1
|
The Rate of Avoidable Pancreatic Resections at a High-Volume Center: An Internal Quality Control and Critical Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041625. [PMID: 36836160 PMCID: PMC9967180 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of benign diseases among pancreatic resections for suspected malignancy still represents a relevant issue in the surgical practice. This study aims to identify the preoperative pitfalls that led to unnecessary surgeries at a single Austrian center over a twenty-year period. METHODS Patients undergoing surgery for suspected pancreatic/periampullary malignancy between 2000 and 2019 at the Linz Elisabethinen Hospital were included. The rate of "mismatches" between clinical suspicion and histology was considered as primary outcome. All cases that, despite that, fulfilled the indication criteria for surgery were defined as minor mismatches (MIN-M). Conversely, the true avoidable surgeries were identified as major mismatches (MAJ-M). RESULTS Among the 320 included patients, 13 (4%) presented with benign lesions at definitive pathology. The rate of MAJ-M was 2.8% (n = 9), and the most frequent causes of misdiagnoses were autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 4) and intrapancreatic accessory spleen (n = 2). In all MAJ-M cases, various mistakes within the preoperative workup were detected: lack of multidisciplinary discussion (n = 7, 77.8%); inappropriate imaging (n = 4, 44.4%); lack of specific blood markers (n = 7, 77.8%). The morbidity and mortality rates for mismatches were 46.7% and 0. CONCLUSION All avoidable surgeries were the result of an incomplete pre-operative workup. The adequate identification of the underlying pitfalls could lead to minimize and, potentially, overcome this phenomenon with a concrete optimization of the surgical-care process.
Collapse
|
2
|
Trenker C, Görg C, Freeman S, Jenssen C, Dong Y, Caraiani C, Ioanițescu ES, Dietrich CF. WFUMB Position Paper-Incidental Findings, How to Manage: Spleen. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2021; 47:2017-2032. [PMID: 34052061 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings (IFs) with a series of publications entitled "Incidental Imaging Findings-The Role of Medical Ultrasound." IFs are less commonly encountered in the spleen than in many other abdominal organs but remain a frequent dilemma in clinical practice. A histological diagnosis is rarely necessary for patient management. Many IFs, such as secondary spleens and splenic cysts, are harmless and do not require any further investigation. The diagnosis of many other focal splenic lesions is, however, often problematic. The following overview is intended to illustrate a variety of incidentally detected spleen pathologies such as size variants, shape variants, secondary spleens, focal splenic lesions and splenic calcifications. It should aid the examiner in establishing the diagnosis. Moreover, it should help the ultrasound practitioner decide which pathologies need no further investigation, those requiring interval imaging and cases in which immediate further diagnostic procedures are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinna Trenker
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, Germany
| | - Christian Görg
- Department of gastroenterology, Interdisciplinary Center of Ultrasound, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse Marburg, Germany
| | - Simon Freeman
- University Hospitals Plymouth, Imaging Directorate, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland GmbH Strausberg/Wriezen, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg "Theodor Fontane", Germany; Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound at Medical University Brandenburg "Theodor Fontane", Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Yi Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Cosmin Caraiani
- Department of Medical Imaging, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Elena Simona Ioanițescu
- Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania; Center of Internal Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Christoph F Dietrich
- Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permancence, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Serra F, De Matteis G, Delfanti S, Feltri M, Vanoli A, Cavenaghi G, Gallotti A, Maestri M, Brugnatelli S. Pancreatic nodule positive for 68-Ga-DOTAPEPTIDE-PET: NET or ectopic spleen? The importance of a good differential diagnosis. Clin Transl Imaging 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-020-00383-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Accessory spleen is a congenital defect in which splenic tissue is present outside the spleen. In 20% of cases, accessory spleen is localized within the pancreatic tail, a condition known as IPAS. The identification of this benign anomaly, which affects about 2% of general population, is not easy because it is often mistaken for a pNET which is more common, at around 5%. A 68-Ga-DOTAPEPTIDE-PET normally identifies pNETs with high rate of sensitivity and specificity, but in some conditions, it produces false positives, including IPAS.
Materials and tools
A clinical case we recently encountered, prompted us to review the available medical literature on the topic. Typing “intrapancreatic accessory spleen” into PubMed database and limiting research to the last 10 years yielded 121 results from which we selected the most relevant articles for decision-making, with a brief explanation of the reasons for selecting those. Our analysis focused on the most critical and least descriptive articles, those which clearly indicated the importance of differential diagnosis by promoting the use of advanced investigations in case of pancreatic nodule suspected for IPAS. Ultimately, our objective was to update the available guidelines recommendations.
