Knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns in surgical management of bicuspid aortopathy: a survey of 100 cardiac surgeons

Magnetic resonance imaging-based hemodynamic wall shear stress alters aortic wall tissue biomechanics in bicuspid aortic valve patients

OBJECTIVE

In this study we aimed to conclusively determine whether altered aortic biomechanics are associated with wall shear stress (WSS) independent of region of tissue collection. Elevated WSS in the ascending aorta of patients with bicuspid aortic valve has been shown to contribute to local maladaptive aortic remodeling and might alter biomechanics.

METHODS

Preoperative 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 22 patients who underwent prophylactic aortic root and/or ascending aorta replacement. Localized elevated WSS was identified in patients using age-matched healthy atlases (n = 60 controls). Tissue samples (n = 78) were collected and categorized according to WSS (elevated vs normal) and region. Samples were subjected to planar biaxial testing. To fully quantify the nonlinear biomechanical response, the tangential modulus (local stiffness) at a low-stretch (LTM) and high-stretch (HTM) linear region and the onset (TZo) and end stress of the nonlinear transition zone were measured. A linear mixed effect models was implemented to determine statistical relationships.

RESULTS

A higher LTM in the circumferential and axial direction was associated with elevated WSS (P = .007 and P = .018 respectively) independent of collection region. Circumferential TZo and HTM were higher with elevated WSS (P = .024 and P = .003); whereas the collection region was associated with variations in axial TZo (P = .013), circumferential HTM (P = .015), and axial HTM (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows strong evidence that biomechanical changes in the aorta are strongly associated with hemodynamics, and not region of tissue collection for bicuspid valve aortopathy patients. Elevated WSS is associated with tissue behavior at low stretch ranges (ie, LTM and TZo).

Bicuspid aortic valve associated aortopathy: 2022 guideline update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is observed in 1-2% of the general population. In addition to valve-related complications (such as aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation), individuals with BAV often develop dilatation of the proximal aorta (aortic root and ascending aorta), a condition termed BAV aortopathy. The development of BAV aortopathy can occur independent of valvular alterations and can lead to aneurysm formation, aortic dissection or aortic rupture. This review aims to update the clinician with an approach to BAV aortopathy decision making in keeping with the 2022 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guideline recommendations.

RECENT FINDINGS

The ACC/AHA 2022 guidelines provide a contemporary and comprehensive approach to the diagnosis and treatment of aortic pathologies. We review the thresholds for replacement of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta along with the strength and level of evidence recommendations. We also review the various Class 2A and 2B recommendations for earlier intervention, which emphasize the importance of experienced surgeons, and multidisciplinary aortic teams (MATs).

SUMMARY

BAV aortopathy is a common and heterogenous clinical problem. The decision making around timing of intervention requires a personalized approach that is based on the aortic dimensions, valve function, rate of growth, family history, patient factors, and surgical experience within MATs.

Prognostic role of aortic distensibility in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: a CMR study

To evaluate the prognostic value of aortic distensibility measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) as predictors of prophylactic aortic valve or aortic surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). 110 patients with BAV were included. Distensibility of middle ascending aorta (AscAo) and proximal descending aorta (DescAo) at baseline was determined using CMR. The association between aortic distensibility and primary endpoint of aortic valve and/or aortic surgery was investigated with Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. The receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) of the area under receiver-operator (AUC) and DeLong test were used to evaluate and compare the performance of different models. During a median follow-up of 66.5 months [IQR 13-75 months], 42 patients experienced surgical treatments. After adjusting for traditional risk factors, aortic distensibility (P = 0.003) and severe valve dysfunction (P < 0.001) were found significantly associated with aortic valve and/or aortic surgery. The model 2 (aortic distensibility and severe valve dysfunction) is slightly better in predicting primary endpoint than the model 1 (aortic diameter and severe valve dysfunction) (AUC: 0.893 vs. 0.842, P = 0.106). In BAV patients, aortic distensibility and severe valve dysfunction are valuable predictors for final aortic valve and/or aortic surgery.

Clinical implications of the biomechanics of bicuspid aortic valve and bicuspid aortopathy

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), which affects up to 2% of the general population, results from the abnormal fusion of the cusps of the aortic valve. Patients with BAV are at a higher risk for developing aortic dilatation, a condition known as bicuspid aortopathy, which is associated with potentially life-threatening sequelae such as aortic dissection and aortic rupture. Although BAV biomechanics have been shown to contribute to aortopathy, their precise impact is yet to be delineated. Herein, we present the latest literature related to BAV biomechanics. We present the most recent definitions and classifications for BAV. We also summarize the current evidence pertaining to the mechanisms that drive bicuspid aortopathy. We highlight how aberrant flow patterns can contribute to the development of aortic dilatation. Finally, we discuss the role cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can have in assessing and managing patient with BAV and bicuspid aortopathy.

Natural history of bicuspid aortic valves and ascending aortic aneurysms: Aortic center experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The American Association of Thoracic Surgery published guidelines in 2018 encouraging regular surveillance rather than surgical intervention for ascending aortic aneurysms under 5.5 cm in both bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. Since then, there have been limited studies reporting outcomes, especially by valve type. We aimed to analyze clinical outcomes including survival and aortic events in a cohort of BAV and TAV patients with ascending aortic aneurisms followed conservatively with routine computerized tomography  (CT) surveillance per current guidelines.

METHODS

We followed 188 patients in our clinic between 2016 and 2019; 147 had two or more CT scans which allowed measurement of aortic growth. Echocardiogram data was evaluated for each patient. We identified similar cohorts of BAV (n = 32) and TAV (n = 64) patients matched by age, sex, hypertension, smoking history, family history of aortic disease, coronary artery disease, and hyperlipidemia. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the unmatched cohorts were performed.

RESULTS

The mean aneurysm size was 4.3 ± 0.58 cm with 95% confidence interval (3.14, 5.46). This did not differ between BAV and TAV patients, nor did aneurysm growth rates. Overall adverse event rate (dissection, rupture, and death) was low for the entire cohort (BAV group, 3% and TAV group, 3.5%). Survival at 10 years for the entire cohort was 90 ± 32%.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of aortic valve type, there was a similar natural history and low adverse event rate. In the absence of risk factors, conservative management can be accomplished with minimal risk to the patient.

