Drivers, Beliefs, and Barriers Surrounding Surgical Opioid Prescribing: A Qualitative Study of Surgeons’ Opioid Prescribing Habits

Comparing Provider and Adolescent Estimates of Postoperative Opioid Use

INTRODUCTION

Most adolescents report unused opioids after surgery. Current interventions compare opioid prescribing between surgeons without capturing actual patient-reported use.

METHODS

We recruited pediatric surgery residents, fellows, advanced practitioners, and surgeons from four surgical divisions at a tertiary care children's hospital. Providers reviewed clinical vignettes based on adolescent-reported postoperative opioid use data from our institution. Afterward, providers were asked to select the number of opioid pills they would prescribe and compare their responses to adolescent-reported use. We then measured provider willingness to change prescribing practices based on this comparison.

RESULTS

Overall, provider response rate was 41.3% (N = 38/92). Providers underestimated the number of opioids used for posterior spinal fusion, open pectus excavatum repair, open pectus carinatum repair, knee arthroscopy, and tonsillectomy and overestimated opioid use following hip reconstruction. Differences in median postoperative opioid use estimates from providers versus adolescent-reported use were significant for knee arthroscopy (10 interquartile range [IQR, 0-3] versus 3 IQR [1.5-13]; P < 0.001) and tonsillectomy (0 IQR [0-2.5] versus 1 IQR [0-7]; P = 0.043). Overall, general pediatric surgery providers underestimated opioid use while orthopedic and cardiothoracic providers overestimated opioid use. Differences between provider specialty were significant for posterior spinal fusion (P = 0.022), knee arthroscopy (P < 0.001), and tonsillectomy (P = 0.005). The number of opioids prescribed varied by provider role and 88.9% of providers (N = 32/36) reported that they would change prescribing habits based on adolescent reports.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences in provider estimates of postoperative prescription opioid use versus adolescent-reported use. Fortunately, providers report a willingness to change prescribing practice based on these differences. Feedback incorporating patient-reported postoperative opioid use may be a more accurate and patient-centered way to decrease excess opioid prescribing.

Bariatric surgery targeting opioid prescribing: a national model for effectively reducing opioid use after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioids are responsible for a significant proportion of opioid-related deaths in the United States. Approximately 6% of opioid-naïve patients who receive opioid prescriptions after surgery become chronic opioid users. However, chronic opioid use after bariatric surgery may be twice as common.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to report the feasibility and efficacy of implementing a national opioid-reducing protocol and to determine the impact of this protocol on opioid use after bariatric surgery.

SETTING

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)-accredited hospitals.

METHODS

Bariatric surgery targeting opioid prescription (BSTOP) was a national project sponsored by the MBSAQIP. It was executed in 3 phases: baseline, pilot, and implementation. A total of 271 MBSAQIP-accredited centers implemented the BSTOP protocol and reported data for all 3 phases. Protocol adherence, inpatient opioid use, opioids discharge prescribing, and outpatient opioid use were analyzed. Hospital-level opioid prescription habits were also assessed.

RESULTS

Compliance with 6 of 9 process measures improved significantly (P < .001). Median morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed during inpatient stay decreased from 35 MMEs during data collection to 23 MMEs during the implementation phase (Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner, P < .001). Opioids prescribed at discharge decreased by 9.5% (P < .001). Low inpatient MME prescriptions were achieved by 14.2% of hospitals, while 15.7% of hospitals became low-discharge opioid prescribers.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a national opioid-reducing protocol in bariatric surgery is feasible and effective in reducing opioid prescribing and use. However, the adoption of postdischarge prescription guidelines remains low. Opportunities to reduce the impact of prescription opioids on overdose deaths persist.

