Recurrent Stroke and Bleeding Events after Acute Cardioembolic Stroke-Analysis Using Japanese Healthcare Database from Acute-Care Institutions

The Effect of Statin Treatment on Outcomes of Cardioembolic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies

BACKGROUND

Several real-world observational studies have investigated the association between statin treatment and outcomes of cardioembolic stroke. However, substantial uncertainties remain about this association.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of statin treatment on the outcomes of cardioembolic stroke.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases for relevant clinical studies. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a random-effects model were used to assess the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 18 observational studies published between 2009 and 2020 were included. No randomized clinical trial was found. Compared with non-statin treatment, statin treatment was not associated with a decreased risk of stroke recurrence in patients with cardioembolic stroke [PWCS] (RR, 0.93; 95% CI 0.82-1.06). However, compared with non-statin treatment, statin treatment was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (RR, 0.59; 95% CI 0.49-0.73) and better functional outcomes (RR, 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.97) in PWCS. There was no significant association between statin treatment and major bleeding event risk in PWCS (RR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.06-2.16). Compared with non-statin treatment, statin treatment was not associated with a decreased risk of coronary atherosclerotic disease in PWCS (RR, 1.04; 95% CI 0.96-1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of statins does not enhance the prevention of stroke recurrence in PWCS, statin treatment is associated with improved clinical outcomes in PWCS. Statins play a beneficial role in the treatment of cardioembolic stroke.

Cardiac imaging after ischemic stroke : Echocardiography, CT, or MRI?

About 20–25% of all ischemic strokes are of cardioembolic etiology, with atrial fibrillation and heart failure as the most common underlying pathologies. Diagnostic work-up by noninvasive cardiac imaging is essential since it may lead to changes in therapy, e.g., in—but not exclusively—secondary stroke prevention. Echocardiography remains the cornerstone of cardiac imaging after ischemic stroke, with the combination of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography as gold standard thanks to their high sensitivity for many common pathologies. Transesophageal echocardiography should be considered as the initial diagnostic tool when a cardioembolic source of stroke is suspected. However, to date, there is no proven benefit of transesophageal echocardiography-related therapy changes on the main outcomes after ischemic stroke. Based on the currently available data, cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging should be regarded as complementary methods to echocardiography, providing additional information in specific situations; however, they cannot be recommended as first-line modalities.