Understanding Quality Issues in Your Surgical Department: Comparing the ACS NSQIP With Traditional Morbidity and Mortality Conferences in a Canadian Academic Hospital

Surgical Outcomes in Canada and the United States: An Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Clinical Registry

BACKGROUND

There has been longstanding uncertainty over whether lower healthcare spending in Canada might be associated with inferior outcomes for hospital-based care. We hypothesized that mortality and surgical complication rates would be higher for patients who underwent four common surgical procedures in Canada as compared to the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adults who underwent hip fracture repair, colectomy, pancreatectomy, or spine surgery in 96 Canadian and 585 US hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. We compared patients with respect to demographic characteristics and comorbidity. We then compared unadjusted and adjusted outcomes within 30-days of surgery for patients in Canada and the US including: (1) Mortality; (2) A composite constituting 1-or-more of the following complications (cardiac arrest; myocardial infarction; pneumonia; renal failure/; return to operating room; surgical site infection; sepsis; unplanned intubation).

RESULTS

Our hip fracture cohort consisted of 21,166 patients in Canada (22.3%) and 73,817 in the US (77.7%), for colectomy 21,279 patients in Canada (8.9%) and 218,307 (91.1%), for pancreatectomy 873 (7.8%) in Canada and 12,078 (92.2%) in the US, and for spine surgery 14,088 (5.3%) and 252,029 (94.7%). Patient sociodemographics and comorbidity were clinically similar between jurisdictions. In adjusted analyses odds of death was significantly higher in Canada for two procedures (colectomy (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.044-1.424; P = .012) and pancreatectomy (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.26-3.56; P = .005)) and similar for hip fracture and spine surgery. Odds of the composite outcome were significantly higher in Canada for all 4 procedures, largely driven by higher risk of cardiac events and post-operative infections.

CONCLUSIONS

We found evidence of higher rates of mortality and surgical complications within 30-days of surgery for patients in Canada as compared to the US.

Development of the 'People-Processes-Paradigm' critical analysis tool for mortality and morbidity reviews: improving understanding of systems factors

BACKGROUND

The impact of systems problems and human factors on delivering safe, high-quality patient care is well recognized. In the surgical setting, mortality and morbidity reviews (MMRs) are the key forum for reviewing and analysing adverse events in patient care yet there is a paucity of simple tools for undertaking such analyses. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot a new tool for analysing mortality and morbidity cases incorporating human factors and systems analysis.

METHODS

The published literature, professional standards, guidelines and existing audit tools for MMRs were reviewed. The 'People-Processes-Paradigm' tool was developed and pilot testing was undertaken and stakeholder feedback was obtained.

RESULTS

Models found for undertaking systems-based analysis of adverse surgical events included the 3D model, SEIPS and the Queensland Health human error and patient safety (HEAPS) Incident Management Tool. Guidelines for standards in MMRs are provided by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, New South Wales Clinical Excellence Commission and Australia and New Zealand audit of surgical mortality (ANZASM). The People-Processes-Paradigm model incorporates these standards and evidence-based systems analysis tools into a single effective tool. The pilot study evaluating the use of this tool demonstrated it to be practical and easily applicable to regular use by clinicians, with the ability to be tailored to individual health service use. Improvements such as electronic format and clarification of case selection processes were recommended by users.

CONCLUSION

The People-Processes-Paradigm tool has been developed for surgeons by surgeons incorporating current professional, legal and regulatory requirements in Australasia, easily transferrable to electronic platforms. This model requires further testing for validation.

[Content of a weekly morbidity and mortality conference in visceral surgery]

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences are essential instruments for quality improvement in surgical departments; however, publications concerning the detailed contents of M&M conferences are rare and have not been published in the German language.

OBJECTIVE

Detailed analysis of the content of a weekly M&M conference in a department of general and visceral surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from a weekly M&M conference were prospectively collected. Epidemiological data, diagnosis, type of surgery, morbidity, postoperative course and mortality were documented for each patient. Type (surgical vs. medicinal) and severity (I-V according to Clavien-Dindo classification) of complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014 a total of 761 out of 11,470 patients with a mean age of 62.2 (15.9) years were discussed in the M&M conferences. Of the M&M patients 39.4% were female, 88.9% showed surgical complications while 28.9% were diagnosed with a medical complication and 91 patients (12.0%) died. Complications were classified as Clavien-Dindo I: 27.9%, II: 10.5%, III: 37.7%, IV: 12% and V: 12.0%. Most surgical complications were classified as Clavien-Dindo I (30.0%) and Clavien-Dindo III (40.9%), medical complications were most often classified as Clavien-Dindo IV (29.6%) and V (34.6%). Wound healing impairment (41%), pulmonary complications (16.6%), anastomotic leakage (15.6%), septic (8.9%) and cardiac (8.0%) complications were discussed most often. Cardiac, pulmonary and septic complications were the main cause of morbidity in deceased patients.

CONCLUSION

The M&M conferences display a morbidity profile of each surgical department. Depending on the speciality and focus of a surgical department, the content of the M&M conferences will vary. Detailed knowledge about the content of M&M conferences enable specific measures to be taken to improve quality and patient safety.