Impacts of opioid stewardship in surgical settings: a scoping review

ABSTRACT

Opioid stewardship programs have been implemented in many countries to reduce harms related to prescription opioid use. Yet, there is an evidence gap on the impact of these programs in surgical settings. This systematic scoping review aimed to examine the impact of opioid stewardship on opioid use and clinical outcomes, alongside assessing adherence, and barriers to its implementation in surgical settings. A systematic search strategy was developed and applied among 7 electronic databases for published literature. In total, 100 eligible articles were included in the review. Most studies showed that opioid stewardship reduced the quantity of opioid use (in 83/88 studies; 94%) and the number of days of opioid supplied (15/18; 83%). No effect was seen on the rate of opioid refills (34/44; 78%), postoperative pain scores (22/23; 96%), and length of hospital stay (12/15; 80%). The adherence rates ranged from 32% to 100%, with considerable heterogeneity in the indicators used to measure the quality use of opioids. Logistical issues, patients' demand for analgesics, clinicians' uncertainty regarding the efficacy of nonopioid analgesics, and a lack of role allocation were reported as major barriers to implementation. Opioid stewardship can improve the quality use of opioids without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. The variety of opioid stewardship types, measurement metrics, study designs, and different surgeries pose challenges in determining causal relationships. Future prospective studies using standardized approaches are needed to develop more robust evidence.

Perceptions and attitudes of medical students toward opioid education: A qualitative study

Objective

Explore the perceptions and attitudes of medical students regarding their education in opioid prescribing for pain management.

Design

Three focus group discussions elicited open-ended, information-rich responses from medical students attending multiple institutions. Thematic analysis identified common themes from focus group transcript data.

Setting

Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Participants

Medical students (n = 12) from four medical schools in the United States.

Results

Focus group participants indicated they experienced changes in their perceptions and attitudes about opioids during their time in medical school, gradually recognizing the importance of treating pain while avoiding overprescribing and opioid-related harms. Discussions revealed that the curriculum on opioid medications and their prescription in medical school is limited and varied, with most opportunities for learning arising during preclinical years. The quantity and quality of the opioid-related education experienced by participants during medical school impacted their perceived knowledge about opioids and, consequently, their confidence in treating pain. Participants noted that important gaps in their knowledge about opioid prescribing persist, which may influence their future prescribing habits. While participants understood they had insufficient knowledge about opioid prescribing, they anticipated there would be additional learning during their residency programs.

Conclusions

There is room for improvement for medical school instruction on the safe and effective use of opioids for pain management in the United States. Medical students themselves have expressed a desire for enhanced opioid education. Strengthening opioid education has implications across various healthcare environments, particularly in settings with prevalent opioid prescribing.

A "just in time" educational intervention for opioid overprescribing in dialysis access surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread efforts to combat the opioid epidemic, an ongoing contributor to opioid misuse remains post-operative opioid overprescribing by residents. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of a low-cost, reproducible "just in time" intervention on opioid prescribing in dialysis access operations.

METHODS

Standardized opioid prescribing guidelines were emailed to residents on the vascular service on the first day of the rotation. Opioid prescriptions were reviewed for four years before and one year after this intervention. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and tests of proportions were used to compare groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 299 patients underwent dialysis access procedures. There was a decrease in patients discharged with opioids following the intervention from 58% to 36% (p ​= ​0.003). For patients prescribed opioids, the median quantity decreased from 90 to 45 oral morphine equivalents (p ​= ​0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This low-cost and timely learning intervention may be a useful adjunct to reduce post-operative opioid prescriptions.

Initial and Long-Term Prescribing of Opioids and Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction

Limited evidence exists on health system characteristics associated with initial and long-term prescribing of opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) following total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), and if these characteristics differ among individuals based on preoperative NSAID exposure. We identified orthopedic surgeon opioid prescribing practices, hospital characteristics, and regional factors associated with initial and long-term prescribing of opioids and NSAIDs among older adults receiving THA/TKA.

Materials and Methods

This observational study included opioid-naïve Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years receiving elective THA/TKA between January 1, 2014 and July 4, 2017. We examined initial (days 1-30 following THA/TKA) and long-term (days 90-180) opioid or NSAID prescribing, stratified by preoperative NSAID exposure. Risk ratios (RRs) for the associations between 10 health system characteristics and case-mix adjusted outcomes were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression models.

