The Effect of Surgical Trainee Education on Opioid Prescribing: An International Evaluation

Cornea specialists are the highest opioid prescribers at a large academic eye institute in the USA

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate the opioid prescription patterns across ophthalmic subspecialties at a large academic eye centre.

METHODS

A single site, retrospective cross-sectional study. Electronic medical records from the year 2018 were screened. Ophthalmology patients ≥18 years of age were included. The main outcome measures were patient demographics, outpatient opioid prescriptions, ophthalmic procedure and prescriber details, including department and training level.

RESULTS

1654 opioid prescriptions were written, accounting for 2.2% of all ophthalmic procedures in a calendar year. Of the patients who received prescriptions, 51.4% were female (n=851) with a mean age of 52.3±18.5 (range 18-95 years). In general, the morphine equivalent dose was low, with an average of 12.4±6.75 pills dispensed (range 1-60) with 0.0±0.01 refills (range 0-3). Cornea specialists were the highest opioid prescribers (22.7% of all providers who wrote a prescription), followed by oculoplastics (22.2%) and retina (18.4%). The most common procedure for which an opioid was prescribed was cornea crosslinking (14.3% of all opioid prescriptions).

CONCLUSIONS

While opioid prescriptions are generally low for ophthalmic procedures across departments, cornea specialists accounted for nearly a third of opioid prescriptions. Over half of corneal crosslinking patients received opioid prescriptions; there remains an unmet need for opioid-sparing therapy for these patients and others with severe eye pain.

An Institutional Curriculum for Opioid Prescribing Education: Outcomes From 2017 to 2022

INTRODUCTION

Prescription opioids, including those prescribed after surgery, have greatly contributed to the US opioid epidemic. Educating opioid prescribers is a crucial component of ensuring the safe use of opioids among surgical patients.

METHODS

An annual opioid prescribing education curriculum was implemented among new surgical prescribers at our institution between 2017 and 2022. The curriculum includes a single 75-min session which is comprised of several components: pain medications (dosing, indications, and contraindications); patients at high risk for uncontrolled pain and/or opioid misuse or abuse; patient monitoring and care plans; and state and federal regulations. Participants were asked to complete an opioid knowledge assessment before and after the didactic session.

RESULTS

Presession and postsession assessments were completed by 197 (89.6%) prescribers. Across the five studied years, the median presession score was 54.5%. This increased to 63.6% after completion of the curriculum, representing a median relative knowledge increase of 18.2%. The median relative improvement was greatest for preinterns and interns (18.2% for both groups); smaller improvements were observed for postgraduate year 2-5 residents (9.1%) and advanced practice providers (9.1%). On a scale of 1 to 10 (with 5 being comfortable), median (interquartile range) self-reported comfort in prescribing opioids increased from 3 (2-5) before education to 5 (4-6) after education (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Each year, the curriculum substantially improved provider knowledge of and comfort in opioid prescribing. Despite increased national awareness of the opioid epidemic and increasing institutional initiatives to improve opioid prescribing practices, there was a sustained knowledge and comfort gap among new surgical prescribers. The observed effects of our opioid education curriculum highlight the value of a simple and efficient educational initiative.

Variability in Opioid Prescribing Among Plastic Surgery Residents After Bilateral Breast Reduction

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioid misuse in the United States accounts for significant avoidable morbidity and mortality. Over one third of all prescriptions written by surgeons are for opioids. Although opioids continue to provide needed analgesia for surgical patients, there are few guidelines in the plastic surgery literature for their safe and appropriate use after surgery. The consequence is wide variability and excessive opioid prescriptions. Understanding patterns of prescribing among plastic surgery residents is a crucial step toward developing safer practice models for managing postoperative pain.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of discharge opioid prescriptions after bilateral breast reduction at a single academic medical center from 2018 to 2021. Single factor 1-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate prescribing patterns by resident, postgraduate year, attending of record, and patient characteristics for 126 patients. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the degree to which these factors predicted opioid prescriptions.

RESULTS

This analysis revealed significant variability among residents prescribing opioids after bilateral breast reductions ( P < 0.001) irrespective of patient comorbidities and demographics. Residents were found to be the main predictor of opioid prescriptions after surgery ( P < 0.001) with a greater number of morphine milligram equivalents prescribed by the more junior residents ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive and variable opioid prescriptions among plastic surgery residents highlight the need for opioid prescribing education early in surgical training and improved oversight and communication with attending surgeons. Furthermore, implementation of evidence-based opioid-conscious analgesic protocols after common surgical procedures may improve patient safety by standardizing postoperative analgesic prescriptions.

