Postoperative surgical trainee opioid prescribing practices (POST OPP): an institutional study

Evaluating opioid prescribing patterns following discharge from elective surgical procedures: a worrying trend during the 'opioid crisis' - an audit of elective surgical procedures

BACKGROUND

The 'opioid crisis' has reached epidemic proportions globally. Importantly, 30% of opioid dependency stem from opioids obtained on hospital discharge prescriptions.

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate opioid prescription patterns on discharge of post-operative patients in an Irish Hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken in a single institution during the 5 year eligibility period (January 2017-October 2021). Comparisons in opioid prescription patterns following minor (inguinal hernia repair (IHR), intermediate (laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)) and major (colonic resection (CR)) were made. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS version 26.0 RESULTS: In total, 300 patients were included in this study with mean age 59.6 years (range: 20-92). Of these, 112 patients underwent IHR (37.3%), 116 patients underwent LC (38.7%), and 72 patients underwent CR (24.0%). The mean age at diagnosis was 61 years, 53 years and 58 years for IHR, LC and CR, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing CR were more likely to have greater comorbidity burden (3.1 vs. 1.2 (IHR) vs. 1.8 (LC) respectively (P = 0.030). On discharge, 27.8% of CR patients received opioids (20/72) compared to 24.1% of IHR (28/116) and 15.9% of LC (18/113) patients, respectively (P = 0.126).

CONCLUSION

We observed considerable variability in opioid prescribing patterns following minor, intermediate and major operations in our centre. Care is required when prescribing opioids in the post-operative setting, and opioid prescription guidelines are required to both tackle and prevent an escalation of this 'opioid crisis'.

Bringing Opiates Off the Streets and Undertaking Excess Scripts: A novel opiate reclamation and prescription reduction program

BACKGROUND

Opioid diversion and misuse continue to present problems in modern medicine. The "opioid epidemic" has claimed more than 250,000 lives since 1999, with studies pointing to prescription opioids as the culprit for future opiate misuse. Currently, there are no well-described, data-driven processes to educate surgeons on reducing opiate prescribing, informed by personal practice patterns. We designed and implemented a novel opiate reclamation and prescription reduction program for surgeons to reclaim unused medications and decrease prescribing using individual provider data.

METHODS

We performed a prospective collection of all unused opiate pain medications for general surgery postoperative patients from July 15, 2020 to January 15, 2021. Patients brought their unused opiates to their routine postoperative follow-up appointment, where they were counted and disposed of in a secure drug take-back bin. Reclaimed opiates were totaled, analyzed, and reported to the providers, who used their individual reclamation rates to refine prescribing habits.

RESULTS

During the reclamation period, 168 operations were performed, with a total of 12,970 morphine milligram equivalents of opiate prescribed by 5 physicians. A total of 6,077.5 morphine milligram equivalents (46.9%) were reclaimed, which is the equivalent of 800 5-mg tablets of oxycodone. A review of these data led to a 30.9% decrease in opiate prescriptions by participating surgeons in addition to the reclamation of an additional 3,150 morphine milligram equivalents over the next 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Continuous monitoring of the medications returned by patients now continues to inform our providers' prescribing practices, decreases the amount of opiates in the community, and improves patient safety.

Postoperative opioid protocol: A 5-year resident-led effort to standardize prescribing patterns

OBJECTIVES

The combined impact of variable surgeon prescribing preferences and low resident prescribing comfort level can lead to significant disparity in opioid prescribing patterns. We report an update on the expanded scope of this now 5-year, resident led initiative to standardize postoperative prescription practices within the Department of Otolaryngology.

METHODS

With Institutional Review Board approval, performed a retrospective review of 12 months before (July 2016 - June 2017) and 48 months after (July 2019-June 2021) implementation of the Expanded Postoperative Analgesia Protocol. The Pre-Protocol and Expanded Protocol cohorts were compared using ANOVA, chi-squared and Fisher Exact tests, with ANCOVA and binary logistic regression for covariate analysis. Cost impact was calculated using average medication spending data for 2018-2019.

RESULTS

470 patients were included in the Pre-Protocol cohort (54 % male, mean age 35 years) and 679 in the Expanded Protocol cohort (63 % male, mean age 36 years). The protocol was effectively implemented as reflected in the reduction of combination opioid medications from 429 (91.3 %) to 26 (3.8 %) (87 % reduction, 95 % CI 86 % to 89 %, p < .001). The protocol resulted in a 66 % reduction in average morphine milligram equivalents per patient (333 mg to 114 mg, mean reduction 219 mg, 95 % CI 206 mg to 232 mg, p < .001), a 68 % reduction in medication refills (refill rate 20 % to 6 %; 14 % reduction, 95 % CI 12 % to 16 %, p < .001) and a 74 % reduction in cost of postoperative medications ($93.82 to $24.64 per patient).