Is this the final answer for the aortopathy with bicuspid aortic valve

There have been changes in the guidelines for surgical indications for aortopathy associated with bicuspid aortic valves over the last 10 years. Although the results of the last 3 years adhering to the latest guidelines have been shown to be good, careful follow-up and accumulation of new research findings are still required.

Hemodynamic Assessment in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Dilation: New Insights From Voxel-By-Voxel Analysis of Reverse Flow, Stasis, and Energetics

Objectives: Clinical management decisions surrounding ascending aorta (AAo) dilation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease benefit from personalized predictive tools. 4D-flow MRI may provide patient-specific markers reflective of BAV-associated aortopathy. This study aims to explore novel 4D-flow MRI parametric voxel-by-voxel forward flow, reverse flow, kinetic energy and stasis in BAV disease. We hypothesize that novel parametric voxel-by-voxel markers will be associated with aortic dilation and referral for surgery and can enhance our understanding of BAV hemodynamics beyond standard metrics.

Methods: A total of 96 subjects (73 BAV patients, 23 healthy controls) underwent MRI scan. Healthy controls had no known cardiovascular disease. Patients were clinically referred for AAo dilation assessment. Indexed diameters were obtained by dividing the aortic diameter by the patient’s body surface area. Patients were followed for the occurrence of aortic surgery. 4D-flow analysis was performed by a single observer in five regions: left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), AAo, arch, proximal descending aorta (PDAo), and distal descending aorta (DDAo). In each region peak velocity, kinetic energy (KE), forward flow (FF), reverse flow (RF), and stasis were measured on a voxel-by-voxel basis. T-tests (or non-parametric equivalent) compared flow parameters between cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analyses explored associations between diameter and parametric voxel-by-voxel parameters.

Results: Compared to controls, BAV patients showed reduced stasis (p < 0.01) and increased RF and FF (p < 0.01) throughout the aorta, and KE remained similar. In the AAo, indexed diameter correlated with age (R = 0.326, p = 0.01), FF (R = −0.648, p < 0.001), RF (R = −0.441, p < 0.001), and stasis (R = −0.288, p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, FF showed a significant inverse association with AAo indexed diameter, independent of age. During a median 179 ± 180 days of follow-up, 23 patients (32%) required aortic surgery. Compared to patients not requiring surgery, they showed increased KE and peak velocity in the proximal aorta (p < 0.01), accompanied by increased RF and reduced stasis throughout the entire aorta (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Novel voxel-by-voxel reverse flow and stasis were altered in BAV patients and are associated with aortic dilation and surgical treatment.

Atlas-Based Evaluation of Hemodynamic in Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

Atlas-based analyses of patients with cardiovascular diseases have recently been explored to understand the mechanistic link between shape and pathophysiology. The construction of probabilistic atlases is based on statistical shape modeling (SSM) to assess key anatomic features for a given patient population. Such an approach is relevant to study the complex nature of the ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) as characterized by different patterns of aortic shapes and valve phenotypes. This study was carried out to develop an SSM of the dilated aorta with both bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), and then assess the computational hemodynamic of virtual models obtained by the deformation of the mean template for specific shape boundaries (i.e., ±1.5 standard deviation, σ). Simulations demonstrated remarkable changes in the velocity streamlines, blood pressure, and fluid shear stress with the principal shape modes such as the aortic size (Mode 1), vessel tortuosity (Mode 2), and aortic valve morphologies (Mode 3). The atlas-based disease assessment can represent a powerful tool to reveal important insights on ATAA-derived hemodynamic, especially for aneurysms which are considered to have borderline anatomies, and thus challenging decision-making. The utilization of SSMs for creating probabilistic patient cohorts can facilitate the understanding of the heterogenous nature of the dilated ascending aorta.

Bicuspid aortic valve disease is associated with abnormal wall shear stress, viscous energy loss, and pressure drop within the ascending thoracic aorta: A cross-sectional study

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease has significant gaps in its clinical management practices. To highlight the potential utility of advanced hemodynamic biomarkers in strengthening BAV assessment, we used 4-dimentional flow magnetic resonance imaging to investigate altered hemodynamics in the ascending aorta (AAo).A total of 32 healthy controls and 53 age-matched BAV patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3T, with cine imaging and 4D-flow. Analysis planes were placed along 3D-segmented aortas at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), sinuses of Valsalva, mid-ascending aorta (MAA), and proximal to the first aortic branch. Locations were analyzed for aortic diameter (normalized to body surface area), pressure drop (PD), viscous energy loss (EL), and wall shear stress (WSS) sub-vectors (axial wall shear stress, circumferential wall shear stress [WSSC], magnitude wall shear stress). Student's t tests, or non-parametric equivalents, compared parameters between cohorts. Univariable and multivariable analyses explored the associations of AAo diameter with hemodynamics within the BAV cohort.Compared to control cohort, BAV patients showed significantly greater PD (MAA: 9.5 ± 8.0 vs 2.8 ± 2.4 mm Hg; P < .01), EL (from LVOT-AA1: 7.39 ± 4.57 mW vs 2.90 ± 1.07 mW; P < .01), and WSSC (MAA: 0.3 ± 0.1 vs 0.2 ± 0.06 Pa; P ≤ .01) throughout the AAo. Correlational analyses revealed an inverse association between AAo diameter and both magnitude wall shear stress and axial wall shear stress.BAV patients exhibited increased PD, EL, and WSSC in the AAo, and an inverse association between AAo diameter and WSS sub-vectors. This demonstrated the impact of PD, EL, and WSS in BAV disease and the importance of altered hemodynamics in aortic remodelling.

Bicuspid aortic valve disease - the influence of valve morphotype on age at and types of surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) with zero or two raphes have been under-represented in previous studies. Whether these patients have unique clinical courses remains unclear. We describe the indications for and types of surgery in patients with BAV, and describe differences between valve morphotypes.

METHODS

Adults who had undergone aortic and/or aortic valve surgery for BAV disease at our centres were identified and classified according to the Sievers definitions.