Results

The study population included 23,351 NSAID-naïve and 10,127 NSAID-prevalent individuals. Increases in standardized measures of orthopedic surgeon opioid prescribing generally decreased the risk of initial NSAID prescribing but increased the risk of long-term opioid prescribing. For example, among NSAID-naïve individuals, the RRs (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for initial NSAID prescribing were 0.95 (0.93-0.97) for 1-2 orthopedic surgeon opioid prescriptions per THA/TKA procedure, 0.94 (0.92-0.97) for 3-4 prescriptions per procedure, and 0.91 (0.89-0.93) for 5+ opioid prescriptions per procedure (reference: <1 opioid prescription per procedure), while the RRs (95% CIs) for long-term opioid prescribing were 1.06 (1.04-1.08), 1.08 (1.06-1.11), and 1.13 (1.11-1.16), respectively. Variation in postoperative analgesic prescribing was observed across U.S. regions. For example, among NSAID-naïve individuals, the RR (95% CIs) for initial opioid prescribing were 0.98 (0.96-1.00) for Region 2 (New York), 1.09 (1.07-1.11) for Region 3 (Philadelphia), 1.07 (1.05-1.10) for Region 4 (Atlanta), 1.03 (1.01-1.05) for Region 5 (Chicago), 1.16 (1.13-1.18) for Region 6 (Dallas), 1.10 (1.08-1.12) for Region 7 (Kansas City), 1.09 (1.06-1.12) for Region 8 (Denver), 1.09 (1.07-1.12) for Region 9 (San Francisco), and 1.11 (1.08-1.13) for Region 10 (Seattle) (reference: Region 1 [Boston]). Hospital characteristics were not meaningfully associated with postoperative analgesic prescribing. The relationships between health system characteristics and postoperative analgesic prescribing were similar for NSAID-naïve and NSAID-prevalent participants.

Discussion

Future efforts aiming to improve the use of multimodal analgesia through increased NSAID prescribing and reduced long-term opioid prescribing following THA/TKA could consider targeting orthopedic surgeons with higher standardized opioid prescribing measures.

Conclusions

Orthopedic surgeon opioid prescribing measures and U.S. region were the greatest health system level predictors of initial, and long-term, prescribing of opioids and prescription NSAIDs among older Medicare beneficiaries following THA/TKA. These results can inform future studies that examine why variation in analgesic prescribing exists across geographic regions and levels of orthopedic surgeon opioid prescribing.

Inpatient pain assessment and decision-making in internal medicine and general surgery residents: A qualitative analysis

Background

Understanding physician approaches to pain treatment is a critical component of opioid and analgesic stewardship. Practice patterns learned in residency often persist longitudinally into practice.

Objective

This study sought to identify salient factors and themes in how resident physicians assess and manage pain.

Methods

Video-recorded focus groups of internal medicine and general surgery residents were conducted via videoconferencing software. Data were analyzed using a ground theory approach and constant comparative method to identify themes and subthemes. Focus groups occurred in September and October 2020.

Results

10 focus groups including 35 subjects were conducted. Four general themes emerged: (1) Assessment considerations; (2) Education & Expectations; (3) Systems Factors; and (4) Management considerations. Participants indicated that while it is important to treat pain, its inherently subjective nature makes it difficult to objectively quantify it. The 0-10 numeric rating scale was problematic and infrequently utilized. Patient expectations of no pain following procedures was viewed as particularly challenging. The absence of formal best practices to guide pain assessment and management was noted in every group. Management approaches overall very highly variable, often relying on word-of-mouth relay of the preferences of specific attending physicians.

Conclusions

Pain is highly nuanced and resident physicians struggle to balance pain's subjectivity with a desire to quantify and appropriately treat it. The 0-10 numeric rating pain scale, though ubiquitous, is problematic. Priority areas of improvement identified include education for both patients and physicians, functional pain scales, and expansion of existing effective resources like the nursing pain team.

Comparing Rationale for Opioid Prescribing Decisions after Surgery with Subsequent Patient Consumption: A Survey of the Highest Quartile of Prescribers

BACKGROUND

Opioid prescribing patterns, including those after surgery, have been implicated as a significant contributor to the US opioid crisis. A plethora of interventions-from nudges to reminders-have been deployed to improve prescribing behavior, but reasons for persistent outlier behavior are often unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Our institution employs multiple prescribing resources and a near real-time, feedback-based intervention to promote appropriate opioid prescribing. Since 2019, an automated system has emailed providers when a prescription exceeds the 75th percentile of typical opioid consumption for a given procedure-as defined by institutional data collection. Emails include population consumption metrics and an optional survey on rationale for prescribing. Responses were analyzed to understand why providers choose to prescribe atypically large discharge opioid prescriptions. We then compared provider prescriptions against patient consumption.

