Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Abdominal Surgery Morbidity, Mortality, and Hospital Readmission

The association of Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy for benign disease: Insurance status remains an important factor in access to high-volume centers

BACKGROUND

Medicaid expansion has been associated with improved access to surgical care at high-volume centers. Its impact on parathyroidectomy, however, is unclear. We evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy at high- and low-volume centers.

METHODS

The Vizient Clinical Data Base was queried for parathyroidectomies. Patients were grouped by insurance status and pre- and post-Medicaid expansion periods. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles (T1-T3) by operative volume (T1 = highest-volume centers). Odds of parathyroidectomy and a difference-in-differences analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

In total, 31,983 patients were identified. Patients were predominantly privately insured (49.9%). Uninsured and Medicaid patients had increasing odds of operation at lower-tertile centers (odds ratio: T1 = ref; uninsured: T2 = 10.0, T3 = 15.8; Medicaid: T2 = 6.2, T3 = 13.5; P < .001). Medicare patients, however, were less likely to undergo operation at lower-volume centers (odds ratio: T2 = 0.89, P < .001; T3 = 0.92, P = .002). Privately insured patients were the least likely to receive care at low-volume centers (odds ratio: T3 = 0.7, P < .001). Medicaid patients in nonexpansion states had 12-16 times higher odds of parathyroidectomy at lower-volume hospitals than their counterparts in expansion states (expansion/nonexpansion states: pre-expansion T3 = 2.3/28.0; postexpansion T3 = 1.3/21.4). Expansion was associated with an increase in the proportion of parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients, with larger gains seen at higher-volume centers (T1 = 5.0%, P = .01; T2 = 3.1%, P = .001; T3 = 2.7%, P = .03). Expansion was not associated with changes in payor distribution for uninsured, Medicare, or privately insured patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients at high-volume centers. However, in nonexpansion states, access to surgical treatment at high-volume centers remains limited for uninsured and underinsured patients.

Utilization and Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery Following the Affordable Care Act in the United States

BACKGROUND

The passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010 marked a pivotal moment in American health care policy, significantly expanding access to health care services. This study aims to explore the relationship between the ACA and the utilization and outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) surgery.

METHODS

Using data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database, this retrospective study compares the pre-ACA period (2007-2009) with the post-ACA period (2017-2019), encompassing patients who had RYGB. Multivariable logistic analysis was done accounting for patient's characteristics, comorbidities, and hospital type.

RESULTS

In the combined periods, there were 158 186 RYGB procedures performed, with 30.0% transpiring in pre-ACA and 70.0% in the post-ACA. Post-ACA, the proportion of uninsured patients decreased from 4.8% to 3.6% (P < .05), while Black patients increased from 12.5% to 18.5% (P < .05). Medicaid-insured patients increased from 6.8% to 18.1% (P < .05), and patients in the poorest income quartile increased from 20% to 26% (P < .05). Patients in the post-ACA period were less likely to have longer hospital stays (OR = .16: 95% CI .16-.17, P < .01), in-hospital mortality (OR = .29: 95% CI .18-.46, P < .01), surgical site infection (OR = .25: 95% CI .21-.29, P < .01), postop hemorrhage (OR = .24: 95% CI .21-.28, P < .01), and anastomotic leak (OR = .14: 95% CI .10-.18, P < .01) than those in the pre-ACA period.

DISCUSSION

Following the implementation of the ACA, utilization of bariatric surgery significantly increased, especially among Black patients, Medicaid beneficiaries, and low-income patients. Moreover, despite the inclusion of more high-risk surgical patients in the post-ACA period, there were better outcomes after surgery.