RESULTS

317 patients were included (74.4% male, median age at surgery 62 years). Of these, 187 (59.0%) had aortic valve surgery, 7 (2.2%) aortic surgery, 120 (37.9%) combined valve and aortic surgery and 3 had a Ross procedure. Most patients had aortic stenosis (71.9%), followed by aortic regurgitation (16.7%). 30-day mortality was low (1.6%).The commonest valve morphology was type-1 (one raphe) in 89.6%; type-0 (no raphes) occurred in 7.9% and type-2 (two raphes) in 2.5%. Patients with type-2 valves were substantially younger at time of surgery than type-1 patients (median 36 vs 63 years, p = 0.008). A higher proportion of patients with type-0 valves required aortic surgery than those with type-1 (68.0% vs 37.3%, p = 0.007). There were no differences between groups for the indication for surgery, valvular abnormality or 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of BAV raphes was independently and significantly associated with age at surgery and the need for aortic intervention. Patients with type 0 and type 2 valves are a small but important proportion of the BAV population, potentially requiring different clinical surveillance and management.

Hemodynamic Profiles Before and After Surgery in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease-A Systematic Review of the Literature

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease presents a unique management challenge both pre- and post-operatively. 4D flow MRI offers multiple tools for the assessment of the thoracic aorta in aortic valve disease. In particular, its assessment of flow patterns and wall shear stress have led to new understandings around the mechanisms of aneurysm development in BAV disease. Novel parameters have now been developed that have the potential to predict pathological aortic dilatation and may help to risk stratify BAV patients in future. This systematic review analyses the current 4D flow MRI literature after aortic valve and/or ascending aortic replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease. 4D flow MRI has also identified distinct challenges posed by this cohort at the time of valve replacement compared to standard management of tri-leaflet disorders, and may help tailor the type and timing of replacement. Eccentric pathological flow patterns seen after bioprosthetic valve implantation, but not with mechanical prostheses, might be an important future consideration in intervention planning. 4D flow MRI also has promising potential in supporting the development of artificial valve prostheses and aortic conduits with more physiological flow patterns.

The Association between Morphological and Functional Characteristics of the Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Bicuspid Aortopathy

Objective

To identify the association between morphological and functional characteristics of the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and bicuspid aortopathy and to identify the determinants of aortic dilatation using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT).

Materials and Methods

This study included 312 subjects (mean [SD] age, 52.7 [14.3] years; 227 males [72.8%]) who underwent TTE and CCT. The BAVs were classified by anterior-posterior (BAV-AP) or right-left (BAV-RL) orientation of the cusps and divided according to the presence (raphe+) or absence of a raphe (raphe−) based on the CCT and intraoperative findings. The dimensions of the sinus of Valsalva and the proximal ascending aorta were measured by CCT. We assessed the determinants of aortic root and proximal ascending aortic dilatation (size index > 2.1 cm/m²) by Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

Of the 312 patients, BAV-AP was present in 188 patients (60.3%), and 185 patients (59.3%) were raphe+. Moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis (AS) was the most common hemodynamic abnormality (54.8%). The most common type of aortopathy was the combined dilated root and mid-ascending aortic phenotype (62.5%). On multivariable analysis, age and AS severity were significantly associated with aortic root dilatation (p < 0.05), and age, sex, and AS severity were significantly associated with ascending aortic dilatation (p < 005). However, the orientation of the cusps, presence of a raphe, and severity of aortic regurgitation were not associated with aortic root and ascending aortic dilatation.

Conclusion

BAV morphological characteristics were not determinants of aortic dilatation. Age, sex, and AS severity were predictors of bicuspid aortopathy. Therefore, age, sex, and AS severity, rather than valve morphology, need to be considered when planning treatment for BAV patients.

Haemodynamic assessment of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: a systematic review of the current literature

Both genetic and haemodynamic theories explain the aetiology, progression and optimal management of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy. In recent years, the haemodynamic theory has been explored with the help of magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics. The objective of this review was to summarize the findings of these investigations with focus on the blood flow pattern and associated variables, including flow eccentricity, helicity, flow displacement, cusp opening angle, systolic flow angle, wall shear stress (WSS) and oscillatory shear index. A structured literature review was performed from January 1990 to January 2018 and revealed the following 3 main findings: (i) the bicuspid aortic valve is associated with flow eccentricity and helicity in the ascending aorta compared to healthy and diseased tricuspid aortic valve, (ii) flow displacement is easier to obtain than WSS and has been shown to correlate with valve morphology and type of aortopathy and (iii) the stenotic bicuspid aortic valve is associated with elevated WSS along the greater curvature of the ascending aorta, where aortic dilatation and aortic wall thinning are commonly found. We conclude that new haemodynamic variables should complement ascending aorta diameter as an indicator for disease progression and the type and timing of intervention. WSS describes the force that blood flow exerts on the vessel wall as a function of viscosity and geometry of the vessel, making it a potentially more reliable marker of disease progression.

Aortopathy in Congenital Heart Disease

Aortic dilatation is common in patients with congenital heart disease and is seen in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and those with conotruncal congenital heart defects. It is important to identify patients with bicuspid aortic valve at high risk for aortic dissection. High-risk patients include those with the aortic root phenotype and those with syndromic or familial aortopathies including Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and Turner syndrome. Aortic dilatation is common in patients with conotruncal congenital heart defects and rarely results in aortic dissection.

The science of BAV aortopathy

The aortopathy associated with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is an epidemiologically relevant source of chronic and acute aortic disease (aneurysm and dissection). However, its pathogenesis is still the object of scientific uncertainties and debates. Indeed, the mechanisms determining the diseases of the ascending aorta in BAV patients are most likely complex and multifactorial, i.e. resulting from variable modes of interplay between genetic and hemodynamic factors. Although few scientific studies have so far taken into adequate account this complexity, leaving the precise sequence of pathogenetic events still undiscovered, the accumulated evidence from previous research approaches have at least brought about important insights. While genetic studies have so far identified variants relevant to either valve malformation or aortic complications (including those in the genes NOTCH1, TGFBR2, ACTA2, GATA5, NKX2.5, SMAD6, ROBO4), however each explaining not more than 5% of the study population, other investigations have thoroughly described both the flow features, with consequent forces acting on the arterial wall (including skewed flow jet direction, rotational flow, wall shear stress), and the main changes in the molecular and cellular wall structure (including extracellular matrix degradation, smooth muscle cell changes, oxidative stress, unbalance of TGF-β signaling, aberrant endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition). All of this evidence, together with the recognition of the diverse phenotypes that the aortopathy can assume in BAV patients, holding possible prognostic significance, is reviewed in this chapter. The complex and multifaceted body of knowledge resulting from clinical and basic science studies on BAV aortopathy has the potential to importantly influence modes of clinical management of this disease in the near future.