RESULTS

During the study period, 10,672 eligible postsurgical patients were discharged; 2,013 prescriptions (29.4% of opioid prescriptions) exceeded our institutional guideline. Surveys were completed by outlier prescribers for 414 (20.6%) encounters. Among patients where both consumption data and prescribing rationale surveys were available, 35.2% did not consume any opioids after discharge and 21.5% consumed <50% of their prescription. Only 93 (39.9%) patients receiving outlier prescriptions were outlier consumers. Most common reasons for prescribing outlier amounts were attending preference (34%) and prescriber analysis of patient characteristics (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

The top quartile of opioid prescriptions did not align with, and often far exceeded, patient postdischarge opioid consumption. Providers cite assessment of patient characteristics as a common driver of decision-making, but this did not align with patient usage for approximately 50% of patients.

Adherence to legislation limiting opioid prescription duration following musculoskeletal injury

OBJECTIVES

North Carolina had implemented legislation (Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention (STOP) Act) limiting opioid prescriptions to 5 days for acute pain and 7 days for post-operative pain. This study aimed to identify patient, prescriber, and facility characteristics associated with STOP Act adherence for patients with acute or post-surgical musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions.

DESIGN

A three-level hierarchical logistic regression model was used to predict odds of adherence with STOP Act duration limits, accounting for fixed and random effects at the patient, prescriber, and facility levels.

SETTING

A large healthcare system in North Carolina.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N = 6,849) presenting from 2018 to 2020 with a diagnosis of an acute MSK injury.

INTERVENTIONS

The STOP Act limited the duration of opioid prescriptions in North Carolina.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Prescriptions adhering to the STOP Act duration limits of 5 days (nonoperative) or 7 days (operative) were the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Opioids were compliant with STOP Act duration limits in 69.3 percent of encounters, with 33 percent of variation accounted for by clinician and 29 percent by facility. Patients prescribed >1 opioid (odds ratio (OR) 0.46, 95 percent confidence interval (CI): 0.36, 0.58) had reduced odds of a compliant prescription; surgical patients had increased odds of a compliant prescription (outpatient surgery: OR 5.89, 95 percent CI: 2.43-14.29; inpatient surgery: OR 7.71, 95 percent CI: 3.04-19.56). Primary care sports medicine clinicians adhered to legislation less frequently than orthopedic surgeons (OR 0.38, 95 percent CI: 0.15, 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Most prescriptions adhered to STOP Act legislation. Tailored interventions to improve adherence among targeted groups of prescribers, eg, those treating nonoperative injuries and sport medicine clinicians, could be useful.

Strategies for Reducing Perioperative Opioid Use in Foot and Ankle Surgery: Education, Risk Identification, and Multimodal Analgesia

There remains a high prevalence and substantial risks of opioid utilization amongst orthopedic patients. The goal of this review is to discuss strategies for responsible opioid use in the perioperative setting following foot and ankle orthopedic surgeries. We will highlight 1) education interventions, 2) risk identification, and 3) non-opioid alternatives for postoperative pain management.

Bringing Opiates Off the Streets and Undertaking Excess Scripts: A novel opiate reclamation and prescription reduction program

BACKGROUND

Opioid diversion and misuse continue to present problems in modern medicine. The "opioid epidemic" has claimed more than 250,000 lives since 1999, with studies pointing to prescription opioids as the culprit for future opiate misuse. Currently, there are no well-described, data-driven processes to educate surgeons on reducing opiate prescribing, informed by personal practice patterns. We designed and implemented a novel opiate reclamation and prescription reduction program for surgeons to reclaim unused medications and decrease prescribing using individual provider data.

METHODS

We performed a prospective collection of all unused opiate pain medications for general surgery postoperative patients from July 15, 2020 to January 15, 2021. Patients brought their unused opiates to their routine postoperative follow-up appointment, where they were counted and disposed of in a secure drug take-back bin. Reclaimed opiates were totaled, analyzed, and reported to the providers, who used their individual reclamation rates to refine prescribing habits.

RESULTS

During the reclamation period, 168 operations were performed, with a total of 12,970 morphine milligram equivalents of opiate prescribed by 5 physicians. A total of 6,077.5 morphine milligram equivalents (46.9%) were reclaimed, which is the equivalent of 800 5-mg tablets of oxycodone. A review of these data led to a 30.9% decrease in opiate prescriptions by participating surgeons in addition to the reclamation of an additional 3,150 morphine milligram equivalents over the next 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Continuous monitoring of the medications returned by patients now continues to inform our providers' prescribing practices, decreases the amount of opiates in the community, and improves patient safety.