Surgical Trainee Perspectives on the Opioid Crisis: The Influence of Explicit and Hidden Curricula

OBJECTIVE

In order to effectively create and implement an educational program to improve opioid prescribing practices, it is important to first consider the unique perspectives of residents on the frontlines of the opioid epidemic. We sought to better understand resident perspectives on opioid prescribing, current practices in pain management, and opioid education as a needs assessment for designing future educational interventions.

DESIGN

This is a qualitative study using focus groups of surgical residents at 4 different institutions.

SETTING

We conducted focus groups using a semistructured interview guide in person or over video conferencing. The residency programs selected for participation represent a broad geographic range and varying residency sizes.

PARTICIPANTS

We used purposeful sampling to recruit general surgery residents from the University of Utah, University of Wisconsin, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham. All general surgery residents at these locations were eligible for inclusion. Participants were assigned to focus groups by residency site and their status as junior (PGY-2, PGY-3) or senior resident (PGY-4, PGY-5).

RESULTS

We completed 8 focus groups with a total of 35 residents included. We identified 4 main themes. First, residents relied on clinical and nonclinical factors when making decisions about opioid prescribing. However, hidden curricula based on unique institutional cultures and attending preferences heavily influenced residents' prescribing practices. Second, residents acknowledged that stigma and biases towards certain patient groups influenced opioid prescribing practices. Third, residents encountered barriers within their health systems to evidence-based opioid prescribing. Fourth, residents did not routinely receive formal education on pain management or opioid prescribing. Residents recommended several interventions to improve the current state of opioid prescribing, including standardized prescribing guidelines, improved patient education, and formal training during the first year of residency.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlighted several areas of opioid prescribing that can be improved upon through educational interventions. These findings can be used to develop programs aimed at improving residents' opioid prescribing practices, both during and after training, and ultimately the safe care of surgical patients.

ETHICS STATEMENT

This project was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board, ID # 00118491. All participants provided written informed consent.

Variability in discharge opioid prescribing practices for children: a historical cohort study

PURPOSE

Legitimate opioid prescriptions can increase the risk of misuse, addiction, and overdose of opioids in children and adolescents. This study aimed to describe the prescribing patterns of discharge opioid analgesics following inpatient visits and to determine patient and prescriber characteristics that are associated with prolonged opioid prescription.

METHODS

In a historical cohort study, we identified patients discharged from hospital with an opioid analgesic prescription in a tertiary pediatric hospital from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017. The primary outcome was the duration of opioid prescription in number of days. We assessed the association between patient and prescriber characteristics and an opioid prescription duration > five days using a generalized estimating equation to account for clustering due to repeated admissions of the same patient.

RESULTS

During the 18-month study period, 15.4% of all admitted patients (3,787/24,571) were given a total of 3,870 opioid prescriptions at discharge. The median [interquartile range] prescribed duration of outpatient opioid therapy was 3.75 [3.00-5.00] days. Seventy-seven percent of the opioid prescriptions were for five days or less. Generalized estimating equation analysis revealed that hospital stay > four days, oxycodone prescription, and prescription by clinical fellows and the orthopedics service were all independently associated with a discharge opioid prescription of > five days.

CONCLUSIONS

Most discharge opioids for children were prescribed for less than five days, consistent with current guidelines for adults. Nevertheless, the dosage and duration of opioids prescribed at discharge varied widely.

Impact of policy-based and institutional interventions on postoperative opioid prescribing practices

BACKGROUND

We assessed the impact of policy-based and institutional interventions to limit postoperative opioid prescribing.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic/open appendectomies, laparoscopic/open cholecystectomies, and laparoscopic/open inguinal hernia repair during a 6-month interval in 2018 (control), 2019 (post-policy intervention), and 2020 (post-institutional intervention) to assess changes in postoperative opioid prescribing patterns. A survey was collected for the 2020 cohort.

RESULTS

Comparing the 762 patients identified in 2018, 2019, and 2020 cohorts there was a significant decrease in mean opioid tabs prescribed (23.5 ± 8.9 vs. 16.2 ± 7.0 vs. 12.8 ± 4.9, p < 0.01) and mean OME dosage (148.0 ± 68.0 vs. 108.6 ± 51.8 vs. 95.4 ± 38.0, p < 0.01), without a difference in refill requests. Patient survey (response rate 63%) indicated 91.4% of patients reported sufficient pain control.

CONCLUSION

Formalized opioid-prescribing guidelines and statewide regulations can significantly decrease postoperative opioid prescribing with good patient satisfaction. Surgeon education may facilitate efforts to minimize narcotic over-prescription without compromising pain management.