1
|
Martella S, Aiello MM, Bertaglia V, Cau R, Denaro N, Cadoni A, Novello S, Scartozzi M, Novello G, Soto Parra HJ, Saba L, Solinas C, Porcu M. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Staging and Radiological Response Criteria in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Target Oncol 2024; 19:13-28. [PMID: 38063957 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-01017-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and challenging cancer associated with asbestos fiber exposure, which offers limited treatment options. Historically, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the primary approach, but recent developments have introduced immunotherapy as a promising alternative for the treatment of this disease. Nevertheless, the unique growth patterns and occasionally ambiguous progressive characteristics of MPM make the interpretation of radiological assessments complex. Immunotherapy further complicates matters by introducing unconventional treatment response patterns such as hyperprogression and pseudoprogression. Consequently, there is a growing imperative to integrate the standard RECIST criteria with the mesothelioma-specific mRECIST criteria (version 1.1), as outlined in iRECIST. This comprehensive review is driven by the intent to provide a valuable resource for radiologists and clinicians engaged in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of MPM in the era of immunotherapy. Specifically, the current imaging methods employed for staging and follow-up will be exposed and discussed, with a focus on the technical specificities and the mRECIST 1.1 methodology. Furthermore, we will provide a discussion about major clinical trials related to the use of immunotherapy in MPM patients. Finally, the latest advancements in radiomics, the applications of artificial intelligence in MPM, and their potential impact on clinical practice for prognosis and therapy, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serafina Martella
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Maria Aiello
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| | - Valentina Bertaglia
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Cau
- Department of Radiology, AOU Cagliari, S.S: 554, km 4,500, CAP: 09042, Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - Nerina Denaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Cadoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, AOU Cagliari, Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Scartozzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, AOU Cagliari, Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - Giuseppe Novello
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| | - Hector Josè Soto Parra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, AOU Cagliari, S.S: 554, km 4,500, CAP: 09042, Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Porcu
- Department of Radiology, AOU Cagliari, S.S: 554, km 4,500, CAP: 09042, Monserrato (CA), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peng XD, You ZY, He LX, Deng Q. Zimberelimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:5290-5296. [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i22.5290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is a rare cancer with a poor prognosis at advanced stage, and the standard first-line treatment for inoperable patients is chemotherapy. Although combining programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors with chemotherapy is generally considered safe and effective in several malignant solid tumors, there are few reports regarding initial immunochemotherapy in advanced MPeM.
CASE SUMMARY Here, to our knowledge, we present the first case of a patient with epithelioid subtype MPeM, who was treatment-naïve and benefited from initial PD-1 inhibitor plus standard chemotherapy with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and good tolerance. A 49-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for a persistent burning sensation in the abdomen. Computed tomography revealed a solid mass in the lower abdomen, which was subsequently diagnosed histologically as epithelioid subtype MPeM by core needle biopsy. The patient received eight cycles of pemetrexed 800 mg (day 1), cisplatin 60/50 mg (day 1–2), and zimberelimab (PD-1 inhibitor) 240 mg (day 1) every 3 wk. He achieved significant reduction of peritoneal tumors with remarkable improvement in symptoms. The best tumor response was partial remission with a final PFS of 7 mo. No immune-related adverse event occurred during the combination treatment.
