Stroke Thrombolysis in Patients Taking Ticagrelor -Two Successful Cases and a Review of the Literature

Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: why not?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to summarize available evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) using recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with specific comorbidities and potential contraindications to systemic reperfusion therapy. Recent advances in IVT implementation in wake-up stroke and in extended time window using advanced neuroimaging will also be highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite theoretical concerns of a higher bleeding risk with IVT, there are no data showing increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) in patients with stroke mimics, including seizures, increasing age and dual antiplatelet pretreatment. In addition, recent randomized evidence allows us to expand the time window of IVT for AIS using advanced neuroimaging both in wake-up stroke patients and in patients presenting within 4.5-9 h from symptom onset fulfilling certain neuroimaging criteria (based on DWI/FLAIR mismatch or perfusion mismatch).

SUMMARY

IVT is a highly effective systemic reperfusion therapy that counts 25 years of everyday clinical experience but still presents several challenges in its application. Appropriate patient selection and adherence to rt-PA protocol is paramount in terms of safety. The effort to simplify the indications, expand the therapeutic time window and eliminate specific initial contraindications is continuously evolving.

Safety of Ticagrelor in Moderate and Severe Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Single-Center Retrospective Review

OBJECTIVES

Ticagrelor may be superior to aspirin after minor ischemic stroke or TIA, particularly in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic disease. However, there may be an increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with moderate to severe ischemic stroke, and ticagrelor has not been studied in this patient population. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the safety of ticagrelor after moderate or severe ischemic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke and NIHSS 6 or greater who were discharged on ticagrelor between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients who underwent angioplasty, stenting or carotid revascularization during the hospitalization were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 183 patients discharged on ticagrelor, 61 patients were included. Median age was 61 (IQR 52-68); 33 (54%) patients were men. Median NIHSS was 11 (IQR 8-15). Fourteen (23%) patients received IV alteplase and 35 (57%) patients received mechanical thrombectomy. Stroke mechanism was large artery atherosclerosis in 53 (87%) of patients, of which 40 (71%) were deemed intracranial atherosclerosis. Final infarct volume was greater than 10 mL in 32 (52%) patients. Follow-up information was available for 53 (87%) patients; median length of follow-up was 3 (IQR 2-6) months. Six (10%) patients experienced recurrent ischemic stroke. No patients experienced symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after initiation of ticagrelor. One (2%) patient experienced major bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the potential safety of ticagrelor following moderate or severe acute ischemic stroke. These findings support the need for future prospective studies.