Haploidentical Versus Matched Unrelated Donor Transplants Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Lymphomas

Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using HLA-haploidentical donor with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus HLA-matched sibling donor for lymphoma

Data comparing HLA-haploidentical donors and HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs) in peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for lymphoma are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed 465 patients with lymphoma aged 16 years or older who underwent PBSCT using haploidentical donors with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo) (n = 166) or MSDs with calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (n = 299). Two-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in the PTCy-haplo and MSD groups were 49.2% versus 51.9% (P = 0.64), 38.0% versus 39.9% (P = 0.97), and 27.7% versus 18.5% (P = 0.006), respectively. In multivariable analyses, PTCy-haplo recipients had slower neutrophil recovery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P < 0.001) and platelet recovery (HR, 0.54; P < 0.001), lower risk of chronic GVHD (HR, 0.64; P = 0.038) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 0.45; P = 0.008), and better GRFS (HR, 0.66; P = 0.003) than MSD transplant recipients. OS, PFS, relapse or progression, and non-relapse mortality were similar between the groups. The difference might be mainly due to PTCy use rather than donor type; however, the results suggested that PTCy-haplo could be a possible option as an alternative to conventional MSD transplantation for lymphoma in PBSCT.

Expanding donor options: haploidentical transplant recipients are also highly likely to have a 7/8-matched unrelated donor

ABSTRACT

The use of haploidentical related donor (HRD) hematopoietic cell transplants (HCTs) in the United States grew by more than fourfold in the last decade, driven mainly by use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis. However, not all patients have a suitable HRD available. In this study, we explored the existence of unrelated donors (URDs) on the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) registry at the 8/8- or 7/8-match level for patients receiving HRD HCT in the United States and reporting to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 2013 and 2020. The data consist of 9696 HRD HCT recipients. The NMDP search prognosis score and a search simulation were used to estimate counts of URD matches on the registry. NMDP search prognosis varied by patient ancestry, with 27.5% non-Hispanic White having a good score compared with 4.6% of African American HRD HCT recipients. Overall, 34% of recipients had ≥1 8/8-matched URDs and 84% had ≥1 7/8 URDs. Recipients of older HRDs (≥35 years) had a likelihood of between 20%- 65% of having ≥5 existing 7/8-matched URDs who were aged ≤35 years. Donor-selection practices varied among the 10 highest-volume HRD centers: 6 had >20% chance of an existing 8/8-matched URD for their HRD recipients, whereas 4 centers had low likelihood of identifying an 8/8-matched URD. In conclusion, although most US patients undergoing HRD HCT do not have an existing 8/8 URD, the majority have an existing 7/8-matched URD. Studies comparing outcomes in patients receiving either HRD or 7/8-matched URD HCT and PTCy-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis may be warranted.

PTCY-Based Haploidentical Donor Transplantation versus HLA-Matched Related and Unrelated Donor Transplantations in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Lymphoma-A Matched-Pair Analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has demonstrated its potential as a curative option for patients with r/r lymphoma. With the introduction of post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based (PTCY) graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis, allo-HCT using haploidentical related donors (Haplo-HSCT) has emerged as a valuable alternative for patients without an available HLA-matched donor. In this study, we compared intermediate and long-term outcomes between Haplo-HSCT and HLA-matched related donor (MRD) and unrelated donor (URD) transplantations in 16 matched pairs using age, disease status, lymphoma classification and performance status as matching criteria. Of note, 88% of patients in each group presented with active disease at the time of conditioning. After a median follow-up of >10 years, 10-year overall and progression-free survival and non-relapse mortality incidence after Haplo-HSCT were 31%, 25% and 38%, respectively, and did not differ compared to the values observed in MRD-HSCT and URD-HSCT. A remarkable lower incidence of acute GvHD ≥ II and moderate and severe chronic GvHD was observed after Haplo-HSCT compared to MRD-HSCT (50%/50%, p = 0.03/0.03) and URD-HSCT (44%/38%, p = 0.04/0.08), resulting in slightly higher 10-year GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (25%) and chronic GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (25%) in the Haplo-HSCT group. In conclusion, Haplo-HSCT is an effective treatment in patients with non-remission NHL. Given its advantage of immediate availability, haploidentical donors should be preferably used in patients with progressive disease lacking an HLA-matched related donor.