Surgical repair of bicuspid aortopathy at small diameters: Clinical and institutional factors

OBJECTIVE

Bicuspid aortic valve is a common risk factor for thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Guidelines for elective ascending aortic intervention (AAI) in bicuspid aortic valve are derived from limited evidence, and the extent of practice variation due to patient and provider characteristics is unknown. Using data from 2 large cardiovascular registries, we investigated factors that influence decisions for AAI.

METHODS

All bicuspid aortic valve cases with known aortic diameters and surgical status were included. We used multivariable logistic regression to profile predictors of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) or AVR+AAI, stratified by patient characteristics, surgical indications, and institution.

RESULTS

We studied 2861 subjects at 18 institutions from 1996 to 2015. The median aortic diameter of patients who underwent AVR+AAI varied widely across institutions (39-52 mm). Aortic diameters were <45 mm in 38% of patients undergoing AVR+AAI. Patients who underwent AAI at <45 mm, compared with those managed nonoperatively, were younger (54 ± 13 vs 61 ± 15 years; P < .001) with more frequent aortic stenosis (53% vs 28%; P < .001) and regurgitation (52% vs 18%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and institutional factors influence the timing of AAI and are associated with significant variability in ascending aortic diameter at AAI across institutions. More than one third of patients with a bicuspid aortic valve undergo AAI at aortic diameters <45 mm. Long-term outcomes of this subgroup of patients, who may manifest earlier and more severe disease, are needed to determine the risk-benefit ratio of routine aortic interventions at smaller diameters.

Applications of a Specialty Bicuspid Aortic Valve Program: Clinical Continuity and Translational Collaboration

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart diagnosis and is associated with aortopathy. Current guidelines for aortic resection have been validated but are based on aortic diameter, which is insufficient to predict acute aortic events. Clinical and translational collaboration is necessary to identify biomarkers that can individualize the timing of prophylactic surgery for BAV aortopathy. We describe our multidisciplinary BAV program, including research protocols aimed at biomarker discovery and results from our longitudinal clinical registry. From 2012–2018, 887 patients enrolled in our clinical BAV registry with the option to undergo four dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow CMR) and donate serum plasma or tissue samples. Of 887 patients, 388 (44%) had an elective BAV-related procedure after initial presentation, while 499 (56%) continued with medical management. Of medical patients, 44 (9%) had elective surgery after 2.3 ± 1.4 years. Surgery patients’ biobank donations include 198 (46%) aorta, 374 (86%) aortic valve, and 314 (73%) plasma samples. The 4D flow CMR was completed for 215 (50%) surgery patients and 243 (49%) medical patients. Patients with BAV aortopathy can be safely followed by a multidisciplinary team to detect indications for surgery. Paired tissue and hemodynamic analysis holds opportunity for biomarker development in BAV aortopathy.

Four-dimensional Virtual Catheter: Noninvasive Assessment of Intra-aortic Hemodynamics in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease

Background Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI enables the evaluation of blood flow alterations in patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). However, current analysis methods are cumbersome and lack the use of the volumetric data from 4D MRI. Purpose To investigate the feasibility and reproducibility of a technique that uses a catheter-like mathematical model (virtual catheter) to assess volumetric intra-aortic hemodynamics from 4D flow MRI in patients with BAV. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, data were collected from adult patients with BAV and healthy participants who underwent aortic 4D flow MRI from November 2011 through August 2014. Reproducibility was tested in healthy study participants who underwent test-retest examinations within 2 weeks. Patients were grouped on the basis of the severity of aortic valve regurgitation (AVR) and aortic valve stenosis (AVS). A 4D virtual catheter mathematical model for probing intra-aortic hemodynamic flow was constructed as a tube with an automatically derived radius along the entire thoracic aorta centerline. Volumetric intra-aortic hemodynamics were computed from 4D flow MRI only within the virtual catheter, and the following volume-normalized systolic peaks were derived: kinetic energy (KE), viscous energy loss rate (VELR), and vorticity. Hemodynamic data were presented as medians with interquartile ranges and compared by using Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results The study included 91 participants (57 patients [mean age, 46 years ± 12], 18 women; 34 healthy participants [mean age: 44 years ± 14], 12 women; 15 healthy participants underwent test-retest examinations). Patients showed higher VELR values compared with healthy participants (median, 31 W/m³ [interquartile range, 21-72] vs 23 W/m³ [interquartile range, 17-30], respectively; P < .001) and vorticity (69 sec^-1 [interquartile range, 59-87] vs 60 sec^-1 [interquartile range, 50-67], respectively; P < .001). Four-dimensional virtual catheter showed differences among different AVS and AVR grades with the highest VELR (120 W/m³; interquartile range, 99-166; P < .001) and vorticity (108 sec^-1; interquartile range, 84-151; P < .001) found in severe AVS. High test-retest reproducibility was found for all virtual catheter-derived metrics (intraclass correlation, 0.80 ± 0.07; coefficient of variation, 9% ± 3). Conclusion The proposed four-dimensional (4D) virtual catheter technique enabled reproducible automated evaluation of volumetric intra-aortic hemodynamics alterations from 4D flow MRI in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Mitsouras and Hope in this issue.

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version

Bicuspid aortic valve disease is the most common congenital cardiac disorder, being present in 1% to 2% of the general population. Associated aortopathy is a common finding in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease, with thoracic aortic dilation noted in approximately 40% of patients in referral centers. Several previous consensus statements and guidelines have addressed the management of bicuspid aortic valve-associated aortopathy, but none focused entirely on this disease process. The current guidelines cover all major aspects of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy, including natural history, phenotypic expression, histology and molecular pathomechanisms, imaging, indications for surgery, surveillance, and follow-up, and recommendations for future research. It is intended to provide clinicians with a current and comprehensive review of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy and to guide the daily management of these complex patients.

