Utilization and effectiveness of multimodal discharge analgesia for postoperative pain management

Discharge Opioid Prescription and Consumption Following Surgery: The POPCORN Observational Study

Background

Few studies have evaluated opioid consumption after various inpatient surgical procedures.

Objectives

To describe opioid prescription patterns and to characterize patient-reported use of opioids after surgery.

Methods

This single-centre prospective observational study was conducted between February and October 2021 at the Jewish General Hospital in Montréal, Quebec. Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent a surgical procedure, were hospitalized for 24 hours or longer after the procedure, and had an opioid prescription at the time of discharge were included. Data were collected for the quantity of opioids prescribed, as documented in hospital records, and the quantity consumed, as reported by participants. Various potential predictors of opioid consumption were explored, and data were also collected on patients' use of non-opioid coanalgesia, scores on the Numeric Rating Scale for pain, opioid renewal requests, and proper opioid disposal during the 30-day follow-up period.

Results

A total of 150 participants completed the study. The median dose prescribed was 10 opioid pills (75.0 morphine milligram equivalents). By the end of the follow-up period, a median of 1 pill (7.5 morphine milligram equivalents) had been consumed from the total amount in the discharge prescription. Overall, 66 participants (44.0%) did not consume any of the opioids prescribed at discharge. Of the total number of pills prescribed, 58.2% (1193/2050) were unused, and 7.0% (5/71) of participants with unused pills disposed of them properly.

Conclusions

Following discharge from hospital, postoperative patients consumed a median proportion of only 10% of prescribed opioid pills. More than half of all prescribed pills were unused. Protocols implementing specific prescribing strategies warrant further investigation to evaluate their potential impact on opioid prescription and consumption.

Finding new analgesics: Computational pharmacology faces drug discovery challenges

Despite the worldwide prevalence and huge burden of pain, pain is an undertreated phenomenon. Currently used analgesics have several limitations regarding their efficacy and safety. The discovery of analgesics possessing a novel mechanism of action has faced multiple challenges, including a limited understanding of biological processes underpinning pain and analgesia and poor animal-to-human translation. Computational pharmacology is currently employed to face these challenges. In this review, we discuss the theory, methods, and applications of computational pharmacology in pain research. Computational pharmacology encompasses a wide variety of theoretical concepts and practical methodological approaches, with the overall aim of gaining biological insight through data acquisition and analysis. Data are acquired from patients or animal models with pain or analgesic treatment, at different levels of biological organization (molecular, cellular, physiological, and behavioral). Distinct methodological algorithms can then be used to analyze and integrate data. This helps to facilitate the identification of biological molecules and processes associated with pain phenotype, build quantitative models of pain signaling, and extract translatable features between humans and animals. However, computational pharmacology has several limitations, and its predictions can provide false positive and negative findings. Therefore, computational predictions are required to be validated experimentally before drawing solid conclusions. In this review, we discuss several case study examples of combining and integrating computational tools with experimental pain research tools to meet drug discovery challenges.

Rates and risk factors for persistent opioid use after cardiothoracic surgery: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study's aim was to estimate potential risk factors for persistent opioid use after cardiothoracic surgery.

METHODS

This study included participants in the McGill University Health Centre clinical trial (2014 to 2016). Provincial medical services, prescription claims, and medical charts data were linked. Persistent opioid use was defined as an initial peri-operative opioid dispensation followed by an opioid dispensation between 91 and 180 days postdischarge. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to assess factors associated with persistent opioid use.

RESULTS

A cohort of 815 patients (mean age: 68.9 [standard deviation = 8.9]) was assembled, of which 8.2% became persistent opioid users. Factors such as higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-10.6), history of diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-3.4), substance and alcohol abuse (adjusted hazard ratio: 16.3, 95% confidence interval: 5.3-49.5), and radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-4.1) were associated with a higher hazard of persistent opioid use. Previous opioid use (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.0-2.8), daily peri-operative opioid dose (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.7), having an opioid dispensation 30 days pre-admission (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-2.8), and pre-admission analgesic use (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-2.8), were also associated with an increased hazard of persistent use. Being prescribed multimodal analgesia at discharge (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.92) was associated with a 46% decreased hazard of developing persistent opioid use.

