Patients with Acute Lacunar Infarction Have Benefit from Intravenous Thrombolysis

Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Thrombolysis by Infarct Type in Patients with No Visible Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of the AcT Trial

BACKGROUND

About 25% of patients with acute ischemic stroke have lacunar infarct on follow-up imaging. In this secondary analysis from the AcT (Alteplase Compared With Tenecteplase) trial, we assessed if there is variation in safety or efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis by infarct type in patients with no visible occlusion. We also determined if this effect differed between tenecteplase and alteplase.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a secondary analysis from the AcT trial. Lacunar infarct was defined as single, ≤15 mm, and in regions supplied by perforating arterioles on 24-hour imaging. Outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 24 hours, any hemorrhage on imaging, and 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. Mixed-effects regression models adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity, thrombolytic type, and onset-to-needle time were used. Of 1577 patients, 456/29.9% had no visible occlusion and interpretable follow-up imaging (magnetic resonance imaging: 41.2%). Of these 93 (20.4%) (magnetic resonance imaging: 62.3%) had lacunar infarct, 171 (37.5%) (magnetic resonance imaging: 67.4%) had nonlacunar infarct, and 192 (42.1%) (magnetic resonance imaging: 7.3%) had no visible infarct. Four patients (2.3%) in the group with nonlacunar infarct and none in the groups with lacunar infarct and no visible infarct developed symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Any intracranial hemorrhage was highest (21; 12.4%) in the group with nonlacunar infarct. There was no significant interaction between thrombolytic type and treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In the AcT trial, safety of intravenous thrombolysis was similar across all infarct types in patients with no visible occlusion but functional outcomes were worst in patients with nonlacunar infarct. Safety and functional outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis were better in the groups with lacunar infarct and no visible infarct as compared with the overall trial population.

Outcome of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with small vessel disease

INTRODUCTION

Lacunar stroke (LS) subtype accounts for a quarter of ischemic strokes. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is known to improve overall stroke outcomes. Very few studies have focused on the outcome of IVT in lacunar strokes.

AIM

To detect the outcome of IVT in LS patients compared to non-thrombolysed LS patients.

METHODS

Fifty patients presenting with LS received the standard protocol of IVT (Group I). They were compared to fifty matched LS patients who presented beyond the time window and were selected as the control group (Group II). Clinical outcome was measured using NIHSS within 24 h, NIHSS at discharge, and MRS after 3 months. Risk factors that could have affected clinical outcomes were compared in the thrombolysis group.

RESULTS

The short-term clinical outcome of Group I showed statistically significant improvement of NIHSS after 24 hrs compared to Group II (mean NIHSS = 5.52±3.89 and 7.44±1.82 respectively), as well as on discharge (mean NIHSS = 3.88±3.50 and 5.78±2.97) respectively. For long-term outcomes, 94 % of GroupⅠ reached MRS 0, 1, and 2 (n = 47/50) versus 74 % (n = 36/50) in Group II. Longer door-to-needle time, severe WMCs (Fazekas score), and pneumonia were shown to be significant predictor factors for the worst outcome.

CONCLUSION

IVT has improved short- and long-term outcomes in LS patients. Longer door-to-needle time, severe WMCs, and pneumonia were shown to be significant predictor factors for the worst outcome.

Efficacy and Safety of Alteplase on Treatment of Acute Single Small Subcortical Infarction

BACKGROUND

Single Small Subcortical Infarction (SSSI) is an isolated small infarction in the territory of perforating artery with a maximum diameter of 20 mm in axial Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI). About 20 to 30% of SSSI patients were reported to have Early Neurological Deterioration (END) in the acute phase, which brought adverse effects on long-term outcomes. The effect of the alteplase on the outcome of SSSI, especially END and long-term outcomes, was ambiguous.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to find out the efficacy and safety of intravenous recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator (rt-PA) on long-term and short- outcomes of patients with SSSI as compared to patients who received standard medical care.

METHODS

The patients were retrospectively screened from a stroke registry of the neurology department of 1st Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2013 to December 2020. Based on treatment modality, patients were dichotomized into alteplase and standard medical care groups. To minimize confounding factors in subgroups, a propensity score matching analysis was done. The primary outcome was the favorable functional outcome 3 months after stroke onset, defined by attaining a score of ≤2 points on the modified Rankin scale (mRS), secondary outcome was the prevention of occurrence of END, defined as an increase of ≥2 points in the total score or ≥1point on motor subunit in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score within 72 hours after admission, safety features were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or death. Multivariate analysis was employed to find the efficacy and safety of alteplase in the treatment of SSSI.

RESULTS

A total of 717 patients with anterior circulation SSSI were selected, and 132 were included in the final analysis. Forty-five patients were treated with alteplase within 4.5 hours and 87 with standard medical care, and 44 pairs were successfully matched by propensity score. Pre-match data showed that the alteplase thrombolysis group showed a higher proportion of favorable outcomes at 3-month follow-up [OR=0.315, 95%CI:0.106, 0.931, P = 0.037] but did not reduce the incidence of END compared with the non-thrombolytic group [OR = 1.033, 95%CI:0.417,2.554, P = 0.943]. Post-match data showed that the alteplase group also showed a higher proportion of favorable outcomes at 3-month follow-up [OR = 0.247, 95%CI: 0.074, 0.830, P = 0.024]; however, it did not reduce the incidence of END compared with the non-thrombolytic group [OR = 1.241, 95%CI: 0.433,3.554, P = 0.688]. There was one case of asymptomatic ICH in alteplase treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SSSI in the anterior circulation are more likely to achieve 3 months favorable outcomes than those who were treated with standard medical care; however, treatment with alteplase may not prevent the occurrence of END.