CONCLUSION

Through purposeful standardization, this 5-year resident led effort resulted in sustained changes to departmental wide prescribing practices yielding reduced variability, reduced cost, improved opioid management and superior pain control for postoperative patients.

Reducing Surgical Risks for Hair Replacement Surgery

Hair loss is a common problem among men and women. Hair replacement surgery (HRS) has become increasingly popular as technological advancements have been made producing remarkably natural results when performed by a skilled surgeon. Although complications from HRS are low compared with other esthetic surgeries, they can still occur even with the best-trained and qualified surgeon or staff. The process of hair restoration can be a long road for some patients and active patient participation and education is key for successful results. In this article, we seek to discuss the surgical risks of HRS and discuss methods to prevent them in your practice.

Addressing an epidemic: Improving guideline-concordant opioid prescribing in surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Excess postoperative opioid prescribing increases the risk of opioid abuse, diversion, and addiction. Clinicians receive variable training for opioid prescribing, and despite the availability of guidelines, wide variations in prescribing practices persist. This quality improvement initiative aimed to assess and improve institutional adherence to published guidelines.

METHODS

This study represented a quality improvement initiative at an academic medical center implemented over a 6-month period with data captured 1 year before and after implementation. The quality improvement initiative focused on prescribing education and monthly feedback reports for clinicians. All opioid-naïve, adult patients undergoing a reviewed procedure were included. Demographics, surgical details, hospital course, and opioid prescriptions were reviewed. Opioids prescribed on discharge were evaluated for concordance with recommendations based on published guidelines. Pre- and postimplementation cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

There were 4,905 patients included: 2,343 preimplementation and 2,562 postimplementation. There were similar distributions in patient demographics between the 2 cohorts. Guideline-concordant discharge prescriptions improved from 50.3% to 72.2% after the quality improvement initiative was implemented (P < .001). Adjusted analysis controlling for sex, age, discharge clinician, length of stay, outpatient surgery, and procedure demonstrated a 190% increase in odds of receiving a guideline-concordant opioid prescription on discharge in the postimplementation cohort (adjusted odds ratio 2.90; 95% confidence interval = 2.55-3.30).

CONCLUSION

This study represented a successful quality improvement initiative improving guideline-concordant opioid discharges and decreasing overprescribing. This study suggested published guidelines are insufficient without close attention to elements of effective change management including the critical importance of locally targeting educational efforts and suggested that real-time, data-driven feedback amplifies impact on prescribing behavior.

Variability in opioid prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs: A survey of providers caring for pediatric surgical patients

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Comprehensive opioid stewardship programs require collective stakeholder alignment and proficiency. We aimed to determine opioid-related prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs among providers who care for pediatric surgical patients.

METHODS

A single-center, cross-sectional survey was conducted of attending physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers (APPs), who managed pediatric surgical patients.

RESULTS

Of 110 providers surveyed, 75% completed the survey. Over half of respondents (n = 43, 52%) reported always/very often prescribing opioids at discharge, with residents reporting the highest rate (66%). Provider types had varying prescribing patterns, including what types of opioids and non-opioids they prescribed. There was a lack of formal training, particularly among residents, of which only 42% reported receiving formal opioid prescribing education. Finally, although only 28% of providers felt that the opioid epidemic affects children, 48% believed pediatric providers' prescribing patterns contributed to the opioid epidemic as a whole, and 80% reported changing their prescribing practices in response.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability exists in opioid prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs among providers who care for pediatric surgical patients. Effective opioid stewardship requires comprehensive policies, pediatric specific guidelines, and education for all providers caring for children to align provider proficiency and optimize prescribing patterns.

Variability and Excess in Opioid Prescribing Patterns After Cleft and Craniosynostosis Repairs

OBJECTIVE

To critically analyze pediatric opioid prescription patterns after cleft and craniosynostosis repairs.

DESIGN

Observational study 1) retrospectively reviewing pediatric opioid prescriptions from July 2018 to June 2019 and 2) prospectively surveying patients about actual opioid use from August 2019 to February 2020.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

133 pediatric patients undergoing cleft lip and/or palate or craniosynostosis repairs. Prospective surveys were offered at postoperative visits; 45 of 69 eligible patients were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Opioid doses prescribed at discharge and actual home opioid use.