CONCLUSION

Multiple patient- and medication-related characteristics were associated with an increased hazard of persistent opioid use.

A scoping review on the availability and utilization of essential opioid analgesics in Sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND

Management of acute, post-operative, and chronic pain requires access to and availability of opioids. While often oversupplied in high-income countries, significant shortages exist in low- and middle-income countries. We conducted a scoping review on availability and usage of opioids in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

METHODS

The five-stage approach of Arksey and O'Malley (2005) was used. MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were search and results categorized into themes: 1) Local/regional availability and supply, 2) Consumption patterns, 3) Legislation and policy, 4) Costs and financing, 5) Knowledge and cultural beliefs, and 6) Education and training.

RESULTS

6923 studies were identified from which 69 (1%) met inclusion criteria. Five key findings were: 1) Significant shortages exist, especially in rural areas, 2) Non-opioid analgesics commonly used as first-line acute pain management, 3) Barriers to market entry and bureaucratic processes prevent local production, 4) Significant knowledge gaps/myths exist amongst healthcare practitioners on opioid use, and 5) Continuous education and short courses will be critical.

CONCLUSIONS

Major challenges significantly limit availability and utilization of essential opioids in SSA. Reforms needed to upscale training and education, increase uptake by professionals, and increase market entry.

A retrospective analysis of pain and opioid usage in head and neck free flap reconstruction

Objectives

Investigate opioid usage and postoperative pain in patients undergoing head and neck free flap surgery.

Methods

A retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction at two academic centers was performed. Data captured included demographics, postoperative inpatient pain, pain at postoperative visits, morphine equivalent doses (MEDs) administration, medication history, and comorbidities. Data were analyzed using regression models, χ 2 tests, and student's t-tests.

Results

Seventy-three percent of patients were discharged with opioid medication, with over half (53.4%) continuing to take opioids at their second postoperative visit, and over one-third (34.2%) continuing to take them around 4-month postoperatively. One out of every five (20.3%) opioid-naïve patients chronically took opioids postoperatively. There was a poor association between inpatient postoperative pain scores and daily MEDs administered (R 2 = 0.13, 0.17, and 0.22 in postoperative Days 3, 5, and 7, respectively). Neither preoperative radiotherapy nor postoperative complications were associated with an increase in opioid usage.

Conclusions

For patients undergoing head and neck free flap operations, opioid medications are commonly used for postoperative analgesia. This practice may increase the chance an opioid-naïve patient uses opioids chronically. We found a poor association between MEDs administered and patient-reported pain scores, which suggests that standardized protocols aimed at optimizing analgesia while reducing opioid administration may be warranted. Level of Evidence: 3 (Retrospective cohort study).

Preoperative Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use: Influence on Abdominal Surgical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Preoperative opioid use has shown association with worse outcomes after surgery. However, little is known about the effect of preoperative benzodiazepines with and without opioids. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative substance use on outcomes after abdominal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing abdominal operations including ventral hernia, colectomy, hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, nephrectomy, and hiatal hernia were identified in an opioid surgical steward program by a regional NSQIP consortium between 2019 and 2021. American College of Surgeons NSQIP data were linked with custom substance use variables created by the collaborative. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for 30-day outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 4,439 patients, 64% (n = 2,847) were women, with a median age of 56 years. The most common operations performed were hysterectomy (22%), ventral hernia repair (22%), and colectomy (21%). Preoperative opioid use was present in 11% of patients (n = 472), 10% (n = 449) were on benzodiazepines, and 2.3% (n = 104) were on both. Serious morbidity was significantly (p < 0.001) increased in patients on preoperative opioids (16% vs 7.9%) and benzodiazepines (14% vs 8.3%) compared with their naïve counterpart and this effect was amplified in patients on both substances (20% vs 7.5%). Multivariable regression analyses reveal that preoperative substance use is an independent risk factor (p < 0.01) for overall morbidity and serious morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative opioid and benzodiazepine use are independent risk factors that contribute to postoperative morbidity. This influence on surgical outcomes is exacerbated when patients are on both substances.