CONCLUSION The outcome of the present case demonstrates the promising anti-tumor activity of immunochemotherapy to treat inoperable MPeM in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Dong Peng
- Department of Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Zhen-Yu You
- Department of Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Lian-Xiang He
- Department of Medical Affairs, Guangzhou Gloria Bioscience Co.,Ltd., Beijing 100005, China
| | - Qi Deng
- Department of Medical Affairs, Guangzhou Gloria Bioscience Co.,Ltd., Beijing 100005, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peng XD, You ZY, He LX, Deng Q. Zimberelimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:5296-5302. [PMID: 37621601 PMCID: PMC10445078 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i22.5296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is a rare cancer with a poor prognosis at advanced stage, and the standard first-line treatment for inoperable patients is chemotherapy. Although combining programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors with chemotherapy is generally considered safe and effective in several malignant solid tumors, there are few reports regarding initial immunochemotherapy in advanced MPeM. CASE SUMMARY Here, to our knowledge, we present the first case of a patient with epithelioid subtype MPeM, who was treatment-naïve and benefited from initial PD-1 inhibitor plus standard chemotherapy with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and good tolerance. A 49-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for a persistent burning sensation in the abdomen. Computed tomography revealed a solid mass in the lower abdomen, which was subsequently diagnosed histologically as epithelioid subtype MPeM by core needle biopsy. The patient received eight cycles of pemetrexed 800 mg (day 1), cisplatin 60/50 mg (day 1-2), and zimberelimab (PD-1 inhibitor) 240 mg (day 1) every 3 wk. He achieved significant reduction of peritoneal tumors with remarkable improvement in symptoms. The best tumor response was partial remission with a final PFS of 7 mo. No immune-related adverse event occurred during the combination treatment. CONCLUSION The outcome of the present case demonstrates the promising anti-tumor activity of immunochemotherapy to treat inoperable MPeM in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Dong Peng
- Department of Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Zhen-Yu You
- Department of Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Lian-Xiang He
- Department of Medical Affairs, Guangzhou Gloria Bioscience Co.,Ltd., Beijing 100005, China
| | - Qi Deng
- Department of Medical Affairs, Guangzhou Gloria Bioscience Co.,Ltd., Beijing 100005, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rondon L, Fu R, Patel MR. Success of Checkpoint Blockade Paves the Way for Novel Immune Therapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112940. [PMID: 37296902 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a malignancy associated with asbestos exposure and is typically categorized as an orphan disease. Recent developments in immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, specifically with agents nivolumab and ipilimumab, have demonstrated an improvement in overall survival over the previous standard chemotherapy leading to their FDA-approval as first-line therapy for unresectable disease. For quite some time, it has been known that these proteins are not the only ones that function as immune checkpoints in human biology, and the hypothesis that MPM is an immunogenic disease has led to an expanding number of studies investigating alternative checkpoint inhibitors and novel immunotherapy for this malignancy. Early trials are also supporting the notion that therapies that target biological molecules on T cells, cancer cells, or that trigger the antitumor activity of other immune cells may represent the future of MPM treatment. Moreover, mesothelin-targeted therapies are thriving in the field, with forthcoming results from multiple trials signaling an improvement in overall survival when combined with other immunotherapy agents. The following manuscript will review the current state of immune therapy for MPM, explore the knowledge gaps in the field, and discuss ongoing novel immunotherapeutic research in early clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lizbeth Rondon
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA
| | - Roberto Fu
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA
| | - Manish R Patel
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perera ND, Mansfield AS. The Evolving Therapeutic Landscape for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:1413-1423. [PMID: 35657483 PMCID: PMC9613518 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01302-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW For patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, prognosis is poor with extremely low 5-year survival rates and limited therapeutic options. Here, we review the current treatment landscape for mesothelioma and highlight promising future therapeutic directions. RECENT FINDINGS Evolving frontline therapeutic options for mesothelioma include VEGF inhibition in combination with chemotherapy and dual immune checkpoint inhibition, with synergisms between the therapies and response prediction via biomarkers also being explored. Evolving experimental treatments for mesothelioma include PARP and ALK inhibitors, dendritic and CAR T-cell therapies, anti-mesothelin vaccines, and oncolytic viral therapies, representing timely advances in the field. The therapeutic landscape for malignant pleural mesothelioma is evolving and preferred treatment in the frontline and later settings will likely evolve with it. However, this does not preclude the evidence for including multi-modal therapies spanning angiogenesis and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and biomarker utilization, in current clinical trials and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirosha D Perera
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Aaron S Mansfield
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Obacz J, Yung H, Shamseddin M, Linnane E, Liu X, Azad AA, Rassl DM, Fairen-Jimenez D, Rintoul RC, Nikolić MZ, Marciniak SJ. Biological basis for novel mesothelioma therapies. Br J Cancer 2021; 125:1039-1055. [PMID: 34226685 PMCID: PMC8505556 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01462-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer that is associated with exposure to asbestos. Although asbestos is banned in several countries, including the UK, an epidemic of mesothelioma is predicted to affect middle-income countries during this century owing to their heavy consumption of asbestos. The prognosis for patients with mesothelioma is poor, reflecting a failure of conventional chemotherapy that has ultimately resulted from an inadequate understanding of its biology. However, recent work has revolutionised the study of mesothelioma, identifying genetic and pathophysiological vulnerabilities, including the loss of tumour suppressors, epigenetic dysregulation and susceptibility to nutrient stress. We discuss how this knowledge, combined with advances in immunotherapy, is enabling the development of novel targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Obacz
