Biventricular pacing after cardiac surgery

Effect of atrioventricular conduction prolongation on optimization of paced atrioventricular delay for biventricular pacing after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

Atrioventricular conduction prolongation (AVCP) in cardiac pacing is measurable and results primarily from delayed atrial conduction. Noninvasive methods for measuring atrial conduction are lacking. Accordingly, AVCP was used to estimate atrial conduction and investigate its role on the paced atrioventricular delay (pAVD) during biventricular pacing (BiVP) optimization.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of data collected as part of a randomized controlled study of temporary BiVP after cardiopulmonary bypass.

SETTING

Single-center study at university-affiliated tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Cardiac surgical patients at risk of left ventricular failure after cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTERVENTIONS

Temporary BiVP was optimized immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass. Vasoactive medication and fluid infusion rates were held constant during optimization.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For each patient the AVCP and the pAVD producing the optimum (highest) cardiac output (OptCO) and mean arterial pressure (OptMAP) were determined. Patients were stratified into long- and short-AVCP groups. Overall AVCP (mean ± standard deviation) was 64 ± 28 ms. For the short-AVCP group (<64 ms, n = 3), AVCP, OptCO, and OptMAP were 40 ± 11, 120 ± 0, and 150 ± 30 ms, respectively, and for the long-AVCP group (>64 ms, n = 4), these same parameters were 89 ± 10, 218 ± 44, and 218 ± 29 ms. OptCO and OptMAP were significantly less in the short-AVCP group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.029, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

AVCP varies widely after cardiopulmonary bypass, affecting optimum pAVD. Failure to correct for this can result in the selection of inappropriately short and potentially deleterious pAVDs, especially when nominal pAVD is used, causing BiVP to appear ineffective.

Left ventricular pacing lead insertion via the coronary sinus cardioplegia cannula: a novel method for temporary biventricular pacing during reoperative cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

Temporary biventricular pacing to treat low output states after cardiac surgery is an active area of investigation. Reoperative cases are not studied due to adhesions, which preclude left ventricular mobilization to place epicardial pacing wires. In such patients, inserting a temporary left ventricular lead via the coronary sinus cardioplegia cannula may allow for biventricular pacing. We developed a novel technique for intraoperative left ventricular lead placement.

METHODS

Eight domestic pigs underwent median sternotomy and pericardiotomy. Temporary pacing wires were sewn to the right atrium and right ventricle. Complete heart block was induced by ethanol ablation of the atrioventricular node. A 13-French retrograde cardioplegia catheter was introduced via the right atrial free wall into the coronary sinus. A 6-French left ventricular pacing lead was inserted into the cardioplegia catheter and advanced into the coronary sinus during biventricular pacing until left ventricular capture was detected by electrocardiogram and arterial pressure monitoring. Left ventricular capture success rate and electrical performance were recorded during five placement attempts.

RESULTS

Left ventricular capture was achieved on 80% of insertion attempts. Left ventricular capture without diaphragmatic pacing was achieved in 7 pigs. Lead tip locations were mostly in lateral and posterior basal coronary vein branches. There were no arrhythmias, bleeding, or perforation associated with lead insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative biventricular pacing with a left ventricular pacing lead inserted via the coronary sinus cardioplegia cannula is feasible, using standard instrumentation and without requiring cardiac manipulation. This approach merits further study in patients undergoing reoperative cardiac surgery.

Optimized temporary biventricular pacing acutely improves intraoperative cardiac output after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass: a substudy of a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Permanent biventricular pacing benefits patients with heart failure and interventricular conduction delay, but the importance of pacing with and without optimization in patients at risk of low cardiac output after cardiac surgery is unknown. We hypothesized that pacing parameters independently affect cardiac output. Accordingly, we analyzed aortic flow measured with an electromagnetic flowmeter in patients at risk of low cardiac output during an ongoing randomized clinical trial of biventricular pacing (n = 11) versus standard of care (n = 9).

METHODS

A substudy was conducted in all 20 patients in both groups with stable pacing after coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, or both. Ejection fraction averaged 33% ± 15%, and QRS duration was 116 ± 19 ms. Effects were measured within 1 hour of the conclusion of cardiopulmonary bypass. Atrioventricular delay (7 settings) and interventricular delay (9 settings) were optimized in random sequence.

RESULTS

Optimization of atrioventricular delay (171 ± 8 ms) at an interventricular delay of 0 ms increased flow by 14% versus the worst setting (111 ± 11 ms, P < .001) and 7% versus nominal atrioventricular delay (120 ms, P < .001). Interventricular delay optimization increased flow 10% versus the worst setting (P < .001) and 5% versus nominal interventricular delay (0 ms, P < .001). Optimized pacing increased cardiac output 13% versus atrial pacing at matched heart rate (5.5 ± 0.5 vs 4.9 ± 0.6 L/min, P = .003) and 10% versus sinus rhythm (5.0 ± 0.6 L/min, P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary biventricular pacing increases intraoperative cardiac output in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery. Atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization maximizes this benefit.