1
|
Godfrey CM, Rausch LA, Feurer ID, Rega SA, Shaffer D, DuBray B, Hickman L, Terhune K, Forbes R. Kidney Transplantation Anastomotic Time Is Jointly Associated With Resident and Attending Experience. J Surg Res 2024; 296:541-546. [PMID: 38335902 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few studies evaluate the interplay of attending and resident learning curves in surgical education. Anastomotic time is known to be correlated with transplant outcomes in kidney transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between the combination of resident and attending experience and anastomotic time in kidney transplantation. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of deceased donor kidney transplants from 2006 to 2019. To analyze the effect of attending and resident experience, dyads were classified as six combinations of early versus later practice attending and resident postgraduate year (PGY-2, PGY-3, and PGY-4/5). Attendings with less than 3 y of postfellowship practice were considered early practice. Linear mixed effects models tested the effects of attending experience, resident PGY, recipient body mass index, and technical operative characteristics (number of donor arteries, operative side) on anastomosis time. RESULTS The final linear mixed effects model included 1306 transplants. Compared to later practice attendings with PGY-4/5 residents as reference, early practice attendings paired with PGY-2 or PGY-3 residents had longer anastomotic times (P ≤ 0.005) when adjusted for recipient body mass index, number of donor arteries, and transplant side. When PGY-4/5 residents were paired with early practice attendings, no difference in anastomotic time was demonstrated. When paired with later practice attendings, PGY-2 residents had longer anastomotic times (P < 0.001) while PGY-3 anastomotic times did not differ from PGY-4/5. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the correlation between trainee and attending experience jointly and anastomotic time, suggesting that pairing residents and attendings by experience may improve surgical training and potentially patient-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline M Godfrey
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| | - Laura A Rausch
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Irene D Feurer
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Scott A Rega
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David Shaffer
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Bernard DuBray
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Laura Hickman
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kyla Terhune
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Rachel Forbes
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kawa N, Araji T, Kaafarani H, Adra SW. A Narrative Review on Intraoperative Adverse Events: Risks, Prevention, and Mitigation. J Surg Res 2024; 295:468-476. [PMID: 38070261 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adverse events from surgical interventions are common. They can occur at various stages of surgical care, and they carry a heavy burden on the different parties involved. While extensive research and efforts have been made to better understand the etiologies of postoperative complications, more research on intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) remains to be done. METHODS In this article, we reviewed the literature looking at iAEs to discuss their risk factors, their implications on surgical care, and the current efforts to mitigate and manage them. RESULTS Risk factors for iAEs are diverse and are dictated by patient-related risk factors, the nature and complexity of the procedures, the surgeon's experience, and the work environment of the operating room. The implications of iAEs vary according to their severity and include increased rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, increased length of hospital stay and readmission, increased care cost, and a second victim emotional toll on the operating surgeon. CONCLUSIONS While transparent reporting of iAEs remains a challenge, many efforts are using new measures not only to report iAEs but also to provide better surveillance, prevention, and mitigation strategies to reduce their overall adverse impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisrine Kawa
- Department of Dermatology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York
| | - Tarek Araji
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Haytham Kaafarani
- Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Emergency Surgery and Critical Care, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Souheil W Adra
- Division of Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoagland D, Olasky J, Kent TS, Vosburg RW. The Impact of Trainee Involvement on Outcomes in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2023; 33:3454-3462. [PMID: 37755646 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06831-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of bariatric operations performed in the USA rises annually. Trainee exposure to this field is necessary to ensure competency in future surgical generations. However, the safety of trainee involvement of these operations has been called into question. OBJECTIVES The aim of our study is to describe differences in outcomes between trainees and non-trainees as first assistants (FA) in sleeve gastrectomy (SG). SETTING The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database METHODS: Patients from the MBSAQIP database who underwent primary SG from 2015 to 2020 were identified. Statistical analysis included two-tailed t-tests and χ2-tests to evaluate the impact of trainees (residents and fellows) compared to non-trainees on post-operative morbidity and operative time. RESULTS Of the 559,324 cases, 25.8% were performed with trainees as FA. Operative length was 27.9% longer in trainee cases. In the trainee group, there was a higher risk of conversion to open procedure (OR 1.32), readmission (OR 1.19), and specific complications (cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, progressive renal insufficiency, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, transfusion, intubation, UTI, VTE, ICU admission, and reintervention), though overall rates were < 1% in each group. Non-trainees had a higher rate of septic shock (OR 1.4). No significant difference was seen in all other perioperative outcomes. CONCLUSION Trainee involvement in SG leads to longer operative times without a clinically significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Such findings should be used to counsel patients and shape expectations for surgeons and hospitals. A focused bariatric surgery trainee curriculum may lessen this gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darian Hoagland
