Omitting ciprofloxacin prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and its impact on clinical outcomes and microbiome structure

Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study of Ciprofloxacin vs Rifaximin as Neutropenia Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Loss of microbiota diversity has been clearly associated with poor outcomes in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting. However, the choice of the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis during the pre-engraftment phase remains unclear. We designed a prospective randomized study to compare our standard-of-care neutropenia prophylaxis (ciprofloxacin) with rifaximin. We enrolled 38 consecutive adult patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting and were randomly assigned to receive ciprofloxacin (20 patients) or rifaximin (18 patients) at day -1. Pretransplant and transplant characteristics did not differ between groups. Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute graft-vs-host disease grade II to IV and moderate/severe chronic graft-vs-host disease was similar in both groups. With a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range, 6.8-30.2) in surviving patients, the 1-year CI of relapse was 20.8% in ciprofloxacin vs 17.8% in rifaximin (P = .616). Importantly, the 1-year CI of treatment-related mortality was significantly reduced in the ciprofloxacin group (10.2% vs 27.8%, P = .032), leading to higher 1-year overall survival (88.9% vs 74.6%, P = .038). In Cox-regression multivariate analysis, antibiotic prophylaxis remained the only predictor of overall survival, independently of donor type, disease risk index, and moderate/severe chronic graft-vs-host disease. Further studies are needed to assess the effects on microbiota diversity and confirm these outcomes.

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia at high risk of serious infections: Exploring pros and cons

BACKGROUND

The use of fluoroquinolones to prevent infections in neutropenic patients with cancer or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a controversial issue, with international guidelines providing conflicting recommendations. Although potential benefits are clear, concerns revolve around efficacy, potential harms, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) implications.

DISCUSSION

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduces neutropenic fever (NF) bloodstream infections and other serious bacterial infections, based on evidence from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in adults and children. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis may also reduce infection-related morbidity and healthcare costs; however, evidence is conflicting. Adverse effects of fluoroquinolones are well recognized in the general population; however, studies in the cancer cohort where it is used for a defined period of neutropenia have not reflected this. The largest concern for routine use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis remains AMR, as many, but not all, observational studies have found that fluoroquinolone prophylaxis might increase the risk of AMR, and some studies have suggested negative impacts on patient outcomes as a result.

CONCLUSIONS

The debate surrounding fluoroquinolone prophylaxis calls for individualized risk assessment based on patient characteristics and local AMR patterns, and prophylaxis should be restricted to patients at the highest risk of serious infection during the highest risk periods to ensure that the risk-benefit analysis is in favor of individual and community benefit. More research is needed to address important unanswered questions about fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with cancer or receiving HSCT.

Results of an Innovative Program for Surveillance, Prophylaxis, and Treatment of Infectious Complications Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Hematological Malignancies (BATMO Protocol)

Background

Infectious complications are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT). The BATMO (Best-Antimicrobial-Therapy-TMO) is an innovative program for infection prevention and management and has been used in our centre since 2019. The specific features of the BATMO protocol regard both prophylaxis during neutropenia (abandonment of fluoroquinolone, posaconazole use in high-risk patients, aerosolized liposomal amphotericin B use until engraftment or a need for antifungal treatment, and letermovir use in CMV-positive recipients from day 0 to day +100) and therapy (empirical antibiotics based on patient clinical history and colonization, new antibiotics used in second-line according to antibiogram with the exception of carbapenemase-producing K pneumoniae for which the use in first-line therapy is chosen).

Methods

Data on the infectious complications of 116 transplant patients before BATMO protocol (Cohort A; 2016 - 2018) were compared to those of 84 transplant patients following the introduction of the BATMO protocol (Cohort B; 2019 - 2021). The clinical and transplant characteristics of the 2 Cohorts were comparable, even though patients in Cohort B were at a higher risk of developing bacterial, fungal, and CMV infections, due to a significantly higher proportion of myeloablative regimens and haploidentical donors.

Results

No change in the incidence of infections with organ localization was observed between the two Cohorts. A significant reduction in Clostridioides difficile infections by day +100 was observed in Cohort B (47% vs. 15%; p=0.04). At day +30, a higher incidence of Gram-negative bloodstream infections (BSIs) was observed in Cohort B (12% vs. 23%; p=0.05). By day +100 and between days +100 and +180, the incidence of BSIs and of the various etiological agents, the mortality from Gram-negative bacteria, and the incidence of invasive fungal infections were not different in the two Cohorts. The incidence of CMV reactivations by day +100 dropped drastically in patients of Cohort B, following letermovir registration (51% vs. 15%; p=0.00001).

Discussion

The results of this study suggest that the BATMO program is safe. In particular, the choice to avoid prophylaxis with fluoroquinolone was associated with an increase in Gram-negative BSIs by day +30, but this did not translate into higher levels of mortality. Moreover, this strategy was associated with a significant reduction of Clostridiodes difficile infections. The efficacy of anti-CMV prophylaxis with letermovir was confirmed by a significant reduction in CMV reactivations. Even though patients in Cohort B were at higher risk of developing fungal infections (more haploidentical transplants with more myeloablative regimens), the extensive use of posaconazole for prophylaxis balanced this risk, and no increase in the incidence of fungal-associated complications was observed.