Severity and Functional Outcome of Patients with Cardioembolic Stroke Occurring during Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Treatment

Contemporary outcomes of acute ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation patients on anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Long-term anticoagulation (AC) therapy reduces the risk of stroke in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF). However, data on the impact of AC on in-hospital stroke outcomes is lacking.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify adult inpatients with AF and a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke between 2016 and 2020. Data was stratified between AC users and nonusers. A multivariate regression model was used to describe the in-hospital outcomes, adjusting for significant comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 655,540 hospitalizations with AF and a primary hospitalization diagnosis of ischemic stroke were included, of which 194,560 (29.7 %) were on long-term AC. Patients on AC tended to be younger (mean age, 77 vs. 78), had a higher average CHA2DS2VASc score (4.48 vs. 4.20), higher rates of hypertension (91 % vs. 88 %), hyperlipidemia (64 % vs. 59 %), and heart failure (34 % vs. 30 %) compared to patients not on long-term AC. Use of AC was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (aOR [95 % CI]: 0.62 [0.60-0.63]), decreased stroke severity (mean NIHSS, 8 vs. 10), decreased use of tPA (aOR 0.42 [0.41-0.43]), mechanical thrombectomy (aOR 0.85 [0.83-0.87]), intracranial hemorrhage (aOR 0.69 [0.67-0.70]), gastrointestinal bleeding (aOR 0.74 [0.70-0.77]), and discharge to skilled nursing facilities (aOR 0.90 [0.89-0.91]), compared to patients not on AC (P<0.001 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with AF admitted for acute ischemic stroke, AC use prior to stroke was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality, decreased stroke severity, decreased discharge to SNF, and fewer stroke-related and bleeding complications.

Acute Ischaemic Stroke in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Potential Causes, Clinical Characteristics, and Short-Term Outcomes

Introduction

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the first-line treatment for primary and secondary acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but a significant percentage of patients develop AIS despite being treated with DOAC. As the number of DOAC-treated patients is growing, so is the number of patients with AIS on DOAC. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of AIS with prestroke DOAC treatment among patients hospitalised in the University Hospital in Kraków, to analyse the clinical characteristics of AIS occurring in patients on DOAC, and to identify potential causes of treatment ineffectiveness in this group.

Materials and Methods

In the study, we included all patients hospitalised in the Department of Neurology of the University Hospital in Kraków within one year (July 2022 to June 2023) with the diagnosis of AIS. The group was divided into two subgroups of patients with and without prestroke DOAC treatment. Based on medical files, we retrospectively analysed the profile of cardiovascular risk factors, stroke severity (assessed with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS), use of causative stroke treatment and short-term outcomes (defined as NIHSS score, modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at discharge, in-hospital mortality, and secondary intracerebral haemorrhage among patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, MT). Within the DOAC-treated subgroup, we looked for potential causes of AIS occurring despite DOAC treatment (valvular AF, poor adherence to treatment, underdosing, other prothrombotic conditions, aetiology of stroke other than thromboembolic, and drug-drug interactions).

Results

In the study, we included 768 AIS patients. 109 (14.2%) had a history of prestroke DOAC treatment. A potential cause of DOAC treatment failure was identified in the majority of them (n = 63, 57.8%). Patients with prestroke DOAC treatment had worse functional condition before stroke and higher stroke severity on admission but similar short-term outcomes and similar short-term effects of treatment with MT. DOAC (+) and DOAC (-) patients had different profiles of cardiovascular risk factors and different factors associated with short-term outcome. Conclusions and Clinical Implications. A potential cause of AIS occurring in DOAC-treated patients can be identified in most cases and in many of them prevented.

Time trends in stroke severity in the years 2005 to 2020: results from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

With aging population, there is an increase of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other vascular risk factors. We investigated trends in stroke severity at hospital admission with respect to AF and other risk factors in a prospective national stroke registry from 2005 to 2020.