RESULTS

90 patients with cleft lip and/or palate and 43 patients with craniosynostosis were included. Median prescribed opioid doses were 10.3 for cleft lip and/or palate procedures (range 0-75), and 14.3 for craniosynostosis repairs (range 0-50). In patients with cleft lip and/or palate, there was a negative correlation between age at surgery and prescribed opioid doses (r_s  =  -0.228, p  =  0.031). 45 patients completed surveys of home opioid use. No patients used more than 10 doses. Forty percent used no opioids at home, 33% used 1 to 2 doses, 18% used 3 to 5 doses, and 9% used 6 to 10 doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid prescriptions vary widely after common craniofacial procedures. Younger patients with cleft lip and/or palate may be more likely to be prescribed more doses. Actual home opioid use is less than prescribed amounts, with most patients using five or fewer doses. A prescribing guideline is proposed.

Discharge Opioid Prescribing Patterns in an Academic Orthopaedic Setting: Level of Training and Subspecialty Patterns

INTRODUCTION

Despite increased research on opioids in the orthopaedic literature, little is known of the prescribing practices of orthopaedic providers based on their level of training. The purpose of this study was to describe the discharge opioid prescribing patterns of orthopaedic providers, stratifying by level of training and orthopaedic subspecialty, within a single medical system.

METHODS

A retrospective review of orthopaedic surgical encounters was performed over a 1-year period for adults who received a discharge opioid prescription. Patient demographics and prescriber characteristics were collected, including the provider's level of training (attending, fellow, resident, physician assistant [PA], and nurse practitioner [NP]) and surgical subspecialty. Junior residents were postgraduate year 1 to 3, whereas senior residents/fellows were postgraduate year 4 to 6. Discharge opioids were converted to milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs). Overprescribing was defined as a prescribing more than a seven-day supply or >45 MMEs per day. Multivariable linear regression analysis determined the factors associated with discharge MMEs, whereas logistic regression determined the factors associated with overprescribing opioids.

RESULTS

Of the 3,786 patients reviewed, 1,500 met the criteria for inclusion in the study. The greatest proportion of opioid prescriptions was written by junior residents (33.9%), followed by NPs (30.1%), PAs (24.1%), senior residents/fellows (10.6%), and attendings (1.2%). Compared with junior residents, senior residents prescribed -59.4 MMEs, NPs prescribed +104 MMEs, and attendings prescribed +168 MMEs (P < 0.05), whereas PAs prescribed similar amounts (P > 0.05). Orthopaedic subspecialty was also predictive of discharge MMEs (P < 0.05). Senior residents and attendings were more likely to prescribe more than seven days of opioids (P < 0.05), whereas NPs and PAs were more likely to prescribe >45 MMEs per day (P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates significant variability in opioid prescribing practices according to provider level of training and subspecialty. National guidelines for opioid prescribing practices and educational programs may help reduce such variability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Understanding Opioid Prescribing Practices of Resident Physicians

BACKGROUND

To compare opioid prescribing practices of resident physicians across a variety of surgical and nonsurgical specialties; to identify factors which influence prescribing practices; and to examine resident utilization of best practice supplemental resources.

METHODS

An anonymous survey which assessed prescribing practices was completed by residents from one of several different subspecialties, including internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urology. Fisher's exact test assessed differences in prescribing practices between specialties.

RESULTS

Only 35% of residents reported receiving formal training in safe opioid prescribing. Overall, the most frequently reported influences on prescribing practices were the use of standardized order sets for specific procedures, attending preference, and patient's history of prescribed opioids. Resident physicians significantly underutilize best practice supplemental resources, such as counseling patients on pain expectations prior to prescribing opioid medication; contacting established pain specialists; screening patients for opioid abuse; referring to the Prescription Monitoring Program; and counseling patients on safe disposal of unused pills (P < .001).

DISCUSSION

The incorporation of comprehensive prescribing education into resident training and the utilization of standardized order sets can promote safe opioid prescribing.