Identifying risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain and preventive measures: a comprehensive update

INTRODUCTION

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a prevalent condition that can diminish health-related quality of life, cause functional deficits, and lead to patient distress. Rates of CPSP are higher for certain types of surgeries than others (thoracic, breast, or lower extremity amputations) but can occur after even uncomplicated minimally invasive procedures. CPSP has multiple mechanisms, but always starts as acute postsurgical pain, which involves inflammatory processes and may encompass direct or indirect neural injury. Risk factors for CPSP are largely known but many, such as female sex, younger age, or type of surgery, are not modifiable. The best strategy against CPSP is to quickly and effectively treat acute postoperative pain using a multimodal analgesic regimen that is safe, effective, and spares opioids.

AREAS COVERED

This is a narrative review of the literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Every surgical patient is at some risk for CPSP. Control of acute postoperative pain appears to be the most effective approach, but principles of good opioid stewardship should apply. The role of regional anesthetics as analgesics is gaining interest and may be appropriate for certain patients. Finally, patients should be better informed about their relative risk for CPSP.

Barriers Facing Physicians in Opioids Prescribing for the Management of Moderate to Severe Pain in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia

Background: Although several interventions are utilized for pain management, opioids remain the most effective intervention for moderate to severe pain. Despite opioids being the most potent analgesics used in different pain settings, several factors impede the optimal prescribing of opioids.Objectives: The study seeks to identify and address the barriers physicians face to prescribing opioids in managing pain.Methods: This study was conducted in a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It involved distributing questionnaires to the participants. The questionnaires sought to identify prescribers' knowledge and current practices as well as obstacles that they face when prescribing opioids. A total of 109 questionnaires were completed by participants.Results: More than half [59.6%] of the respondents thought that opioid use was an optimal way to treat moderate to severe pain. About 33% chose "never" when asked if they fear legal sanctions when prescribing opioids. Fear of side effects limited almost 90% of the respondents from prescribing opioids.Conclusion: The study confirmed the perception that opioids are the most potent pharmacological intervention in treating pain. Several barriers were identified and discussed in this study. Further studies from different settings to understand these barriers are highly recommended.

Variation in opioid filling after same-day breast surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management practices in breast surgery are variable, with recent evidence that approaches for minimizing or sparing opioids can be successfully implemented. We describe opioid filling and predictors of higher doses in patients undergoing same-day breast surgery in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we used linked administrative health data to identify patients aged 18 years or older who underwent same-day breast surgery from 2012 to 2020. We categorized procedure types by increasing invasiveness of surgery: partial, with or without axillary intervention (P ± axilla); total, with or without axillary intervention (T ± axilla); radical, with or without axillary intervention (R ± axilla); and bilateral. The primary outcome was filling an opioid prescription within 7 or fewer days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were total oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) filled (mg, median and interquartile range [IQR]) and filling more than 1 prescription within 7 or fewer days after surgery. We estimated associations (adjusted risk ratios [RRs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) between study variables and outcomes in multivariable models. We used a random intercept for each unique prescriber to account for provider-level clustering.

RESULTS

Of the 84 369 patients who underwent same-day breast surgery, 72% (n = 60 620) filled an opioid prescription. Median OMEs filled increased with invasiveness (P ± axilla = 135 [IQR 90-180] mg; T ± axilla = 135 [IQR 100-200] mg; R ± axilla = 150 [IQR 113-225] mg, bilateral surgery = 150 [IQR 113-225] mg; p < 0.0001). Factors associated with filling more than 1 opioid prescription were age 30-59 years (v. age 18-29 yr), increased invasiveness (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.70-2.30 bilateral v. P ± axilla), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2 versus 0-1 (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.34-1.69) and malignancy (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.26-1.53).

INTERPRETATION

Most patients undergoing same-day breast surgery fill an opioid prescription within 7 days. Efforts are needed to identify patient groups where opioids may be successfully minimized or eliminated.

Variation in prescribing of opioids for emergency department encounters: A cohort study in the Military Health System

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) clinicians account for approximately 13% of all opioid prescriptions to opioid-naïve patients and variability in the rates of prescribing have been noted among individual clinicians and different EDs. This study elucidates the amount of variability within a unified health system (the U.S. Military Health System [MHS]) with the expectation that understanding the sources of variability will enable health system leaders to improve the quality of decision making.