METHODS

Data from the prospective Austrian Stroke Unit Registry were used to study demographic and clinical factors associated with the change in admission stroke severity over years. Time trends in admission stroke severity of patients with pre-stroke modified Rankin Score ≤ 3 were investigated with respect to clinical variables and predefined age groups 18-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84 and ≥ 85 years. Time trends were studied using robust generalized linear models assuming normal distribution with a log link. Stroke severity on admission was assessed according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS).

RESULTS

In total, 140,312 patients with acute ischemic stroke were included in the analysis. Within the study period, mean patients' age increased from 70 to 72 years (p < 0.001) and median NIHSS at admission decreased from 4 to 3 (p < 0.001). The frequency of AF increased from 25 to 32% (p < 0.001). The decrease in median admission NIHSS was evident in all relevant subgroups but more pronounced in patients with risk factors including AF, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, elderly patients and those with pre-stroke disability.

CONCLUSION

Despite an aging population and generally increasing AF frequency, we observed a consistent trend towards less disabling strokes on admission.

Association Between Inappropriately Dosed Anticoagulation Therapy With Stroke Severity and Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, some patients experience stroke despite OAC therapy, and knowledge about the impact of prior treatment quality is lacking.

Methods and Results

Patients with atrial fibrillation on OAC therapy who had a first‐time ischemic stroke were identified in the Danish Stroke Registry (2005–2018). Patients treated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy were compared according to the international normalized ratio just before stroke (international normalized ratio <2 [subtherapeutic], international normalized ratio 2–3 [therapeutic], international normalized ratio >3 [supratherapeutic]), and patients on underdosed, appropriately dosed, and overdosed direct OAC (DOAC) therapy were compared. Stroke severity was determined using the Scandinavia Stroke Scale (0–58 points), and the risk of very severe stroke (0–14 points) was analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. One‐year mortality was determined using multivariable Cox regression. A total of 2319 patients with atrial fibrillation and stroke were included; 1196 were taking a VKA (subtherapeutic [46%], therapeutic [43%], supratherapeutic [11%]), and 1123 were taking DOAC (underdosed [23%], appropriately dosed [60%], and overdosed [17%]). Subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic VKA therapy (compared with therapeutic) and underdosed DOAC therapy (compared with appropriate and underdosed DOAC) patients were older, more often women, and more comorbid. Subtherapeutic VKA therapy was associated with very severe stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.06 [95% CI, 1.28–3.31]), whereas supratherapeutic VKA therapy was not (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.60–2.57]) compared with therapeutic VKA therapy. Patients on subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic VKA therapy had a higher 1‐year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.29–2.13]); HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.08–2.22], respectively) than those on therapeutic VKA therapy. Treatment with underdosed or overdosed DOAC therapy was not associated with very severe stroke (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.76–2.15]; OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.37–1.43], respectively) and was not associated with 1‐year mortality (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.83–1.44]; HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.57–1.18], respectively) than appropriate DOAC.

Conclusions

Half of the patients with atrial fibrillation with stroke were on inappropriate OAC therapy. Subtherapeutic VKA was associated with worse stroke severity and higher mortality rate than therapeutic VKA therapy. Neither underdosed nor overdosed DOAC was associated with worse outcomes in adjusted models compared with appropriately dosed DOAC. This study supports DOAC as a first‐line therapy over VKA.

Treatment with Edoxaban Attenuates Acute Stroke Severity in Mice by Reducing Blood-Brain Barrier Damage and Inflammation

Patients with atrial fibrillation and previous ischemic stroke (IS) are at increased risk of cerebrovascular events despite anticoagulation. In these patients, treatment with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) such as edoxaban reduced the probability and severity of further IS without increasing the risk of major bleeding. However, the detailed protective mechanism of edoxaban has not yet been investigated in a model of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Therefore, in the current study we aimed to assess in a clinically relevant setting whether treatment with edoxaban attenuates stroke severity, and whether edoxaban has an impact on the local cerebral inflammatory response and blood–brain barrier (BBB) function after experimental IS in mice. Focal cerebral ischemia was induced by transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in male mice receiving edoxaban, phenprocoumon or vehicle. Infarct volumes, functional outcome and the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage were assessed. BBB damage and the extent of local inflammatory response were determined. Treatment with edoxaban significantly reduced infarct volumes and improved neurological outcome and BBB function on day 1 and attenuated brain tissue inflammation. In summary, our study provides evidence that edoxaban might exert its protective effect in human IS by modulating different key steps of IS pathophysiology, but further studies are warranted.