Inpatient Opioid Consumption Variability following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of 4,038 Procedures

This study examined an early iteration of an inpatient opioid administration-reporting tool, which standardized patient opioid consumption as an average daily morphine milligram equivalence per surgical encounter (MME/day/encounter) among total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients. The objective was to assess the variability of inpatient opioid administration rates among surgeons after implementation of a multimodal opioid sparing pain protocol. We queried the electronic medical record at our institution for patients undergoing elective primary TKA between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2018. Patient demographics, inpatient and surgical factors, and inpatient opioid administration were retrieved. Opioid consumption was converted into average MME for each postoperative day. These MME/day/encounter values were used to determine mean and variance of opioids prescribed by individual surgeons. A secondary analysis of regional inpatient opioid consumption was determined by patient zip codes. In total, 23 surgeons performed 4,038 primary TKA. The institutional average opioid dose was 46.24 ± 0.75 MME/day/encounter. Average intersurgeon (IS) opioid prescribing ranged from 17.67 to 59.15 MME/day/encounter. Intrasurgeon variability ranged between ± 1.01 and ± 7.51 MME/day/encounter. After adjusting for patient factors, the average institutional MME/day/encounter was 38.43 ± 0.42, with average IS variability ranging from 18.29 to 42.84 MME/day/encounter, and intrasurgeon variability ranging between ± 1.05 and ± 2.82 MME/day/encounter. Our results suggest that there is intrainstitutional variability in opioid administration following primary TKA even after controlling for potential patient risk factors. TKA candidates may benefit from the implementation of a more rigid standardization of multimodal pain management protocols that can control pain while minimizing the opioid burden. This is a level of evidence III, retrospective observational analysis.

Opioid Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology Training Programs

OBJECTIVE

Our primary objective was to assess the current state of pain and opioid education in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) by performing a detailed review of the national educational curricula guiding OBGYN residency and fellowship training programs in the United States.

METHODS

From 2019 to 2020 we reviewed seven documents created to guide learning and structure educational training for OBGYN residency and fellowship programs in the United States: the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) Educational Objectives Core Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology, the 2016 Educational Objectives-Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, and the 2018 Guides to Learning in Complex Family Planning, Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology, Maternal Fetal Medicine, and Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Each document was reviewed by two authors to assess for items referring to pain or opioids.

RESULTS

The CREOG educational objectives, used to inform educational curricula for residency programs, were the most comprehensive, mentioning pain and/or opioid educational objectives the highest number of times and including the most categories. The CREOG document was followed by the Guides to Learning for Gynecologic Oncology and for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery. The Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Guide to Learning did not mention pain and/or opioids in the educational objectives.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies an opportunity for consistent and appropriate opioid and pain management education in OBGYN training.

Reducing Superfluous Opioid Prescribing Practices After Brain Surgery: It Is Time to Talk About Drugs

BACKGROUND

Opioids are prescribed routinely after cranial surgery despite a paucity of evidence regarding the optimal quantity needed. Overprescribing may adversely contribute to opioid abuse, chronic use, and diversion.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a system-wide campaign to reduce opioid prescribing excess while maintaining adequate analgesia.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing a craniotomy for tumor resection with home disposition before and after a 2-mo educational intervention was completed. The educational initiative was composed of directed didactic seminars targeting senior staff, residents, and advanced practice providers. Opioid prescribing patterns were then assessed for patients discharged before and after the intervention period.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients were discharged home following a craniotomy for tumor resection during the study period: 98 who underwent surgery prior to the educational interventions compared to 105 patients treated post-intervention. Following a 2-mo educational period, the quantity of opioids prescribed decreased by 52% (median morphine milligram equivalent per day [interquartile range], 32.1 [16.1, 64.3] vs 15.4 [0, 32.9], P < .001). Refill requests also decreased by 56% (17% vs 8%, P = .027) despite both groups having similar baseline characteristics. There was no increase in pain scores at outpatient follow-up (1.23 vs 0.85, P = .105).

CONCLUSION

A dramatic reduction in opioids prescribed was achieved without affecting refill requests, patient satisfaction, or perceived analgesia. The use of targeted didactic education to safely improve opioid prescribing following intracranial surgery uniquely highlights the ability of simple, evidence-based interventions to impact clinical decision making, lessen potential patient harm, and address national public health concerns.

