External stenting and disease progression in saphenous vein grafts two years after coronary artery bypass grafting: A multicenter randomized trial

External stenting for saphenous vein grafts reduces early postoperative graft failure

OBJECTIVES

Multiple studies have shown that external stenting (ExSt) mitigates the progression of vein graft disease years after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We used computed tomography to evaluate the effect of ExSt on perioperative vein graft patency.

METHODS

This study assessed graft patency rates of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) in consecutive patients with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2018 and 2021. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes of supported and non-supported groups at both patient and graft levels, with age, EuroSCORE II, gender, diabetes and arterial grafts as covariates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different covariates. The goal of the study was to provide valuable insights into the clinical outcomes of SVG in patients having CABG.

RESULTS

The study examined a total of 357 patients who met the inclusion criteria and evaluated 572 vein grafts. Of these, 150 patients (205 SVGs) received ExSt, whereas 207 patients (337 SVGs) did not receive ExSt. The study results indicated that the likelihood of overall SVG patency at discharge was higher in the stented group than in the non-stented group, both at the level of the grafts [93.8% vs 87.8%, odds ratio (OR) 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-4.5; P = 0.05] and at the patient level (90.1% vs 83.5%, OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.9-3.6; P = 0.1). It is worth noting that the difference between the stented and non-stented groups was most significant in the subgroup that received 2 arterial grafts (96.5% vs 89.6%, OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.2-8.4; P = 0.02) and in the subgroup with a higher EuroSCORE II (median >1.1) (98.6% vs 88.6%, OR 8.8; 95% CI 1.1-72.7; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The ExSt is associated with improved perioperative SVG patency at both the graft and the patient levels. Moreover, SVGs to the right territory and high-risk patients appear to have an advantage using ExSt.

Intimal hyperplasia, saphenous vein graft disease, and clinical outcomes: Insights from the CTSN VEST randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Diffuse intimal hyperplasia and graft irregularity adversely affect the long-term patency of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The VEST trial evaluated the efficacy of external graft support in limiting the development of intimal hyperplasia (IH) at 1 year postsurgery. In the present secondary analysis, we explored the associations between graft disease and IH and clinical events. We also examined risk factors for early graft occlusion.

METHODS

VEST is a within-patient randomized, multicenter trial that enrolled 224 patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing CABG surgery, of whom 203 were evaluated by 1 year postsurgery. Intimal hyperplasia, lumen uniformity, graft stenosis, and graft perfusion were measured by intravascular ultrasound and angiography. Major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization) were recorded over a median follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

Worse lumen uniformity, greater stenosis, and worse graft perfusion were associated with higher IH values and an increased incidence of clinical events. Consistent with previous findings, we identified endoscopic vein harvesting, female sex, and transit time flow measurement of pulsatility index and flow as risk factors for SVG occlusion during the first year postsurgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this secondary analysis of the VEST trial, we observed an association between intimal hyperplasia area and clinical measures of SVG disease at 1 year postsurgery. More severe SVG disease and larger areas of IH were associated with a higher incidence of 3-year MACCE. Ongoing follow-up to 5 years will further elucidate the impact of SVG disease on long-term clinical outcomes of CABG.

Consensus statement-graft treatment in cardiovascular bypass graft surgery

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is and continues to be the preferred revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease. Graft selection has been shown to influence the outcomes following CABG. During the last almost 60 years saphenous vein grafts (SVG) together with the internal mammary artery have become the standard of care for patients undergoing CABG surgery. While there is little doubt about the benefits, the patency rates are constantly under debate. Despite its acknowledged limitations in terms of long-term patency due to intimal hyperplasia, the saphenous vein is still the most often used graft. Although reendothelialization occurs early postoperatively, the process of intimal hyperplasia remains irreversible. This is due in part to the persistence of high shear forces, the chronic localized inflammatory response, and the partial dysfunctionality of the regenerated endothelium. "No-Touch" harvesting techniques, specific storage solutions, pressure controlled graft flushing and external stenting are important and established methods aiming to overcome the process of intimal hyperplasia at different time levels. Still despite the known evidence these methods are not standard everywhere. The use of arterial grafts is another strategy to address the inferior SVG patency rates and to perform CABG with total arterial revascularization. Composite grafting, pharmacological agents as well as latest minimal invasive techniques aim in the same direction. To give guide and set standards all graft related topics for CABG are presented in this expert opinion document on graft treatment.

