Should general surgery residents be taught laparoscopic pyloromyotomies? An ethical perspective

A Contemporary Review of Surgical Approach and Outcomes in Pediatric Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis

INTRODUCTION

In order to define optimal resources and outcome standards for infant pyloromyotomy, we sought to perform a contemporary analysis of surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open) and outcomes.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Pediatrics Participant Use File (NSQIP PUF) was queried from 2016 to 2020. Utilization of laparoscopy was trended over time. Complication rates and length of stay were compared by operative approach.

RESULTS

9752 pyloromyotomies were included in the analysis. The utilization of laparoscopy steadily increased over the study time period (66% to 79%) and was associated with a shorter operative time. On multivariate regression, the utilization of laparoscopy was associated with a lower risk of overall complications, length of stay, and superficial surgical site infections. Overall complication rates were lower than previously reported (2.02%). The most common complication was superficial infection (1.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In facilities reporting to pediatric National Quality Improvement Project, utilization of laparoscopy has steadily increased, and complication rates are lower than previously reported. Complication rates and length of stay were lower with the laparoscopic approach in this contemporary cohort. These results offer benchmarks for quality improvement initiatives. The laparoscopic approach should be standard in facilities performing this procedure.

Proficiency for Advanced Laparoscopic Procedures in Gynecologic Residency Program: Do all Residents Need to be Trained?

OBJECTIVES

To assess the current state of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the Dutch residency program, the level of competence among graduated residents, and whether they still perform these procedures. Furthermore, their current attitudes toward the implementation of minimally invasive surgery into residency training were assessed.

DESIGN

An online survey (Canadian Task Force Classification III) regarding the level of competence, performance, training, and interest for gynecologic laparoscopic procedures.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Gynecologists who finished residency training between 2008 and 2013 in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

Response rate was 73% (171/235). The scores for all basic and intermediate laparoscopic procedures performed immediately after residency showed the highest competence level (median 5, of scale 1-5). The competence level for advanced laparoscopic procedures was less at 3, indicating that the graduated residents are not able to perform these procedures without supervision. Overall, 56% of the gynecologists no longer perform any level 3 advanced procedures, and 86% do not perform level 4 advanced procedures. Gynecologists who still perform the inquired laparoscopic procedures scored a significantly higher competence level immediately after residency training for most of procedures compared with the gynecologists who do not perform these procedures.

CONCLUSION

Residents are sufficiently trained for basic and intermediate laparoscopic procedures during residency training. However, they are not sufficiently equipped to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures without supervision. We should consider training advanced procedures especially to a selected group of residents because most gynecologists do not perform these procedures after residency. The learning curve for advanced procedures continues to rise after finishing residency for those who keep on performing these procedures, therefore an additional fellowship is recommended for this group.