P2.03-058 Tiger-3: A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Rociletinib Vs Chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Next-Generation Kinase Inhibitors Targeting Specific Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Recent Overview

Lung cancer causes many deaths globally. Mutations in regulatory genes, irregularities in specific signal transduction events, or alterations of signalling pathways are observed in cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Over the past two decades, a few kinases have been identified, validated, and studied as biomarkers for NSCLC. Among them, EGFR, ALK, ROS1, MET, RET, NTRK, and BRAF are regarded as targetable biomarkers to cure and/or control the disease. In recent years, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved more than 15 kinase inhibitors targeting these NSCLC biomarkers. The kinase inhibitors significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) of NSCLC patients. Challenges still remain for metastatic diseases and advanced NSCLC cases. New discoveries of potent kinase inhibitors and rapid development of modern medical technologies will help to control NSCLC cases. This article provides an overview of the discoveries of various types of kinase inhibitors against NSCLC, along with medicinal chemistry aspects and related developments in next-generation kinase inhibitors that have been reported in recent years.

Efficacy and Safety of Rociletinib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: The Results of TIGER-3, a Phase 3 Randomized Study

INTRODUCTION

The TIGER-3 (NCT02322281) study was initiated to compare the efficacy and safety of rociletinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets EGFR T790M and common EGFR-activating mutations, versus chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC who progressed on first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC with disease progression on standard therapy (previous EGFR TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy) were randomized to oral rociletinib (500 or 625 mg twice daily) or single-agent chemotherapy (pemetrexed, gemcitabine, docetaxel, or paclitaxel).

RESULTS

Enrollment was halted when rociletinib development was discontinued in 2016. Of 149 enrolled patients, 75 were randomized to rociletinib (n = 53: 500 mg twice daily; n = 22: 625 mg twice daily) and 74 to chemotherapy. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6-5.4) in the rociletinib 500-mg group and 5.5 months (95% CI: 1.8-8.1) in the 625-mg group versus 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.4-2.9) in the chemotherapy group. An improved PFS was observed in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC treated with rociletinib (n = 25; 500 mg and 625 mg twice daily) versus chemotherapy (n = 20; 6.8 versus 2.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28-1.07, p = 0.074). Grade 3 or higher hyperglycemia (24.0%), corrected QT prolongation (6.7%), diarrhea (2.7%), and vomiting (1.3%) were more frequent with rociletinib than chemotherapy (0%, 0%, 1.4%, and 0%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Rociletinib had a more favorable median PFS versus chemotherapy but had higher rates of hyperglycemia and corrected QT prolongation in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on previous EGFR TKI. Incomplete enrollment prevented evaluation of the primary efficacy end point.