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jaisa Olasky
- Department of Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, USA
| | - Tara S Kent
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - R Wesley Vosburg
- Department of surgery Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 355 Waverley Oaks rd, suite 100, Waltham, MA, 02452, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith MC, Nordness MF, Fogel J, Streams JR, Dennis BM, Gunter OL. The Safe Cholecystectomy: Evaluating the Use of Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy Between Junior and Senior Faculty. Am Surg 2023:31348231157859. [PMID: 36802977 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231157859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy (SC) is a technique for performing safe cholecystectomy when excessive inflammation prevents exposure of the Critical View of Safety. Studies have evaluated outcomes and complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), with mixed results in terms of surgeon experience. It is unclear if the rate of SC is associated with experience. We hypothesized that the rate of SC would decrease as surgical experience increased. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of LC performed at an academic medical center. Demographics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. We performed a multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between years in practice and performance of SC. We performed a sensitivity analysis comparing those in their first year on faculty with all others. RESULTS Between November 1, 2017, and November 1, 2021, there were 1222 LC performed. 771 patients (63%) were female. 89 patients (7.3%) underwent SC. There were no bile duct injuries requiring reconstruction. Controlling for age, sex, and ASA class, there was no difference in the rate of SC by years of experience (OR .98, 95% CI .94-1.01). In a sensitivity analysis comparing first-year faculty to those beyond their first year, there was also no difference (OR .76, 95% CI 0.42-1.39). DISCUSSION We find no difference in the rate of performance of SC between junior and senior faculty. This reflects consistency, in keeping with best practice guidelines. This could be confounded by junior faculty requesting assistance during difficult operations. Further investigation into factors affecting decision-making may clarify this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Smith
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, 12328Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mina F Nordness
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, 12328Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jessa Fogel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 1479University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jill R Streams
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, 12328Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bradley M Dennis
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, 12328Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Oliver L Gunter
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, 12328Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Endo K, Morishima K, Koizumi M, Sasanuma H, Sakuma Y, Lefor AK, Sata N. Lateral retroperitoneal adrenalectomy: Comparison of introduction and education periods of a new surgical procedure in a teaching hospital. A retrospective case series study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijso.2022.100550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
6
|
Residents as primary surgeons do not affect the complication rate in reduction mammaplasties and mastopexies—a 10-year single-center experience. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-022-01994-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
7
|
Bustamante Recuenco C, Alonso-Lambertí Rizo L, Salazar Carrasco A, Valle Rubio A, Cendrero Martín M, Jiménez Carneros V, Ramos Rodríguez JL, Jiménez Miramón FJ. Resident training in colorectal laparoscopic surgery: A retrospective morbidity, mortality and survival analysis of 408 cases in our environment. Cir Esp 2022; 100:555-561. [PMID: 35697242 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer has a growing incidence in our society. However, the performance of laparoscopic interventions in this field is still not included in the National Training Program. Given the lack of references, our objective was to analyze the resident's participation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and its possible effect on morbidity and mortality and oncological prognosis. METHODS A retrospective longitudinal single-center study that included all laparoscopic colorectal surgical procedures performed by residents (R group) and by attending surgeons (A group) between 01/01/2009 and 12/31/2017, maintaining follow-up until 12/31/2018. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, overall survival (OS) and disease- free survival (DFS), as well as their relationship with the resident involvement as first surgeon were analyzed. RESULTS 408 patients were analyzed, of which 138 (33.8%) were operated by a supervised resident and 270 (66.2%) by the attending surgeon. No differences were detected in the rate of postoperative complications between both groups (OR: 1.536; 95% CI: 0.947-2.409; p = 0.081). Furthermore, resident participation had no influence on tumor recurrence rate (R Group: 14.2% vs. A Group: 16.9%; p = 0.588) or on overall (p = 0.562) or disease-free survival (p = 0.305). CONCLUSION Resident involvement in laparoscopic colorectal surgery had no influence on morbidity and mortality or oncological prognosis in our center. Conducting prospective studies in this regard will provide greater knowledge, enabling a progressive improvement of the training program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ainhoa Valle Rubio
