Associations Between Care Bundles and Postoperative Outcomes After Major Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Enhanced recovery after surgery and intestinal obstruction: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Acute intestinal obstruction is a blockage of the intestine which causes a range of clinical symptoms such as acute and severe abdominal pain, nausea, and obstipation. Intestinal obstruction is a medical emergency and can be life-threatening when left untreated. In cases where treatment involves emergency abdominal surgery, a multimodal perioperative care pathway (enhanced recovery after surgery ERAS) has shown to accelerate patient recovery after surgery, reduce hospital length of stay, and improve overall outcomes. The objective of this scoping review was to identify and synthesize the existing evidence regarding the implementation of ERAS components with a focus on postoperative components in patients undergoing surgery for acute intestinal obstruction.

METHODS

This scoping review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews framework. PubMed-Medline and Embase database were searched.

RESULTS

The search identified 1860 studies of which 16 were included in the final analysis. All the studies were quantitative. Eleven studies used 10 or more ERAS interventions (range 10-28). The most common interventions were multimodal systemic analgesia, and the least common were the management of blood glucose and screening tools.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review found that 56% (n = 9/16) of the identified studies used 10 or more ERAS interventions out of a possible 35. This review highlighted the need for studies on the ERAS emergency laparotomy guidelines.

Does practice make perfect? The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on complications after intra-abdominal procedures

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in the regionalization of surgical procedures. However, evidence on the volume-outcome relationship for emergency intra-abdominal surgery is not well-synthesized. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarize evidence regarding the impact of hospital and surgeon volume on complications.

METHODS

We identified cohort studies assessing the impact of hospital/surgeon volume on postoperative complications after emergency intra-abdominal procedures, with data collected after the year 2000 through a literature search without language restriction in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. A weighted overall complication rate was calculated, and a random effect regression model was used for a summary odds ratio. A sensitivity analysis with the removal of studies contributing to heterogeneity was performed (PROSPERO: CRD42022358879).

RESULTS

The search yielded 2,153 articles, of which 9 cohort studies were included and determined to be good quality according to the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. These studies reported outcomes for the following procedures: cholecystectomy, colectomy, appendectomy, small bowel resection, peptic ulcer repair, adhesiolysis, laparotomy, and hernia repair. Eight studies (2,358,093 patients) with available data were included in the meta-analysis. Low hospital volume was not significantly associated with higher complications. In the sensitivity analysis, low hospital volume was significantly associated with higher complications when appropriate heterogeneity was achieved. Low surgeon volume was associated with higher complications, and these findings remained consistent in the sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

We found that hospital and surgeon volume was significantly associated with higher complications in patients undergoing emergency intra-abdominal surgery when appropriate heterogeneity was achieved.