Investigating the "Weekend Effect" on Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

A Systematic Literature Review on the Burden of Disease for Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

A vast amount of literature is available on the burden of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Yet, most information on AIS burden does not stratify by stroke severity, and the inclusion of mild strokes (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale < 5) might obscure the true impact of moderate-to-severe AIS. Therefore, it is important to understand the literature as it pertains to the epidemiological, clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of moderate-to-severe AIS from a global perspective.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted, including articles published between January 2015 and June 2023. The clinical burden search focused on patients with moderate or severe AIS. Due to the paucity of evidence, the humanistic and economic burdens were evaluated based on overall AIS studies. Abstract and full-text screening were conducted by 2 reviewers, with data extraction completed by 1 reviewer. In all, 136 studies were included in the SLR.

RESULTS

AIS caused a substantial burden for patients and the healthcare system. The clinical burden of AIS (specifically severe AIS) resulted in high mortality and worse functional outcomes across multiple demographics (female sex, older age, and patients with comorbidities). The economic burden of overall AIS was substantial, with inpatient costs as the primary driver (a mean or median stay of 7 days). The highest inpatient costs were reported in South Korea ($45,180) and the United States ($38,470).

CONCLUSIONS

The review highlighted the huge burden of moderate-to-severe AIS, with patients experiencing worse outcomes with increased stroke severity. Further focus is needed on outcomes relating to moderate-to-severe AIS to fully understand the burden of stroke in this patient population.

Effect of Hospital Arrival Time on Functional Prognosis of Stroke Patients: Japan Stroke Data Bank Over 20 Years

AIMS

The impact of weekend/holiday and nighttime hospitalization on functional outcomes and long-term trends in stroke patients is unclear. We examined functional and life outcomes and changes over time.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data of 203,176patients for hospital arrival day of week and 76,442patients for arrival times using Japan Stroke Data Bank. The endpoints were favorable outcome (Modified Rankin Scale[mRS]0-2), unfavorable outcome(mRS 5-6), and in-hospital mortality. We calculated odds ratios(OR) and 95% confidence interval(CI) of weekends/holidays and off-hours versus weekdays and on-hours for 2000-2009 and 2010-2020 using a mixed-effect multivariate model adjusted for confounding factors and evaluated interactions. Thereafter, we performed to check for year trends.

RESULTS

All endpoints were worse in weekend/holiday admissions for all stroke and in off-hours hospitalization for total stroke(TS), ischemic stroke(IS), and intracerebral hemorrhage(ICH). The adjusted ORs for favorable outcomes of weekend/holiday admissions were TS, 0.90(0.87-0.93); IS, 0.89(0.86-0.93); ICH, 0.91(0.84-0.98) and unfavorable outcome TS, 1.04(1.002-1.08) IS, 1.06(1.01-1.11). Off-hour hospitalization had adjusted ORs for favorable outcome(TS, 0.86 [95% CI: 0.82-0.91]; IS, 0.90 [0.84-0.95]; ICH, 0.85 [0.75-0.96]), unfavorable outcome(TS, 1.14 [1.07-1.22]; IS, 1.13 [1.04-1.23]; ICH, 1.15 [1.01-1.31]), and mortality (TS, 1.15 [1.05-1.26]; IS, 1.17 [1.04-1.32]). For IS, the incidence of unfavorable outcomes during off-hours was significantly lower in 2010-2020 than in 2000-2009; after adjusting for reperfusion therapy, it was no longer significant.

CONCLUSION

Stroke patients admitted on weekends/holidays and off-hours had worse functional and life outcomes. Functional outcomes for off-hour admission for IS improved at 10-year intervals, possibly due to improvements in stroke care systems.

Use of diagnostic subtraction angiography for ischemic stroke (US DUTCH study) Regional variation and time-trend among medicare beneficiaries

INTRODUCTION

There are no guideline recommendations for DSA in the ischemic stroke work-up. We studied the rate of DSA in ischemic stroke, the recent time-trend, hospital variation and associated factors.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with ischemic stroke admitted between 2016 and 2020 in the United States. ICD-10 codes were used to determine ischemic stroke diagnosis and procedure codes for thrombectomy and DSA. Hospital trends and factors associated with DSA performance were analyzed in hospitals with DSA capacity.

RESULTS

7.373 (0.7 %) of the 1,085,644 ischemic stroke patients, had a DSA for diagnostic purposes. In the patients that were admitted to a hospital with DSA facility, the following factors showed the strongest association with DSA: younger age (aOR=0.81 [95 % confidence interval (CI):0.81-0.83]), thrombectomy rate in that hospital (aOR=2549 [95 %CI:610-10663]), transfer (aOR=1.41[95 %CI:1.34-1.50]) and carotid disease (aOR=5.8 [95 %CI:5.6-6.1]). There was large variation in the hospital DSA rate, varying from 0.07 % to 11.1 %. Of the variance of DSA rates, 15 % was attributed to the residual effect hospital propensity to perform DSA. The top decile of hospitals with the highest DSA rate, performed DSA's in >2.3 % of patients, compared to the 0.6 % median. There was no change in DSA rates over time.