- FEA Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Cendrero Martín
- FEA Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Nuestra Señora de los Sonsoles, Ávila, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dorken Gallastegi A, Mikdad S, Kapoen C, Breen KA, Naar L, Gaitanidis A, El Hechi M, Pian-Smith M, Cooper JB, Antonelli DM, MacKenzie O, Del Carmen MG, Lillemoe KD, Kaafarani HMA. Intraoperative Deaths: Who, Why, and Can We Prevent Them? J Surg Res 2022; 274:185-195. [PMID: 35180495 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intraoperative deaths (IODs) are rare but catastrophic. We systematically analyzed IODs to identify clinical and patient safety patterns. METHODS IODs in a large academic center between 2015 and 2019 were included. Perioperative details were systematically reviewed, focusing on (1) identifying phenotypes of IOD, (2) describing emerging themes immediately preceding cardiac arrest, and (3) suggesting interventions to mitigate IOD in each phenotype. RESULTS Forty-one patients were included. Three IOD phenotypes were identified: trauma (T), nontrauma emergency (NT), and elective (EL) surgery patients, each with 2 sub-phenotypes (e.g., ELm and ELv for elective surgery with medical arrests or vascular injury and bleeding, respectively). In phenotype T, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated before incision in 42%, resuscitative thoracotomy was performed in 33%, and transient return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 30% of patients. In phenotype NT, ruptured aortic aneurysms accounted for half the cases, and median blood product utilization was 2,694 mL. In phenotype ELm, preoperative evaluation did not include electrocardiogram in 12%, cardiac consultation in 62%, stress test in 87%, and chest x-ray in 37% of patients. In phenotype ELv, 83% had a single peripheral intravenous line, and vascular injury was almost always followed by escalation in monitoring (e.g., central/arterial line), alert to the blood bank, and call for surgical backup. CONCLUSIONS We have created a framework for IOD that can help with intraoperative safety and quality analysis. Focusing on interventions that address appropriateness versus futility in care in phenotypes T and NT, and on prevention and mitigation of intraoperative vessel injury (e.g., intraoperative rescue team) or preoperative optimization in phenotype EL may help prevent IODs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ander Dorken Gallastegi
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah Mikdad
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carolijn Kapoen
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kerry A Breen
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leon Naar
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Apostolos Gaitanidis
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Majed El Hechi
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - May Pian-Smith
- Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey B Cooper
- Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Donna M Antonelli
- Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Olivia MacKenzie
- Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marcela G Del Carmen
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Haytham M A Kaafarani
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Outcomes & Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wojcik BM, McKinley SK, Fong ZV, Mansur A, Bloom JP, Amari N, Hamdi I, Chang DC, Petrusa E, Mullen JT, Phitayakorn R. The Resident-Run Minor Surgery Clinic: A Four-Year Analysis of Patient Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Resident Education. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2021; 78:1838-1850. [PMID: 34092535 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A resident-run minor surgery clinic was developed to increase resident procedural autonomy. We evaluated whether 1) there was a significant difference between complications and patient satisfaction when procedures were independently performed by surgical residents vs. a surgical attending and 2) if participation was associated with an increase in resident procedural confidence. DESIGN Third year general surgery residents participated in a weekly procedure clinic from 2014-2018. Post-procedure complications and patient satisfaction were compared between patients operated on by residents vs. the staff surgeon. Residents were surveyed regarding their confidence in independently performing a variety of clinic-based patient care tasks. SETTING Massachusetts General Hospital General in Boston, MA; an academic tertiary care general surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS Post-graduate year three general surgery residents that ran the clinic as part of a general surgery rotation. RESULTS 1230 patients underwent 1592 procedures (612 in resident clinic, 980 in attending clinic). There was no significant difference in the 30-day complication rate between patients operated on by the resident vs. attending (2.5% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.49). 