Tricyclic Antidepressants in Nociceptive and Neuropathic Pain: A Review of Their Analgesic Properties in Combination With Opioids

Objectives: To determine the efficacy and safety of commonly prescribed tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) as analgesics for nociceptive and neuropathic pain in combination with opioids. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature review was conducted with the assistance of a medical reference librarian on PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science using the following search terminology: "Amitriptyline" OR "Doxepin" OR "Desipramine" OR "Imipramine" OR "Nortriptyline" OR "Clomipramine" OR "Trimipramine" AND "Analgesia." Reports of adult patients who received any TCA as an adjunctive analgesic to opioids were included. Study Selection and Data Extraction: A total of 293 results were obtained from the initial database inquiries, following which exclusion criteria were applied and 6 articles were included in this review. Three of the reports detailed the use of TCAs in the perioperative setting, whereas the remaining 3 evaluated their effect on different etiologies of neuropathic pain. Data Synthesis: Tricyclic antidepressants were found to have modest, yet not insignificant, independent analgesic properties, although the ability to provide pain relief was relegated to a select few agents. Desipramine has the most data available for use in nociceptive, postoperative pain through its ability to potentiate and prolong the analgesic effects of opioids and was not associated with adverse drug effects. Conclusions: The efficacy of TCAs for neuropathic pain was not corroborated by this review, and the anticholinergic adverse effects associated with this drug class were found to be significant. Further research is needed to quantify the efficacy of TCAs in the management of nociceptive pain.

Acute Pain Management Pearls: A Focused Review for the Hospital Clinician

Acute pain management is a challenging area encountered by inpatient clinicians every day. While patient care is increasingly complex and costly in this realm, the availability of applicable specialists is waning. This narrative review seeks to support diverse hospital-based healthcare providers in refining and updating their acute pain management knowledge base through clinical pearls and point-of-care resources. Practical guidance is provided for the design and adjustment of inpatient multimodal analgesic regimens, including conventional and burgeoning non-opioid and opioid therapies. The importance of customized care plans for patients with preexisting opioid tolerance, chronic pain, or opioid use disorder is emphasized, and current recommendations for inpatient management of associated chronic therapies are discussed. References to best available guidelines and literature are offered for further exploration. Improved clinician attention and more developed skill sets related to acute pain management could significantly benefit hospitalized patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization.

Nursing Resources Linked to Postsurgical Outcomes for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

To determine whether better nursing resources (ie, nurse education, staffing, work environment) are each associated with improved postsurgical outcomes for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD).

Opioid2MME: Standardizing opioid prescriptions to morphine milligram equivalents from electronic health records

BACKGROUND

The national increase in opioid use and misuse has become a public health crisis in the U.S. To tackle this crisis, the systematic evaluation and monitoring of opioid prescribing patterns is necessary. Thus, opioid prescriptions from electronic health records (EHRs) must be standardized to morphine milligram equivalent (MME) to facilitate monitoring and surveillance. While most studies report MMEs to describe opioid prescribing patterns, there is a lack of transparency regarding their data pre-processing and conversion processes for replication or comparison purposes.

METHODS

In this work, we developed Opioid2MME, a SQL-based open-source framework, to convert opioid prescriptions to MMEs using EHR prescription data. The MME conversions were validated internally using F-measures through manual chart review; were compared with two existing tools, as MedEx and MedXN; and the framework was tested in an external academic EHR system.

RESULTS

We identified 232,913 prescriptions for 49,060 unique patients in the EHRs, 2008-2019. We manually annotated a sample of prescriptions to assess the performance of the framework. The internal evaluation for medication information extraction achieved F-measures from 0.98 to 1.00 for each piece of the extracted information, outperforming MedEx and MedXN (F-Scores 0.98 and 0.94, respectively). MME values in the internal EHR system obtained a F-measure of 0.97 and identified 3% of the data as outliers and 7% missing values. The MME conversion in the external EHR system obtained 78.3% agreement between the MME values obtained with the development site.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated that the framework is replicable and capable of converting opioid prescriptions to MMEs across different medical institutions. In summary, this work sets the groundwork for the systematic evaluation and monitoring of opioid prescribing patterns across healthcare systems.

Risk factors of chronic opioid use after surgical procedures in noncancer patients: A nationwide case-control study

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an indication for opioid prescription in noncancer patients, and chronic use of opioids is associated with overdose and abuse.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with chronic opioid use (COU) following surgery among noncancer patients.

DESIGN

A nationwide case-control study.