Clinical Effect of Digital Subtraction Angiography Combined with Neurointerventional Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease and Its Influence on Vascular Endothelial Function and Oxidative Stress

Objective

Ischemic cerebrovascular disease is a commonly seen vascular disorder in clinical practice. Given the difficulty of drug therapy to achieve ideal curative effects, interventional therapy has gradually become the preferred treatment for the disease. This research primarily discusses the short-term efficacy of digital subtraction angiography- (DSA-) guided neurointerventional thrombolysis for acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease (AICVD) and its influence on vascular endothelial function (VEF) and oxidative stress (OS).

Methods

All the clinical data of 162 patients diagnosed with AICVD and treated between June 2019 and December 2021 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. They were assigned to two cohorts according to the difference in interventional methods: a conventional group (CG) given recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) therapy and an observation group (OG) intervened by DSA-guided neurointerventional thrombolysis. The two groups were compared with respect to short-term treatment efficacy, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, cerebral hemodynamics, and VEF and OS indexes.

Results

The short-term efficacy was better in OG (93.98%) than in CG (82.28%). After treatment, the NIHSS score decreased in both cohorts with obvious differences within the group at different time points, and the posttreatment NIHSS score was lower in OG as compared to CG. OG had higher Q m and V m while lower W v, Z cv, and R v than CG. Higher endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) was observed in OG, as well as lower ankle-brachial index (ABI) and pulse wave velocity (PWV). And the posttreatment MDA was lower while SOD, GSH-Px, and TAC were higher in OG compared with those on CG. All the above differences were of statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

DSA-guided neurointerventional thrombolysis is highly effective in the treatment of AICVD, which can not only effectively improve patients' neurological function and cerebral hemodynamics but also mitigate VEF injury and help to alleviate patients' OS.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (iv-rtPA) has been routinely used to treat ischemic stroke for 25 years, following large clinical trials. However, there are few prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of this therapy in strokes attributed to cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). We evaluated functional outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) using all available data on the effects of iv-rtPA in SVD-related ischemic stroke (defined either using neuroimaging, clinical features, or both). Using fixed-effect and random-effects models, we calculated the pooled effect estimates with regard to excellent and favorable outcomes (mRS=0-1 and 0-2 respectively, at 3 months), and the rate of sICH. Twenty-three studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, 11 of which were comparative, and there were only 3 randomized clinical trials. In adjusted analyses, there was an increased odds of excellent outcome (adjusted OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.29-1.82, I2: 0%) or favorable outcome (adjusted OR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.31-2.15,I2: 0%) in patients who received iv-rtPA compared with placebo. Across the six studies which reported it, the incidence of sICH was higher in the treatment group (M-H RR = 8.83, 95% CI: 2.76-28.27). The pooled rate of sICH in patients with SVD administered iv-rtPA was only 0.72% (95% CI: 0.12%-1.64%). We conclude that when ischemic stroke attributed to SVD is considered separately, available data on the effects of iv-rtPA therapy are insufficient for the highest level of recommendation, but it seems to be safe. Although further therapeutic trials in SVD-related ischemic stroke appear to be justified, our findings should not prevent its continued use for this group of patients in clinical practice.

Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Alteplase in Acute Lacunar Ischemic Stroke: The ENCHANTED Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine any differential efficacy and safety of low- vs standard-dose IV alteplase for lacunar vs nonlacunar acute ischemic stroke (AIS), we performed post hoc analyzes from the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED) alteplase dose arm.

METHODS

In a cohort of 3,297 ENCHANTED participants, we identified those with lacunar or nonlacunar AIS with different levels of confidence (definite/according to prespecified definitions based on clinical and adjudicated imaging findings. Logistic regression models were used to determine associations of lacunar AIS with 90-day outcomes (primary, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 2-6; secondary, other mRS scores, intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH], and early neurologic deterioration or death) and treatment effects of low- vs standard-dose alteplase across lacunar and nonlacunar AIS with adjustment for baseline covariables.

RESULTS

Of 2,588 participants with available imaging and clinical data, we classified cases as definite/probable lacunar (n = 490) or nonlacunar AIS (n = 2,098) for primary analyses. Regardless of alteplase dose received, lacunar AIS participants had favorable functional (mRS 2-6, adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.60 [0.47-0.77]) and other clinical or safety outcomes compared to participants with nonlacunar AIS. Low-dose alteplase (versus standard) had no differential effect on functional outcomes (mRS 2-6, 1.04 [0.87-1.24]) but reduced the risk of symptomatic ICH in all included participants. There were no differential treatment effects of low- vs standard-dose alteplase on all outcomes across lacunar and nonlacunar AIS (all p _interaction ≥0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence from the ENCHANTED trial that low-dose alteplase had any advantages over standard dose for definite/probable lacunar AIS.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with lacunar AIS, low-dose alteplase had no additional benefit or safety over standard-dose alteplase.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01422616.

Efficacy of neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease and its influence on neurological function and prognosis of patients

The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICD) and its influence on the neurological function and prognosis of patients. A total of 119 patients with ICD admitted to Xinxiang Central Hospital (Xinxiang, China) from May 2013 to September 2015 were selected. Among them, 65 patients were enrolled in the control group and treated with intravenous thrombolysis, whereas the other 54 patients were enrolled in the observation group and were treated with intravenous thrombolysis combined with neurointervention. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) system was used to evaluate the neurological function of patients after treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was carried out to assess the survival of patients. The total effective rate, complications, vascular recanalization and the hospitalization time after treatment were compared between the two groups. The NIHSS scores at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment were statistically lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate and total vascular recanalization in the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was statistically lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). In conclusion, neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis can not only effectively improve the diseased blood vessels of patients and restore the damaged nerve function, but also reduce the incidence of complications. Moreover, neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis is safe and can ensure a better quality of life of patients.