459 patient satisfaction surveys were administered with a 79.1% response rate. There was no significant difference in the overall quality of care rating between residents and the attending surgeon (87.5% top-box rating vs. 93.1%, p = 0.15). Twenty-one residents completed both a pre- and post-rotation survey (77.8% response rate). The proportion of residents indicating that they could independently perform a variety of patient care tasks significantly increased across the rotation (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Mid-level general surgery residents can independently perform office-based procedures without detriment to safety or patient satisfaction. The resident-run procedure clinic serves as an environment for residents to grow in confidence in both technical and non-technical skills. Given the high rate at which patients provide resident feedback, future work may investigate how to best incorporate patient derived evaluations into resident assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Wojcik
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sophia K McKinley
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zhi Ven Fong
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Arian Mansur
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jordan P Bloom
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Noor Amari
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Isra Hamdi
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David C Chang
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emil Petrusa
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John T Mullen
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Roy Phitayakorn
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bustamante Recuenco C, Alonso-Lambertí Rizo L, Salazar Carrasco A, Valle Rubio A, Cendrero Martín M, Jiménez Carneros V, Ramos Rodríguez JL, Jiménez Miramón FJ. Resident training in colorectal laparoscopic surgery: A retrospective morbidity, mortality and survival analysis of 408 cases in our environment. Cir Esp 2021; 100:S0009-739X(21)00162-7. [PMID: 34059314 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer has a growing incidence in our society. However, the performance of laparoscopic interventions in this field is still not included in the National Training Program. Given the lack of references, our objective was to analyze the resident's participation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and its possible effect on morbidity and mortality and oncological prognosis. METHODS A retrospective longitudinal single-center study that included all laparoscopic colorectal surgical procedures performed by residents (R group) and by attending surgeons (A group) between 01/01/2009 and 12/31/2017, maintaining follow-up until 12/31/2018. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), as well as their relationship with the resident involvement as first surgeon were analyzed. RESULTS 408 patients were analyzed, of which 138 (33.8%) were operated by a supervised resident and 270 (66.2%) by the attending surgeon. No differences were detected in the rate of postoperative complications between both groups (OR: 1.536; 95% CI: 0.947-2.409; p=0.081). Furthermore, resident participation had no influence on tumor recurrence rate (R Group: 14.2% vs. A Group: 16.9%; p=0.588) or on overall (p = 0.562) or disease-free survival (p = 0.305). CONCLUSION Resident involvement in laparoscopic colorectal surgery had no influence on morbidity and mortality or oncological prognosis in our center. Conducting prospective studies in this regard will provide greater knowledge, enabling a progressive improvement of the training program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ainhoa Valle Rubio
- FEA Cirugía General y del Aparato digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, España
| | - Manuel Cendrero Martín
- FEA Cirugía General y del Aparato digestivo, Hospital Nuestra Señora de los Sonsoles, Ávila, España
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Impact of fellow compared to resident assistance on outcomes of minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:1554-1562. [PMID: 33763745 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08444-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As fellowship training after general surgery residency has become increasingly common, the impact on resident education must be considered. Patient safety and procedure outcomes are often used as justification by attendings who favor fellows over residents in certain minimally invasive surgery (MIS) operations. The aim of the present study was to compare the impact of trainee level on the outcomes of selected MIS operations to determine if giving preference to fellows on grounds of outcomes is warranted. METHODS Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), laparoscopic splenectomy (LS), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), or laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) with assistance of a general surgery chief resident or fellow were identified from the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2007-2012). Patients were matched 1:1 based on propensity score for the odds of undergoing operations assisted by a fellow. RESULTS 5145 patients underwent LHHR, 1396 LSG, 9656 LRYGB, 863 LS, 13,434 LC, and 3069 LVHR. Fellows assisted in 41.7% of LHHR, 49.2% of LSG, 56.4% of LRYGB, 25.7% of LS, 17.1% of LC, and 27.0% of LVHR cases. After matching, overall and severe complication rates were comparable between cases performed with assistance of a fellow or chief resident. Median operative time was longer for LSG, LRYGB, and LC when a fellow assisted. CONCLUSIONS Surgical outcomes were similar between fellow and chief resident assistance in MIS operations, arguing that increased resident participation in basic and complex laparoscopic operations is appropriate without compromising patient safety.