SETTING

Retrospective analysis of the annual national patient sample data from 2012 to 2018 in South Korea.

PATIENTS

Adults without cancer who had undergone surgery and received noninjectable opioids during hospital stay.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

COU during 3 months following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 15 543 participants were included, and the prevalence overall and in opioid-naïve users was 8.1 and 5.7%, respectively. Prior exposure patterns of opioids [intermittent user, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.35; 95% CI, 2.00 to 2.77, and continuous user, aOR 8.58; 95% CI, 6.54 to 11.24] and concomitant use of benzodiazepine (in continuous user, aOR 18.60; 95% CI 11.70 to 29.55) were strongly associated with COU compared with naïve users. Morphine milligram equivalent, type of opioid strength at discharge and prescription of nonopioid analgesics at discharge were also associated with COU. Compared with minor surgery, knee (aOR 1.49; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.89), spine (aOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.33 to 2.06) and shoulder (aOR 2.54; 95% CI 1.97 to 3.27) procedures showed a significantly positive association with COU. Sensitivity analysis in opioid-naïve patients showed similar results.

CONCLUSION

About 8.1% of noncancer patients who had undergone surgery and were prescribed noninjectable opioids became chronic opioid users in Korea. Identified risk factors could be used to derive strategies for safe opioid use in noncancer patients in the future.

Gaps in standardized postoperative pain management quality measures: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was an assessment of availability postoperative pain management quality measures and National Quality Forum-endorsed measures. Postoperative pain is an important clinical timepoint because poor pain control can lead to patient suffering, chronic opiate use, and/or chronic pain. Quality measures can guide best practices, but it is unclear whether there are measures for managing pain after surgery.

METHODS

The National Quality Forum Quality Positioning System, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Indicators, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Measures Inventory Tool databases were searched in November 2019. We conducted a systematic literature review to further identify quality measures in research publications, clinical practice guidelines, and gray literature for the period between March 11, 2015 and March 11, 2020.

RESULTS

Our systematic review yielded 1,328 publications, of which 206 were pertinent. Nineteen pain management quality measures were identified from the quality measure databases, and 5 were endorsed by National Quality Forum. The National Quality Forum measures were not specific to postoperative pain management. Three of the non-endorsed measures were specific to postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

The dearth of published postoperative pain management quality measures, especially National Quality Forum-endorsed measures, highlights the need for more rigorous evidence and widely endorsed postoperative pain quality measures to guide best practices.

Preoperative Opioid Use and Readmissions Following Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between preoperative opioid exposure and readmissions following common surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Preoperative opioid use is common, but its effect on opioid-related, pain-related, respiratory-related, and all-cause readmissions following surgery is unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed claims data from a 20% national Medicare sample of patients ages ≥ 65 with Medicare Part D claims undergoing surgery between January 1, 2009 and November 30, 2016. We grouped patients by the dose, duration, recency, and continuity of preoperative opioid prescription fills. We used logistic regression to examine the association between prior opioid exposure and 30-day readmissions, adjusted for patient risk factors and procedure type.

RESULTS

Of 373,991 patients, 168,579 (45%) filled a preoperative opioid prescription within 12 months of surgery, ranging from minimal to chronic high use. Preoperative opioid exposure was associated with higher rate of opioid-related readmissions, compared with naive patients [low: aOR=1.63, 95% CI=1.26-2.12; high: aOR=3.70, 95% CI=2.71-5.04]. Preoperative opioid exposure was also associated with higher risk of pain-related readmissions [low: aOR=1.27, 95% CI=1.23-1.32; high: aOR=1.62, 95% CI=1.53-1.71] and respiratory-related readmissions [low: aOR=1.10, 95% CI=1.05-1.16; high: aOR=1.44, 95% CI=1.34-1.55]. Low, moderate, and high chronic preoperative opioid exposures were predictive of all-cause readmissions (low: OR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.06-1.12); high: OR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.18-1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher levels of preoperative opioid exposure are associated with increased risk of readmissions after surgery. These findings emphasize the importance of screening patients for preoperative opioid exposure and creating risk mitigation strategies for patients.

Synergism between oral paracetamol and nefopam in a murine model of postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

The use of paracetamol or nefopam for postoperative pain control is limited by the need of high doses associated with unwanted effects. Previous works suggest positive interactions between both compounds that may be exploited to obtain potentiation of antinociception.