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Keith Peters Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Henry Yung
- UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine Rayne Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marie Shamseddin
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Saffron Walden, UK
| | - Emily Linnane
- Adsorption & Advanced Materials Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Xiewen Liu
- Adsorption & Advanced Materials Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Arsalan A Azad
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Keith Peters Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Doris M Rassl
- Department of Histopathology, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Fairen-Jimenez
- Adsorption & Advanced Materials Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Robert C Rintoul
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marko Z Nikolić
- UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine Rayne Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stefan J Marciniak
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Keith Peters Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sam M Janes
- From the Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London (S.M.J., D.A.), the Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital (S.M.J.), London, and the University of Leicester, Leicester (D.A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Doraid Alrifai
- From the Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London (S.M.J., D.A.), the Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital (S.M.J.), London, and the University of Leicester, Leicester (D.A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Dean A Fennell
- From the Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London (S.M.J., D.A.), the Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital (S.M.J.), London, and the University of Leicester, Leicester (D.A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hotta K, Fujimoto N. Current evidence and future perspectives of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 8:jitc-2019-000461. [PMID: 32098830 PMCID: PMC7057421 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Platinum-based chemotherapy is commonly used as the standard first-line treatment for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, in recent times, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to a paradigm shift. Herein, we review relevant literature and ongoing trials of ICIs used as both first-line and salvage therapies. Specifically, in the Japanese single-arm, phase II trial, the MERIT trial, nivolumab, an antiprogrammed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody showed favorable efficacy when used as a salvage therapy. Currently, multiple ICI monotherapy or combination therapy trials have been conducted, which could provide further evidence. Among available ICIs, the anti-PD-1 antibody is promising for unresectable MPM, despite the limited efficacy of anti-CTLA4 monotherapy. Ongoing studies will further confirm the potential efficacy of ICIs for MPM, as observed across other malignancies. It is also crucial to identify any clinically useful predictive biomarkers that could reveal ICIs with maximal effects in MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuyuki Hotta
- Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Nobukazu Fujimoto
- Department of Medical Oncology and Medicine, Okayama Rosai Hospitalosai Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dudnik E, Reinhorn D, Holtzman L. Novel and Promising Systemic Treatment Approaches in Mesothelioma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:89. [PMID: 34424409 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00883-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT There was limited progress in the development of novel systemic approaches in the treatment of advanced malignant mesothelioma for years following the publication of the pivotal phase III trial of Vogelzang et al. that established the cisplatin/pemetrexed regimen as a standard 1st-line systemic therapy. Since then, over the last several years, a significant step forward has been made, with incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents. In addition, better appreciation of mesothelioma biology has allowed detection of novelmolecular therapeutic targets. All the above-mentioned strategies, along with the additional promising approaches represented by adoptive T cell therapy, dendritic cell therapy, cancer vaccines, oncoviral therapy, and agents targeting mesothelin are discussed in this review. The clinical research to identify effective biologic targets and treatment combinations in malignant mesothelioma is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Dudnik
- Thoracic Cancer Service, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, 49100, Petah Tikva, Israel. .,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, POB 39040 Ramat Aviv, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Daniel Reinhorn
- Thoracic Cancer Service, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, 49100, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Liran Holtzman
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, POB 39040 Ramat Aviv, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lopci E, Kobe C, Gnanasegaran G, Adam JA, de Geus-Oei LF. "PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma". Semin Nucl Med 2021; 51:458-473. [PMID: 33993985 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose [18F]FDG-PET/CT represents the metabolic imaging of choice in various cancer types. Used either at diagnosis or during treatment response assessment, the modality allows for a more accurate definition of tumor extent compared to morphological imaging and is able to predict the therapeutic benefit earlier in time. Due to the aspecific uptake property of [18F]FDG there is an overlap of its distribution in normal and pathological conditions, which can make the interpretation of the imaging challenging. Lung and pleural neoplasia are no exception to this, thus acknowledging of possible pitfalls and artifacts are mandatory for image interpretation. While most pitfalls and artifacts are common for all indications with metabolic imaging with [18F]FDG-PET/CT, there are specific variants and pitfalls in lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. The aim of the present article is to shed light on the most frequent and relevant variants and pitfalls in [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging in lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano MI, Italy.