Collapse
|
12
|
Tang A, Cohan CM, Beattie G, Mooney CM, Chiang A, Keeley JA. Factors that Predict the Need for Subtotal Cholecystectomy. Am Surg 2020; 87:1245-1251. [PMID: 33339461 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820979783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subtotal cholecystectomy is a "damage control" or "bailout procedure" that is used in difficult gallbladder cases when severe inflammation distorts the local anatomy resulting in increased risk in damage to surrounding structures. Subtotal cholecystectomy rates increased nationally over the past decade. We aimed to determine provider experience and patient factors associated with the performance of subtotal cholecystectomies. METHODS All cholecystectomies from 2016 to 2019 were reviewed. Patient demographics, laboratory values, imaging, preoperative diagnosis, surgical technique (fenestrating vs. reconstituting), and years of attending and resident experience were collected. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate for factors that increase the likelihood of subtotal cholecystectomy. RESULTS Of 916 cholecystectomies, 86 were subtotal. The likelihood of subtotal cholecystectomy did not increase based on attending experience of ≤5 vs. > 5 years (odds ratio (OR) .66, P = .09). Older age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.23, P = .03), male sex (aOR 2.59, P < .01), white blood cells (WBC) above 10.3 (aOR 2.02, P = .02), and preoperative diagnosis of acute on chronic cholecystitis (aOR 5.47, P < .01) were associated with increased likelihood of subtotal cholecystectomy. DISCUSSION Older age, male sex, WBC above 10.3, and preoperative diagnosis of acute on chronic cholecystitis were associated with the increased likelihood of subtotal cholecystectomies. The performance of subtotal cholecystectomy was not impacted by attending years of experience. In cases of severe gallbladder pathology, this technique is being used as an operative strategy among all surgeon levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Tang
- Department of Surgery, 8785University of California San Francisco, East Bay-Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Caitlin M Cohan
- Department of Surgery, 8785University of California San Francisco, East Bay-Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Genna Beattie
- Department of Surgery, 8785University of California San Francisco, East Bay-Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Colin M Mooney
- Department of Surgery, 8785University of California San Francisco, East Bay-Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Anna Chiang
- 1438University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Jessica A Keeley
- Department of Surgery, 8785University of California San Francisco, East Bay-Oakland, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mansour LT, Brien S, Reid J, Maddern GJ. Peri-operative Mortality Following Cholecystectomy in Australia: Potential Preventability of Adverse Events. World J Surg 2020; 45:681-689. [PMID: 33043383 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05815-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholecystectomy is a commonly performed procedure; however, it is not without risks. It is crucial to constantly audit surgical outcomes in order to improve quality of care. The aim of this retrospective population-based cohort study is to identify preventable issues of clinical management associated with adverse occurrences in order to reduce mortality of cholecystectomy patients. METHODS Data were obtained from the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM). It encompasses peer-reviewed first and second line assessments of management of cholecystectomy patients who died from 2005 to 2015 in Australia. Clinical Management Issues (CMIs) were identified from text in assessments and grouped into communication failures, pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative categories. These were further classified into subthemes using thematic analysis with a data-driven approach. RESULTS There were 359 deaths in the study period. CMIs were present in 71 cases, with a reported total of 124 concerns or adverse events. Post-operative CMIs were the most prevalent issue [50% (62/124)], with the most common theme being delay to recognise complications (19/124). Pre-operative concerns were the second most common (n = 34). Decision to operate was questioned in 14 cases, and delay to surgery was reported in 12 cases. CONCLUSION ANZASM analysis has allowed us to identify modifiable adverse occurrences. This audit shows that delay to recognise complications is the most common assessment recorded. Preventive measures should be taken to improve outcomes and reduce peri-operative mortality, with an emphasis on post-operative management and enhancing communication between members of the multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Taher Mansour
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Sean Brien
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Jessica Reid
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Guy J Maddern
