1
|
Keane OA, Chambers C, Brady CM, Rehberg J, Iyer S, Santore MT. Reducing Retained Foreign Objects in the Operating Room: A Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 237:864-872. [PMID: 37638667 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the incidence of pediatric retained foreign objects (RFOs) during surgery is diminutive (1/32,000), RFOs are often the most common sentinel events reported. In 2021, our institution noted an increase in RFOs evidenced by a substantial decrease in days between events. We aimed to minimize the incidence of RFO which was measured as an increase of days between events at our institution by implementation of a Quality Improvement initiative. STUDY DESIGN This effort was conducted across 4 surgical centers within a tertiary children's healthcare system in December 2021. Patients undergoing surgery within this healthcare system across all surgical specialties were included. The quality improvement initiative was developed by a multidisciplinary team and included 6 steps focusing on quiet time, minimizing interruptions, and closed-loop communication during final surgical count. Seven Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were used to test, refine, and implement the protocol. Adherence to the final surgical count protocol was monitored throughout the study period. RESULTS In 2021, before protocol implementation, average time between RFO events was 29 days. After implementation of our quality initiative, the final surgical count protocol, we improved to 451 days between RFO events by February 2023, exceeding the upper control limit (235 days). After implementation, the number of RFO events dropped from 7 in 2021 to 0 in 2022. Adherence to the final surgical count protocol implementation was 96.4% by the end of cycle 7. CONCLUSIONS RFOs during pediatric surgical procedures can be successfully reduced using quality improvement methodology focusing on standardizing the procedure of the final surgical count.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia A Keane
- From the Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Keane, Santore)
| | - Cindi Chambers
- From the Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Keane, Santore)
| | - Colin M Brady
- From the Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Keane, Santore)
| | - Jeff Rehberg
- From the Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Keane, Santore)
| | - Srikant Iyer
- From the Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Keane, Santore)
| | - Matthew T Santore
- From the Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Keane, Santore)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weprin S, Crocerossa F, Meyer D, Maddra K, Valancy D, Osardu R, Kang HS, Moore RH, Carbonara U, J Kim F, Autorino R. Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review. Patient Saf Surg 2021; 15:24. [PMID: 34253246 PMCID: PMC8276389 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management. METHODS Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical "sharps," a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of "sharps". Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview. RESULTS Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery. CONCLUSION The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Weprin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
- Division of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Dielle Meyer
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Maddra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - David Valancy
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Reginald Osardu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Hae Sung Kang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Robert H Moore
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
- Dept of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Fernando J Kim
- Division of Urology Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Colorado, Denver, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|