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Executive summary

Bicuspid aortic valve disease is a common congenital cardiac disorder, being present in 1% to 2% of the general population. Associated aortopathy is a common finding in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease, with thoracic aortic dilation noted in approximately 40% of patients in referral centers. Several previous consensus statements and guidelines have addressed the management of bicuspid aortic valve-associated aortopathy, but none focused entirely on this disease process. The current document is an executive summary of "The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Guidelines on Bicuspid Aortic Valve-Related Aortopathy." All major aspects of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy, including natural history, phenotypic expression, histology and molecular pathomechanisms, imaging, indications for surgery, surveillance, and follow-up, and recommendations for future research are contained within these guidelines. The current executive summary serves as a condensed version of the guidelines to provide clinicians with a current and comprehensive review of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy and to guide the daily management of these complex patients.

Risk Stratification in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy: Emerging Evidence and Future Perspectives

The current management of aortic dilatation associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve (bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy) is based on dimensional parameters (diameter of the aneurysm, growth of the diameter over time) and few other criteria. The disease is however heterogeneous in terms of natural and clinical history and risk of acute complications, ie aortic dissection. Dimensional criteria are now admitted to have limited value as predictors of such complications. Thus, novel principles for risk stratification have been recently investigated, including phenotypic criteria, flow-related metrics, and circulating biomarkers. A systematization of the typical anatomoclinical forms that the aortopathy can assume has led to the identification of the more severe root phenotype, associated with higher risk of progression of the aneurysm and possible higher aortic dissection risk. Four-dimensional-flow magnetic resonance imaging studies are searching for potentially clinically significant metrics of flow derangement, based on the recognized association of local abnormal shear stress with wall pathology. Other research initiatives are addressing the question whether circulating molecules could predict the presence or, more importantly, the future development of aortopathy. The present review summarizes the latest progresses in the knowledge on risk stratification of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy, focusing on critical aspects and debated points.

Threshold for intervention upon ascending aortic aneurysms: an evolving target and implication of bicuspid aortic valve

With the proliferation of non-invasive thoracic imaging modalities, the question of when to operate on asymptomatic ascending aortic aneurysms for non-syndromic patients is becoming increasingly relevant. Operation is extensive, often involves circulatory arrest, and subjects the patient to significant risk of mortality and morbidity. Surgery is performed to avert fatal aortic adverse events, which carry a markedly poor prognosis. The question of when the balance is tipped toward preemptive surgical repair is challenging and is centered around predicting the risk of an acute aortic syndrome. Size of the aneurysm has been the traditional guide for decision-making but how this is measured, what risks it truly predicts, the influence of the patient's size, valve morphology, genetic profile, and other risk factors for non-syndromic patients are poorly understood. We here review this issue in detail.

Evolving Surgical Approaches to Bicuspid Aortic Valve Associated Aortopathy

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac pathology which results from the fusion of two adjacent aortic valve cusps. It is associated with dilatation of the aorta, known as bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy or bicuspid aortopathy. Bicuspid aortopathy is progressive and is linked with adverse clinical events. Hence, frequent monitoring and early intervention with prophylactic surgical resection of the proximal aorta is often recommended. Over the past two decades resection strategies and surgical interventions have mainly been directed by surgeon and institution preferences. These practices have ranged from conservative to aggressive approaches based on aortic size and growth criteria. This strategy, however, may not best reflect the risks of important aortic events. A new set of guidelines was proposed for the treatment of bicuspid aortopathy. Herein, we will highlight the most recent findings pertinent to bicuspid aortopathy and its management in the context of a case presentation.

Segmental aortic stiffness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve compared with first-degree relatives

Aims

To compare the stiffness index in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) with first-degree relatives at each segment of the thoracic ascending aorta and to compare segmental analysis of aortic stiffness in association with BAV morphotype and function.

Methods

219 patients with BAV and 148 first-degree relatives (without BAV) were consecutively included at a reference centre for BAV. Ultrasound assessment of aortic and carotid stiffness was based on the variation of the segmental arterial diameters during the cardiac cycle and on blood pressure.

Results

Without adjustment, the ascending aorta of patients with BAV seemed stiffer at each segment compared with controls (stiffness index at the sinus of Valsalva: 17.0±10.9 vs 8.9±6.1, p<0.001; tubular aorta: 20.4±31.3 vs 12.7±4.8, p=0.04). However, after adjustment on aortic diameter and age, only the sinus of Valsalva remained stiffer (p<0.001), whereas the tubular aorta no longer differed (p=0.610). In patients with BAV, aortic diameters were not influenced by the valve morphotype, except for the arch, which was more dilated in the case of 1- Non coronary sinus-Right subtype of BAV : 36.1 vs 27.6 mm, p<0.001. Aortic regurgitation was associated with an increase in aortic diameters at the sinus of Valsalva (p<0.001) and the tubular aortic levels (p=0.04).

Conclusion

Stiffness increase at the sinus of Valsalva level is independent of aortic dilatation in patients with BAV, contrary to the classic relationship between stiffness and dilatation found on the other segments. The relationship between stiffness and clinical impact needs to be assessed at each aortic segment.

Candidate plasma biomarkers for predicting ascending aortic aneurysm in bicuspid aortic valve disease

Background

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality affecting 1–2% of the population and is associated with a significantly increased risk of ascending aortic aneurysm. However, predicting which patients will develop aneurysms remains a challenge. This pilot study aimed to identify candidate plasma biomarkers for monitoring ascending aortic diameter and predicting risk of future aneurysm in BAV patients.

Methods

Plasma samples were collected pre-operatively from BAV patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. Maximum ascending aortic diameter was measured on pre-operative transoesophageal echocardiography. Maximum diameter ≥ 45 mm was classified as aneurysmal. Sequential Window Acquisition of all THeoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH-MS), an advanced mass spectrometry technique, was used to identify and quantify all proteins within the samples. Protein abundance and aortic diameter were correlated using logistic regression. Levene’s test was used to identify proteins demonstrating low abundance variability in the aneurysmal patients (consistent expression in disease), and high variability in the non-aneurysmal patients (differential expression between ‘at risk’ and not ‘at risk’ patients).