Improved early risk stratification of deep sternal wound infection risk after coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) following open heart surgery is associated with excessive morbidity and mortality. Contemporary DSWI risk prediction models aim at identifying high-risk patients with varying complexity and performance characteristics. We aimed to optimize the DSWI risk factor set and to identify additional risk factors for early postoperative detection of patients prone to DSWI.

METHODS

Single-centre retrospective analysis of patients with isolated multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing myocardial revascularization at Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg between 2007 and 2022 was performed to identify risk factors for DSWI. Three data sets were created to examine preoperative, intraoperative, and early postoperative parameters, constituting the "Baseline", the "Improved Baseline" and the "Extended" models. The "Extended" data set included risk factors that had not been analysed before. Univariable and stepwise forward multiple logistic regression analyses were performed for each respective set of variables.

RESULTS

From 5221 patients, 179 (3.4%) developed DSWI. The "Extended" model performed best, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80, 95%-CI: [0.76, 0.83]. Pleural effusion requiring intervention, postoperative delirium, preoperative hospital stay > 24 h, and the use of fibrin sealant were new independent predictors of DSWI in addition to age, Diabetes Mellitus on insulin, Body Mass Index, peripheral artery disease, mediastinal re-exploration, bilateral internal mammary harvesting, acute kidney injury and blood transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The "Extended" regression model with the short-term postoperative complications significantly improved DSWI risk discrimination after surgical revascularization. Short preoperative stay, prevention of postoperative delirium, protocols reducing the need for evacuation of effusion and restrictive use of fibrin sealant for sternal closure facilitate DSWI reduction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The registered retrospective study was registered at the study centre and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg (IRB-2019-005).

Techniques and Technologies to Improve Vein Graft Patency in Coronary Surgery

Vein grafts are the most used conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), even though many studies have suggested their lower patency compared to arterial alternatives. We have reviewed the techniques and technologies that have been investigated over the years with the aim of improving the quality of these conduits. We found that preoperative and postoperative optimal medical therapy and no-touch harvesting techniques have the strongest evidence for optimizing vein graft patency. On the other hand, the use of venous external support, endoscopic harvesting, vein preservation solution and anastomosis, and graft configuration need further investigation. We have also analyzed strategies to treat vein graft failure: when feasible, re-doing the CABG and native vessel primary coronary intervention (PCI) are the best options, followed by percutaneous procedures targeting the failed grafts.

External Stenting for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The external stenting of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been proven to reduce intimal hyperplasia (IH) in animal models, paving the way for human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be conducted. Herein, we performed a study-level meta-analysis to assess the impact of the Venous External SupporT (VEST) device, an external stent, on the outcomes of SVGs. A systematic search was conducted to identify all RCTs comparing VEST-stented to non-stented SVGs in patients undergoing CABG. The primary outcome was graft occlusion. The main secondary outcomes were repeat revascularization, SVG IH area, and intimal-medial thickness. Two RCTs totaling 407 patients were included. At a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, there was no difference in graft occlusion between groups (incidence rate ratio: 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-1.53). The rate of repeat revascularization was also similar (odds ratio: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.27-1.64). The IH area (standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.45; 95% CI: -0.79 to -0.10) and intimal-medial thickness (SMD: -0.50; 95% CI: -0.90 to -0.10) were significantly reduced in the VEST group. Our findings show that significant reductions in the IH area and the intimal-medial thickness in VEST-stented SVGs do not currently translate into a lesser need for repeat revascularization or less graft occlusion events compared to non-stented SVGs at 1.5 years after CABG.