Coagulation Assay and Stroke Severity upon Admission of Patients with Cardioembolic Cerebral Infarction during Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use

Although the severity of acute cerebral infarction varies in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), no practical method to predict the severity has been established. We analyzed retrospectively the relationship between cardioembolic cerebral infarction severity and coagulation indicators in patients treated with DOACs. We assessed the anticoagulation effect of DOACs using the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), and prothrombin time international standardized ratio (PT-INR) in 71 patients with cardioembolic cerebral infarction admitted to our hospital between January 2015 and December 2019. The participants were divided into a prolongation group (prolonged APTT for oral thrombin inhibitors or prolonged PT for oral factor Xa inhibitors, n =37) and a normal group (no prolongation of coagulation markers, n =34). Of the 71 patients, 21 (30%) and 50 (70%) were using oral thrombin and oral factor Xa inhibitors, respectively. PT, PT-INR, and APTT were significantly higher in the prolongation group (PT: 17.4 ± 5.1 vs. 12.8 ± 1.4 s, P < 0.001; PT-INR: 1.5 ± 0.5 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1, P < 0.001; APTT: 44.8 ± 26.4 vs. 30.4 ± 4.1 s, P = 0.003). The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission and the prevalence of large vessel occlusion were significantly lower in the prolongation group (NIHSS: 2.0 vs. 9.5, P = 0.007; large vessel occlusion: 27% vs. 53%, P = 0.031). The prevalence of large vessel occlusion was low and stroke severity was mild in patients undergoing DOAC therapy with prolongation of coagulation assay markers upon onset of cardioembolic cerebral infarction.

Effects of dabigatran and rivaroxaban on stroke severity according to the results of routine coagulation tests

Introduction

Prior use of direct oral anticoagulants has been associated with reduced stroke severity in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) on stroke severity in patients who were receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban at the time of stroke onset.

Materials and methods

We enrolled 107 patients with NVAF who developed acute ischemic stroke while on dabigatran or rivaroxaban and presented within 24 hours to nine hospitals between January 2014 and December 2018. The results of PT and aPTT assays were obtained within 24 hours of stroke onset in all patients. We analyzed PT and aPTT in relation to stroke severity and ischemic lesion volume using correlation and multivariable regression analyses.

Results

Of the 107 patients included, 46 (43.0%) were on dabigatran and 61 (57.0%) were on rivaroxaban. In patients with prior dabigatran use, while aPTT was inversely correlated with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (r = -0.369, p = 0.012) and ischemic lesion volume (r = -0.480, p = 0.005), there was no correlation between PT and either of these variables. Multivariable analysis confirmed the existence of a significant independent inverse relationship between aPTT and NIHSS score at admission (B, -0.201; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.370 to -0.032; p = 0.005) and between aPTT and ischemic lesion volume (B, -0.076; 95% CI, -0.130 to -0.023; p = 0.007). In patients with prior rivaroxaban use, neither PT nor aPTT was associated with admission NIHSS score or ischemic lesion volume in the correlation and multivariable analyses.

Conclusions

In patients with NVAF who were receiving dabigatran, prolonged aPTT was associated with reduced stroke severity.

