Surgeon behavior and knowledge on hand scrub and skin antisepsis in the operating room

Actualidades en la higiene de manos quirúrgica. Revisión de la literatura

Introducción: La higiene de manos quirúrgica, procedimiento esencial en cirugía; es una técnica que ha evolucionado y se ha ido actualizando tras el surgimiento de evidencia científica. El manual de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) publicado hace diez años es uno de los documentos que plasman cambios de esta técnica, como dejar de usar el cepillo. Sin embargo, es necesario analizar la evidencia actual con la finalidad de reconocer las nuevas tendencias de acuerdo con los resultados de las investigaciones publicadas. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión actualizada de la literatura sobre la higiene de manos quirúrgica. Desarrollo: El lavado de manos quirúrgico con cepillo es un procedimiento que se realiza en la mayoría de las instituciones hospitalarias de México; pocas han incursionado en la técnica en la que se omite el uso de cepillo. Existen diversos estudios que sustentan que el uso de cepillos debe ser erradicado debido al daño tisular que estos ocasionan. La abrasión dérmica provocada por el uso de cepillos origina que el personal se cepille las superficies de las manos y brazos por menos tiempo que el recomendado y esto a su vez impide un efecto idóneo por parte de los antisépticos. Las sustancias más recomendadas son la clorhexidina y las soluciones a base de alcohol. Conclusiones: La higiene de manos quirúrgica sin cepillo debe ser considerada debido a que disminuye costos hospitalarios, garantiza la efectividad de la descontaminación de manos, ocasiona menos lesiones dérmicas y contribuye a la reducción de las infecciones relacionadas al sitio quirúrgico.

Adherence to surgical hand antisepsis: Barriers and facilitators in a tertiary care hospital

Although surgical hand antisepsis is paramount to surgical infection prevention, adherence to correct technique may be suboptimal. We conducted direct observations and semistructured interviews to identify barriers and facilitators to appropriate surgical hand antisepsis in a tertiary care hospital. Only 18% (9 out of 50) surgical hand antisepsis observations were fully compliant with the recommended application techniques. Most surgical staff members considered lack of organizational oversight, monitoring, and direct hands-on training as important barriers to adherence.

Quality of surgical scrub in a heart hospital: Do not take it for granted

Introduction: The role of scrub in the prevention of post-surgery infections is well-known. This study aimed to investigate the inputs and process of surgical scrub in operating rooms of the largest heart hospital of northwest Iran.

Methods: This study took place with a before-after design as a clinical audit in 2014. A check list developed based on national and international standards of surgical hand scrub was used as the study instrument. Checklists were completed by observation of surgical team scrubbing in real situation. Descriptive statistics and graphs were used to describe the results.

Results: A compliance degree with the standards for prerequisites, equipment, general items, process and time of scrub was observed as 58%, 55%, 33%, 68% and 22%, respectively. The compliance degree after the intervention was 72%, 66%, 66%, 85% and 61%, respectively. Improvement was observed in all studied aspects of scrub. The total score of compliance with the standards changed from 47% to 70%. The main issues were incorrect order of scrubbing the areas of the hands, incorrect way of scrubbing the arms, insufficient scrubbing the arms (not above elbow), and lack of awareness about hospital’s policy on scrub time.

Conclusion: The results showed defects in the surgical scrub of the studied hospital and that the compliance with the standards can be improved by simple interventions. Periodical audit and observation of the scrub and then feedback is recommended.

The impact of surgical hand antisepsis technique on surgical site infection

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence exists regarding the effect on superficial and deep incisional surgical site infections (SDSSIs) of alcohol-based hand rubs (ABR) versus traditional aqueous surgical scrubs (TSS). User preferences and practice are unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study examining SDSSIs using VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program cases before ABR implementation (2007-2009, TSS group) and after (2013-2014, ABR group). A descriptive survey.

RESULTS

SDSSI rates were 1.8% and 1.5% for TSS (n=4051) and ABR (n=2293), respectively (p=0.31). The adjusted odds of SDSSI using ABR was not significant (OR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.32). Greatest SDSSI risk was from preoperative radiotherapy (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.14-6.78), general surgery (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.30-4.39) and preoperative smoking (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.02-2.44). Of 95 surveys included, 52% favored ABR. Although 95% self-reported correct product application, improper duration was revealed in both groups (TSS 18% and ABR 10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an ABR for use in surgical hand antisepsis did not alter SDSSI rates. Improving product knowledge and compliance may improve SSI rates.

Surface contamination in operating rooms: a risk for transmission of pathogens?

BACKGROUND

The role of surface contamination in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens is recognized increasingly. For more than 100 years, the inanimate environment in operating rooms (e.g., walls, tables, floors, and equipment surfaces) has been considered a potential source of pathogens that may cause surgical site infections (SSIs). However, the role of contaminated surfaces in pathogen acquisition in this setting generally is considered negligible, as most SSIs are believed to originate from patients' or healthcare workers' flora.

METHODS

A search of relevant medical literature was performed using PubMed to identify studies that investigated surface contamination of operating rooms and its possible role in infection transmission.

RESULTS

Despite a limited number of studies evaluating the role of surface contamination in operating rooms, there is accumulating evidence that the inanimate environment of the operating room can become contaminated with pathogens despite standard environmental cleaning. These pathogens can then be transmitted to the hands of personnel and then to patients and may result in SSIs and infection outbreaks.

