Association of earlier extubation and postoperative delirium after coronary artery bypass grafting

Sex-Specific Validity of the PRE-DELIRIC Model and the E-PRE-DELIRIC Model for Predicting Delirium in Patients After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Several risk prediction models are used in intensive care units (ICUs) to detect delirium risk.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the sex-specific validity of the Prediction of Delirium in ICU patients (PRE-DELIRIC) and Early Prediction of Delirium in ICU patients (E-PRE-DELIRIC) models for predicting delirium in ICU patients after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective data from electronic medical records of ICU patients who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2019 and December 2022 were examined. Both models were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values based on the highest Youden index for female and male patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Delirium incidence was 30.7% and 27.5% in female and male patients, respectively. In the PRE-DELIRIC model, the highest Youden index scores for female and male patients were 67.00 and 57.54, respectively, with sensitivities and specificities of 61% and 88%, and 72% and 79%, respectively. In the E-PRE-DELIRIC model, the highest scores for female and male patients were 14.25 and 14.05, with sensitivities and specificities of 78% and 50%, and 70% and 53%, respectively. The area under the curve of the PRE-DELIRIC model for female and male patients was 0.77 and 0.78, respectively, and that of the E-PRE-DELIRIC model was 0.67 and 0.63, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRE-DELIRIC model showed higher specificity and was more reliable for male patients, whereas the E-PRE-DELIRIC model demonstrated better sensitivity for female patients due to its inclusion of more female-sensitive factors. A combined approach is recommended for improved reliability and validity in delirium risk assessment in clinical settings.

Safe Landing: Feasibility and Safety of Operating Room Extubation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Valve Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to explore key safety outcomes after operating room (OR) extubation in minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic medical center in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing valvular surgery via thoracotomy (November 2017-October 2022) at a single institution.

INTERVENTIONS

The OR extubation protocol was implemented on August 20, 2020.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Delirium rates, reintubation rates, and intubation duration were compared before and after OR extubation protocol implementation. Logistic regression identified patient perioperative characteristics associated with unsuccessful OR extubation. Among 312 patients, 254 were extubated in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 58 in the OR. Preoperative demographics were comparable except for the Charlson Comorbidity Index (median: 2.0 ICU extubation v 1.5 OR extubation). Interrupted time series analysis showed no change in postoperative delirium post-OR extubation implementation, with a trend toward decreasing delirium (risk ratio = 0.37, CI: 0.13-1.10, p = 0.07). The postimplementation era also had a lower median intubation duration (8 hours v 13 hours, p < 0.001) without increasing reintubation rates (1.7% v 7.9%, p = 0.159). Increased bypass length (odds ratio = 0.99, CI: 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents (odds ratio = 0.99, CI: 0.99-1.0, p = 0.009), and preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index above 3 (odds ratio = 0.42, CI: 0.19-0.95, p = 0.037) were associated with decreased odds of OR extubation.

CONCLUSIONS

OR extubation was not associated with increased postoperative delirium or reintubation rates but did decrease intubation duration. Successful OR extubation relies upon the consideration of various patient perioperative characteristics.

Early extubation after elective surgical aortic valve replacement during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is an established therapy for severe calcific aortic stenosis. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) protocols have been shown to improve outcomes for elective cardiac procedures. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted early extubation post-elective surgeries to preserve critical care resources.

AIM OF THIS STUDY

To investigate the effects of extubating patients within 6 h post-elective SAVR on hospital and ICU length of stay, mortality rates, ICU readmissions, and postoperative pneumonia.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The retrospective analysis at the University Hospital Aachen, Germany, includes data from 2017 to 2022 and compares a total of 73 elective SAVR patients. Among these, 23 patients were extubated within 6 h (EXT group), while 50 patients remained intubated for over 6 h (INT group).

RESULTS

The INT group experienced longer postoperative ventilation, needed more vasopressor support, had a higher incidence of postoperative pneumonia, and longer ICU length of stay. No significant differences were noted in overall hospital length of stay, mortality, or ICU readmission rates between the groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that early extubation in high-risk, multimorbid surgical aortic valve replacement patients is safe, and is associated with a reduction of pneumonia rates, and with shorter ICU and hospital length of stays, reinforcing the benefits of ERACS protocols, especially critical during the COVID-19 pandemic to optimize intensive care use.