Prior Anticoagulation and Short- or Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Background

We aimed to clarify associations between prior anticoagulation and short‐ or long‐term clinical outcomes in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Methods and Results

A total of 1189 ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were hospitalized within 7 days after onset were analyzed. Of these, 813 patients (68.4%) received no prior anticoagulation, 310 (26.1%) received prior warfarin treatment with an international normalized ratio (INR) <2 on admission, 28 (2.4%) received prior warfarin treatment with an INR ≥2 on admission, and the remaining 38 (3.2%) received prior direct oral anticoagulant treatment. Prior warfarin treatment was associated with a lower risk of death or disability at 3 months compared with no prior anticoagulation (INR <2: adjusted odds ratio: 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42–0.81; P=0.001; INR ≥2: adjusted odds ratio: 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16–0.97; P=0.043) but was not associated with a lower risk of death or disability at 2 years. Prior warfarin treatment with an INR ≥2 on admission was associated with a higher risk of ischemic events within 2 years compared with no prior anticoagulation (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.94; 95% CI, 1.20–6.15; P=0.021).

Conclusions

Prior warfarin treatment was associated with a lower risk of death or disability at 3 months but was not associated with a lower risk of death or disability at 2 years in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Prior warfarin treatment with an INR ≥2 on admission was associated with a higher risk of ischemic events within 2 years.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01581502.

Characteristics and Factors for Short-Term Functional Outcome in Stroke Patients With Atrial Fibrillation, Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study

Background and aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of ischemic stroke; however, detailed clinical data and prognostic factors for stroke patients with AF are lacking in Korea. We aimed to investigate clinical information and factors associated with functional outcomes of stroke patients with AF from the Korean nationwide ATrial fibrillaTion EvaluatioN regisTry in Ischemic strOke patieNts (K-ATTENTION) database.

Methods: From January 2013 to December 2015, consecutive clinical information from acute stroke patients with AF or history of AF was collected from 11 centers in Korea. Collected data included demographics, risk factors, pre-stroke medication, stroke severity, stroke subtypes, concomitant cerebral atherosclerosis, brain image findings, recanalization therapy, discharge medication, and functional outcome at 3 months after index stroke.

Results: A total of 3,213 stroke patients (mean age, 73.6 ± 9.8 years; female, 48.6%) were included. The mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 4.9. Among the 1,849 (57.5%) patients who had brain image and functional outcome data, poor outcome (modified Rankin scale > 2) was noted in 53.1% (981/1,849) of patients. After adjusting for age, sex, and variables that had a p < 0.05 in univariate analysis or well-known factors for functional outcome, presence of asymptomatic extracranial cerebral atherosclerosis [odd ratio (OR): 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36–2.82, p = 0.001] and less frequent prior stroke statin intake (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49–0.98, p = 0.038) were associated with poor functional outcome.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that presence of non-relevant extracranial cerebral atherosclerosis may affect poor functional outcome and prior stroke statin therapy may be feasible in Korean stroke patients with AF.

Atrial fibrillation type matters: greater infarct volume and worse neurological defects seen in acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism due to persistent or permanent rather than paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Aims

Some studies have shown that the type of atrial fibrillation (AF), whether paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent or permanent AF (PeAF), affects the incidence of ischaemic stroke. This study sought to determine the relationship between the AF pattern and the severity and brain volume of infarction in an AF population including transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients.

Methods and results

This was a retrospective observational study. We studied 161 consecutive patients who were admitted to our stroke care unit with cardiogenic embolism or TIA related to non-valvular AF (age 79 ± 9.5, 78 females, and 87 PAF patients). We evaluated the differences in severity and infarct volume between the types of AF. Additionally, we divided the patients into three groups according to severe stroke (n = 38), TIA (n = 28), and those who were neither (stroke, n = 95) for the assessment of the predictors of severe stroke and TIA. Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation patients with acute cardiogenic stroke or TIA had worse peak National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores [PAF median 4 (range 3-14), PeAF 17 (5.8-25); P < 0.0001] and worse NIHSS scores at discharge [PAF 2.0 (1-7), PeAF 11 (3-22); P < 0.0001]. Their infarct brain volume assessed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was also larger [PAF 4.4 (1.1-32) mL, PeAF 64 (6.9-170) mL; P < 0.0001]. Multivariate analysis of severe stroke vs. non-severe stroke patients showed that having PeAF was the only independent predictor of severe stroke [odds ratio (OR) 4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91-10.2; P = 0.0003]. Comparison of TIA vs. non-TIA patients showed that PeAF (OR 0.120, 95% CI 0.0230-0.444; P = 0.0008) and anticoagulant use (OR 8.24, 95% CI 2.15-40.8; P = 0.0018) were independent predictors of TIA.

Conclusion

Cardiogenic emboli due to non-valvular PeAF are associated with a worse acute clinical course and greater volume of infarction than those due to PAF.

Patients on NOACs in the Emergency Room

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the increasing use of NOACs, there is still uncertainty on how to treat NOAC patients presenting with neurological emergencies. Initial assessment of coagulation status is challenging but essential in these patients to provide best-possible treatment in case of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Meanwhile, anticoagulation reversal strategies have been suggested; yet, the optimal management is still unestablished. The current review aims to provide up-to-date information on (i) how to identify patients with NOAC intake, (ii) which therapies are feasible in the setting of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke as well as traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, and (iii) how to proceed with patients requiring emergency lumbar puncture.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite several expert opinions, there is still an ongoing debate which NOAC patients presenting with ischemic stroke may benefit from recanalizing strategies and whether these treatment approaches can be performed safely. Results from two phase IV trials investigating the efficacy of NOAC-specific reversal agents in case of major bleeding seem promising with regard to hemostatic parameters, but these antidotes have not been verified to clinically benefit patients, and approval by authorities in parts is still pending. Specific reversal agents are on the way and will provide new treatment options in patients with NOAC-related ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Up to now, the decision which patients should undergo recanalizing treatment for ischemic stroke, or which specific pharmacological reversal treatment in hemorrhagic stroke should be initiated, has to be made cautiously on an individual basis after assessing hemostatic parameters.

Clinical presentation, diagnostic findings and management of cerebral ischemic events in patients on treatment with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants - A systematic review

Background

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are equally or potentially superior in terms of effectiveness in the prevention of ischemic stroke and carry a lower associated risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to Vitamin K antagonists. Nevertheless, ischemic strokes also occur in patients who are being treated with NOAC. In those particular patients, knowledge about the underlying stroke etiology, clinical presentation, acute management, and complication rates is scarce.

Objective

Systematic literature review to provide a comprehensive clinical overview in terms of presentation, laboratory, imaging parameters and outcomes of patients suffering from acute cerebral ischemic events (i.e. TIA and acute ischemic stroke) while on treatment with a NOAC. Only if available, comparison to VKA is presented which was not the primary focus of this analysis.

Data sources

PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE from January 1, 2006, to November 20, 2018.

Study eligibility criteria

52 studies providing detailed information on a total of 12247 patients were included. We excluded case reports and case series with less than five patients.

Study appraisal and synthesis method

We systematically assessed study quality using a bias tool and pooled consistent data.

Results

Existing data indicates milder stroke severity and smaller infarct size of acute ischemic stroke on treatment with NOAC compared to stroke occurrence on Vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Established risk factors for ischemic events also play a role in stroke while on NOACs, albeit the underlying etiology remains poorly understood. Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy seem to be safe and effective, but patient selection for recanalization therapies is challenging.

Limitations

Limited quality of published data, duplicate cases, statistical issues of data pooling, possible incomplete retrieval of identified research and reporting bias might have limited our findings.

Conclusions

Acute ischemic events despite treatment with NOAC therapy are insufficiently investigated.

Systematic review registration number

PROSPERO: CRD42018074853.

Non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants have a positive impact on ischaemic stroke severity in patients with atrial fibrillation

Aims

Several studies showed reduced stroke severity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) if the international normalized ratio (INR) was ≥ 2 at stroke onset. There are no respective data for non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The aim of this study was to compare the impact of NOAC or phenprocoumon intake on stroke severity.

Methods and results

In this single-centre observational study, 3669 patients with acute ischaemic stroke were retrospectively analysed regarding AF status and medication immediately before admission. Using multivariable regression, we analysed the association of pre-admission anticoagulation with severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥ 11) on admission and poor outcome at discharge (modified Rankin scale score > 2). Before the index stroke, 655 patients had known AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2. While 325 (49.6%) patients were anticoagulated, 159 (24.3%) were prescribed a NOAC and 75 (11.5%) phenprocoumon patients had an INR ≥ 2 on admission. Compared with AF patients without medical stroke prevention, an INR ≥ 2 [OR 0.23 (95% CI 0.10-0.53)] or NOAC intake [OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.27-0.86)] were associated with a lower probability of severe stroke after adjustment for confounders, while an INR < 2 [OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.33-1.16)] was not. Adjusted odds ratios for poor functional outcome at hospital discharge were 0.47 (95% CI 0.27-0.84) for NOAC patients, 0.33 (95% CI 0.17-0.65) for INR ≥ 2 and 0.61 (95% CI 0.32-1.16) for INR < 2.

Conclusion

NOAC intake before stroke did reduce the probability of severe stroke on hospital admission and poor functional outcome at hospital discharge as similarly demonstrated for phenprocoumon patients with an INR ≥ 2 on admission.

The Dose of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Stroke Severity in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The severity and the functional outcome of patients with stroke occurring during off-label underdosing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remain uncertain.

METHODS

We studied 53 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were treated with DOACs before the onset of stroke. Thirty patients were treated for primary prevention of stroke and 23 patients were treated for secondary prevention. DOAC treatments were categorized into 3 groups based on the following doses: (1) standard-dose group (n = 17), (2) low-dose group (n = 23), and (3) off-label underdose group (n = 13).

RESULTS

Age was significantly older in the low-dose group than in the standard-dose group (P = .026). The standard-dose group and the low-dose group showed higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores (median, 4) compared with the off-label underdose group (median, 3). More than half of the patients had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of less than 8, and many patients had a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤1). There were no differences in stroke severity and outcome among the 3 groups. The ratio of being discharged home was the highest in the standard-dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients who have off-label underdosing of DOACs do not develop more severe stroke and a poorer outcome than those with the recommended dose. Careful attention to recommended doses is required for the full benefits from DOACs.

Pretreatment with rivaroxaban attenuates stroke severity in rats by a dual antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory mechanism

Stroke outcome is more favourable in patients receiving oral anticoagulants compared with non-anticoagulated patients. The reasons for this “stroke-attenuating” property of oral anticoagulants are largely unknown. This study examined whether prestroke anticoagulation with rivaroxaban, a novel direct factor Xa inhibitor, influences stroke severity, thrombin-mediated intracerebral thrombus formation and pro-inflammatory processes in a rat model of brain ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Male Wistar rats were anticoagulated with rivaroxaban and subjected to 90 minutes of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Infarct size, functional outcome and the occurrence of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) were assessed until day 7. Thrombin generation was determined by measuring the amount of thrombin/antithrombin complex. Intracerebral thrombus formation was evaluated by histology and Western blot. CD68-immunoreactivity and the expression of cytokines and adhesion molecules were investigated to assess postischaemic inflammation. The integrity of the blood–brain barrier was analysed using fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran. Rats pretreated with rivaroxaban developed significantly smaller strokes and less severe functional deficits compared with controls. Although rivaroxaban strongly reduced thrombin-mediated thrombus formation, this was not accompanied by an increased risk of ICH. In addition, rivaroxaban dampened the inflammatory response in the ischaemic brain by downregulating ICAM-1 expression and the activation of CD68+-immune cells. In contrast, rivaroxaban had no effect on the integrity of the blood–brain barrier after stroke. Here, we identified reduced thrombo-inflammation as a major determinant of the stroke-protective property of rivaroxaban in rats. Further studies are needed to assess the therapeutic potential of novel oral anticoagulants in the acute phase after a stroke.