The VEST External Support for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Surgery: A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are the most frequently used conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but their higher rate of occlusion compared to arterial conduits remains a concern. Previous studies have shown that SVG failure is mainly driven by intimal hyperplasia, an adaptative response to higher pressures of the arterial circulation. The VESTTM device (Vascular Graft Solutions, Tel Aviv, Israel), an external support designed to mitigate intimal hyperplasia in SVGs, has been tested in few clinical trials (RCTs). Herein, we descriptively evaluated the randomized evidence on the VEST device.

External stenting for saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Autologous saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are the most commonly used bypass conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with multivessel coronary artery disease. Although external support devices for SVGs have shown promising outcomes, the overall efficacy and safety remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate external stenting for SVGs in CABG versus non-stented SVGs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrails.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate external-stented SVGs versus non-stented SVGs in CABG up to 31 August 2022. The risk ratio and mean difference with 95% confidence interval were analysed. The primary efficacy outcomes included intimal hyperplasia area and thickness. The secondary efficacy outcomes were graft failure (≥50% stenosis) and lumen diameter uniformity.

RESULTS

We pooled 438 patients from three RCTs. The external stented SVGs group showed significant reductions in intimal hyperplasia area (MD: -0.78, p < 0.001, I2  = 0%) and thickness (MD: -0.06, p < 0.001, I2  = 0%) compared to the non-stented SVGs group. Meanwhile, external support devices improved lumen uniformity with Fitzgibbon I classification (risk ratio (RR):1.1595, p = 0.05, I2  = 0%). SVG failure rates were not increased in the external stented SVGs group during the short follow-up period (RR: 1.14, p = 0.38, I2  = 0%). Furthermore, the incidences of mortality and major cardiac and cerebrovascular events were consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

External support devices for SVGs significantly reduced the intimal hyperplasia area and thickness, and improved the lumen uniformity, assessed with the Fitzgibbon I classification. Meanwhile, they did not increase the overall SVG failure rate.

A review on the treatment of intimal hyperplasia with perivascular medical devices: role of mechanical factors and drug release kinetics

INTRODUCTION

Intimal hyperplasia (IH) is a significant factor limiting the success of revascularization surgery for blood flow restoration. IH results from a foreign body response and mechanical disparity that involves complex biochemical reactions resulting in graft failure. The available treatment option utilizes either different pharmacological interventions or mechanical support to the vascular grafts with limited success.

AREAS COVERED

This review explains the pathophysiology of IH, responsible mechanical and biological factors, and treatment options, emphasizing perivascular devices. They are designed to provide mechanical support and pharmacology actions. The perivascular drug delivery concept has successfully demonstrated efficacy in various animal studies. Accurate projections of drug release mechanisms using mathematical modeling could be used to formulate prolonged drug elution devices. Numerical modeling aspects for the prediction of design outcomes have been given due importance that fulfills the unmet clinical need for better patient care.

EXPERT OPINION

IH could be effectively prevented by simultaneous mechanical scaffolding and sustained local drug delivery. Future perivascular medical devices could be designed to integrate these essential features. Numerical modeling for device performance prediction should be utilized in the development of next-generation perivascular devices.

VEST III trial - should we support the vein grafts?

VEST III trial is the largest randomized controlled trial to date to evaluate the role of external stents on late graft failure. In this study, an external stent was applied to vein grafts and compared with another unsupported vein graft in the same patient. The groups were compared for overall graft patency and intimal hyperplasia. Patent vein grafts were further assessed and graded based on the Fitzgibbon patency scale. This review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the trial.

