Determinants of preventable stroke-Ankara ACROSS stroke preventability study

Comparison of the associations between life's essential 8 and life's simple 7 with stroke: NHANES 1999-2018

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the association between Life's Essential 8 (LE8) and stroke and all-cause mortality, and compare whether it has an advantage over Life's Simple 7 (LS7).

METHODS

This study investigated data from NHANES spanning from 1999 to 2018. The LE8 was categorized as low, moderate and high cardiovascular health (CVH). LS7 score was categorized as inadequate, average, or optimal. Weighted logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) were used to examin correlations. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to detect the accuracy in predicting stroke. The stratified and sensitivity analyses were conducted along with mediation analysis. In addition, a longitudinal cohort was constructed by combining the mortality data, and Cox regression models were utilized to determine the association between CVH and the mortality rate.

RESULTS

For LE8, compared to low CVH, moderate CVH was associated with a 41 % lower risk of stroke, and high CVH was associated with a 71 % lower prevalence of stroke. For LS7, compared to inadequate CVH, average CVH was associated with a 24 % lower prevalence of stroke, and optimal CVH was associated with a 39 % lower prevalence of stroke. RCS showed inverse dose-response relationships of both LE8 and LS7 with stroke. In unweighted ROC, LE8 (AUC = 0.702, 95 % CI: 0.685-0.718, P < 0.001) has a stronger ability to discriminate stroke than LS7 (0.677, 95 % CI: 0.658-0.696, P < 0.001) (PDeLong = 0.046). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated robustness of LE8 in predicting stroke. GGT and WBC mediated 4.92 % and 4.58 % of the association, respectively. Cox regression showed neither LE8 nor LS7 were predictive of mortality risk among stroke survivor.

CONCLUSIONS

LE8 outperformed LS7 in classifying stroke. Oxidative stress and inflammation mediated the association between LE8 and stroke.

Preventability of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack in a tertiary care center in Argentina

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with many individuals presenting with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (AIS/TIA) due to underlying vascular risk factors (VRF). While these patients typically undergo routine evaluations for acute treatment, the prevention of these conditions is often underestimated. This study reports the prevalence of non-optimized VRF and estimates their degree of avoidability in a cohort of patients treated in a tertiary care center following AIS/TIA.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled patients older than 18 years who experienced AIS/TIA over a two-year period. Preventability was defined as the degree to which an acute cerebrovascular event could have been prevented if the VRF had been appropriately treated. Using the variables determined at the onset of AIS or TIA, we developed a 10-point scale to classify the degree of preventability (not preventable [score of 0], low preventability [score of 1-3], and high preventability [score of 4 or higher]). We further defined sub-scores based on the effectiveness of treatment of high blood pressure [HBP] (0-2 points), dyslipidemia [DLP] (0-2 points), atrial fibrillation [AF] (1 point), active smoking [AS] (1 point), obesity (1 point), previous coronary heart disease [CHD] (1 point), and previous AIS/TIA (2 points). Demographic factors, etiologies, and imaging findings were evaluated, tabulated independently, and subsequently correlated with clinical findings extracted from the available patient records.

RESULTS

Of the 395 patients (334 with AIS and 61 with TIA), 376 (95.19 %) exhibited some degree of preventability, whereas 19 (4.81 %) presented with a nonpreventable event. In total, 296 (74.94 %) presented a low preventable event, and 80 (20.25 %) presented a high preventable event. Applying the Chi-square test of independence to stroke etiology highlighted cardio-aortic embolism and large artery atherosclerosis as groups with a significantly higher burden of risk factors necessitating intervention, while patients with stroke of other etiologies had more adequate control of VRF. In terms of stroke severity, as determined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), patients with NIHSS scores >5 were more likely to experience preventable events. According to the ABCD2 score, higher risk scores were significantly associated with a higher preventive factor burden; however, age, sex, vascular territory, and Canadian TIA scores were not related to the prevention of AIS/TIA.