The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Opioid and Pain Reduction: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background The opioid crisis has prompted surgeons to search for alternative postoperative methods of analgesia. Liposomal bupivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic formulation used for pain, potentially reducing opioid use. Evaluation of liposomal bupivacaine as a viable alternative for pain management is needed. The objective was to assess the efficacy of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of liposomal bupivacaine in postoperative pain management and opioid consumption. Material and Methods The authors extracted RCTs comparing liposomal bupivacaine versus placebo or active comparators for postoperative pain or opioid reduction from PubMED/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Exclusion criteria included nonhuman studies, non-RCTs, pooled studies, and inability to access full text. The following variables were abstracted: surgical specialty, number of subjects, pain and opioid outcomes, and authors' financial conflicts of interest. Results We identified 77 published RCTs, of which 63 studies with a total of 6770 subjects met inclusion criteria. Liposomal bupivacaine did not demonstrate significant pain relief compared to placebo or active agents in 74.58% of RCTs. Of the studies evaluating narcotic use, liposomal bupivacaine did not show a reduction in opioid consumption in 85.71% of RCTs. Liposomal bupivacaine, when compared to standard bupivacaine or another active agent, yielded no reduction in opioid use in 83.33% and 100.00% of studies, respectively. Clinical trials with a financial conflict of interest relating to the manufacturer of liposomal bupivacaine were significantly more likely to show pain relief (OR: 14.31 [95% CI, 2.8, 73.10], P = 0.0001) and decreased opioid consumption (OR: 12.35 [95% CI 1.40, 109.07], P = 0.0237). Of the 265 unpublished RCTs on ClinicalTrials.gov, 47.54% were withdrawn, terminated, suspended, or completed without study results available. Conclusions The efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine for providing superior postoperative pain control relative to placebo or another active agent is not supported by a majority of RCTs. Underreporting of trial results and bias due to underlying financial relationships amongst authors are two major concerns that should be considered when evaluating the available evidence.

"It's Like Learning by the Seat of Your Pants": Surgeons Lack Formal Training in Opioid Prescribing

OBJECTIVE

To determine the training surgical residents and faculty receive on opioid prescribing, and to identify opportunities for curricula development to fill training gaps.

DESIGN

We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews and surveys. After applying an overarching organizational framework, we used an iterative, team-based process to develop relevant inductive codes. We then performed thematic analyses to identify and catalogue critical domains related to surgeons' education about opioid prescribing.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Maximum variation purposive sampling was used to recruit general surgery residents and surgical faculty members.

RESULTS

We interviewed 21 attending surgeons and 20 surgical residents. Surgeons reported minimal formal training on pain management and prescribing opioids. A minority of individuals described receiving opioid training in the form of continuing medical education, intern boot camp sessions, and medical school classes. Participants compensated for the lack of formal training during residency by informally learning from senior residents, consulting pain specialists, and seeking external learning resources. Increased surgical experience was correlated with increased comfort with pain management. A majority of surgeons desired formal training. The most commonly requested educational resources were opioid prescribing guidelines for common operations and recommendations for treating chronic pain patients. Residents requested that training occur early in residency to maximize the benefits received. Based on these findings, we developed a conceptual framework to explain how surgeons learn to prescribe opioids and to highlight opportunities for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Although surgeons routinely prescribe opioids and desire education on opioids, a majority of them do not receive any training. Instituting formal educational programs is critical for improving opioid prescribing practices among surgeons.These programs should include standard prescribing guidelines and address management of acute postoperative pain in patients with chronic pain.

Emergency Medicine Intern Education for Best Practices in Opioid Prescribing

Introduction

Opioid exposure has been identified as a contributing factor to the opioid epidemic. Reducing patient exposure, by altering heavy opioid prescribing patterns but appropriately addressing patient pain, may represent one approach to combat this public health issue. Our goal was to create and implement an opioid education program for emergency medicine (EM) interns as a means of establishing foundational best practices for safer and more thoughtful prescribing.

Methods

This was a retrospective study at an academic, urban emergency department (ED) comparing ED and discharge opioid prescribing practices over a 12-week time period for two 14-intern EM classes (2016 and 2018) to evaluate an early opioid reduction education program. The education program included opioid prescribing guidelines for common ED disease states associated with moderate pain, clinician talking points, and electronic education modules, and was completed by EM interns in July/August 2018. Opioid prescription rates per shift were calculated and opioid prescribing best practices described. We used chi-squared analysis for comparisons between the 2016 and 2018 classes.

Results

Overall, ED and discharge opioid orders prescribed by EM interns were fewer in the 2018 class that received education compared with the 2016 class. ED opioid orders were reduced by 64% (800 vs 291 orders, rate per shift 1.8 vs 0.7 orders) and opioid discharge prescriptions by 75% (279 vs 70 prescriptions, rate per shift 0.7 vs 0.2 prescriptions). The rate of prescribing combination opioid products compared to opioids alone was decreased for ED orders (32% vs 16%, P < 0.01) and discharge prescriptions (91% vs 74%, P < 0.01) between the groups. Also, the median tablets per discharge prescription (14.5 vs 10) and total tablets prescribed (4305 vs 749) were reduced, P < 0.01. There were no differences in selection of opioid product or total morphine milligram equivalents prescribed when an opioid was used.