A Linear Temporal Increase in Thrombin Activity and Loss of Its Receptor in Mouse Brain following Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Brain thrombin activity is increased following acute ischemic stroke and may play a pathogenic role through the protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1). In order to better assess these factors, we obtained a novel detailed temporal and spatial profile of thrombin activity in a mouse model of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAo).

METHODS

Thrombin activity was measured by fluorescence spectroscopy on coronal slices taken from the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres 2, 5, and 24 h following pMCAo (n = 5, 6, 5 mice, respectively). Its spatial distribution was determined by punch samples taken from the ischemic core and penumbra and further confirmed using an enzyme histochemistry technique (n = 4). Levels of PAR1 were determined using western blot.

RESULTS

Two hours following pMCAo, thrombin activity in the stroke core was already significantly higher than the contralateral area (11 ± 5 vs. 2 ± 1 mU/ml). At 5 and 24 h, thrombin activity continued to rise linearly (r = 0.998, p = 0.001) and to expand in the ischemic hemisphere beyond the ischemic core reaching deleterious levels of 271 ± 117 and 123 ± 14 mU/ml (mean ± SEM) in the basal ganglia and ischemic cortex, respectively. The peak elevation of thrombin activity in the ischemic core that was confirmed by fluorescence histochemistry was in good correlation with the infarcts areas. PAR1 levels in the ischemic core decreased as stroke progressed and thrombin activity increased.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, there is a time- and space-related increase in brain thrombin activity in acute ischemic stroke that is closely related to the progression of brain damage. These results may be useful in the development of therapeutic strategies for ischemic stroke that involve the thrombin-PAR1 pathway in order to prevent secondary thrombin related brain damage.

[Direct oral anticoagulants and acute stroke : Insights into translational research studies]

In recent years a considerable number of translational research studies on intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke have been published, which are characterized by a particular proximity to practical clinical questions. Animal research has provided insights into the pathophysiological processes and therapy effects, which have so far only been insufficiently investigated in clinical studies. This includes the effectiveness of a rapid reversal of anticoagulation in cases of anticoagulation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage and the safety of thrombolytic treatment in ischemic stroke occurring during treatment with anticoagulants. With the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants these problems have become of particular contemporary relevance. Of course, results from experimental translational studies on stroke cannot be directly translated into clinical routine. Nevertheless, these investigations help to understand the underlying processes and mechanisms and provide proof of concept data for new treatment strategies. This review summarizes the most relevant results in this field of research with a particular focus on practical clinical questions.

Prothrombin time on admission in patients with cardioembolic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage occurring during warfarin treatment in the direct oral anticoagulant era

Warfarin is used worldwide to prevent cardioembolic stroke (CES) in patients with atrial fibrillation even in the era of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). We evaluated clinical characteristics of the patients with CES and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) occurring during warfarin treatment, focusing on prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) at the occurrence. The consecutive 846 CES patients (78 ± 9 years) and 870 ICH patients (68 ± 13 years) admitted to the Hirosaki Stroke and Rehabilitation Center from April 2011 through March 2015 were studied. The antithrombotic agents administered in CES patients before the onset included antiplatelets in 146 patients (17%), warfarin in 205 (24%), DOAC in 37 (5%), and none in the other 458 (54%). Mean PT-INR within 24 hours after the onset in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with warfarin was 1.34 ± 0.33 (n = 129), and 111 of them (86%) showed PT-INR value below the recommended therapeutic range in Japan. The antithrombotic agents administered in ICH patient included antiplatelets in 87 patients (10%), warfarin in 86 (10%), DOAC in 8 (1%), and none in the other 689 (79%). Mean PT-INR within 24 hours after the onset in patients with warfarin was 2.27 ± 0.62 (n = 65), and 56 of them (86%) showed PT-INR < 2.8. Thus, there is a large population with poor warfarin control complicating CES and that with good warfarin control complicating ICH, indicating limitation of warfarin treatment in the DOAC era.