METHODS

The design was a retrospective cohort study examining variation in opioid prescribing within EDs of the US MHS. Participants were Army soldiers who returned from a deployment and received care between October 2009 and September 2016. The exposure was ED encounters at a military treatment facility. Key measures were the proportion of ED encounters with an opioid prescription fill; total opioid dose of the fill (morphine milligram equivalent, MME); and total opioid days-supply of the fill.

RESULTS

The mean proportion of ED encounters with an opioid fill across providers was 19.7% (SD 8.8%), median proportion was 18.6%, and the distribution was close to symmetric with the 75th percentile provider prescribing opioids in 24.6% of their ED encounters and the 25th percentile provider prescribing in 13.4% of their encounters. The provider-level mean opioid dose per encounter was 113.1 MME (SD 56.0) with the 75th percentile (130.1) 50% higher than the 25th percentile (87.4). The mean opioid supply per encounter was 6.8 days (SD 3.9) with more than a twofold ratio between the 75th percentile (8.3) and the 25th (4.1). Using a series of multilevel regression models to examine opioid fills associated with ED encounters and their dose levels, the variation among providers within facilities was much larger in magnitude than the variation among facilities.

CONCLUSION

Among ED encounters of Army soldiers at military treatment facilities, there was substantial variation among providers in prescribing opioid prescriptions that were not explained by patient case-mix. These results suggest that programmes and protocols to address less than optimal prescribing in the ED should be initiated to improve the quality of care.

Addressing an epidemic: Improving guideline-concordant opioid prescribing in surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Excess postoperative opioid prescribing increases the risk of opioid abuse, diversion, and addiction. Clinicians receive variable training for opioid prescribing, and despite the availability of guidelines, wide variations in prescribing practices persist. This quality improvement initiative aimed to assess and improve institutional adherence to published guidelines.

METHODS

This study represented a quality improvement initiative at an academic medical center implemented over a 6-month period with data captured 1 year before and after implementation. The quality improvement initiative focused on prescribing education and monthly feedback reports for clinicians. All opioid-naïve, adult patients undergoing a reviewed procedure were included. Demographics, surgical details, hospital course, and opioid prescriptions were reviewed. Opioids prescribed on discharge were evaluated for concordance with recommendations based on published guidelines. Pre- and postimplementation cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

There were 4,905 patients included: 2,343 preimplementation and 2,562 postimplementation. There were similar distributions in patient demographics between the 2 cohorts. Guideline-concordant discharge prescriptions improved from 50.3% to 72.2% after the quality improvement initiative was implemented (P < .001). Adjusted analysis controlling for sex, age, discharge clinician, length of stay, outpatient surgery, and procedure demonstrated a 190% increase in odds of receiving a guideline-concordant opioid prescription on discharge in the postimplementation cohort (adjusted odds ratio 2.90; 95% confidence interval = 2.55-3.30).

CONCLUSION

This study represented a successful quality improvement initiative improving guideline-concordant opioid discharges and decreasing overprescribing. This study suggested published guidelines are insufficient without close attention to elements of effective change management including the critical importance of locally targeting educational efforts and suggested that real-time, data-driven feedback amplifies impact on prescribing behavior.

Association Between Statewide Medicaid Opioid Policy and Postoperative Opioid Prescribing among Surgeons at a Large Safety-Net Hospital

BACKGROUND

Restrictive state and payer policies may be effective in reducing opioid prescribing by surgeons, but their impact has not been well studied. In 2017, Washington Medicaid implemented an opiod prescribing limit of 42 pills, prompting a large regional safety-net hospital to implement a decision support intervention in response. We aimed to evaluate the effects on surgeons' prescribing.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively studied postoperative opioid prescribing (quantity of pills prescribed at discharge) to opioid-naïve surgical patients at a regional safety-net hospital from 2016 to 2020. We investigated associations between the policy and opioid prescribing by using interrupted time series analysis, adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 12,799 surgical encounters involving opioid-naïve patients (59% male, mean age 52) were analyzed. Opioids were prescribed for 75%. From 2016 to 2020, the mean prescribed opioid quantity decreased from 36 pills to 17 pills. In interrupted time series analysis, the Medicaid policy implementation was associated with an immediate change of -8.4 pills (95% CI -12 to -4.7; p < 0.001) per prescription and a subsequent rate of decrease similar to that prepolicy. In a comparison of changes between patients insured through Medicaid vs Medicare, Medicaid patients had an immediate change of -9.8 pills (95% CI -19 to -0.76; p = 0.03) after policy implementation and continued decreases similar to those prepolicy. No immediate or subsequent policy-related changes were observed among Medicare patients.