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Judit A Adam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, AMS, the Netherlands
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hu ZI, Ghafoor A, Sengupta M, Hassan R. Malignant mesothelioma: Advances in immune checkpoint inhibitor and mesothelin-targeted therapies. Cancer 2021; 127:1010-1020. [PMID: 33620732 PMCID: PMC8555868 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. For many years, the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved first-line treatment for unresectable mesothelioma was pemetrexed plus cisplatin. However, the recent approval of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as frontline treatment for patients with pleural mesothelioma marks a significant milestone for the treatment of this disease. In this review, the authors describe recent advances in therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with advanced, unresectable mesothelioma, highlighting the emerging use of immunotherapy and mesothelin-targeted therapies for the management of malignant mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zishuo I Hu
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Azam Ghafoor
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Manjistha Sengupta
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cantini L, Pecci F, Merloni F, Lanese A, Lenci E, Paoloni F, Aerts JG, Berardi R. Old but gold: the role of drug combinations in improving response to immune check-point inhibitors in thoracic malignancies beyond NSCLC. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2021; 2:1-25. [PMID: 36046087 PMCID: PMC9400728 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2021.00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-oncogene addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has revolutionized the treatment scenario and led to a meaningful improvement in patient prognosis. Disappointingly, the success of ICI therapy in NSCLC has not been fully replicated in other thoracic malignancies as small cell lung cancer (SCLC), malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), and thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), due to the peculiar biological features of these disease and to the difficulties in the conduction of well-designed, biomarker-driven clinical trials. Therefore, combination strategies of ICIs plus conventional therapies (either chemotherapy, alternative ICIs or targeted agents) have been implemented. Although first approvals of ICI therapy have been recently granted in SCLC and MPM (in combination with chemotherapy and different ICIs), results remain somewhat modest and limited to a small proportion of patients. This work reviews the trial results of ICI therapy in mesothelioma, SCLC, and TETs and discusses the potential of combining ICIs with old drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Cantini
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Federica Pecci
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Filippo Merloni
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Lanese
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Edoardo Lenci
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesco Paoloni
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Joachim G.J.V. Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands 3Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Asciak R, George V, Rahman NM. Update on biology and management of mesothelioma. Eur Respir Rev 2021; 30:30/159/200226. [PMID: 33472960 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0226-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive, incurable cancer that is usually caused by asbestos exposure several decades before symptoms arise. Despite widespread prohibition of asbestos production and supply, its incidence continues to increase. It is heterogeneous in its presentation and behaviour, and diagnosis can be notoriously difficult. Identification of actionable gene mutations has proven challenging and current treatment options are largely ineffective, with a median survival of 10-12 months.However, the past few years have witnessed major advances in our understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of mesothelioma. This has also revealed the limitations of existing diagnostic algorithms and identified new treatment targets.Recent clinical trials have re-examined the role of surgery, provided new options for the management of associated pleural effusions and heralded the addition of targeted therapies. The increasing complexity of mesothelioma management, along with a desperate need for further research, means that a multidisciplinary team framework is essential for the delivery of contemporary mesothelioma care.This review provides a synthesised overview of the current state of knowledge and an update on the latest research in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle Asciak
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK .,Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Vineeth George
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Najiib M Rahman
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang H, Xu D, Schmid RA, Peng RW. Biomarker-guided targeted and immunotherapies in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920971421. [PMID: 33240401 PMCID: PMC7672749 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920971421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a lethal thoracic malignancy whose incidence is still increasing worldwide. MPM is characterized by frequent inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes (TSGs), e.g., the homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/2B and various genetic alterations that inactivate BAP1, NF2, LATS1/2, and TP53. The leading cause for the poor prognosis of patients with MPM is the lack of effective treatment options, with conventional chemotherapy being the standard of care in the clinic, which has remained unchanged for almost 20 years. Precision oncology, a burgeoning effort to provide precise cancer treatment tailored to unique molecular changes in individual patients, has made tremendous progress in the last decade in several cancers, but not in MPM. Recent studies indicate a high degree of tumor heterogeneity in MPM and the importance to optimize histological and molecular classifications for improved treatment. In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview of recent advances in MPM by focusing on new stratifications of tumor subgroups, specific vulnerabilities associated with functional loss of TSGs and other biomarkers, and potential clinical implications. The molecularly based subdivisions not only deepen our understanding of MPM pathobiology, but more importantly, they may raise unprecedented new hopes for personalized treatment of MPM patients with biomarker-guided targeted and immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitang Yang