Venous External Support in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Neointimal hyperplasia and lumen irregularities are major contributors to vein graft failure and the use of VEST^(R) should prevent this. In this review, we aim to evaluate the angiographic outcomes of externally supported vein grafts.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed for randomized clinical trials published by August 2022. The primary outcome was graft failure. Secondary outcomes included graft ectasia, intimal hyperplasia area and thickness, and graft non-uniformity. Odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) for continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials with a total of 437 patients were included with follow-up ranging from 1 to 2 years. The odds of graft failure were similar in the two groups (OR 1.22; 95%CI 0.88 to 1.71; I²=0%). Intimal hyperplasia area [MD -0.77 mm²; 95%CI -1.10 to -0.45; I²=0%] and thickness [MD -0.06 mm; 95%CI -0.08 to -0.04; I²=0%] were significantly lower in the VEST group. Fitzgibbon Patency Scale of II or III (representing angiographic conduit non-uniformity; OR 0.67; 95%CI 0.48 to 0.94; I²=0%) and graft ectasia (OR 0.53; 95%CI 0.32 to 0.88; I²=33%) were also significantly lower in the VEST group.

CONCLUSIONS

At short-term follow-up, VEST does not seem to reduce the incidence of graft failure, although it is associated with attenuation of intimal hyperplasia and non-uniformity. Longer angiographic follow-up is warranted to determine whether these positive effects might translate into a positive effect in graft failure and in long-term clinical outcomes.

Angiographic Outcomes for Arterial and Venous Conduits Used in CABG

Coronary artery bypass grafting is the most commonly performed cardiac surgical procedure. Conduit selection is crucial to achieving early optimal outcomes, with graft patency being likely the main driver to long-term survival. We present a review of current evidence on the patency of arterial and venous bypass conduits and of differences in angiographic outcomes.

Biodegradable external wrapping promotes favorable adaptation in an ovine vein graft model

Vein grafts, the most commonly used conduits in multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, have high intermediate- and long-term failure rates. The abrupt and marked increase in hemodynamic loads on the vein graft is a known contributor to failure. Recent computational modeling suggests that veins can more successfully adapt to an increase in mechanical load if the rate of loading is gradual. Applying an external wrap or support at the time of surgery is one way to reduce the transmural load, and this approach has improved performance relative to an unsupported vein graft in several animal studies. Yet, a clinical trial in humans has shown benefits and drawbacks, and mechanisms by which an external wrap affects vein graft adaptation remain unknown. This study aims to elucidate such mechanisms using a multimodal experimental and computational data collection pipeline. We quantify morphometry using magnetic resonance imaging, mechanics using biaxial testing, hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics, structure using histology, and transcriptional changes using bulk RNA-sequencing in an ovine carotid-jugular interposition vein graft model, without and with an external biodegradable wrap that allows loads to increase gradually. We show that a biodegradable external wrap promotes luminal uniformity, physiological wall shear stress, and a consistent vein graft phenotype, namely, it prevents over-distension, over-thickening, intimal hyperplasia, and inflammation, and it preserves mechanotransduction. These mechanobiological insights into vein graft adaptation in the presence of an external support can inform computational growth and remodeling models of external support and facilitate design and manufacturing of next-generation external wrapping devices. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: External mechanical support is emerging as a promising technology to prevent vein graft failure following coronary bypass graft surgery. While variants of this technology are currently under investigation in clinical trials, the fundamental mechanisms of adaptation remain poorly understood. We employ an ovine carotid-jugular interposition vein graft model, with and without an external biodegradable wrap to provide mechanical support, and probe vein graft adaptation using a multimodal experimental and computational data collection pipeline. We quantify morphometry using magnetic resonance imaging, mechanics using biaxial testing, fluid flow using computational fluid dynamics, vascular composition and structure using histology, and transcriptional changes using bulk RNA sequencing. We show that the wrap mitigates vein graft failure by promoting multiple adaptive mechanisms (across biological scales).

External Support for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Intimal hyperplasia and subsequent saphenous vein graft failure may have significant adverse clinical effects in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. External support of saphenous vein grafts has the potential to prevent vein graft dilation and hence slow the rate of intimal hyperplasia and increase long-term vein patency.