CONCLUSION

In a large regional safety-net institution, postoperative opioid prescriptions decreased in size over time, with immediate changes associated with a state Medicaid policy and corresponding decision support intervention. These findings pose implications for surgeons, hospital leaders, and payers seeking to address opioid use via judicious prescribing.

The opioid reduction task force: using the ACHQC Data Registry to combat an epidemic in hernia patients

PURPOSE

Post-operative opioid prescriptions contribute to prolonged opioid misuse and abuse. Using a national hernia registry, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a data-driven educational intervention on surgeon prescribing behavior.

METHODS

After collecting opioid prescribing and patient consumption data from March 2019-December 2019 in inguinal and umbilical hernia repair, the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) Opioid Reduction Task Force presented data at a Quality Improvement (QI) Summit to educate surgeons on strategies to minimize opioid prescribing. Surgeons were asked to implement a multimodal pain management approach and were supported with educational tools created by the task force. Prescribing and consumption data after the summit, December 2019-March 2021, were then collected to assess the effectiveness of the QI effort.

RESULTS

Registry participation before and after the QI summit increased from 52 to 91 surgeons, with an increase of 353-830 umbilical hernia patients and 976-2447 inguinal hernia patients. After the summit, high (> 10 tablets) surgeon prescribers shifted toward low (≤ 10 tablets) prescribing. Yet, patients consumed less than what was prescribed, with a significant increase in patients consuming ≤ 10 tablets before and after the summit: 79-88% in umbilical hernia (p = 0.01) and 85-94% in inguinal hernia (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Following an educational QI summit by the ACHQC Opioid Reduction Task Force, high opioid prescribing has shifted toward low. However, patients consume less than prescribed, highlighting the importance of continuing this effort to reduce opioid prescribing.

Standardizing Opioid Prescribing in a Pediatric Hospital: A Quality Improvement Effort

BACKGROUND

Opioids are indicated for moderate-to-severe pain caused by trauma, ischemia, surgery, cancer and sickle cell disease, and vaso-occlusive episodes (SCD-VOC). There is only limited evidence regarding the appropriate number of doses to prescribe for specific indications. Therefore, we developed and implemented an opioid prescribing algorithm with dosing guidelines for specific procedures and conditions. We aimed to reach and sustain 90% compliance within 1 year of implementation.

METHODS

We conducted this quality improvement effort at a pediatric academic quaternary care institution. In 2018, a multidisciplinary team identified the need for a standard approach to opioid prescribing. The algorithm guides prescribers to evaluate the medical history, physical examination, red flags, pain type, and to initiate opioid-sparing interventions before prescribing opioids. Opioid prescriptions written between January 2015 and September 2020 were included. Examples from 2 hospital departments will be highlighted. Control charts for compliance with guidelines and variability in the doses prescribed are presented for selected procedures and conditions.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, 83 037 opioid prescriptions in 53 804 unique patients were entered electronically. The encounters with ≥1 opioid prescription decreased from 48% to 25% between 2015 and 2019. Compliance with the specific guidelines increased to ∼85% for periacetabular osteotomies and SCD-VOC and close to 100% for anterior-cruciate ligament surgery. In all 3 procedures and conditions, variability in the number of doses prescribed decreased significantly.

CONCLUSION

We developed an algorithm, guidelines, and a process for improvement. The number of opioid prescriptions and variability in opioid prescribing decreased. Future evaluation of specific initiatives within departments is needed.