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of BioMedical Research (DBMR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Duo Xu
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of BioMedical Research (DBMR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ralph A. Schmid
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of BioMedical Research (DBMR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 50, Bern, 3010, Switzerland
| | - Ren-Wang Peng
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of BioMedical Research (DBMR), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 50, Bern, 3010, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ahmadzada T, Cooper WA, Holmes M, Mahar A, Westman H, Gill AJ, Nordman I, Yip PY, Pal A, Zielinski R, Pavlakis N, Nagrial A, Daneshvar D, Brungs D, Karikios D, Aleksova V, Burn J, Asher R, Grau GE, Hosseini-Beheshti E, Reid G, Clarke S, Kao S. Retrospective Evaluation of the Use of Pembrolizumab in Malignant Mesothelioma in a Real-World Australian Population. JTO Clin Res Rep 2020; 1:100075. [PMID: 34589956 PMCID: PMC8474198 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of pembrolizumab in patients with mesothelioma from a real-world Australian population. We aimed to determine clinical factors and predictive biomarkers that could help select patients who are likely to benefit from pembrolizumab. METHOD Patients with mesothelioma who were treated with pembrolizumab as part of the Insurance and Care New South Wales compensation scheme were included. Clinical information was collected retrospectively. Tumor biomarkers such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), BAP1, and CD3-positive (CD3+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were examined using archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples. RESULTS A total of 98 patients were included with a median age of 70 years (range, 46-91 y); 92% were men; 76% had epithelioid subtype; 21% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0. Pembrolizumab was used as second-line or subsequent-line treatment in 94 patients and as first-line treatment in four patients. The overall response rate was 18%, and the disease control rate was 56%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6-6.2), and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval: 6.6-13.7). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 27% of patients, of which nine (9%) were of grade 3 or higher. In the multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with longer PFS included baseline ECOG status of 0 (median PFS: 12 mo versus 4 mo, p < 0.01) and PD-L1 tumor proportion score of greater than or equal to 1% (median PFS: 6 mo versus 4 mo, p < 0.01). Baseline platelet count of less than or equal to 400 × 109/liter was independently associated with longer PFS and OS (median PFS: 6 mo versus 2 mo, p = 0.05; median OS: 10 mo versus 4 mo, p = 0.01), whereas lack of pretreatment dexamethasone was independently associated with OS but not PFS (median OS: 10 mo versus 3 mo, p = 0.01). The odds of response were higher for patients with baseline ECOG status of 0 (p = 0.02) and with greater than or equal to 5% CD3+ TILs in the tumor (p < 0.01). PD-L1 expression, BAP1 loss, and CD3+ TILs in the stroma were not significantly associated with the overall response rate. CONCLUSIONS Immunotherapy is a reasonable treatment option for patients with mesothelioma. Our results are comparable to other clinical trials investigating pembrolizumab in mesothelioma in terms of response. Good performance status assessment remains the most robust predictor for patient outcomes. CD3+ TILs in the tumor may help select patients that are likely to respond to pembrolizumab, whereas factors such as PD-L1 expression, baseline platelet count, and lack of pretreatment dexamethasone may help predict survival outcomes from pembrolizumab treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamkin Ahmadzada
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wendy A. Cooper
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, New South Wales Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mikaela Holmes
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, New South Wales Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annabelle Mahar
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, New South Wales Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Helen Westman
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony J. Gill
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ina Nordman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Po Yee Yip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Abhijit Pal
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Zielinski
- Central West Cancer Care Centre, Orange Base Hospital, Orange, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nick Pavlakis
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adnan Nagrial
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology Department, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dariush Daneshvar
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Institute of Clinical Pathology & Medical Research (ICPMR)–Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Brungs
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Illawarra Cancer Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Deme Karikios
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vesna Aleksova
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juliet Burn
- Anatomical Pathology, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Asher
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georges E. Grau
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Vascular Immunology Unit, Department of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- The Sydney Nano Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elham Hosseini-Beheshti
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Vascular Immunology Unit, Department of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Glen Reid
- Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Stephen Clarke
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven Kao
