Self-Appraised Readiness of Senior and Graduating General Surgery Residents to Perform Thoracic Surgery

Postprocedural Cognitive Load Measurement With Immediate Feedback to Guide Curriculum Development

BACKGROUND

Methods to assess competency in cardiothoracic training are essential. Here, we report a system that allows us to better assess competency from the perspective of both the trainee and educator. We hypothesized that postprocedural cognitive burden measurement (by the trainee) with immediate feedback (from the educator) could aid in identifying barriers to the acquisition of skills and knowledge so that training curricula can be individualized.

METHODS

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), a validated instrument to measure cognitive load, was administered with an online platform after bronchoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for 11 residents. Immediate postprocedure feedback and standardized debriefing occurred for each procedure.

RESULTS

Mean NASA-TLX scores were highest (indicating greater cognitive load) for esophagogastroduodenoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (P < .001). When comparing subscale measures, mental demand was significantly higher for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (P = .026) compared with the other procedures, whereas physical demand was highest for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (P = .018). Self-reported frustration was similar for all case types (P = .247). Cognitive burden decreased with a greater number of procedures for bronchoscopy (P = .027). Significant improvement was noted by the trainee at the end of the rotation in self-assessed procedural competency and preparedness for thoracic board topics (all P < .05). Postprocedure feedback by the attending surgeon correlated with more frequent completion of self-evaluations by the residents.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal assessment of cognitive load in combination with postprocedural feedback identified barriers to skill acquisition for both residents and educators. This information allows for individualized rotation development as a step toward a competency-based curriculum.

Clarifying the Role of the Modern General Surgeon: The Effect of Specialization on Inpatient Practice Patterns in General Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The growing concentration of fellowship-trained and integrated residency-trained subspecialty surgeons has encroached on the breadth and volume of a so-called "true" general surgery practice, leaving the role of new general surgeons in flux. We aimed to describe the surgical practice of new general surgeons with and without subspecialty fellowship training.

DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study, state discharge data was linked to American Medical Association Masterfile and American Hospital Association annual survey data. New-to-practice general surgeons with and without subspecialty board-certification in colorectal surgery (CRS) or cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) were identified in 2008, and followed over 10 years. Surgeon overall inpatient case volume, colorectal resection case volume, and thoracic lobectomy case volume were compared between surgeons with and without related subspecialty training.

SETTING

NY and FL (2008-2017).

PARTICIPANTS

The study population included 276 new-to-practice surgeons with mean age of 36.9 years. New-to-practice surgeons were defined as those with zero to three years of experience in 2008.

RESULTS

Of all surgeons, 11.2% were subspecialty board-certified in CRS and 11.6% were subspecialty board-certified in CTS. Board-certified CRS surgeons performed more colorectal resections than the non-CRS general surgeons each year (p-value <0.001 for all). Overall, non-CRS general surgeons performed 60.7% of all colorectal resections. Board-certified CTS surgeons performed more thoracic lobectomies than non-CTS surgeons each year. Non-CTS surgeons performed 1.1% of all thoracic lobectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

On average, new subspecialty surgeons perform significantly more specialty operations than non-subspecialty new general surgeons. However, as a group, new non-colorectal general surgeons perform the majority of colorectal resections. In contrast, new non-cardiothoracic general surgeons perform less than two percent of the thoracic lobectomies. This may have implications for a shift in the training paradigm going forward.