Discussion and conclusions
Despite concern in the medical literature, a differential IPAS diagnosis is still subordinate to other clinical, radiological, nuclear medicine, and cytological criteria. After reviewing the literature, we recommend that IPAS should always be considered as a possibility before diagnosis of pNET is made. IPAS should be suspected in the presence of the following findings: asymptomatic pancreatic nodule found incidentally, absence of laboratory findings of NETs, localization in the pancreatic tail, between 1 and 3 cm in size with well-defined margins, homogeneous enhancement, and similar attenuation to the spleen on CT and MRI. In these cases, the use of advanced investigations beyond 68-Ga-DOTAPEPTIDE-PET must be systematic. The recognition of IPAS is not only a diagnostic refinement, but it also avoids unnecessary surgery for the patient.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheuk W, Liao J, Chan JKC. "Baby Spleen Sleeping in a Cradle": An Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen. Int J Surg Pathol 2020; 29:516-517. [PMID: 32552218 DOI: 10.1177/1066896920935586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W Cheuk
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR China
| | - J Liao
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR China
| | - J K C Chan
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gilani SM, Muniraj T, Farrell JJ, Aslanian HR, Cai G. Endoscopicultrasound‐guidedfine needle aspiration of accessory spleen: Cytomorphologic features and diagnostic considerations. Diagn Cytopathol 2020; 48:623-628. [DOI: 10.1002/dc.24434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Syed M. Gilani
- Department of PathologyYale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
| | - Thiruvengadam Muniraj
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Digestive DiseasesYale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
| | - James J. Farrell
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Digestive DiseasesYale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
| | - Harry R. Aslanian
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Digestive DiseasesYale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
| | - Guoping Cai
- Department of PathologyYale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Luo J, Chen J, Huang F, Zhou P, Huang P. Heterotopic accessory spleen with squamous epithelial cyst in pancreas mimicking other pancreatic tumor: a case report. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:507. [PMID: 32395551 PMCID: PMC7210170 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
A 49-year-old female undergoing a periodic health examination at other hospital revealed a mass in the tail of pancreas. The patient denied any personal history of surgery except subtotal hysterectomy because of multiple myomas in uterus 7 years ago, family history of abdominal cancer and trauma. Physical examination and laboratory finding (including tumor marker) were unremarkable. Chest X-ray result was normal. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination showed a well-defined hypoechoic pancreatic mass which was suggestive of solid pseudopapillary tumor. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) of the abdomen revealed a mass of hypodensity suggestive of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Because of the risk of bleeding and exclusion of surgical contraindications, patient underwent laparoscopic surgery. Intraoperatively, a solid mass was identified in the tail of pancreas, the intraoperative frozen pathological examination suggested a heterotopic accessary spleen (HAS) with squamous epithelial cyst. Partial pancreatectomy was performed. The uniqueness of this case is that the spleen can be ectopic to the pancreas, what is even more unexpected is that the HAS undergone cystic change. When encountering a pancreatic mass, we need to think about the possibility of HAS. In conclusion, it is important to diagnose HAS with squamous cyst in the pancreatic tail presenting as other pancreatic masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieli Luo
- Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China
| | - Jianshe Chen
- Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China
| | - Fengbo Huang
- Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China
| | - Panpan Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China
| | - Pintong Huang
- Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diagnosis of intrapancreatic accessory spleen by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration mimicking a pancreatic neoplasm: a case report and review of literature. Clin J Gastroenterol 2019; 13:287-297. [DOI: 10.1007/s12328-019-01045-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
8
|
Lancellotti F, Sacco L, Cerasari S, Bellato V, Cicconi S, Ciardi A, Muttillo EM, Feola T, Caronna R, Chirletti P. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen false positive to 68Ga-Dotatoc: case report and literature review. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:117. [PMID: 31288823 PMCID: PMC6617599 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1660-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Intrapancreatic accessory spleen (IPAS) is an uncommon finding of pancreatic mass. Differential diagnosis with pancreatic tumor, especially with non-functional neuroendocrine tumor (NF-NET), may be very hard and sometimes it entails unnecessary surgery. A combination of CT scan, MRI, and nuclear medicine can confirm the diagnosis of IPAS. 68-Ga-Dotatoc PET/CT is the gold standard in NET diagnosis and it can allow to distinguish between IPAS and NET. Case presentation A 69-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for an incidental nodule in the tail of the pancreas with focal uptake of 68-Ga-dotatate at PET/CT. NET was suspected and open distal splenopancreatectomy was performed. Pathologic examination revealed an IPAS. Conclusion This is the second IPAS case in which a positive 68Ga-Dotatoc uptake led to a false diagnosis of pancreatic NET. Here is a proposal of a literature review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lancellotti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Sacco
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Saverio Cerasari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Bellato
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Cicconi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Ciardi
- Department of Radiological Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Maria Muttillo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Feola
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Caronna
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Piero Chirletti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|