Long-Term Impact of a Mission-Based Surgical Training Rotation on Plastic Surgery Capacity Building in Rwanda

Publishing Trends in International Humanitarian Cleft Lip and Palate Care: A Systematic Review

Background: Humanitarian outreach delivers essential cleft lip and palate (CLP) care in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To review the literature regarding humanitarian CLP care and determine if a shift toward more sustainable care delivery is observed. Methods: A systematic review was performed on articles describing CLP repair in humanitarian settings from 1985 to 2020. Publications were categorized into trip reports, outcomes, teaching, and public health. Articles were stratified into three 12-year intervals (T1-T3) for analysis. Results: A total of 246 publications were included. Average annual publications increased 15.4-fold from T1 to T3 (p < 0.001). Among publications focused on delivering CLP-related care, descriptive trip report articles trended downward (58% in T1 vs. 42% in T3), whereas outcome-focused publications trended upward (42% in T1 vs. 58% T3). Public health research represented the greatest percentage of publications in T3 (50%). There were 22 teaching-related publications in T3 and only one in prior years. Conclusion: Research trends demonstrate a shift away from focusing solely on the number of surgical cases completed and toward more sustainable models of care delivery that address barriers to receiving longitudinal care.

Systematic review of low-income and middle-income country perceptions of visiting surgical teams from high-income countries

BACKGROUND

The shortage of surgeons, anaesthesiologists and obstetricians in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is occasionally bridged by foreign surgical teams from high-income countries on short-term visits. To advise on ethical guidelines for such activities, the aim of this study was to present LMIC stakeholders' perceptions of visiting surgical teams from high-income countries.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines in November 2021, using standardised search terms in PubMed/Medline (National Library of Medicine), EMBASE (Elsevier), Global Health Database (EBSCO) and Global Index Medicus, and complementary hand searches in African Journals Online and Google Scholar. Included studies were analysed thematically using a meta-ethnographic approach.

RESULTS

Out of 3867 identified studies, 30 articles from 15 countries were included for analysis. Advantages of visiting surgical teams included alleviating clinical care needs, skills improvement, system-level strengthening, academic and career benefits and broader collaboration opportunities. Disadvantages of visiting surgical teams involved poor quality of care and lack of follow-up, insufficient knowledge transfers, dilemmas of ethics and equity, competition, administrative and financial issues and language barriers.

CONCLUSION

Surgical short-term visits from high-income countries are insufficiently described from the perspective of stakeholders in LMICs, yet such perspectives are essential for quality of care, ethics and equity, skills and knowledge transfer and sustainable health system strengthening. More in-depth studies, particularly of LMIC perceptions, are required to inform further development of ethical guidelines for global surgery and support ethical and sustainable strengthening of LMIC surgical systems.