Cost-utility analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism panel-based machine learning algorithm to predict risk of opioid use disorder

Aim: To conduct a cost-utility analysis of a novel genetic diagnostic test (OUDTEST) for risk of developing opioid use disorder for elective orthopedic surgery patients. Materials & Methods: A simulation model assessed cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for OUDTEST from private insurer and self-insured employer perspectives over a 5-year time horizon for a hypothetical patient population. Results: OUDTEST was found to cost less and increase QALYs, over a 5-year period for private insurance (savings US$2510; QALYs 0.02) and self-insured employers (-US$2682; QALYs 0.02). OUDTEST was a dominant strategy in 71.1% (private insurance) and 72.7% (self-insured employer) of model iterations. Sensitivity analyses revealed robust results except for physician compliance. Conclusion: OUDTEST was expected to be a cost-effective solution for personalizing postsurgical pain management in orthopedic patients.

Resident Opioid Prescribing Habits Do Not Reflect Best Practices in Post-Operative Pain Management: An Assessment of the Knowledge and Education Gap

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate deficiencies in knowledge and education in opioid prescribing and to compare surgical resident opioid-prescribing practices to Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network (OPEN) procedure-specific guidelines.

DESIGN

Anonymous web-based survey distributed to all general surgery residents to evaluate prior education received and confidence in knowledge in opioid prescribing. The number of 5 milligram oxycodone tablets prescribed for common procedures was assessed and compared with OPEN for significance using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

SETTING

General surgery residency program within large university-based tertiary medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Categorical general surgery residents of all postgraduate years.

RESULTS

Fifty-six of 72 (78%) categorical residents completed the survey. Few reported receiving formal education in opioid prescribing in medical school (32%) or residency (16%). While 82% of residents felt confident in opioid side effects, fewer felt the same with regards to opioid pharmacokinetics (36%) or proper opioid disposal (29%). Opioids prescribed varied widely with residents prescribing significantly more than recommended by OPEN in 9 of 14 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Tackling the evolving opioid epidemic requires a multidisciplinary approach that addresses prescribing at all steps of the process, starting with trainee education.

Evaluation of opioid prescribing preferences among surgical residents and faculty

BACKGROUND

Residents report that faculty preference is a significant driver of opioid prescribing practices. This study compared opioid prescribing preferences of surgical residents and faculty against published guidelines and actual practice and assessed perceptions in communication and transparency around these practices.

METHODS

Surgical residents and faculty were surveyed to evaluate the number of oxycodone tablets prescribed for common procedures. Quantities were compared between residents, faculty, Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network guidelines, and actual opioids prescribed. Frequency with which faculty communicate prescribing preferences and the desire for feedback and transparency in prescription practices were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-six (72%) residents and 57 (59%) faculty completed the survey. Overall, faculty preferred a median number of tablets greater than recommended by Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network in 5 procedures, while residents did so in 9 of 14 procedures. On average, across all operations, faculty reported prescribing practices compliant with Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network 56.1% of the time, whereas residents did so 47.6% of the time (P = .40). Interestingly, opioids actually prescribed were significantly less than recommended in 7 procedures. Among faculty, 62% reported often or always specifying prescription preferences to residents, while only 9% of residents noted that faculty often did so. Residents (80%) and faculty (75%) were amenable to seeing regular reports of personal opioid prescription practices, and 74% and 65% were amenable to seeing practices compared with peers. Only 34% of residents and 44% of faculty wanted prescription practices made public.

CONCLUSION

There is a disconnect between opioid prescribing preferences and practice among surgical residents and faculty. Increased transparency through individualized reports and education regarding Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network guidelines with incorporation into the electronic medical record as practice advisories may reduce prescription variability.

Misalignment of Stakeholder Incentives in the Opioid Crisis

The current opioid epidemic has killed more than 446,000 Americans over the past two decades. Despite the magnitude of the crisis, little is known to what degree the misalignment of incentives among stakeholders due to competing interests has contributed to the current situation. In this study, we explore evidence in the literature for the working hypothesis that misalignment rooted in the cost, quality, or access to care can be a significant contributor to the opioid epidemic. The review identified several problems that can contribute to incentive misalignment by compromising the triple aims (cost, quality, and access) in this epidemic. Some of these issues include the inefficacy of conventional payment mechanisms in providing incentives for providers, practice guidelines in pain management that are not easily implementable across different medical specialties, barriers in adopting multi-modal pain management strategies, low capacity of providers/treatments to address opioid/substance use disorders, the complexity of addressing the co-occurrence of chronic pain and opioid use disorders, and patients' non-adherence to opioid substitution treatments. In discussing these issues, we also shed light on factors that can facilitate the alignment of incentives among stakeholders to effectively address the current crisis.