The efficacy of earplugs and eye masks for delirium severity and sleep quality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in cardiac intensive care units: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome with a wide range of possible causes and multiple complications in patients admitted to intensive care units. It is, therefore, necessary to seek appropriate and safe strategies to prevent and manage delirium. This study is intended to examine the efficacy of eye masks and earplugs for delirium severity and sleep quality in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting in a cardiac intensive care unit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted on 114 patients who were consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group received routine care plus eye masks and earplugs, and the control group received only routine care. The delirium severity and sleep quality were measured with the Neelon and Champagne confusion scale and the Verran and Snyder-Halpern sleep scale.

RESULTS

The mean delirium severity score differed significantly between the two groups on the second, third, and fourth postoperative days (p < 0.001). Although the trend of changes in the mean delirium severity score from the first postoperative day (before the intervention) to the second, third, and fourth postoperative days was downward in the two groups (trending towards higher delirium severity), the control group experienced greater changes than the experimental group. An intragroup analysis of delirium severity detected a statistically significant difference in both the experimental and control groups (p < 0.001). The sleep quality domains (sleep disturbance, sleep effectiveness, sleep supplementation) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups across the three intervention days (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The overnight use of eye masks and earplugs were found to have positive effects on sleep quality domains (sleep disturbance, sleep effectiveness, sleep supplementation) and delirium severity in coronary artery bypass grafting patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit for several days. It was also found that a significant interaction effect between the sleep disturbance subscale and delirium severity exists.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

(https://en.irct.ir): IRCT20210523051370N2.

Association of immediate versus delayed extubation of patients admitted to intensive care units postoperatively and outcomes: A retrospective study

AIM OF THIS STUDY

This study seeks to investigate, whether extubation of tracheally intubated patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) postoperatively either immediately at the day of admission (day 1) or delayed at the first postoperative day (day 2) is associated with differences in outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from an Austrian ICU registry. Adult patients admitted between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2019 following elective and emergency surgery, who were intubated at the day 1 and were extubated at day 1 or day 2, were included. We performed logistic regression analyses for in-hospital mortality and over-sedation or agitation following extubation.

RESULTS

52 982 patients constituted the main study population. 1 231 (3.3%) patients extubated at day 1 and 958 (5.9%) at day 2 died in hospital, 464 (1.3%) patients extubated at day 1 and 613 (3.8%) at day 2 demonstrated agitation or over-sedation after extubation during ICU stay; OR (95% CI) for in-hospital mortality were OR 1.17 (1.01-1.35, p = 0.031) and OR 2.15 (1.75-2.65, p<0.001) for agitation or over-sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that immediate extubation as soon as deemed feasible by clinicians is associated with favourable outcomes and may thus be considered preferable in tracheally intubated patients admitted to ICU postoperatively.

Prevention of postoperative delirium after cardiovascular surgery: A team-based approach

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the efficacy of the Delirium Team Approach program for delirium prevention after cardiovascular surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 256 patients who underwent cardiac or thoracic vascular surgery between May 2017 and May 2020. We compared the outcomes before and after implementation of the Delirium Team Approach program in December 2018. The program included the following components: (a) educational sessions for the medical team regarding delirium and its management, (b) review of preprinted physician orders for insomnia and agitation, and (c) routine screening for delirium. We investigated the early outcomes and effects of the Delirium Team Approach program on postoperative delirium.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative delirium significantly decreased from 53.3% to 37.0% after implementation of the Delirium Team Approach program (P = .008). Although no intergroup differences were observed in the rates of stroke and reexploration for bleeding, the length of intensive care unit stay and the overall length of postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the postintervention group. Hospital costs, excluding surgery, and the cost during intensive care unit stay were lower in the postintervention group. Multivariable analysis showed that the Delirium Team Approach program was associated with a reduction in postoperative delirium (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.67; P = .001). Other predictors of delirium included age, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and intubation time. After risk adjustment using propensity score matching, the rate of postoperative delirium was lower in the postintervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the Delirium Team Approach program was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative delirium in patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery.