Exploring hand coordination as a measure of surgical skill

Utilizing Grasp Monitoring to Predict Microsurgical Expertise

INTRODUCTION

Most microsurgical procedures require the surgeon to use tools to grasp and hold fragile objects in the surgical site. Prior research on grasping in surgery has mostly either been in other surgical techniques or used grasping as an auxiliary metric. We focus on microsurgery and investigate what grasping can tell about microsurgical skill and suturing performance. This study lays groundwork for using automatic detection of grasps to evaluate surgical skill.

METHODS

Five expert surgeons and six novices completed sutures on a microsurgical training board. Video recordings of the performance were annotated for the number of grasps, while an eye tracker recorded the participants' pupil dilations for cognitive workload assessment. Performance was measured with suturing duration and the University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Assessment instrument (UWOMSA). Differences in skill, suturing performance and cognitive workload were compared with grasping behavior.

RESULTS

Novices needed significantly more grasps to complete sutures and failed to grasp more often than the experts. The number of grasps affected the suturing duration more in novices. Decreasing suturing efficiency as measured by UWOMSA instrument was associated with increase in grasps, even when we controlled for overall skill differences. Novices displayed larger pupil dilations when averaged over a sufficiently large sample, and the difference increased after the grasp.

CONCLUSIONS

Grasping action during microsurgical procedures can be used as a conceptually simple yet objective proxy in microsurgical performance assessment. If the grasps could be detected automatically, they could be used to aid in computational evaluation of surgical trainees' performance.

Movement-level process modeling of microsurgical bimanual and unimanual tasks

Purpose

Microsurgical techniques require highly skilled manual handling of specialized surgical instruments. Surgical process models are central for objective evaluation of these skills, enabling data-driven solutions that can improve intraoperative efficiency.

Method

We built a surgical process model, defined at movement level in terms of elementary surgical actions (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n=4$$\end{document}n=4) and targets (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n=4$$\end{document}n=4). The model also included nonproductive movements, which enabled us to evaluate suturing efficiency and bi-manual dexterity. The elementary activities were used to investigate differences between novice (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n=5$$\end{document}n=5) and expert surgeons (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n=5$$\end{document}n=5) by comparing the cosine similarity of vector representations of a microsurgical suturing training task and its different segments.

Results

Based on our model, the experts were significantly more efficient than the novices at using their tools individually and simultaneously. At suture level, the experts were significantly more efficient at using their left hand tool, but the differences were not significant for the right hand tool. At the level of individual suture segments, the experts had on average 21.0 % higher suturing efficiency and 48.2 % higher bi-manual efficiency, and the results varied between segments. Similarity of the manual actions showed that expert and novice surgeons could be distinguished by their movement patterns.

Conclusions

The surgical process model allowed us to identify differences between novices’ and experts’ movements and to evaluate their uni- and bi-manual tool use efficiency. Analyzing surgical tasks in this manner could be used to evaluate surgical skill and help surgical trainees detect problems in their performance computationally.