CONCLUSION

Contaminated surfaces can be responsible for the transmission of pathogens in the operating room setting. Further studies are necessary to quantify the role of contaminated surfaces in the transmission of pathogens and to inform the most effective environmental interventions. Given the serious consequences of SSIs, special attention should be given to the proper cleaning and disinfection of the inanimate environment in operating rooms in addition to the other established infection control measures to reduce the burden of SSIs.

Adherence to surgical hand rubbing directives in a hospital district of Southwest Finland

BACKGROUND

The primary objective was to measure the compliance with alcohol-based surgical hand rubbing (SHR) among operation room personnel. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of feedback sessions on compliance.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational before-after intervention study. Between October 2010 and June 2012 the hygiene nurses observed SHR among operation room personnel in the hospital district of Southwest Finland. After feedback sessions a second observation round was conducted in the main operation room of Turku University Hospital. The first observation round comprised 477 observations: 259 (54%) were doctors, 190 (40%) nurses and 28 (5%) other personnel. In the second observation round a total of 210 observations were made.

RESULTS

During the first round in 42% of observations the 3 min SHR time recommended by WHO was used. Median times for SHR were 1 min 50 s (range 0 min to 5 min 44 s) for doctors and 3 min 25 s (range 1 min 1 s to 8 min 15 s) for nurses, respectively (p < 0.0001). In 40% of observations hands were not properly dried after a wash before applying SHR and in 45% hands were not allowed to dry properly after SHR before donning surgical gloves. After feedback, time for SHR did not significantly improve but technique did.

CONCLUSIONS

SHR was performed incorrectly in most observations even after feedback. The results stress the importance of more effective education, helping techniques and positive role models for operation room personnel to promote SHR.

Disinfectant choices in veterinary practices, shelters and households: ABCD guidelines on safe and effective disinfection for feline environments

OVERVIEW

Regardless of whether a pathogen is viral, bacterial, parasitic, fungal or an emerging unknown, the mainstay of infectious disease control is hygiene, and the cornerstone of good hygiene is effective disinfection.

CHALLENGES AND CURRENT CHOICES

Certain pathogens present a challenge to kill effectively: parvovirus, protozoal oocysts, mycobacteria, bacterial spores and prions resist most disinfectants but can be eliminated through heat, especially steam, which will kill protozoal oocysts. Heat is the safest and most effective disinfectant, but cannot be universally applied. Temperatures in washing machines and dishwashers should be at least 60 °C to eliminate pathogenic spores and resistant viruses. Enveloped viruses are susceptible to most disinfectants; of the non-enveloped viruses, parvovirus is recognised as being the most difficult to eradicate. Sodium hypochlorite is recommended for many applications: cleaning of floors, laundry, food preparation surfaces and utensils. Skin scrubs and rubs containing alcohols are more effective than those containing chlorhexidine, and less subject to contamination.

DISINFECTANTS TO AVOID

Deficiency of the enzyme UDP-glucuronosyl transferase renders the cat susceptible to the toxic effects of phenol-based disinfectants (including many essential oils), so these should be avoided in feline environments. Quaternary ammonium compounds (eg, benzalkonium chloride) are also probably best avoided.

THE FUTURE

Veterinary disinfection approaches in the future may include use of ultraviolet radiation and, increasingly, silver.

Usage of ultraviolet test method for monitoring the efficacy of surgical hand rub technique among medical students

BACKGROUND

Adequate hand movements are essential in surgical hand rub, so it is important for medical students to learn it correctly. To assess its efficacy, we aimed to use ultraviolet (UV) light test after applying fluorescent solution.

METHODS

Digital images of the hands of 253 medical students were analyzed during "Basic Surgical Techniques" course on the 10th (Survey 1) and 14th (Survey 2) week of the curriculum to check the process and the skills development. The last step of the surgical hand rub was performed with a fluorescent solution, and then the hands were placed under UV light. Photographs were taken and analyzed. Every uncovered area was considered an error. Number and the localization of missed spots and its extent was determined. For evaluation, palmar (P) and dorsal (D) sides of the hands were divided into regions of interest (1-distal phalanxes, 2-thumb and first metacarpus, 3-second to fifth fingers, and 4-second to fifth metacarpals).

RESULTS

Various magnitude and number of failure occurred in 123 (48.61%) students in survey 1 and in 65 (25.69%) in survey 2. The most frequent sites of the missed spots were D/2 and P/4 region in survey 1 and D/1 and P/4 in survey 2. There was an improvement seen in survey 2, as shown by a decrease in the number and extent of missed spots. Right-handed students made fewer mistakes on their nondominant hands than left-handed students (n = 23) did.

DISCUSSION

The method was suitable to monitor the efficacy of surgical hand rub technique and identify the mistakes and the critical sites. The main advantage of the UV test was the immediate feedback, which resulted in a distinct improvement.

CONCLUSION

Applying the UV test to the medical education and training may contribute to improvement in the compliance and the efficacy of the technique of surgical hand rub among the students.

Fighting surgical site infections in small animals: are we getting anywhere?

A diverse array of pathogen-related, patient-related, and caretaker-related issues influence risk and prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs). The entire surgical team involved in health care settings in which surgical procedures are performed play a pivotal role in the prevention of SSIs. In this article, current knowledge of SSI risk factors and prevention methods is reviewed. Although new avenues that can be explored in the prevention of SSIs in veterinary medicine are described, the main conclusion drawn is that the best method for prevention of SSI is to adhere to what we already know.