Conclusion

An opioid reduction education program targeting EM interns was associated with a reduction in opioid prescribing in the ED and at discharge. This may be an effective way to influence early prescribing patterns and best practices of EM interns.

Postoperative Analgesia Protocol: A Resident-Led Effort to Standardize Opioid Prescribing Patterns

OBJECTIVES

The combined impact of variable surgeon prescribing preferences and low resident prescribing comfort level can lead to significant disparity in opioid prescribing patterns for the same surgery in the same academic surgical practice. We report the results of a resident led initiative to standardize postoperative prescription practices within the Department of Otolaryngology at a single tertiary-care academic hospital in order to reduce overall opioid distribution.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Following approval by the Institutional Review Board, performed a retrospective review of 12 months before (July 2016-June 2017) and after (July 2017-June 2018) implementation of the Postoperative Analgesia Protocol, which included all adults undergoing tonsillectomy, septoplasty, thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, tympanoplasty, middle ear exploration, stapedectomy, and ossicular chain reconstruction.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty eight procedures met inclusion criteria. Following implementation, total morphine milligram equivalents decreased by 26% (P < .0001). The number of patients requiring opioid refills decreased by 49%, and morphine milligram equivalents received as refills decreased by 16% (P < .001). Thyroid and parathyroid surgery had the greatest reduction in morphine milligram equivalents prescribed (84%, P < .001), followed by septoplasty (30%, P = .001) and tonsillectomy (18%, P < .001). The number of patients receiving refills of opioid medications decreased for all procedures (tonsillectomy 54%; septoplasty 67%; thyroid/parathyroid surgery 80%, middle ear surgery 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

While every patient and surgery must be treated individually, this study demonstrates that a resident led standardization of pain control regimes can result in significant reductions in total quantity of opioids prescribed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Laryngoscope, 131:982-988, 2021.

Reduction in Prescribed Opioids after General Surgery Procedures at a Public Hospital

Overdose of opioids is the number one cause of accidental death in the United States, and surgeons are overprescribing these medications. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of implementing postoperative opioid prescribing guidelines for general surgery procedures at a public hospital, where patients have lower socioeconomic status, public insurance, and limited access to care. We implemented a quality improvement project, which included in-service training for surgical staff and distribution of standardized guidelines. An infographic for patients was created to facilitate education on postoperative pain management. Pre- and postintervention opioid prescriptions and emergency room visits were compared for patients undergoing common general surgery procedures (inguinal hernia repair, appendectomy, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy). The median number of narcotic pills prescribed significantly decreased from 30 (n = 64) to 15 (n = 63) after the intervention ( P < 0.0001). Morphine milligram equivalents decreased from a median [range] of 150 [20,600] to 90 [5,300] ( P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients with postoperative pain-related emergency department visits remained low (1.6%). Standardization of postoperative opioid prescription practices was successfully implemented at a public hospital without an increase in the number of emergency room visits for pain.

Post-discharge opioid prescribing after laparoscopic appendicectomy and cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Opioid over-prescription following surgery is a significant public health issue in most developed countries. Multiple studies have been conducted in the USA demonstrating and investigating the issue; however, there is a lack of literature addressing this topic in the Australian setting. The aim of this study is to review prescribing practices at an Australian tertiary referral hospital on discharge in patients having undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or laparoscopic appendicetomy (LA). Additionally, to identify potential factors which influence medical officer prescribing practices.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study on opioid prescribing practice on all patients who underwent LC or LA over a 12-month period at an Australian tertiary referral hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 435 patients (223 LC, 214 LA) were prescribed a mean opioid dose on discharge of 25 oral morphine milli-equivalents (range 0-180 morphine milli-equivalents). Less opioids were prescribed following elective procedures (42% versus 10%, P < 0.001). There is a downward trend of opioid prescribing on discharge as the Junior Medical Officer clinical year progresses (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a lower rate of opiate prescription on discharge for LC and LA in an Australian setting when compared to the US data. There is a wide diversity of prescribing demonstrated. This indicates the need for better training of opioid prescribers to reduce over-prescribing.