Objective

To determine efficacy, as measured by intimal hyperplasia, and safety of an external saphenous vein graft support device in patients undergoing a coronary bypass graft procedure.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This within-patient randomized, open-label, multicenter study was conducted at 17 Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network centers in North America. Between January 2018 and February 2019, 224 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing isolated bypass surgery were enrolled. For each patient, 1 of 2 vein grafts was randomized to receive external support or no support.

Interventions

External vein graft support or no support.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy end point was intimal hyperplasia area assessed by intravascular ultrasound at 12 months postrandomization for each study graft. Secondary confirmatory end points were lumen diameter uniformity assessed by angiography and graft failure (≥50% stenosis) by quantitative coronary angiography. Major cardiac and cerebrovascular events were collected through month 12.

Results

Among 224 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [8.3] years; 178 [79.5%] male), 203 (90.6%) were eligible for intravascular ultrasound, of which 85 (41.9%) had at least 1 study graft occluded or severely diseased at 12 months (55 supported, 56 unsupported). After imputation of data missing because of graft occlusion or severe disease, the estimated mean (SE) intimal hyperplasia area was 5.11 (0.16) mm2 in supported grafts and 5.79 (0.20) mm2 in unsupported grafts (P = .07). In a sensitivity analysis of 113 patients with both grafts imaged, the mean intimal hyperplasia area was 4.58 (0.18) mm2 and 5.12 (0.23) mm2 in supported and unsupported grafts, respectively (P = .04). By 12 months, 5 patients (2.2%) died and 16 patients (7.1%) experienced a major cardiac or cerebrovascular event.

Conclusions and Relevance

The 12-month difference in intimal hyperplasia area between supported and unsupported grafts did not achieve statistical significance. Cumulative mortality and major cardiac or cerebrovascular events rates were similar to those in other randomized coronary artery bypass trials. Further investigation to assess the effect of external graft support devices on long-term graft patency and clinical outcomes is warranted.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03209609.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Octogenarians-Risks, Outcomes, and Trends in 1283 Consecutive Patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe the risks, outcomes, and trends in patients older than 80 years undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 1283 consecutive patients who were older than 80 years and underwent primary isolated CABG from January 1, 1993, to October 31, 2019, in our clinic. Kaplan-Meier survival probability and quartile estimates were used to analyze patients' survival. Logistic regression models were used for analyzing temporal trends in CABG cases and outcomes. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was developed to study risk factors for mortality.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was overall 4% (n=51) but showed a significant decrease during the study period (P=.015). Median follow-up was 16.7 (interquartile range, 10.3-21.1) years, and Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rates at 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years were 90.2%, 67.9%, 31.1%, and 8.2%, respectively. Median survival time was 7.6 years compared with 6.0 years for age- and sex-matched octogenarians in the general US population (P<.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified older age (P<.001), recent atrial fibrillation or flutter (P<.001), diabetes mellitus (P<.001), smoking history (P=.006), cerebrovascular disease (P=.04), immunosuppressive status (P=.01), extreme levels of creatinine (P<.001), chronic lung disease (P=.02), peripheral vascular disease (P=.02), decreased ejection fraction (P=.03) and increased Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk score (P=.01) as significant risk factors of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Although CABG in octogenarians carries a higher surgical risk, it may be associated with favorable outcomes and increase in long-term survival. Further studies are warranted to define subgroups benefiting more from surgical revascularization.

Effects of the harvesting technique and external stenting on progression of vein graft disease 2 years after coronary artery bypass

