Operative Shutdown and Recovery: Restructuring Surgical Operations During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis is Safe During the COVID-19 Pandemic Shutdown

INTRODUCTION

In the spring of 2020, New York City was one of the first epicenters of the COVID outbreak. In this study, we evaluate the incidence and treatment of appendicitis in two New York City community hospitals during the COVID pandemic.

METHODS

This retrospective study focused on the incidence and outcome of acute appendicitis in the adult population (>18 y old) during peak-COVID periods (March 16, 2020,-June 15, 2020) compared to pre-COVID and post-COVID periods. We compared the number of patients who underwent operative versus nonoperative management, patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), complications, and readmission rates within these time periods. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (analysis of variance).

RESULTS

From January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, 393 patients presented with acute appendicitis and 321 (81.7%) were treated operatively, compared to 441 total and 366 treated operatively (83%) in 2019 (P = 0.88). During the COVID outbreak, fewer patients presented with appendicitis (mean 6.9 ± 1 pre-COVID case/week, 4.4 ± 2.4 peak-COVID cases/week and 7.6 ± 0.65 post-COVID cases/week, P = 0.018) with no significant difference in the pre-COVID and post-COVID period. There was no difference in LOS between the pre-, peak-, and post-COVID periods with a median of 1 for all the three, (interquartile range (IQR): 0.8-2, 0.6-2, 0.6-2, respectively, P = 0.43). Additionally, there was no difference in 30-day readmission rates (4.2%, 0%, 3.9%, P = 0.99) and postoperative complications (4.2%, 0%, 2.9%, P = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

During peak-COVID, there was a significant reduction in the number of patients who presented with acute appendicitis without a post rebound increase in presentation. Those who presented during peak-COVID were able to undergo operative management safely, without affecting LOS or postoperative complications.

Medical malpractice in robotic surgery: a Westlaw database analysis

Malpractice claims involving robot-assisted surgical procedures have increased more than 250% in the past 7 years compared to the seven years prior. We examined robotic surgery malpractice claims to identify trends in claimed liabilities, describe legal outcomes, and determine strategies to minimize future litigation. The Westlaw legal database was queried retrospectively for U.S. state and federal trials regarding robot-assisted surgical procedures from 2006 to 2013 and 2014 to 2021. Data abstracted from verdict reports included year, state, court type, defendant specialty, procedure performed, claimed injuries and liabilities, verdict, and damage amount awarded. Sixty-one cases across 25 states were identified, 16 cases between 2006 and 2013, and 45 from 2014 to 2021. Among those 45 cases, defendant verdicts predominated (n = 35, 77.8%), with only four plaintiff verdicts (8.9%) and six settlements (13.3%). Overall, 169 liabilities were claimed, most commonly negligent surgery (82.2%), misdiagnosis/failure to diagnose (46.7%), delayed treatment (35.6%), and lack of informed consent (31.1%). Thirteen cases resulted in indemnity payments (mean = $1,251,274), with damages ranging from $10,087 (infection and retained foreign body) to $5,008,922 (patient death). Hysterectomy (n = 19, 42.2%) was the most commonly litigated surgery, followed by prostatectomy (n = 5) and hernia repair (n = 4). The most litigated specialties were obstetrics/gynecology (48.9%), general surgery (28.9%), and urology (15.6%). Malpractice litigation in robot-assisted surgery is infrequent. As robotic procedures become more commonplace, surgeons must keep common liabilities in mind, as there are valuable and actionable lessons to be learned from these cases. Malpractice reform, continuing medical education activities, and improved informed consent protocols may help minimize future litigation.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Elective Inpatient Surgical Admissions: Evidence From Maryland

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic led to large-scale cancellation and deferral of elective surgeries. We quantified volume declines, and subsequent recoveries, across all hospitals in Maryland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on elective inpatient surgical volumes were assembled from the Maryland Health Service Cost Review Commission for years 2019-2020. The data covered all hospitals in the state. We compared the volume of elective inpatient surgeries in the second (Q2) and fourth quarters (Q4) of 2020 to those same quarters in 2019. Analysis was stratified by patient, hospital, and service characteristics.

RESULTS

Surgical volumes were 55.8% lower in 2020 Q2 than in 2019 Q2. Differences were largest for orthopedic surgeries (74.3% decline), those on Medicare (61.4%), and in urban hospitals (57.3%). By 2020 Q4, volumes for most service lines were within 15% of volumes in 2019 Q4. Orthopedic surgery remained most affected (44.5% below levels in 2019 Q4) and Plastic Surgery (21.9% lower).

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 led to large volume declines across hospitals in Maryland followed by a partial recovery. We observed large variability, particularly across service lines. These results can help contextualize case-specific experiences and inform research studying potential health effects of these delays and cancellations.