Results

Fifteen plasma samples were collected (seven non-aneurysmal and 8 aneurysmal BAV patients). The mean age of the patients was 55.5 years and the majority were female (10/15, 67%). Four proteins (haemoglobin subunits alpha, beta and delta and mannan-binding lectin serine protease) correlated significantly with maximal ascending aortic diameter (p < 0.05, r = 0.5–0.6). Five plasma proteins demonstrated significantly lower variability in the aneurysmal group and may indicate increased risk of aneurysm in non-aneurysmal patients (DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit, lumican, tetranectin, gelsolin and cartilage acidic protein 1). A further 7 proteins were identified only in the aneurysmal group (matrin-3, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, coactosin-like protein, peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A, golgin subfamily B member 1, myeloperoxidase and 2′-deoxynucleoside 5′-phosphate N-hydrolase 1).

Conclusions

This study is the first to identify candidate plasma biomarkers for predicting aortic diameter and risk of future aneurysm in BAV patients. It provides valuable pilot data and proof of principle that could be used to design a large-scale prospective investigation. Ultimately, a more affordable ‘off-the-shelf’ follow-on blood assay could then be developed in place of SWATH-MS, for use in the healthcare setting.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13019-018-0762-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aortic valve-mediated wall shear stress is heterogeneous and predicts regional aortic elastic fiber thinning in bicuspid aortic valve-associated aortopathy

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to investigate an association between the magnitude of flow-mediated aortic wall shear stress (WSS) and medial wall histopathology in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) with aortopathy.

METHODS

Patients with BAV (n = 27; 52 ± 15 years; 3 women; proximal thoracic aorta diameter = 4.4 ± 0.7 and 4.6 ± 0.5 cm) who underwent prophylactic aortic resection received preoperative 3-dimensional time-resolved phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging with 3-dimensional velocity encoding to quantify WSS relative to a population of healthy age- and sex-matched tricuspid aortic valve control participants (n = 20). Quantitative histopathology was conducted on BAV aorta tissue samples resected at surgery (n = 93), and correlation was performed between elastic fiber thickness and in vivo aortic WSS as continuous variables. Validation of elastic fiber thickness was achieved by correlation relative to tissue stiffness determined using biaxial biomechanical testing (n = 22 samples).

RESULTS

Elastic fibers were thinner and WSS was higher along the greater curvature compared with other circumferential regions (vs anterior wall: P = .003 and P = .0001, respectively; lesser curvature: both P = .001). Increased regional WSS was associated with decreased elastic fiber thickness (r = -0.25; P = .02). Patient stratification with subanalysis showed an increase in the correlation between WSS and histopathology with aortic valve stenosis (r = -0.36; P = .002) and smaller aortic diameters (<4.5 cm: r = -0.39; P = .03). Elastic fiber thinning was associated with circumferential stiffness (r = -0.41; P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with BAV, increased aortic valve-mediated WSS is significantly associated with elastic fiber thinning, particularly with aortic valve stenosis and in earlier stages of aortopathy. Elastic fiber thinning correlates with impaired tissue biomechanics. These novel findings further implicate valve-mediated hemodynamics in the progression of BAV aortopathy.

Enlightening the Association between Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Aortopathy

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients have an increased incidence of developing aortic dilation. Despite its importance, the pathogenesis of aortopathy in BAV is still largely undetermined. Nowadays, intense focus falls both on BAV morphology and progression of valvular dysfunction and on the development of aortic dilation. However, less is known about the relationship between aortic valve morphology and aortic dilation. A better understanding of the molecular pathways involved in the homeostasis of the aortic wall, including the extracellular matrix, the plasticity of the vascular smooth cells, TGFβ signaling, and epigenetic dysregulation, is key to enlighten the mechanisms underpinning BAV-aortopathy development and progression. To date, there are two main theories on this subject, i.e., the genetic and the hemodynamic theory, with an ongoing debate over the pathogenesis of BAV-aortopathy. Furthermore, the lack of early detection biomarkers leads to challenges in the management of patients affected by BAV-aortopathy. Here, we critically review the current knowledge on the driving mechanisms of BAV-aortopathy together with the current clinical management and lack of available biomarkers allowing for early detection and better treatment optimization.

Bicuspid aortic valve-associated aortopathy: update on biomarkers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy is common and its progression for individual patients is difficult to predict. The present review aims to identify recent developments using biomarkers for the determination of risk and progression of disease in patients with BAV aortopathy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel rare genetic variants and epigenetic methylation signatures affecting non-cytosine phosphate guanine (non-CpG) and CpG sites, nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase and Sod expression may lead to improved prediction of the aortopathy phenotype. Circulating transforming growth factor β-1/endoglin and miRNA signatures are found to be indicative of aortic dilation. Aortic miRNA, sphingomyelin and oxidative stress levels are linked to aortopathy progression and aortic dilation. Further evidence is shown that the pattern of cusp fusion in BAV may influence the location and extent of aortopathy.

SUMMARY

The clinical phenotypic variability seen in BAV patients suggests complex interactions between genetic variants, epigenetic regulation modifications and the variable effect of valve-mediated hemodynamic flow disturbances on the aorta and its secreted markers. Emerging biomarkers may serve along with advanced noninvasive imaging modalities to precisely identify risk of aortic complications and identify those patients who are in need of surgical intervention.

Evolution of Precision Medicine and Surgical Strategies for Bicuspid Aortic Valve-Associated Aortopathy

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital cardiac malformation affecting 1–2% of people. BAV results from fusion of two adjacent aortic valve cusps, and is associated with dilatation of the aorta, known as bicuspid valve associated aortopathy. Bicuspid valve aortopathy is progressive and associated with catastrophic clinical events, such as aortic dissection and rupture. Therefore, frequent monitoring and early intervention with prophylactic surgical resection of the proximal aorta is often recommended. However, the specific pattern of aortopathy is highly variable among patients, with different segments of the ascending aorta being affected. Individual patient risks are sometimes difficult to predict. Resection strategies are informed by current surgical guidelines which are primarily based on aortic size and growth criteria. These criteria may not optimally reflect the risk of important aortic events. To address these issues in the care of patients with bicuspid valve aortopathy, our translational research group has focused on validating use of novel imaging techniques to establish non-invasive hemodynamic biomarkers for risk-stratifying BAV patients. In this article, we review recent efforts, successes, and ongoing challenges in the development of more precise and individualized surgical approaches for patients with bicuspid aortic valves and associated aortic disease.