OBJECTIVES

In a post hoc analysis of the VEST III trial, we investigated the effect of the harvesting technique on saphenous vein graft (SVG) patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Angiographic outcomes were assessed in 183 patients undergoing open (126 patients, 252 SVG) or endoscopic harvesting (57 patients, 114 SVG). Overall SVG patency was assessed by computed tomography angiography at 6 months and by coronary angiography at 2 years. Fitzgibbon patency (FP I, II and III) and intimal hyperplasia (IH) in a patient subset were assessed by coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound, respectively, at 2 years.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between patients who underwent open and those who underwent endoscopic harvesting. Open compared with endoscopic harvesting was associated with higher overall SVG patency rates at 6 months (92.9% vs 80.4%, P = 0.04) and 2 years (90.8% vs 73.9%, P = 0.01), improved FP I, II and III rates (65.2% vs 49.2%; 25.3% vs 45.9%, and 9.5% vs 4.9%, respectively; odds ratio 2.81, P = 0.09) and reduced IH area (-31.8%; P = 0.04) and thickness (-28.9%; P = 0.04). External stenting was associated with improved FP I, II and III rates (odds ratio 2.84, P = 0.01), reduced IH area (-19.5%; P < 0.001) and thickness (-25.0%; P < 0.001) in the open-harvest group and reduced IH area (-12.7%; P = 0.01) and thickness (-9.5%; P = 0.21) in the endoscopic-harvest group.

CONCLUSIONS

A post-hoc analysis of the VEST III trial showed that open harvesting is associated with improved overall SVG patency and reduced IH. External stenting reduces SVG disease progression, particularly with open harvesting.

External stenting of saphenous vein grafts for coronary artery bypass: a single-center analysis of clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Angiographic studies have shown that external stenting reduces disease progression in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, reports of clinical outcomes of external SVG stenting are limited.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis using a prospectively maintained national registry to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing either isolated CABG or combined (CABG + valve) procedures with use of an external SVG stent between December 2015 and December 2019. Median follow-up was 36.2 months (IQR: 24.4-41.6 months). The primary endpoint was ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and the composite of death, non-fatal MI or stroke at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier rates of survival, freedom from the composite of death, non-fatal MI or stroke and freedom from repeat revascularization were calculated at 3 years.

RESULTS

The study population included 74 patients (isolated CABG, N.=61; combined procedure, N.=13). Mean age was 65.5±9.2 years, and 81% were male. External stenting of one SVG was performed in 63 patients (85%) and external stenting of 2 SVG in 11 patients (15%). External stenting was most frequently performed on an SVG to the right coronary artery (N.=45 patients; 53%). Ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization occurred in 0% at 1 year. All-cause death, MI, stroke, and the composite of death, MI, or stroke at 1 year occurred in 2.7% (2/74), 0% (0/74), 1.4% (1/74), and 4.1% (3/74), respectively. At 3 years, the rates of survival, freedom from the composite of death, non-fatal MI or stroke, and freedom from repeat revascularization were 89.7% (95% CI: 78.0-95.3), 88.3% (95% CI: 76.5-94.4), and 94.8% (95% CI: 84.6-98.3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcomes with external SVG stenting are excellent without ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year, and low rates of repeat revascularization at 3 years. Further follow-up will show whether external stenting reduces SVG failure with a benefit on long-term clinical outcomes.

Rationale and design of a randomized trial evaluating an external support device for saphenous vein coronary grafts

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most common revascularization approach for the treatment of multi-vessel coronary artery disease. While the internal mammary artery is nearly universally used to bypass the left anterior descending coronary artery, autologous saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are still the most frequently used conduits to grafts the remaining coronary artery targets. Long-term failure of these grafts, however, continues to limit the benefits of surgery.

METHODS

The Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network trial of the safety and effectiveness of a Venous External Support (VEST) device is a randomized, multicenter, within-patient trial comparing VEST-supported versus unsupported saphenous vein grafts in patients undergoing CABG. Key inclusion criteria are the need for CABG with a planned internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending and two or more saphenous vein grafts to other coronary arteries. The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial is SVG intimal hyperplasia (plaque + media) area assessed by intravascular ultrasound at 12 months post randomization. Occluded grafts are accounted for in the analysis of the primary endpoint. Secondary confirmatory endpoints are lumen diameter uniformity and graft failure (>50% stenosis) assessed by coronary angiography at 12 months. The safety endpoints are the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and hospitalization within 5 years from randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the VEST trial will determine whether the VEST device can safely limit SVG intimal hyperplasia in patients undergoing CABG as treatment for coronary atherosclerotic disease.