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hattersley R, Downing F, Gibson S, Demetriou J, Elmenhorst K, Kulendra N, Mielke B, Woods S. Impact of intra-operative hypotension on mortality rates and post-operative complications in dogs undergoing cholecystectomy. J Small Anim Pract 2020; 61:624-629. [PMID: 32845022 DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the mortality rate within a cohort of dogs undergoing cholecystectomy and investigate the impact of intra-operative hypotension on mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical records at five UK referral centres were reviewed for dogs undergoing cholecystectomy. Data collected included presenting signs, pre-operative blood test results, intra-operative data including frequency and duration of hypotension and the incidence and type of post-operative complications. RESULTS Data from 119 dogs were included. Sixteen dogs (13%) died before discharge and by 28 days after surgery the total mortality was 19 dogs (17%). Hypotension lasting over 10 minutes during general anaesthesia occurred in 65 dogs (54.6%), with a mean ± sd duration of 36.1 ± 30.0 minutes. Intra-operative hypotension or the number of hypotensive episodes did not appear to be associated with in-hospital or 28-day mortality. American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade (of fitness for surgery) was significantly associated with both in-hospital and 28-day mortality on univariable analysis, as were post-operative hypoproteinaemia, ileus and pancreatitis. However on multivariable analysis, only ileus and pancreatitis were found to significantly impact mortality. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Dogs presenting with a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade appear to have a higher risk of mortality, although intra-operative hypotension did not appear to be part of this risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - F Downing
- Davies Veterinary Specialists, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - S Gibson
- Davies Veterinary Specialists, Hertfordshire, UK
| | | | - K Elmenhorst
- Anderson Moores Veterinary Specialists, Hampshire, UK
| | - N Kulendra
- North Downs Specialist Referrals, Surrey, UK
| | - B Mielke
- Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - S Woods
- Veterinary Specialists Scotland, Livingston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Supervision of resident physicians is a high-risk area of emergency medicine, and what constitutes appropriate supervision is a complex question. In this article, policies and procedures for appropriate supervision of resident physicians and the implications for billing are reviewed. Recommendations on supervision of resident physicians in the emergency department are detailed, with attention paid to addressing challenges in balancing patient safety with resident autonomy and education during the course of patient care and graduate medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Y Sheng
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 800 Harrison Avenue, BCD Building, 1st Floor, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
| | - Avery Clark
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 800 Harrison Avenue, BCD Building, 1st Floor, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Cristopher Amanti
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 800 Harrison Avenue, BCD Building, 1st Floor, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pucher PH, Peckham-Cooper A, Fleming C, Mohamed W, Clements JM, Nally D, Humm G, Mohan HM. Consensus recommendations on balancing educational opportunities and service provision in surgical training: Association of Surgeons in Training Delphi qualitative study. Int J Surg 2020; 84:207-211. [PMID: 32276079 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ensuring the highest quality of surgical training remains a challenge as demands on health service provision rise. This study aimed to explore the differences and potential conflicts between service provision and dedicated training activity provided by surgical trainees, and recommend solutions. METHODS Participants were drawn from the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) national council. Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was employed by members of the ASiT executive addressing 3 key domains (1) defining differences between training and service tasks, (2) impact of service-provision on training and (3) ways to improve training. A two-round Delphi process was conducted via electronic survey to ASiT council. Consensus was considered achieved for any statement where 80% or more of respondents indicated agreement. RESULTS 47 statements were generated through NGT which were put to the Delphi process. Consensus was reached on a total of 24/47 statements. Educational or training tasks were identified as being activities which progressed a trainee's skill set, could be tailored to a trainee's own ability, and involved acting as a trainer to more junior colleagues. The negative impact of excess service provision included training quality, trainee mental health, and surgical trainee recruitment. Potential measures to improve training included increasing hospital staffing and resources, protected training times, trainee-specific or competency-based learning and training or incentivising trainers. CONCLUSION This trainee-based study provides several consensus recommendations on the characteristics that define surgical training and how a balance between service provision and training can potentially be achieved. Policy makers and health systems may be guided by these to ensure high quality training and a satisfied workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip H Pucher
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, United Kingdom; Wessex Deanery HEE, United Kingdom.