METHODS

Mechanical and heat antinociception induced by oral doses of paracetamol, nefopam or their combination was studied by isobolographic analysis in a murine model of postsurgical pain. The effective doses that produced 50% antinociception (ED₅₀ ) were calculated from the log dose-response curves for each compound. Subsequently, the effects of ED_8.7 s, ED_12.5 s, ED_17.5 s and ED₃₅ s of nefopam and paracetamol combined were assessed.

RESULTS

Oral paracetamol induced dose-dependent relief of postoperative sensitivity and showed higher efficacy reducing mechanical hypersensitivity (ED₅₀ 177.3 ± 15.4 mg/kg) than heat hyperalgesia (ED₅₀ 278.6 ± 43 mg/kg). Oral nefopam induced dose-dependent antinociception with similar efficacy for mechanical and heat hypersensitivity (ED₅₀ s 5.42 ± 0.81 vs. 5.83 ± 0.72). Combinations of increasing isoeffective doses revealed that combined ED_17.5 s (85.76 mg/kg paracetamol and 1.9 mg/kg nefopam) and ED₃₅ s (132.67 mg/kg and 3.73 mg/kg) showed synergistic effects leading to 75% and 90% mechanical antinociception, respectively. These mixtures were defined by interaction indexes of 0.43 and 0.41 and ratios 45:1 and 35:1 paracetamol:nefopam, respectively. The same combinations showed additive effects for the inhibition of incisional thermal hyperalgesia.

CONCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS

This work describes a synergistic antinociceptive interaction between low doses of nefopam and paracetamol for the treatment of postoperative hypersensitivity to peripheral stimuli. The promising results obtained on reflexive nociceptive responses of young male mice subjected to plantar surgery highlight the interest of further research evaluating the effects of this mixture on the affective-motivational component of pain and in females and additional age groups. Confirmation of pain-relieving efficacy and safety of this oral combination clinically available in European and Asian countries could provide a useful tool for postsurgical pain management.

SIGNIFICANCE

Early postoperative pain is currently undertreated and has been recognized as a relevant source of chronic postsurgical pain. Oral efficient treatments could facilitate fast-track surgeries and patient recovery at home. Here, we identify in a mouse model of postoperative pain a potent synergistic oral combination consisting of low paracetamol and nefopam doses that provides relief of postsurgical hypersensitivity to mechanical and thermal stimuli. Oral multimodal paracetamol-nefopam mixtures represent a potential clinically available pharmacological strategy for the relief of incisional sensitivity and the promotion of patient recovery.

Pain Management in Clinical Practice Research Using Electronic Health Records

BACKGROUND

The use of electronic health record (EHR) systems encourages and facilitates the use of data for the development and surveillance of quality indicators, including pain management.

AIM

to conduct an integrative review on pain management research using data extracted from EHR in order to synthesize and analyze the following elements: pain management (assessments, interventions, and outcomes) and study results with potential clinical implications, data source, clinical sample characteristics, and method description.

DESIGN

An integrative review of the literature was undertaken to identify exemplars of scientific research studies that explore pain management using data from EHR, using Cooper's framework.

RESULTS

Our search of 1,061 records from PubMed, Scopus, and Cinahl was narrowed down to 28 eligible articles to be analyzed.

CONCLUSION

Results of this integrative review will make a critical contribution, assisting others in developing research proposals and sound research methods, as well as providing an overview of such studies over the past 10 years. Through this review it is therefore possible to guide new research on clinical pain management using EHR.

Impact of Pharmacy-Led Education Regarding Multimodal Acute Pain Management on Medical Residents’ Prescribing of Opioids

Background:

Opioids are commonly prescribed for patients with acute pain. Guidelines recommend multimodal regimens to synergistically treat pain and provide enhanced recovery.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to assess changes in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed by internal medicine (IM) medical residents for acute pain after a series of pharmacist-led in-services on prescribing multimodal pain regimens.

