observed for both groups. Conventional Tac, MMF and steroid-based immunosuppression therapy is equivalent in efficacy of therapy in living-related and unrelated renal transplants. In our opinion, induction therapy in patients without immunologic risk factors has no favourable effect.

Recipient age and mycophenolate mofetil as the main determinants of outcome after steroid withdrawal: analysis of long-term follow-up in renal transplantation

The long-term benefit of steroid withdrawal on patient and graft survival is unproven. Steroids were stopped within the first year after kidney transplantation in 223 consecutive low-risk patients initially treated with thymoglobulin and triple-drug therapy. The 15-year actuarial graft survival rate was 83.9%. Risk factors for graft loss were: proteinuria (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.96, P = 0.0003), creatinine >130 micromol/L (HR: 3.37, P = 0.01), recipient age <35 years (HR: 5.31, P = 0.001), and no mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment (HR: 8.83, P = 0.04). Interestingly, recipient age and no MMF treatment were not risk factors in higher-risk patients in whom steroids were continued. The 2-year incidence of acute rejection following steroid withdrawal was 12.1%; the graft survival rate was lower in this group (71.1%). Our findings indicate that late steroid withdrawal results in excellent long-term outcome in most low-risk patients, but it should be attempted with caution in younger patients and when MMF is not used.