Questionnaires used to assess barriers of clinical guideline use among physicians are not comprehensive, reliable, or valid: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This study described the number and characteristics of questionnaires used to assess barriers of guideline use among physicians.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A scoping review was conducted. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 2005 to June 2016. English-language studies that administered a questionnaire to assess barriers of guideline use among practicing physicians were eligible. Summary statistics were used to report study and questionnaire characteristics. Questionnaire content was assessed with a checklist of 57 known barriers.

RESULTS

Each of the 178 included studies administered a unique questionnaire. The number of questionnaires increased yearly from 2005 to 2015. Few were pilot-tested (50, 28.1%) or tested for psychometric properties (3, 1.7%). Two were based on theory. None probed for the full range of known barriers. Ten included a free-text option. The majority assessed professional barriers (177, 99.4%) but few of the 14 factors within this domain. Questionnaire characteristics did not change over time.

CONCLUSION

Organizations administered questionnaires that were not reliable or valid and did not comprehensively assess barriers and may have selected interventions unlikely to promote guideline use. Research is needed to construct a questionnaire that is practical, adaptable, and robust and leads to the selection of interventions that support guideline use.

Aortic shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve with stenosis and insufficiency

OBJECTIVES

Bicuspid aortic valve, characterized by valve malformation and risk for aortopathy, displays profound alteration in systolic aortic outflow and wall shear stress distribution. The present study performed 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in patients with bicuspid aortic valve with right-left cusp fusion, focusing on the impact of valve function on hemodynamic status within the ascending aorta.

METHODS

Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 50 subjects with right-left bicuspid aortic valve and 15 age- and aortic size-matched controls with tricuspid aortic valve. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve were categorized into 3 groups according to their aortic valve function as follows: bicuspid aortic valve with no more than mild aortic valve dysfunction (bicuspid aortic valve control, n = 20), bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortic insufficiency (n = 15), and bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortic stenosis (n = 15).

RESULTS

All patients with right-left bicuspid aortic valve exhibited peak wall shear stress at the right-anterior position of the ascending aorta (bicuspid aortic valve vs trileaflet aortic valve at the right-anterior position: 0.91 ± 0.23 N/m² vs 0.43 ± 0.12 N/m², P < .001) with no distinct alteration between bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortic insufficiency and bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortic stenosis. The predominance of dilatation involving the tubular ascending aorta (82%, type 2 aortopathy) persisted, with or without valve dysfunction. Compared with bicuspid aortic valve control subjects, the bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortic insufficiency group displayed universally elevated wall shear stress (0.75 ± 0.12 N/m² vs 0.57 ± 0.09 N/m², P < .01) in the ascending aorta, which was associated with elevated cardiac stroke volume (P < .05). The bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortic stenosis group showed elevated flow eccentricity in the form of significantly increased standard deviation of circumferential wall shear stress, which correlated with markedly increased peak aortic valve velocity (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The location of peak aortic wall shear stress and type of aortopathy remained homogeneous among patients with right-left bicuspid aortic valve irrespective of valve dysfunction. Severe aortic insufficiency or stenosis resulted in further elevated aortic wall shear stress and exaggerated flow eccentricity.

Clinical and echocardiographic determinants in bicuspid aortic dilatation: Results from a longitudinal observational study

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is associated with aortic dilatation. Timing of follow-up and surgery is challenging. Hence, there is an unmet clinical need for additional risk stratification. It is unclear whether valve morphology is associated with dilatation rates. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the association between clinical and echocardiographic determinants (including valve morphology) and aortic dimension and the progression rate of dilatation.Aortic dimensions were assessed on serial echocardiographic images between 1999 and 2014 in a population of 392 patients with BAVs in a tertiary care center in the Netherlands. Analyses using mixed linear models were performed.Mean age of participants was 48 ± 17 years and 69% were male. BAV morphology was associated with aortic dimensions, as well as age, sex, BSA, and valvular dysfunction. Tubular ascending aorta, sinus of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction showed a dilatation rate of 0.32, 0.18, and 0.06 mm/year, respectively. Dilatation rate was not associated with valve morphology.In the present study, there is no association between BAV morphology and aortic dilatation rates. Therefore, morphology is of limited use in prediction of aortic growth. Discovering fast progressors remains challenging.

Year in review: bicuspid aortopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article outlines the key research contribution to bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortopathy over the past 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

Investigators have further defined the current gaps in knowledge and the scope of the clinical problem of BAV aortopathy. Support for aggressive resection strategies is waning as evidence mounts to suggest that BAV is not similar to genetic connective tissue disorders with respect to aortic risks. The role of cusp fusion patterns and valve-mediated hemodynamics in disease progression is a major area of discovery. Molecular and cellular mechanisms remain elusive and contradictory.

SUMMARY

BAV aortopathy is a major public health problem that remains poorly understood. New insights on valve-mediated hemodynamics using novel imaging modalities may lead to more individualized resection strategies and improved clinical guidelines.

Investigation on the Regional Loss Factor and Its Anisotropy for Aortic Aneurysms

An aortic aneurysm is a lethal arterial disease that mainly occurs in the thoracic and abdominal regions of the aorta. Thoracic aortic aneurysms are prevalent in the root/ascending parts of the aorta and can lead to aortic rupture resulting in the sudden death of patients. Understanding the biomechanical and histopathological changes associated with ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAAs), this study investigates the mechanical properties of the aorta during strip-biaxial tensile cycles. The loss factor-defined as the ratio of dissipated energy to the energy absorbed during a tensile cycle-the incremental modulus, and their anisotropy indexes were compared with the media fiber compositions for aneurysmal (n = 26) and control (n = 4) human ascending aortas. The aneurysmal aortas were categorized into the aortas with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valves (TAV). The strip-biaxial loss factor correlates well with the diameter of the aortas with BAV and TAV (for the axial direction, respectively, R² = 0.71, p = 0.0022 and R² = 0.54, p = 0.0096). The loss factor increases significantly with patients' age in the BAV group (for the axial direction: R² = 0.45, p = 0.0164). The loss factor is isotropic for all TAV quadrants, whereas it is on average only isotropic in the anterior and outer curvature regions of the BAV group. The results suggest that loss factor may be a useful surrogate measure to describe the histopathology of aneurysmal tissue and to demonstrate the differences between ATAAs with the BAV and TAV.

