1
|
Melancon MP, Yevich S, Avritscher R, Swigost A, Lu L, Tian L, Damasco JA, Dixon K, Cortes AC, Munoz NM, Liang D, Liu D, Tam AL. A novel irinotecan-lipiodol nanoemulsion for intravascular administration: pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in the normal and tumor bearing rat liver. Drug Deliv 2021; 28:240-251. [PMID: 33501859 PMCID: PMC8725905 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1869863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the United States and treatment options are limited for patients who develop liver metastases. Several chemotherapeutic regimens have been used for transvascular liver-directed therapy in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases without clear evidence of superiority of one therapy over another. We describe the development of a novel nanoemulsion through combining irinotecan (IRI), a first line systemic agent used for the treatment of colon cancer, with lipiodol, an oily contrast medium derived from poppy seed oil, and evaluated its pharmacokinetic and biodistribution profile as a function of portal venous chemoembolization (PVCE) versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) delivery. The Tessari technique was used to create a stable emulsion (20 mg IRI mixed with 2 mL lipiodol) with resultant particle size ranging from 28.9 nm to 56.4 nm. Pharmacokinetic profile established through venous sampling in Buffalo rats demonstrate that the area under the curve (AUC0−∞) of IRI was significantly less after PVCE with IRI-lipiodol as compared to IRI alone (131 vs. 316 µg*min/mL, p-value = .023), suggesting significantly higher amounts of IRI retention in the liver with the IRI-lipiodol nanoemulsion via first-pass extraction. Subseqent biodistribution studies in tumor-bearing WAG/Rjj rats revealed more IRI present in the tumor following TACE versus PVCE (29.19 ± 12.33 µg/g versus 3.42 ± 1.62; p-value = .0033) or IV (29.19 ± 12.33 µg/g versus 1.05 ± 0.47; p-value = .0035). The IRI-lipiodol nanoemulsion demonstrated an acceptable hepatotoxicity profile in all routes of administration. In conclusion, the IRI-lipiodol nanoemulsion via TACE showed promise and warrants further investigation as an option for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marites P Melancon
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven Yevich
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rony Avritscher
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam Swigost
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Linfeng Lu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Li Tian
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jossana A Damasco
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine Dixon
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea C Cortes
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nina M Munoz
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dong Liang
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Liu
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alda L Tam
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bajwa R, Madoff DC, Kishore SA. Embolotherapy for Hepatic Oncology: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. DIGESTIVE DISEASE INTERVENTIONS 2020; 4:134-147. [PMID: 32832829 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AbstractPrimary and secondary liver cancers are a major cause of mortality worldwide. Transarterial liver-directed therapy, or embolotherapy, represents an important locoregional treatment strategy for primary and secondary liver tumors. Embolotherapeutic modalities include bland embolization (transarterial embolization), chemoembolization (transarterial chemoembolization), and radioembolization or selective internal radiotherapy. A brief technical overview of embolotherapeutic modalities as well as supportive evidence for the treatment of most common primary and secondary liver tumors will be discussed in this review. Several potential future applications, including synergy with systemic therapy, interventional theranostics, and artificial intelligence will also be reviewed briefly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raazi Bajwa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - David C Madoff
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sirish A Kishore
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alese OB, Kim S, Chen Z, Ramalingam SS, Owonikoko TK, El-Rayes BF. Analysis of liver-directed therapies in U.S. cancer patients. Curr Oncol 2015; 22:e457-61. [PMID: 26715883 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The liver is a common site of primary and metastatic cancer. Liver-directed therapies are commonly used to treat cancer involving the liver. We report on the patterns, predictors, and outcomes of liver-directed therapies in hospitalized cancer patients in the United States. METHODS Data were obtained from all U.S. states that contributed to the Nationwide Inpatient Sample maintained by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality between 2006 and 2010. Univariate and multivariate testing was used to identify factors significantly associated with patient outcome. RESULTS For the 5-year period of interest, 12,540 patient discharges were identified. Mean age in the sample was 60 years. Primary liver lesions (n = 8840) made up 26.9% of the sample; the remaining cases were metastases. Most procedures were performed in large (79%) urban (98%) hospitals and in patients with insurance (97.9%). The most common intervention was partial hepatectomy (42.7%), followed by open (9.9%), percutaneous (7.2%), and laparoscopic (5.04%) ablation of liver lesions; embolization (9.8%); and liver transplantation (2.64%). The incidence of in-hospital mortality was very low (2.4%), and the complication rate was 12.2%. Complications such as acute liver necrosis, ascites, hepatic coma, hepatorenal syndrome, liver abscess, and high number of comorbid illnesses (>8) accounted for 60% of the in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS The low rate of morbidity and mortality associated with liver-directed therapies in hospitalized cancer patients supports the continuing utility of such procedures in the management of primary and metastatic liver cancer. The patterns of health disparities observed with respect to the use of liver-directed therapies are concerning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O B Alese
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A
| | - S Kim
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A
| | - Z Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A
| | - S S Ramalingam
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A
| | - T K Owonikoko
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A
| | - B F El-Rayes
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zaydfudim VM, McMurry TL, Harrigan AM, Friel CM, Stukenborg GJ, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Hedrick TL. Improving treatment and survival: a population-based study of current outcomes after a hepatic resection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17:1019-24. [PMID: 26353888 PMCID: PMC4605341 DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-based studies historically report underutilization of a resection in patients with colorectal metastases to the liver. Recent data suggest limitations of the methods in the historical analysis. The present study examines trends in a hepatic resection and survival among Medicare recipients with hepatic metastases. METHODS Medicare recipients with incident colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 2009 were identified in the SEER(Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results)-Medicare dataset. Patients were stratified into historical (1991-2001) and current (2002-2009) cohorts. Analyses compared treatment, peri-operative outcomes and survival. RESULTS Of 31.574 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver, 14,859 were in the current cohort treated after 2002 and 16,715 comprised the historical control group. The overall proportion treated with a hepatic resection increased significantly during the study period (P < 0.001) with pre/post change from 6.5% pre-2002 to 7.5% currently (P < 0.001). Over time, haemorrhagic and infectious complications declined (both P ≤ 0.047), but 30-day mortality was similar (3.5% versus 3.9%, P = 0.660). After adjusting for predictors of survival, the use of a hepatic resection [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.42, P < 0.001] and treatment after 2002 (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.86-0.90, P < 0.001) were associated with a reduced risk of death. CONCLUSIONS Case identification using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes is imperfect; however, comparison of trends over time suggests an improvement in multimodality therapy and survival in patients with colorectal metastases to the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Zaydfudim
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA,Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Timothy L McMurry
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA,Department of Public Health Sciences, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Amy M Harrigan
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA,Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Charles M Friel
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA
| | - George J Stukenborg
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA,Department of Public Health Sciences, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Todd W Bauer
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Reid B Adams
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Traci L Hedrick
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA,Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu DM, Thakor AS, Baerlocher M, Alshammari MT, Lim H, Kos S, Kennedy AS, Wasan H. A review of conventional and drug-eluting chemoembolization in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases: principles and proof. Future Oncol 2015; 11:1421-8. [PMID: 25602287 DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|