CONCLUSIONS

The high percentage of preventable events reflects the need to study other factors that may contribute to unhealthy lifestyles in this population. Potential reasons for poor health include high levels of stress, sleep deprivation, working conditions and an unhealthy diet. Further studies are required to better understand these phenomena.

The association of the platelet/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with self-reported stroke and cardiovascular mortality: a population-based observational study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that the relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and stroke is controversial, and the association between the platelet/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (PHR), a novel marker for inflammation and hypercoagulability states, and stroke has not been established.

METHODS

This study presents an analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Stroke history, HDL-C levels, and platelet counts were obtained during cross-sectional surveys. The PHR was calculated as the ratio of the number of platelets to HDL-C concentration. Weighted logistic regression was used to assess the associations of HDL-C and the PHR with stroke. Nonlinearity of this relationship was determined through restricted cubic splines (RCSs) and two-piecewise linear regression for identifying inflection points. Furthermore, Cox regression was utilized to prospectively analyze the associations of the PHR and HDL-C concentration with cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in stroke survivors.

RESULTS

A total of 27,301 eligible participants were included in the study; mean age, 47.28 years and 50.57% were female, among whom 1,040 had a history of stroke. After full adjustment, the odds ratio (OR) of stroke associated with a per standard deviation (SD) increase in the PHR was estimated at 1.13 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 - 1.24, P = 0.01), and the OR of stroke associated with a per SD increase in HDL-C was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-1.05, P = 0.30). The RCS indicated a nonlinear relationship for both variables (PPHR = 0.018 and PHDL-C = 0.003), and further piecewise linear regression identified inflection points at PHR = 223.684 and HDL-C = 1.4 mmol/L. Segmental regression indicated that in the PHR ≥ 223.684 segment, the estimated OR of stroke associated with a per-SD increase in the PHR was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.09 - 1.31, P < 0.001), while the association of stroke with HDL-C was not significant before or after the inflection point (P > 0.05). Furthermore, Cox regression and RCS showed that a per-SD increase in the PHR was linearly associated with a greater risk of CVD mortality among stroke survivors (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.22, P < 0.001; nonlinear, P = 0.956), while HDL-C was not significantly associated with CVD mortality.

CONCLUSION

The association between the PHR and stroke incidence exhibited a significant threshold effect, with an inflection point at 223.684. A PHR exceeding 223.684 was positively associated with stroke, while the association between HDL-C and stroke was not significant. Additionally, the PHR was positively and linearly associated with CVD mortality among stroke survivors.

Early Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Incidence in Primary Care: Translating Measurements into Actions-A Retrospective Cohort Study

(1) Background: AF-related strokes will triple by 2060, are associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline, and alone or in combination, will be one of the main health and economic burdens on the European population. The main goal of this paper is to describe the incidence of new AF associated with stroke, cognitive decline and mortality among people at high risk for AF. (2) Methods: Multicenter, observational, retrospective, community-based studies were conducted from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021. The setting was primary care centers. A total of 40,297 people aged ≥65 years without previous AF or stroke were stratified by AFrisk at 5 years. The main measurements were the overall incidence density/1000 person-years (CI95%) of AF and stroke, prevalence of cognitive decline, and Kaplan-Meier curve. (3) Results: In total, 46.4% women, 77.65 ± 8.46 years old on average showed anAF incidence of 9.9/103/year (CI95% 9.5-10.3), associated with a four-fold higher risk of stroke (CI95% 3.4-4.7), cognitive impairment(OR 1.34 (CI95% 1.1-1.5)), and all-cause mortality (OR 1.14 (CI95% 1.0-1.2)), but there was no significant difference in ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, or peripheral arteriopathy. Unknown AF was diagnosed in 9.4% and of these patients, 21.1% were diagnosed with new stroke. (4) Conclusions: The patients at high AF risk (Q4th) already had an increased cardiovascular risk before they were diagnosed with AF.