Aortic valve disease with ascending aortic aneurysm: Impact of concomitant root-sparing (supracoronary) aortic replacement in nonsyndromic patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to assess the anticipated incremental risk of a concomitant aortic resection performed with an aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with root-sparing ascending replacement were compared with those who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement using propensity score matching (81 pairs; mean age, 63 ± 11 years [root-sparing ascending replacement] vs 64 ± 14 years). To evaluate the impact of the technique at distal site, 71 pairs of those undergoing root-sparing ascending replacement also were matched by propensity score according to distal anastomosis performed clamped and open under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was equal between the root-sparing ascending replacement and isolated aortic valve replacement groups. No significant difference was found regarding postoperative morbidities, such as bleeding, renal failure, stroke, and length of stay, except prolonged ventilation was found after root-sparing procedures (P = .028). Survival estimation showed no difference between the groups. Comparing the patients undergoing root-sparing ascending replacement with clamped and opened distal anastomosis revealed a prolonged ventilation requirement (7% vs 3%; P = not significant) in the open group. Operative mortality was 0% in both groups, and midterm survival was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant replacement of the aorta in root-sparing fashion is associated with an excellent operative outcome and adds no additional risk to aortic valve replacement in elective and non-high-risk patients. If the distal anastomosis is performed in an open fashion, while the operative mortality is still very low, morbidities are slightly higher, but midterm survival remains comparable.

Valve-Related Hemodynamics Mediate Human Bicuspid Aortopathy: Insights From Wall Shear Stress Mapping

BACKGROUND

Suspected genetic causes for extracellular matrix (ECM) dysregulation in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) have influenced strategies and thresholds for surgical resection of BAV aortopathy. Using 4-dimensional (4D) flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), we have documented increased regional wall shear stress (WSS) in the ascending aorta of BAV patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the relationship between WSS and regional aortic tissue remodeling in BAV patients to determine the influence of regional WSS on the expression of ECM dysregulation.

METHODS

BAV patients (n = 20) undergoing ascending aortic resection underwent pre-operative 4D flow CMR to regionally map WSS. Paired aortic wall samples (i.e., within-patient samples obtained from regions of elevated and normal WSS) were collected and compared for medial elastin degeneration by histology and ECM regulation by protein expression.

RESULTS

Regions of increased WSS showed greater medial elastin degradation compared to adjacent areas with normal WSS: decreased total elastin (p = 0.01) with thinner fibers (p = 0.00007) that were farther apart (p = 0.001). Multiplex protein analyses of ECM regulatory molecules revealed an increase in transforming growth factor β-1 (p = 0.04), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 (p = 0.03), MMP-2 (p = 0.06), MMP-3 (p = 0.02), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (p = 0.04) in elevated WSS regions, indicating ECM dysregulation in regions of high WSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Regions of increased WSS correspond with ECM dysregulation and elastic fiber degeneration in the ascending aorta of BAV patients, implicating valve-related hemodynamics as a contributing factor in the development of aortopathy. Further study to validate the use of 4D flow CMR as a noninvasive biomarker of disease progression and its ability to individualize resection strategies is warranted.

Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging-based characterization of aortic morphometry and haemodynamics: impact of age, aortic diameter, and valve morphology

AIMS

Four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was employed for the simultaneous assessment of morphometry and flow parameters along the thoracic aorta to investigate associations between flow, age, aorta diameter, and aortic valve morphology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-five subjects, 65 controls, 50 patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and 50 patients with a dilated aorta, and a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) underwent 4D flow MRI. Following 3D segmentation of the aorta, a vessel centreline was calculated and used to extract aorta diameter, peak systolic velocity, and normalized systolic flow displacement. Validation of 4D flow MRI-based morphometric measurements compared with manual diameter measurements from standard contrast-enhanced MR angiography in 20 controls showed good agreement (mean difference = 0.4 mm, limits of agreement = ±1.31 mm) except at the sinus of valsalva. BAV showed significant differences in average peak velocity (PV; P < 0.016) compared with TAV and controls between the left ventricle outflow tract to sino-tubular junction (BAV: 1.3 ± 0.3 m/s; TAV: 1.2 ± 0.2 m/s; controls: 1.0 ± 0.1 m/s) and the ascending aorta for average normalized flow displacement (BAV: 0.11 ± 0.02; TAV: 0.09 ± 0.02; controls: 0.06 ± 0.01, P < 0.016) despite similar average aortic dimensions for BAV (37 ± 1 mm) and TAV (39 ± 1 mm). Multivariate linear regression showed a significant correlation of maximal aortic diameter to age, PV, and normalized flow displacement (R(2) = 0.413, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A single acquisition of 4D flow MRI characterized local morphological and haemodynamic differences between groups along the aorta. BAV showed altered haemodynamics when compared with TAV in spite of having similar aorta dimensions. Maximal aorta diameter was associated with age, PV, and normalized flow displacement.

Current topics on bicuspid aortic valve: clinical aspects and surgical management

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) has been identified as the most common heart valve anomaly and is considered to be a heritable disorder that affects various cardiovascular disorders, including aortopathy. Current topics regarding the clinical management of BAV including surgical strategies with or without concomitant aortic repair or replacement are attracting interest, in addition to the pathological and morphological aspects of BAV as well as aortopathy. However, surgical indications are still being debated and are dependent on current clinical guidelines and surgeons' preferences. Although clinical guidelines have already been established for the management of BAV with or without aortopathy, many studies on clinical management and surgical techniques involving various kinds of subjects have previously been published. Although a large number of studies concerning the clinical aspects of BAV have been reviewed in detail, controversy still surrounds the clinical and surgical management of BAV. Therefore, surgeons should carefully consider valve pathology when deciding whether to replace the ascending aorta. In this review, we summarized current topics on BAV and the surgical management of diseased BAV with or without aortopathy based on previous findings, including catheter-based interventional management.