Methods:

Two hundred patients were assessed for changes in oral MMEs prescribed prior to and after a 3-part in-service series on multimodal pain management. Inclusion criteria included those who were admitted with acute pain managed by an IM resident, were prescribed analgesic(s), and were 18 years and older. Patients excluded were those admitted into the intensive care unit, receiving chronic pain management, obstetric patients, cancer patients, patients with previous opioid exposure, and patients using patient-controlled analgesia. The study outcomes were change in oral MMEs prescribed by medical residents for acute pain after the in-services, multimodal regimen use, appropriate analgesics prescribed, prescribing a bowel regimen if the patient was prescribed an opioid, and prescribers’ survey results.

Results:

A total of 6358.6 oral MMEs were prescribed before and 5297 oral MMEs were prescribed after the in-services. Fifty-eight patients before and 70 patients after the in-services were prescribed a multimodal regimen. Ten patients before and 18 patients after the in-services were given a bowel regimen. Eighty percent of the patients before and 85% after the in-services had an appropriate pain scale for their prescriptions. IM medical resident and student survey scores improved after each in-service.

Conclusion:

An educational series on multimodal regimens for acute pain management decreased opioid prescription and increased the use of multimodal regimens for acute pain.

Review of nonopioid multimodal analgesia for surgical and trauma patients

Purpose

Pain is a frequent finding in surgical and trauma patients, and effective pain control remains a common challenge in the hospital setting. Opioids have traditionally been the foundation of pain management; however, these agents are associated with various adverse effects and risks of dependence and diversion.

Summary

In response to the rising national opioid epidemic and the various risks associated with opioid use, multimodal pain management through use of nonopioid analgesics such as acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, α 2 agonists, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, skeletal muscle relaxants, sodium channel blockers, and local anesthetics has gained popularity recently. Multimodal analgesia has synergistic therapeutic effects and can decrease adverse effects by enabling use of lower doses of each agent in the multimodal regimen. This review discusses properties of the various nonopioid analgesics and encourages pharmacists to play an active role in the selection, initiation, and dose-titration of multimodal analgesia. The choice of nonopioid agents should be based on patient comorbidities, hemodynamic stability, and the agents’ respective adverse effect profiles. A multidisciplinary plan for management of pain should be formulated during transitions of care and is an area of opportunity for pharmacists to improve patient care.

Conclusion

Multimodal analgesia effectively treats pain while decreasing adverse effects. There is mounting evidence to support use of this strategy to decrease opioid use. As medication experts, pharmacists can play a key role in the selection, initiation, and dose-titration of analgesic agents based on patient-specific factors.

Perioperative opioid use and pain-related outcomes in the Veterans Health Administration

Understanding variation in perioperative opioid exposure and its effect on patients' outcomes is critical for pain management. This study characterized perioperative exposure to morphine and its association with postoperative pain and 30-day readmissions. We utilized nationwide Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) data on four high-volume surgical procedures, 2007-2014. We identified 235,239 Veterans undergoing orthopedic, general, or vascular surgery; 5.4% high trajectories (116.1 OME/Day), 53.2% medium trajectories (39.7 OME/Day), and 41.4% low trajectories (19.1 OME/Day). Modeled estimates suggest that patients in the high OME group had higher risk of a pain-related readmission (OR: 1.59; CI: 1.39, 1.83) compared to the low OME trajectory. Yet when stratified by pain trajectory, patients with high pain and high OME had lower risk of a pain-related readmission compared to patients in the high pain low OME group (OR: 0.76, CI: 0.62, 0.94). In conclusion, patients receiving high perioperative OME are more likely to return to care for pain-related problems. This study highlights opportunities to reduce the amount of prescriptions opioids in the communities.

Cross-Cultural Comparison of Nonopioid and Multimodal Analgesic Prescribing in Orthopaedic Trauma

BACKGROUND

After musculoskeletal injury, US providers prescribe opioids more frequently and at higher dosages than prescribers in the Netherlands and Haiti; however, the extent of variation in nonopioid analgesic prescribing is unknown. The aim of our study was to evaluate how nonopioid prescribing by orthopaedic residents varies by geographic context.

METHODS

Orthopaedic residents in three countries in which residents are the primary prescribers of postoperative analgesia in academic medical centers (Haiti, the Netherlands, and the United States) responded to surveys using vignette-based musculoskeletal trauma case scenarios. The residents chose which medications they would prescribe for postdischarge analgesia. We quantified the likelihood and dose of acetaminophen or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription. We constructed multivariable regressions with generalized estimating equations to describe differences in nonopiate prescription according to country, the resident's sex and training year, and the injury site and age in the test cases.