CONCLUSION

DSA is used infrequently in acute ischemic stroke patients and did not change between 2016 to 2020. Hospital variation in DSA use was however large, and not solely explained by patient and facility factors.

Predictors of Endovascular Treatment Procedural Complications in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Single-Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Procedural complications occur in 4%-29% of endovascular treatments in acute ischemic stroke. However, little is known about their predictors and clinical impact in the real world. We aimed to investigate the frequency and clinical impact of procedural complications of endovascular treatment and identify associated risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2015-2019, we retrospectively reviewed all patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving endovascular treatment within 24 hours included in the Acute STroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne. We identified patients having an endovascular treatment procedural complication (local access complication, arterial perforation, dissection or vasospasm, and embolization in a previously nonischemic territory) and performed logistic regression analyses to identify associated predictors. We also correlated procedural complications with long-term clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 684 consecutive patients receiving endovascular treatment, 113 (16.5%) had at least 1 procedural complication. The most powerful predictors were groin puncture off-hours (OR = 2.24), treatment of 2 arterial sites (OR = 2.71), and active smoking (OR = 1.93). Patients with a complication had a significantly less favorable short-term clinical outcome (Δ-NIHSS score of -2.2 versus -4.33, P-value adjusted < .001), but a similar long-term clinical outcome (mRS at 3 months = 3 versus 2, P-value adjusted = .272).

CONCLUSIONS

Procedural complications are quite common in endovascular treatment and lead to a less favorable short-term but similar long-term outcome. Their association with treatment off-hours and at 2 arterial sites requires particular attention in these situations to optimize the overall benefit of endovascular treatment.

The Management and Outcome of Stroke Patients Admitted on Weekdays Compared to Weekends at the King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Background and Purpose

Stroke is an unexpected medical emergency that can result in significant disability. The weekend effect suggests that individuals with acute medical problems are not treated the same way on weekends as they are on weekdays. There is no previous published study about weekend effect on stroke patients from Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This was an IRB approved, retrospective, cohort study. All stroke patients admitted between January 2017 and December 2018 were included. Ten standards of care were chosen to assess compliance with standardized care. Seven measures were chosen for acute management of stroke.

Results

A total of 731 patients were included, 68.5% were males; 493 (67%) were admitted during weekdays and 238 (33%) on weekends. There was no difference for age (P = .32), gender (P = .32), nationality (P = .62), stroke subtype (P = .27) and stroke severity (P = .69) on weekday or weekend admission. In two-third patients, more than 70% of stroke orders were utilized, with no difference in thrombolysis rate (P = .81). There was no difference in recurrent stroke (P = .86), mortality or discharge disposition (P = .34) between the patients. The patients admitted during weekdays had less complications (38 vs 46%; P = .04).

Conclusions

There was no difference in the quality of care provided to stroke patients admitted during weekdays or weekends. There was no difference in the use of acute intervention on weekends and weekdays. Patients had similar outcomes and discharge disposition whether admitted on weekdays or weekends, except that those admitted on weekends had a significantly greater overall number of complications.

Effect of admission time on provision of acute stroke treatment at stroke units and stroke centers—An analysis of the Swiss Stroke Registry

Introduction:

Rapid treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) depends on sufficient staffing which differs between Stroke Centers and Stroke Units in Switzerland. We studied the effect of admission time on performance measures of AIS treatment and related temporal trends over time.

Patients and methods:

We compared treatment rates, door-to-image-time, door-to-needle-time, and door-to-groin-puncture-time in stroke patients admitted during office hours (Monday–Friday 8:00–17:59) and non-office hours at all certified Stroke Centers and Stroke Units in Switzerland, as well as secular trends thereof between 2014 and 2019, using data from the Swiss Stroke Registry. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale and mortality at 3 months.

Results:

Data were eligible for analysis in 31,788 (90.2%) of 35,261 patients. Treatment rates for IVT/EVT were higher during non-office hours compared with office hours in Stroke Centers (40.8 vs 36.5%) and Stroke Units (21.8 vs 18.5%). Door-to-image-time and door-to-needle-time increased significantly during non-office hours. Median (IQR) door-to-groin-puncture-time at Stroke Centers was longer during non-office hours compared to office hours (84 (59–116) vs 95 (66–130) minutes). Admission during non-office hours was independently associated with worse functional outcome (1.11 [95%CI: 1.04–1.18]) and increased mortality (1.13 [95%CI: 1.01–1.27]). From 2014 to 2019, median door-to-groin-puncture-time improved and the treatment rate for wake-up strokes increased.

Discussion and Conclusion:

Despite differences in staffing, patient admission during non-office hours delayed IVT to a similar, modest degree at Stroke Centers and Stroke Units. A larger delay of EVT was observed during non-office hours, but Stroke Centers sped up delivery of EVT over time. Patients admitted during non-office hours had worse functional outcomes, which was not explained by treatment delays.