Trauma Care in India: Capacity Assessment Survey From Five Centers

Prehospital Factors Associated with Delayed Hospital Arrival of Stroke Patients: A Regional Single-Center Study from India

Background

Only a small percentage of patients with acute stroke are currently eligible for thrombolysis, partly due to severe delays in hospital arrival. We had previously conducted the first regional study to assess the factors delaying acute stroke care in India. The present study aims to understand and describe in depth the variables associated with prehospital delay among patients admitted with an acute ischemic stroke.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected by conducting an in-depth interview of 470 acute ischemic stroke patients and their bystanders, aged above 18 years, presenting to the Department of Emergency Medicine, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur. Patients who arrived within 4.5 h of symptom onset were considered as "early arrival" and those who arrived after 4.5 h were considered as "delayed arrival." Univariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken to determine associations between variables of interest and delays to hospital presentation.

Results

Of the 470 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 73 patients reached within 4.5 h (15.5%), whereas 397 patients arrived after 4.5 h. The mean age of acute stroke patients who reached within 4.5 h was 63 ± 13.7 years, whereas the mean age of those who reached after 4.5 h was 63 ± 12.1 years. Binary logistic regression performed to quantify the associations of prehospital factors showed an increased risk of prehospital delay among individuals with lack of awareness (odds ratio [OR] = 5.16 [3.040-8.757], P < 0.001), followed by those for whom a vehicle was not available at the site of event (OR = 3.745 [1.864-7.522], P < 0.001). Within the predefined socioeconomic strata, compared to lower class, upper middle class had less risk (OR = 0.135 [0.018-1.035], P = 0.054), whereas the distance from first medical contact to emergency department contributed moderate risk (OR = 1.071 [1.028-1.116], P < 0.001) for prehospital delay.

Conclusions

Health promotion techniques that increase public knowledge about the early signs of stroke, transferring patients directly to hospitals with thrombolysis capabilities, and making ambulance services more widely available are appropriate measures to reduce prehospital delay.

Pediatric traumatic brain injury prehospital guidelines: a systematic review and appraisal

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) disproportionately affects children within low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Prehospital emergency care can mitigate secondary brain injury and improve outcomes. Here, we systematically review clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for pediatric TBI with the goal to inform LMICs prehospital care.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We appraised evidence-based CPGs addressing prehospital management of pediatric TBI using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) tool. CPGs were rated as high-quality if ≥ 5 (out of 6) AGREE domains scored > 60%.

RESULTS

Of the 326 articles identified, 10 CPGs were included in analysis. All 10 were developed in HICs, and 4 were rated as high-quality. A total of 154 pediatric prehospital recommendations were grouped into three subcategories, initial assessment (35.7%), prehospital treatment (38.3%), and triage (26.0%). Of these, 79 (51.3%) were evidence-based with grading, and 31 (20.1%) were consensus-based without direct evidence.

CONCLUSION

Currently available CPGs for prehospital pediatric TBI management were all developed in HICs. Four CPGs have high-quality, and recommendations from these can serve as frameworks for LMICs or resource-limited settings. Context-specific evaluation and implementation of evidence-based recommendations allow LMIC settings to respond to the public health crisis of pediatric TBI and address gaps in trauma care systems.

Assessment of Trauma Care Capacity in Karachi, Pakistan: Toward an Integrated Trauma Care System

BACKGROUND

Pakistan is a lower-middle-income country with a high burden of injuries. Karachi, its most populated city, lacks a trauma care system due to which trauma patients do not receive the required care. We conducted an assessment of the existing facilities for trauma care in Karachi.

METHODS

Twenty-two tertiary and secondary hospitals from public and private sectors across Karachi were assessed. The Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care (GETC) tool was used to collect information about the availability of skills, knowledge, and equipment at these facilities.

RESULTS

Among tertiary hospitals (n = 7), private sector hospitals had a better median (IQR) score, 90.4 (81.8-93.1), as compared to the public sector hospitals, 44.1 (29.3-75.8). Among secondary hospitals (n = 15), private sector hospitals had a better median (IQR) score, 70.3 (67.8-77.7), as compared to the public sector hospitals, 39.7 (21.9-53.3).

DISCUSSION

This study identifies considerable deficiencies in trauma care in Karachi and provides objective data that can guide urgently needed reforms tailored to this city's needs. On a systems level, it delineates the need for a regulatory framework to define trauma care levels and designate selected hospitals across the city accordingly. Using these data, improvement in trauma care systems can be achieved through collaboration and partnership between public and private stakeholders.