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Belderbos RA, Vroman H, Aerts JGJV. Cellular Immunotherapy and Locoregional Administration of CAR T-Cells in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:777. [PMID: 32582537 PMCID: PMC7283907 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a treatment recalcitrant tumor with a poor overall survival (OS). Current approved treatment consists of first line chemotherapy that only modestly increases OS, illustrating the desperate need for other treatment options in MPM. Unfortunately, clinical studies that investigate the effectivity of checkpoint inhibitor (CI) treatment failed to improve clinical outcome over current applied therapies. In general, MPM is characterized as an immunological cold tumor with low T-cell infiltration, which could explain the disappointing results of clinical trials investigating CI treatment in MPM. Currently, many other therapeutic approaches, such as cellular therapies and cancer vaccines are investigated that could induce a tumor-specific immune response and increase of the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In this review we will discuss these novel treatment approaches for MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Belderbos
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Heleen Vroman
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhou M, Joshi N, Raj KP, Wakelee H, Neal JW. PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Case Series and Literature Review. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 22:e329-e335. [PMID: 32624413 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Zhou
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Nitin Joshi
- University Healthcare Alliance, Stanford Healthcare, Newark, CA
| | - Kavitha P Raj
- University Healthcare Alliance, Stanford Healthcare, Newark, CA
| | - Heather Wakelee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Joel W Neal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Remon J, Passiglia F, Ahn MJ, Barlesi F, Forde PM, Garon EB, Gettinger S, Goldberg SB, Herbst RS, Horn L, Kubota K, Lu S, Mezquita L, Paz-Ares L, Popat S, Schalper KA, Skoulidis F, Reck M, Adjei AA, Scagliotti GV. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Thoracic Malignancies: Review of the Existing Evidence by an IASLC Expert Panel and Recommendations. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15:914-947. [PMID: 32179179 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In the past 10 years, a deeper understanding of the immune landscape of cancers, including immune evasion processes, has allowed the development of a new class of agents. The reactivation of host antitumor immune response offers the potential for long-term survival benefit in a portion of patients with thoracic malignancies. The advent of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), both as single agents and in combination with chemotherapy, and more recently, the combination of ICI, anti-programmed cell death protein 1, and anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody, have led to breakthrough therapeutic advances for patients with advanced NSCLC, and to a lesser extent, patients with SCLC. Encouraging activity has recently emerged in pretreated patients with thymic carcinoma (TC). Conversely, in malignant pleural mesothelioma, pivotal positive signs of activity have not been fully confirmed in randomized trials. The additive effects of chemoradiation and immunotherapy suggested intriguing potential for therapeutic synergy with combination strategies. This has led to the introduction of ICI consolidation therapy in stage III NSCLC, creating a platform for future therapeutic developments in earlier-stage disease. Despite the definitive clinical benefit observed with ICI, primary and acquired resistance represent well-known biological phenomena, which may affect the therapeutic efficacy of these agents. The development of innovative strategies to overcome ICI resistance, standardization of new patterns of ICI progression, identification of predictive biomarkers of response, optimal treatment duration, and characterization of ICI efficacy in special populations, represent crucial issues to be adequately addressed, with the aim of improving the therapeutic benefit of ICI in patients with thoracic malignancies. In this article, an international panel of experts in the field of thoracic malignancies discussed these topics, evaluating currently available scientific evidence, with the final aim of providing clinical recommendations, which may guide oncologists in their current practice and elucidate future treatment strategies and research priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Remon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (HM-CIOCC), Hospital HM Delfos, HM Hospitales, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Passiglia
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Fabrice Barlesi
- Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Aix Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, CRCM, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Patrick M Forde
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Edward B Garon
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Translational Research in Oncology US Network, Los Angeles, California
| | - Scott Gettinger
- Department of Medicine (Section of Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Department of Medicine (Section of Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Roy S Herbst
- Department of Medicine (Section of Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Leora Horn
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kaoru Kubota
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shun Lu
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Laura Mezquita
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Luis Paz-Ares
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sanjay Popat
- Medical Oncology Department, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Medical Oncology Department, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kurt A Schalper
- Departments of Pathology and Medicine (Section of Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ferdinandos Skoulidis
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Martin Reck
- Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center of Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Alex A Adjei
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Giorgio V Scagliotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Viscardi G, Di Liello R, Morgillo F. How I treat malignant pleural mesothelioma. ESMO Open 2020; 4:e000669. [PMID: 32156681 PMCID: PMC7082638 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive malignancy mostly associated with occupational asbestos exposure. Prognosis is poor and only highly selected patients may benefit from aggressive surgical management, also as part of a multimodal approach. In advanced disease, the combination of pemetrexed and platinum remains the only established treatment, while efficacy evidence of second line chemotherapy is lacking. Thus, a deeper knowledge of biology of the disease and more effective treatments are urgently needed. Refer to specialised centres with multidisciplinary expertise is mandatory, as well as inclusion of patients in clinical trials is advisable whenever possible. In all stages of disease focus on symptoms control is paramount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Viscardi