RESULTS

Compared with residents from the United States, residents from Haiti were more likely to prescribe nonopioids (odds ratio, 3.22 [confidence interval, 1.94 to 5.34], P < 0.0001) and residents from the Netherlands nearly always prescribed nonopioids. Of those cases where one or more opioid was prescribed, providers also prescribed a nonopioid (acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) in 345/603 (57.2%) of US, 152/152 (100%) of Dutch, and 69/97 (71.1%) of Haitian cases (Fisher exact test P value <0.0001). Finally, providers prescribed only nonopioids for pain control in 3/348 (0.86%) of US, 32/184 (17.4%) of Dutch, and 107/176 (60.8%) of Haitian cases (Fisher exact test P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing multimodal analgesic patterns, US prescribers prescribed nonopioid analgesics less frequently than prescribers in two other countries, one low income and one high income, either in isolation or in conjunction with opioids.

Leveraging Digital Data to Inform and Improve Quality Cancer Care

BACKGROUND

Efficient capture of routine clinical care and patient outcomes is needed at a population-level, as is evidence on important treatment-related side effects and their effect on well-being and clinical outcomes. The increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR) offers new opportunities to generate population-level patient-centered evidence on oncologic care that can better guide treatment decisions and patient-valued care.

METHODS

This study includes patients seeking care at an academic medical center, 2008 to 2018. Digital data sources are combined to address missingness, inaccuracy, and noise common to EHR data. Clinical concepts were identified and extracted from EHR unstructured data using natural language processing (NLP) and machine/deep learning techniques. All models are trained, tested, and validated on independent data samples using standard metrics.

RESULTS

We provide use cases for using EHR data to assess guideline adherence and quality measurements among patients with cancer. Pretreatment assessment was evaluated by guideline adherence and quality metrics for cancer staging metrics. Our studies in perioperative quality focused on medications administered and guideline adherence. Patient outcomes included treatment-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced technologies applied to EHRs present opportunities to advance population-level quality assessment, to learn from routinely collected clinical data for personalized treatment guidelines, and to augment epidemiologic and population health studies. The effective use of digital data can inform patient-valued care, quality initiatives, and policy guidelines.

IMPACT

A comprehensive set of health data analyzed with advanced technologies results in a unique resource that facilitates wide-ranging, innovative, and impactful research on prostate cancer. This work demonstrates new ways to use the EHRs and technology to advance epidemiologic studies and benefit oncologic care.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Modernizing Population Science."

Assessment of Persistent and Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use Among Patients Undergoing Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Importance

Although the development of persistent opioid use after surgical procedures has garnered much attention in recent years, large-scale studies characterizing patterns of persistent opioid use among patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures are lacking.

Objective

To assess the prevalence of immediate and long-term postoperative opioid use after plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this population-based cohort study, patients who underwent 5 classes of plastic and reconstructive procedures (nasal, eye, breast, abdomen, and soft tissue reconstruction) between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, were identified using IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental research databases. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, lacked continuous insurance coverage for 1 year preoperatively and postoperatively, had a second anesthesia event within 1 year postoperatively, and filled an opioid prescription within the year prior to surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Analgesic prescription patterns in the immediate postoperative period. The primary outcome was rates of persistent opioid use (opioid prescriptions filled 90-180 days postoperatively). The secondary outcome was rates of prolonged opioid use (opioid prescriptions filled 90-180 days postoperatively and again 181-365 days postoperatively). Explanatory variables included patient demographics, procedure type, and relevant comorbidities.

Results

Of the 466 677 patients who met inclusion criteria, 96 397 (45.3%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 46.8 (17.7) years. Furthermore, 212 387 (54.6%) of the patients filled prescriptions for postoperative analgesics, with 212 387 (91.5%) of analgesic prescriptions filled being for opioids. Persistent opioid use occurred in 30 865 (6.6%) patients (5.1%-13.5% across procedure classes), while prolonged opioid use occurred in 10 487 (2.3%) patients (1.7%-5.6% across procedure classes). Patients who filled prescriptions for opioids in the perioperative period were significantly more likely to exhibit persistent (odds ratio [OR], 2.87; 95% CI, 2.80-2.94) and prolonged (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 2.77-3.02) opioid use than those who did not fill perioperative opioid prescriptions, with the greatest odds for persistent use found in patients who underwent breast (OR, 4.36; 95% CI, 4.10-4.63) and nasal (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 3.30-3.73) procedures. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, independent risk factors for persistent and prolonged opioid use included perioperative opioid use, procedure type, and prior-year mental health (depression and anxiety) and substance abuse diagnoses.