| | - Adam Peckham-Cooper
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, United Kingdom; Yorkshire & Humber HEE, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Fleming
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, United Kingdom; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Ireland
| | - Walid Mohamed
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, United Kingdom
| | | | - Deirdre Nally
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Humm
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, United Kingdom
| | - Helen M Mohan
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Geus SWL, Geary AD, Arinze N, Ng SC, Carter CO, Sachs TE, Hall JF, Hess DT, Tseng JF, Pernar LIM. Resident involvement in minimally-invasive vs. open procedures. Am J Surg 2019; 219:289-294. [PMID: 31722797 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.10.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes in laparoscopic compared to open procedures. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2007-2012 was queried for open and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR), inguinal hernia repair (IHR), splenectomy, colectomy, or cholecystectomy (CCY). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. RESULTS In total, 88,337 VHR, 20,586 IHR, 59,254 colectomies, 3301 splenectomies, and 95,900 CCY were identified. Resident involvement was predictive for major complication during open VHR (AOR, 1.29; p < 0.001), but not during any other procedure. Resident participation significantly prolonged operative time for open, as well as laparoscopic VHR, IHR, colectomy, splenectomy, and CCY (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that resident participation has a similar impact on surgical outcomes during laparoscopic and open surgery, and is generally safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna W L de Geus
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alaina D Geary
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nkiruka Arinze
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sing Chau Ng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cullen O Carter
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Teviah E Sachs
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason F Hall
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Donald T Hess
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer F Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luise I M Pernar
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wojcik BM, McKinley SK, Amari N, Chang DC, Wachtel H, Petrusa E, Mullen JT, Phitayakorn R. A comparison of patient satisfaction when office-based procedures are performed by general surgery residents versus an attending surgeon. Surgery 2019; 166:116-122. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
19
|
Mu SZ. In Autonomy We Trust: Increasing Intraoperative Learning to Produce Better Surgeons. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2019; 94:618. [PMID: 30720521 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Z Mu
- Resident, General Surgery, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey; ; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1467-1967
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wojcik BM, Han K, Peponis T, Velmahos G, Kaafarani HMA. Impact of Intra-Operative Adverse Events on the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Abdominal Surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2019; 20:174-183. [PMID: 30657419 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2018.157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-operative adverse events (iAEs) recently were shown to correlate independently with an increased risk of post-operative death, morbidity, re-admissions, and length of hospital stay. We sought to understand further the impact of iAEs on surgical site infections (SSIs) in abdominal surgical procedures and delineate which patient populations are most affected. We hypothesized that all patients with iAEs have an increased risk for SSI, especially those with pre-existing risk factors for SSI. PATIENTS AND METHODS To identify iAEs, a well-described three-step methodology was used: (1) the 2007-2012 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was merged with the administrative database of our tertiary academic center, (2) the merged database was screened for iAEs in abdominal surgical procedures using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification-based Patient Safety Indicator "Accidental Puncture/Laceration," and (3) each flagged record was systematically reviewed to confirm iAE occurrence. Uni-variable and backward stepwise multi-variable analyses (adjusting for demographics, co-morbidities, type and complexity of operation) were performed to study the independent correlation between iAEs and SSIs (superficial, deep incisional, and organ-space). The correlation between iAEs and SSIs was investigated especially in patients deemed a priori at high risk for SSIs, specifically those older than age 60 and those with diabetes mellitus, obesity, cigarette smoking, steroid use, or American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥III. RESULTS A total of 9,288 operations were included, and iAEs were detected in 183 (2.0%). Most iAEs consisted of bowel (44%) or vessel (29%) injuries and were addressed intra-operatively (92%). SSI occurred in 686 (7.4%) cases and included 331 (3.5%) superficial, 32 (0.34%) deep incisional, and 333 (3.6%) organ/space infections. iAEs were correlated independently with SSI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.52, p = 0.013), and more severe iAEs were associated with a higher risk of infection. Analysis by SSI type revealed a significant association with organ/space SSI (OR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.07-3.05; p = 0.027), but not incisional infections. Most interestingly, the occurrence of an iAE was correlated with increased SSI rate in the low-risk but not the high-risk patient populations. Specifically, iAEs increased SSI in patients younger than 60 (OR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.55-4.67, p < 0.001), non-diabetic patients (OR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-2.58, p = 0.034), non-obese patients (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.81-4.66, p < 0.001), non-smokers (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.08-2.6, p = 0.022), with no steroid use (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.15-2.6, p < 0.008), and with ASA class <III (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.31-3.87, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS The iAEs are associated independently with increased SSIs, particularly in patients with less pre-existing risk factors for SSI. Preventing iAEs or mitigating their impact, once they occur, may help decrease the rate of SSIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Wojcik
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kelsey Han
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas Peponis
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - George Velmahos
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|