A new global fibrinolysis capacity assay for the sensitive detection of hyperfibrinolysis and hypofibrinogenemia in trauma patients

Comparison of whole blood versus red blood cells and plasma to correct trauma-induced coagulopathy ex vivo

BACKGROUND

Early resuscitation is based on platelet-poor components such as red blood cells and plasma (RBC + P), contributing to platelet dilution and worsening of trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC). We aimed to compare the ability of cold-stored whole blood (WB) versus RBC + P as a single component to correct TIC.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Blood samples were collected on admission from trauma patients who required activation of the major hemorrhage protocol at a single UK major trauma center in 2021/2022. Samples were spiked ex vivo with volumes equivalent to two, four, or eight units of WB or RBC + P stored for a maximum of 2 weeks. Thromboelastometry, platelet counting, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) were performed.

RESULTS

Samples from 20 adult trauma patients were analyzed. Median age was 32 years (27-42), 89% were male, 70% had platelet dysfunction (tissue factor-activated ROTEM [EXTEM]-tissue factor-activated ROTEM with cytochalasin D [FIBTEM] clot amplitude at 5 min [A5] ≤ 30 mm), 65% were coagulopathic (EXTEM A5 ≤ 40 mm), and 42% died. EXTEM-FIBTEM A5 was higher following spiking with WB than RBC + P (33 mm, 26-33, vs. 27 mm, 24-30, p < .001). WB-spiking corrected platelet dysfunction in 2 patient samples out of 20, whereas RBC + P increased the frequency of platelet dysfunction (1/20 sample) and TIC (4/20 samples). RBC + P was associated with a dose-dependent deterioration in rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) clot strength and dynamics, platelet count, and aggregation in response to multiple agonists compared with WB-spiking, which maintained or partially corrected these abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Compared with RBC + P, WB better preserves ex vivo platelet-related ROTEM parameters, platelet count, and aggregation, but does not fully correct these common derangements of TIC.

Platelets in Hemostasis, Thrombosis, and Inflammation After Major Trauma

Trauma currently accounts for 10% of the total global burden of disease and over 5 million deaths per year, making it a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although recent advances in early resuscitation have improved early survival from critical injury, the mortality rate in patients with major hemorrhage approaches 50% even in mature trauma systems. A major determinant of clinical outcomes from a major injury is a complex, dynamic hemostatic landscape. Critically injured patients frequently present to the emergency department with an acute traumatic coagulopathy that increases mortality from bleeding, yet, within 48 to 72 hours after injury will switch from a hypocoagulable to a hypercoagulable state with increased risk of venous thromboembolism and multiple organ dysfunction. This review will focus on the role of platelets in these processes. As effectors of hemostasis and thrombosis, they are central to each phase of recovery from injury, and our understanding of postinjury platelet biology has dramatically advanced over the past decade. This review describes our current knowledge of the changes in platelet behavior that occur following major trauma, the mechanisms by which these changes develop, and the implications for clinical outcomes. Importantly, supported by research in other disease settings, this review also reflects the emerging role of thromboinflammation in trauma including cross talk between platelets, innate immune cells, and coagulation. We also address the unresolved questions and significant knowledge gaps that remain, and finally highlight areas that with the further study will help deliver further improvements in trauma care.

A comparative analysis of tranexamic acid dosing strategies in traumatic major hemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a life-saving treatment for traumatic hemorrhage, but the optimal dosing regimen remains unknown. Different doses and treatment strategies have been proposed, including single bolus, repeated bolus, or bolus plus infusion. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different TXA dosing strategies on clinical outcomes in bleeding trauma patients.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a perpetual cohort study from a UK Level I trauma center. Adult patients who activated the local major hemorrhage protocol and received TXA were included. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 24-hour mortality, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, venous thromboembolism, and rotational thromboelastometry fibrinolysis.

RESULTS

Over an 11-year period, 525 patients were included. Three dosing groups were identified: 1 g bolus only (n = 317), 1 g bolus +1 g infusion over 8 hours (n = 80), and 2 g bolus (n = 128). Demographics and admission physiology were similar, but there were differences in injury severity (median Injury Severity Score, 25, 29, and 25); and admission systolic blood pressure (median Systolic Blood Pressure, 99, 108, 99 mm Hg) across the 1-g, 1 g + 1 g, and 2-g groups. 28-day mortality was 21% in each treatment group. The incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome was significantly higher in the bolus plus infusion group (84%) vs. 1 g bolus (64%) and 2 g bolus (62%) group, p = 0.002, but on multivariable analysis was nonsignificant. Venous thromboembolism rates were similar in the 1-g bolus (4%), 2 g bolus (8%) and bolus plus infusion groups (7%). There was no difference in rotational thromboelastometry maximum lysis at 24 hours: 5% in both the 1-g and 2-g bolus groups vs. 4% in bolus plus infusion group.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes and 24-hour fibrinolysis state were equivalent across three different dosing strategies of TXA. Single bolus administration is likely preferable to a bolus plus infusion regimen.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.