Standardized Hospital-Based Care Programs Improve Geriatric Hip Fracture Outcomes: An Analysis of the ACS NSQIP Targeted Hip Fracture Series

OBJECTIVE

To determine relative complication rates and outcome measures in patients treated under a standardized hip fracture program (SHFP).

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients who underwent operative fixation of femoral neck, intertrochanteric hip, and subtrochanteric hip fractures in 2016. Cohorts of patients who were and were not treated under a documented SHFP were identified. Relevant perioperative clinical and outcomes data were collected. Multivariate regression was used to assess risk-adjusted complication rates and outcomes for patients treated in SHFPs.

RESULTS

A total of 9360 hip fracture patients were identified of whom 5070 (54.2%) were treated under a documented SHFP. Median age was 84 years, and 69.9% of patients were women. Patients in an SHFP had a lower risk-adjusted incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis [odds ratio (OR) 0.48 (0.32-0.72), P < 0.001]. Rates of other medical and surgical complications and 30-day mortality were statistically comparable. Risk-adjusted evaluation showed that SHFP patients were less likely to be discharged to an inpatient facility versus home [OR 0.72 (0.63-0.81), P < 0.001] and had a lower 30-day readmission rate [OR 0.83 (0.71-0.97), P = 0.023]. Furthermore, the SHFP patients had higher rates of immediate postoperative weight-bearing as tolerated [OR 1.23 (1.10-1.37), P < 0.001], adherence to deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis at 28 days [OR 1.27 (1.16-1.38), P < 0.001], and initiation of bone protective medications [OR 1.79 (1.64-1.96), P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Care in a modern hospital-based SHFP is associated with improved short-term outcome measures. Further development and widespread implementation of organized, multidisciplinary orthogeriatric hip fracture protocols is recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Narrative Review of Strategies to Prioritize Quality Improvement

BACKGROUND

The morbidity and mortality conference (MMC) provides a valuable opportunity to review patient care processes and safety concerns, aligning with a growing quality improvement (QI) mandate. Yet the structure, processes, and aims of many MMCs are often ill-defined. This review summarizes strategies employed by medical, surgical, and critical care departments in the development of patient safety-centered MMCs.

METHODS

A structured narrative review of literature was conducted using combinations of the search terms "morbidity and mortality conference(s)," "morbidity and mortality meetings," or "morbidity and mortality round(s)." The titles and abstracts of 250 returned articles were screened; 76 articles were reviewed in full, with 32 meeting the full inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The literature review elicited a number of methods used by medical, surgical, and critical care MMCs to emphasize QI and patient safety outcomes. A list of actionable changes made in each article was compiled. Five themes common to QI-centered MMCs were identified: (1) defining the role of the MMC, (2) involving stakeholders, (3) detecting and selecting appropriate cases for presentation, (4) structuring goal-directed discussion, and (5) forming recommendations and assigning follow-up. Innovative methods to pair adverse event screening with MMCs were superior to nonstructured voluntary reporting and case selection for overall morbidity detection. Structured case review, discussion, and follow-up were more likely to lead to implementing systems-based change, and interdisciplinary MMCs were associated with a greater likelihood of forming an action item.

CONCLUSION

The modern patient safety-centered MMC shares common themes of practices that can be adopted by institutions looking to create a venue for analysis of care processes, a platform to launch QI initiatives, and a culture of safety.

Comparison of observed to predicted outcomes using the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative outcomes predicted by the ACS NSQIP universal risk calculator have not been validated for specific procedures like pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

A random sample of 400 PD patients from the NSQIP database was analyzed. Patients were categorized into four groups of 100 each based on ICD-9 diagnosis (211.6, 157.0, 156.2, and 577.1). Estimated risks of postoperative outcomes recorded by the calculator were compared to observed outcomes using the Brier Score (BS). The calculated BS was compared to a null model BS. A BS of zero indicated perfect prediction, while a BS of one indicated the poorest prediction.

RESULTS

BS for all groupings was generally low, reflecting good prediction. BS for any and major complications was higher (0.23 and 0.22, respectively). This was also seen within ICD-9 subgroups. For patients with ampullary cancer, BS for these outcomes was higher (0.27 and 0.26, respectively). Comparison to the null model BS (0.24 and 0.24, respectively) correlated lesser predictive accuracy of the calculator for this subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACS NSQIP risk calculator, although accurate in predicting outcomes in patients undergoing PD, shows variation when accounting for specific ICD-9 diagnoses. Incorporating the diagnosis may better guide surgeons and patients preoperatively in making informed decisions. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:157-162. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Current concept review: quality and process improvement in orthopedics

Multiple health care stakeholders are increasingly scrutinizing musculoskeletal care to optimize quality and cost efficiency. This has led to greater emphasis on quality and process improvement. There is a robust set of business strategies that are increasingly being applied to health care delivery. These quality and process improvement tools (QPITs) have specific applications to segments of, or the entire episode of, patient care. In the rapidly changing health care world, it will behoove all orthopedic surgeons to have an understanding of the manner in which care delivery processes can be evaluated and improved. Many of the commonly used QPITs, including checklist initiatives, standardized clinical care pathways, lean methodology, six sigma strategies, and total quality management, embrace basic principles of quality improvement. These principles include focusing on outcomes, optimizing communication among health care team members, increasing process standardization, and decreasing process variation. This review summarizes the common QPITs, including how and when they might be employed to improve care delivery.