The Effect of the Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention Act on Opiate Prescription Practices Within the Orthopaedic Surgery Department of an Academic Medical Center

In 2017, the Department of Health and Human Service declared a public health emergency known as the opioid crisis. In North Carolina, the “Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention Act of 2017” (STOP Act) went into effect on January 1, 2018, seeking to strengthen oversight over opioid prescriptions. Among other mandates, this legislation limited the duration of the initial prescription to 5 or 7 days. The purpose of this study was to compare narcotic prescription practices within the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at an academic medical center before and after the enactment of the STOP Act. We hypothesized that there would be a statistically significant decrease in the amount of postoperative opioids prescribed after the STOP Act and that this decrease would be consistent across all types of providers in the Orthopaedic Surgery Department.

Opioid utilization is minimal after outpatient pediatric urologic surgery

INTRODUCTION

There are no guidelines for opioid use after pediatric urologic surgery, and it is unknown to what extent prescriptions written for these patients may be contributing to the opioid epidemic in the United States. We sought to characterize opioid utilization in a prospective fashion following outpatient pediatric urologic surgery at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After obtainingapproval from the Institutional Review Board, we prospectively recruited pediatric patients undergoing outpatient urologic surgery. All patients and families were counseled regarding appropriate use of over-the-counter pain medications as first-line agents, with opioids for breakthrough pain only. All patients received an opioid prescription (ORx), which we attempted to standardize to 10 doses. Parents were provided with a log for keeping track of pain medication administration. Postoperative surveys were sent at various time points after surgery to assess utilization of pain medications at home. We quantified unused opioids prescribed and evaluated factors potentially associated with opioid use.

RESULTS

Two hundred and two patients were recruited. All patients were male, with a median age of 2.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 5.5, range 0.5-17.9 years). One hundred and fifty-four children underwent penile surgery, 22 underwent scrotal surgery, and 27 underwent inguinal surgery. Nearly half of our study patients were black, 33.2% were white, 12.9% were Latino, and 4.0% were Asian. The median number of doses prescribed was 10 (IQR 0, range 4.0-20.8). Postoperative surveys were completed by 80.7% of study patients. The median number of opioid doses used was 0 (IQR 2), whereas the mean was 1.28 (standard deviation (SD) 1.98). None of the factors evaluated (including patient age, surgery type, perioperative pain management techniques, length of surgery, and insurance type) were associated with the amount of opioid used at home after surgery, as utilization was equally low across all groups.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Ensuring adequate postoperative pain control for children is critical, yet it is also important to minimize excess ORx. We found that the majority of pediatric patients used 0-2 doses of prescription pain medication after discharge following outpatient urologic surgery, representing a small percentage of the total prescribed amount. Low utilization was seen irrespective of patient age, procedure, and perioperative factors. These data can be used to guide perioperative patient and family counseling and to guide future efforts to standardize ORx following outpatient pediatric urologic surgery.

Pain management and prescribing practices in otolaryngology residency programs

PURPOSE

To understand the knowledge, competency and influencing factors regarding postoperative opioid prescribing practices among Otolaryngology Residents. To understand the educational background and resources regarding pain management and opioid prescribing among Otolaryngology Residency Programs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to Otolaryngology residents in the greater New York City area. Subjects reported their preferred pain management prescription for eight common otolaryngology surgeries. Questions addressed opioid and non-opioid prescribing influences, use/knowledge of pain management resources, and prior opioid prescribing education (OPE). An anonymous survey was distributed to US Otolaryngology Program Directors addressing resident prescribing influences and OPE in residency training programs.

RESULTS

Thirty-Five residents and fifteen PDs participated. Resident opioid prescribing was widely variable with averages ranging from 3.8 to 21.1 narcotic pills among eight standard otolaryngology surgeries. Attending/senior preference was believed to largely influence resident prescribing habits among residents (3.66, ±6.68), and PDs (4.73, ±0.46). Only 20% of programs had formal OPE in place, consistent with the 65.71% of residents who reported no prior OPE.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A large inconsistency in Otolaryngology resident postoperative pain management exists, despite their responsibility to provide analgesic therapy. The lack of formal OPE programs in US Otolaryngology residency programs may lead to outside factors unrelated to surgery influencing these prescribing practices. This brings light to the need of Otolaryngology Resident OPE to assist in standardizing prescribing practices, provide meaningful patient education on opioid use and disposal and educate residents on the risk assessment tools offered to provide the most appropriate and safe analgesic therapy to patients.

Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia After Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy

OBJECTIVES

Multimodal analgesia (MMA) may reduce opioid use among children who are hospitalized, and may contribute toward enhanced recovery after selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for patients with spasticity in pediatric cerebral palsy. In this retrospective cohort study, we assess an MMA protocol consisting of scheduled nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug doses (ketorolac or ibuprofen), alternating with scheduled acetaminophen and diazepam doses, with as-needed opioids. It was hypothesized that protocol use would be associated with reductions in opioid requirements and other clinical improvements.

METHODS

Data were obtained for 52 patients undergoing SDR at an academic tertiary care pediatric hospital (2012-2017, with the protocol implemented in 2014). Using a retrospective cohort design, we compared outcomes between protocol and nonprotocol patients, employing both univariate t test and Wilcoxon rank test comparisons as well as multivariable regression methods. The primary outcome was total as-needed opioid requirements over postoperative days (PODs) 0 to 2, measured in oral morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram. Additional outcomes included antiemetic medication doses, discharge opioid prescriptions, total direct cost, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Twelve patients received the MMA protocol, and 40 patients did not. POD-0 MMA initiation was independently associated with a reduction of 0.14 morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram in mean opioid requirements over PODs 0 to 2 in the multiple regression analysis (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.28; P = .04). No statistically significant differences were demonstrated in doses of antiemetic medications, discharge opioid prescriptions, total direct cost, and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

This MMA protocol may help reduce opioid use after SDR. Improving protocol implementation in a prospective, multisite study will help elucidate further MMA effects on pain, costs, and recovery.

Minimizing Opioid Prescribing in Surgery (MOPiS) Initiative: An Analysis of Implementation Barriers

BACKGROUND

The United States is in the midst of an opioid epidemic. In response, our institution developed the Minimizing Opioid Prescribing in Surgery (MOPiS) initiative. MOPiS is a multicomponent intervention including: (1) patient education on opioid safety and pain management expectations; (2) clinician education on safe opioid prescribing; (3) prescribing data feedback; (4) patient risk screening to assess for addictive behavior; and (5) optimizations to the electronic health record (EHR). We conducted a preintervention formative evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted 22 semistructured interviews with key stakeholders (surgeons, nurses, pharmacists, and administrators) at six hospitals within a single health care system. Interviewees were asked about perceived barriers and facilitators to the components of the intervention. Responses were analyzed to identify common themes using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

RESULTS

We identified common themes of potential implementation barriers and classified them under 12 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains and three intervention domains. Time and resource constraints (needs and resources), the modality of educational material (design quality and packaging), and prescribers' concern for patient satisfaction scores (external policy and incentives) were identified as the most significant structural barriers. Resident physicians, pharmacists, and pain specialists were identified as potential key facilitating actors to the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified specific barriers to successful implementation of an opioid reduction initiative in a surgical setting. In our MOPiS initiative, a preintervention formative evaluation enabled the design of strategies that will overcome implementation barriers specific to the components of our initiative.

Fighting Back: Institutional Strategies to Combat the Opioid Epidemic: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Current research on opioid use within orthopedic surgery has focused on efforts to identify patients at risk for chronic opioid use. Studies addressing prevention of opioid misuse related to orthopedic care are lacking. Evidence-based interventions to reduce the reliance on opioids for post-operative pain relief will be a key component of any comprehensive institutional opioid policy.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate institutional strategies that reduce opioid administration or consumption after orthopedic surgery.

METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, a search was conducted of the PubMed database for English-language articles that analyzed interventions by physicians, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, or other hospital staff to reduce post-operative opioid use or narcotic prescription amounts after surgery. Studies that contained objective outcome measures (i.e., no expert opinion articles) were selected. Investigations on the effect of pharmacologic adjuvants, cryotherapy, or regional nerve blockades on opioid use were excluded.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 6598 titles, of which 13 full-text articles were ultimately selected for inclusion in this systematic review. The review identified two major categories of interventions-patient-focused and provider-focused (e.g., physicians, nurses, physical therapists, pharmacists). Formal patient education programs were most effective in reducing opioid use. On the provider side, prescribing guidelines appear to decrease the overall number of pills prescribed, often without changes in patient satisfaction or requests for refills.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers are just beginning to establish the most effective ways for institutions to reduce opioid use and promote responsible post-operative prescribing. Institutional prescribing guidelines, standardized bedside pain-management programs, and formal patient education curriculums are all evidence-based interventions that can achieve these goals. The available research also supports an interprofessional approach in any institutional opioid-reduction strategy.