Conclusions and Relevance

Given the significant risk of persistent opioid use after plastic and reconstructive procedures, it is imperative to develop best practices guidelines for postoperative opioid prescription practices in this population.

Level of Evidence

NA.

Trajectory analysis for postoperative pain using electronic health records: A nonparametric method with robust linear regression and K-medians cluster analysis

Postoperative pain scores are widely monitored and collected in the electronic health record, yet current methods fail to fully leverage the data with fast implementation. A robust linear regression was fitted to describe the association between the log-scaled pain score and time from discharge after total knee replacement. The estimated trajectories were used for a subsequent K-medians cluster analysis to categorize the longitudinal pain score patterns into distinct clusters. For each cluster, a mixture regression model estimated the association between pain score and time to discharge adjusting for confounding. The fitted regression model generated the pain trajectory pattern for given cluster. Finally, regression analyses examined the association between pain trajectories and patient outcomes. A total of 3442 surgeries were identified with a median of 22 pain scores at an academic hospital during 2009-2016. Four pain trajectory patterns were identified and one was associated with higher rates of outcomes. In conclusion, we described a novel approach with fast implementation to model patients' pain experience using electronic health records. In the era of big data science, clinical research should be learning from all available data regarding a patient's episode of care instead of focusing on the "average" patient outcomes.

American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Perioperative Opioid Minimization in Opioid-Naïve Patients

Surgical care episodes place opioid-naïve patients at risk for transitioning to new persistent postoperative opioid use. With one of the central principles being the application of multimodal pain interventions to reduce the reliance on opioid-based medications, enhanced recovery pathways provide a framework that decreases perioperative opioid use. The fourth Perioperative Quality Initiative brought together a group of international experts representing anesthesiology, surgery, and nursing with the objective of providing consensus recommendations on this important topic. Fourth Perioperative Quality Initiative was a consensus-building conference designed around a modified Delphi process in which the group alternately convened for plenary discussion sessions in between small group discussions. The process included several iterative steps including a literature review of the topics, building consensus around the important questions related to the topic, and sequential steps of content building and refinement until agreement was achieved and a consensus document was produced. During the fourth Perioperative Quality Initiative conference and thereafter as a writing group, reference applicability to the topic was discussed in any area where there was disagreement. For this manuscript, the questions answered included (1) What are the potential strategies for preventing persistent postoperative opioid use? (2) Is opioid-free anesthesia and analgesia feasible and appropriate for routine operations? and (3) Is opioid-free (intraoperative) anesthesia associated with equivalent or superior outcomes compared to an opioid minimization in the perioperative period? We will discuss the relevant literature for each questions, emphasize what we do not know, and prioritize the areas for future research.

Preoperative opioid use and postoperative pain associated with surgical readmissions

BACKGROUND

The extent of preoperative opioid utilization and the relationship with pain-related readmissions are not well understood.

METHODS

VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program data on general, vascular, and orthopedic surgeries (2007-2014) were merged with pharmacy data to evaluate preoperative opioid use and pain-related readmissions. Opioid use in the 6-month preoperative period was categorized as none, infrequent, frequent, and daily.

RESULTS

In the six-month preoperative period, 65.7% had no opioid use, 16.7% had infrequent use, 6.3% frequent use, and 11.4% were daily opioid users. Adjusted odds of pain-related readmission were higher for opioid-exposed groups vs the opioid-naïve group: infrequent (OR 1.17; 95% CI:1.04-1.31), frequent (OR 1.28; 95% CI:1.08-1.52), and daily (OR 1.49; 95% CI:1.27-1.74). Among preoperative opioid users, those with a pain-related readmission had higher daily preoperative oral morphine equivalents (mean 44.5 vs. 36.1, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients using opioids preoperatively experienced higher rates of pain-related readmissions, which increased with frequency and dosage of opioid exposure.