Emergent laparotomy and temporary abdominal closure for the cirrhotic patient

Perioperative Evaluation and Management of Patients With Cirrhosis: Risk Assessment, Surgical Outcomes, and Future Directions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. We provide a narrative review of the available data regarding perioperative morbidity and mortality, risk assessment, and management of patients with cirrhosis undergoing non-hepatic surgical procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature from 1998-2018 and identified 87 studies reporting perioperative outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. We extracted elements of study design and perioperative mortality by surgical procedure, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score reported in these 87 studies to support our narrative review.

RESULTS

Overall, perioperative mortality is 2-10 times higher in patients with cirrhosis compared to patients without cirrhosis, depending on the severity of liver dysfunction. For elective procedures, patients with compensated cirrhosis (CTP class A, or MELD <10) have minimal increase in operative mortality. CTP class C patients (or MELD >15) are at high risk for mortality; liver transplantation or alternatives to surgery should be considered. Very little data exist to guide perioperative management of patients with cirrhosis, so most recommendations are based on case series and expert opinion. Existing risk calculators are inadequate.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity of liver dysfunction, medical comorbidities and the type and complexity of surgery, including whether it is elective versus emergent, are all determinants of perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients with cirrhosis. There are major limitations to the existing clinical research on risk assessment and perioperative management that warrant further investigation.

Open abdomen in liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Damage control laparotomy with vacuum assisted closure (VAC) is used for selective cases in trauma. In liver transplantation, VAC has also been applied for management of intra-operative hemorrhage. The primary objective was to evaluate peri-operative blood loss and blood product utilization in VAC compared to primary abdominal closure (PAC) at the index transplant operation.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all adults undergoing deceased donor liver transplantation (2007-2011) at a single center tertiary care institution.

RESULTS

201 deceased donor liver transplantations were performed, with 167 PAC and 34 VAC cases. Intra-operative blood loss (4.4L vs 10.7L), cell saver return (1399 ml vs 3998 ml), FFP (7.6U vs 15.9U) and PLT requirements (8.5U vs 18.3U), were all significantly elevated in VAC compared to PAC. VAC patients had significantly increased RBC, FFP, PLT, and total volume requirements during initial ICU admission. 30 PAC cases required on demand laparotomy and most commonly for post-operative bleeding.

CONCLUSION

In liver transplantation, application of VAC secondary to massive intra-operative exsanguination was safely utilized. Further evaluation is required to identify long-term morbidity and mortality.