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Raimondo Di Liello
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Floriana Morgillo
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Minchom A, Yuan W, Crespo M, Gurel B, Figueiredo I, Wotherspoon A, Miranda S, Riisnaes R, Ferreira A, Bertan C, Pereira R, Clarke M, Baker C, Ang JE, Fotiadis N, Tunariu N, Carreira S, Popat S, O'Brien M, Banerji U, de Bono J, Lopez J. Molecular and immunological features of a prolonged exceptional responder with malignant pleural mesothelioma treated initially and rechallenged with pembrolizumab. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:e000713. [PMID: 32169873 PMCID: PMC7069263 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This case represents an exceptional response to pembrolizumab in a patient with epithelioid mesothelioma with a further response on rechallenge. CASE PRESENTATION A 77-year-old woman with advanced epithelioid mesothelioma extensively pretreated with chemotherapy demonstrated a prolonged response of 45 months to 52 cycles of pembrolizumab. On rechallenge with pembrolizumab, further disease stability was achieved. Serial biopsies and analysis by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence demonstrated marked immune infiltration and documented the emergency of markers of immune exhaustion. Whole exome sequencing demonstrated a reduction in tumor mutational burden consistent with subclone elimination by immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. The relapse biopsy had missense mutation in BTN2A1. CONCLUSION This case supports rechallenge of programme death receptor 1 inhibitor in cases of previous CPI sensitivity and gives molecular insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Minchom
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Wei Yuan
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Mateus Crespo
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Bora Gurel
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Ines Figueiredo
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | | | - Susana Miranda
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Ruth Riisnaes
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Ana Ferreira
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Claudia Bertan
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Rita Pereira
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Matt Clarke
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Chloe Baker
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Joo Ern Ang
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Nicos Fotiadis
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Suzanne Carreira
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | - Udai Banerji
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Johann de Bono
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Juanita Lopez
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
de Gooijer CJ, Borm FJ, Scherpereel A, Baas P. Immunotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:187. [PMID: 32154179 PMCID: PMC7047444 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The only registered systemic treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is platinum based chemotherapy combined with pemetrexed, with or without bevacizumab. Immunotherapy did seem active in small phase II trials. In this review, we will highlight the most important immunotherapy-based research performed and put a focus on the future of MPM. PD-(L)1 inhibitors show response rates between 10 and 29% in phase II trials, with a wide range in progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, single agent pembrolizumab was not superior to chemotherapy (gemcitabine or vinorelbine) in the recent published PROMISE-Meso trial in pre-treated patients. In small studies with CTLA-4 inhibitors there is evidence for response in some patients, but it fails to show a better PFS and OS compared to best supportive care in a randomized study. A combination of PD-(L)1 inhibitor with CTLA-4 inhibitor seem to have a similar response as PD-(L)1 monotherapy. The first results of combining durvalumab (PD-L1 blocking) with cisplatin-pemetrexed in the first line are promising. Another immune treatment is Dendritic Cell (DC) immunotherapy, which is recently tested in mesothelioma, shows remarkable anti-tumor activity in three clinical studies. The value of single agent checkpoint inhibitors is limited in MPM. There is an urgent need for biomarkers to select the optimal candidates for immunotherapy among MPM patients in terms of efficacy and tolerance. Results of combination checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy are awaiting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frank J. Borm
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherland Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Baas
- Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, CHU, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hotta K, Fujimoto N, Kozuki T, Aoe K, Kiura K. Nivolumab for the treatment of unresectable pleural mesothelioma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2019; 20:109-114. [PMID: 31825692 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1703945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the current first-line standard therapy for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Recently, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been intensively investigated as treatment options for this disease. Nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 agent, was one of the first drugs used and is representative of available ICIs.Areas covered: This review discusses previous relevant reports and current ongoing trials of nivolumab. The efficacy and safety of nivolumab have been investigated mostly in second-line or later treatment settings as both monotherapy and in combination with other ICIs. Particularly, nivolumab monotherapy yielded promising efficacy with an objective response rate of 29% and median overall survival of 17.3 months in salvage settings in the single-arm, Japanese phase 2 trial (MERIT). Notably, the study led to Japanese approval of nivolumab for unresectable recurrent MPM. Several trials with monotherapy or cotherapy with nivolumab have commenced, including randomized trials of nivolumab monotherapy vs. placebo in the salvage setting, and cotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab vs. the platinum doublet in the frontline setting.Expert opinion: Nivolumab seems like a reasonable option for unresectable, relapsed MPM despite the lack of randomized trial data. Ongoing pivotal trials will confirm its efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuyuki Hotta
- Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Nobukazu Fujimoto
- Department of Medical Oncology and Medicine, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kozuki
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Keisuke Aoe
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Yamaguchi-Ube Medical Center, Ube, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Kiura
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Carbone M, Adusumilli PS, Alexander HR, Baas P, Bardelli F, Bononi A, Bueno R, Felley-Bosco E, Galateau-Salle F, Jablons D, Mansfield AS, Minaai M, de Perrot M, Pesavento P, Rusch V, Severson DT, Taioli E, Tsao A, Woodard G, Yang H, Zauderer MG, Pass HI. Mesothelioma: Scientific clues for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69:402-429. [PMID: 31283845 PMCID: PMC8192079 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 268] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mesothelioma affects mostly older individuals who have been occupationally exposed to asbestos. The global mesothelioma incidence and mortality rates are unknown, because data are not available from developing countries that continue to use large amounts of asbestos. The incidence rate of mesothelioma has decreased in Australia, the United States, and Western Europe, where the use of asbestos was banned or strictly regulated in the 1970s and 1980s, demonstrating the value of these preventive measures. However, in these same countries, the overall number of deaths from mesothelioma has not decreased as the size of the population and the percentage of old people have increased. Moreover, hotspots of mesothelioma may occur when carcinogenic fibers that are present in the environment are disturbed as rural areas are being developed. Novel immunohistochemical and molecular markers have improved the accuracy of diagnosis; however, about 14% (high-resource countries) to 50% (developing countries) of mesothelioma diagnoses are incorrect, resulting in inadequate treatment and complicating epidemiological studies. The discovery that germline BRCA1-asssociated protein 1 (BAP1) mutations cause mesothelioma and other cancers (BAP1 cancer syndrome) elucidated some of the key pathogenic mechanisms, and treatments targeting these molecular mechanisms and/or modulating the immune response are being tested. The role of surgery in pleural mesothelioma is controversial as it is difficult to predict who will benefit from aggressive management, even when local therapies are added to existing or novel systemic treatments. Treatment outcomes are improving, however, for peritoneal mesothelioma. Multidisciplinary international collaboration will be necessary to improve prevention, early detection, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Carbone
- Thoracic Oncology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - H. Richard Alexander
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fabrizio Bardelli
- National Research Council Institute of Nanotechnology, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Bononi
- Thoracic Oncology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emanuela Felley-Bosco
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - David Jablons
- Thoracic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Helen Diller Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Michael Minaai
- Thoracic Oncology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patricia Pesavento
- Pathology, Immunology, and Microbiology Laboratory, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Valerie Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David T. Severson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emanuela Taioli
- Translational Epidemiology and Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Anne Tsao
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Thoracic and Head/Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gavitt Woodard
- Thoracic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Helen Diller Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Haining Yang
- Thoracic Oncology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | | | - Harvey I. Pass
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gill RR, Tsao AS, Kindler HL, Richards WG, Armato SG, Francis RJ, Gomez DR, Dahlberg S, Rimner A, Simone CB, de Perrot M, Blumenthal G, Adjei AA, Bueno R, Harpole DH, Hesdorffer M, Hirsch FR, Pass HI, Yorke E, Rosenzweig K, Burt B, Fennell DA, Lindwasser W, Malik S, Peikert T, Mansfield AS, Salgia R, Yang H, Rusch VW, Nowak AK. Radiologic Considerations and Standardization of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Imaging Within Clinical Trials: Consensus Statement from the NCI Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee - International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer - Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14:1718-1731. [PMID: 31470129 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Detailed guidelines pertaining to radiological assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma are currently lacking due to the rarity of the disease, complex morphology, propensity to invade multiple planes simultaneously, and lack of specific recommendations within the radiology community about assessment, reporting, and follow-up. In March 2017, a multidisciplinary meeting of mesothelioma experts was co-sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. One of the outcomes of this conference was the foundation of detailed, multidisciplinary consensus imaging and management guidelines. Here, we present the recommendations for radiologic assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma in the setting of clinical trial enrollment. We discuss optimization of imaging parameters across modalities, standardized reporting, and response assessment within clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu R Gill
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Anne S Tsao
- Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hedy L Kindler
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - William G Richards
- Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samuel G Armato
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Roslyn J Francis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Suzanne Dahlberg
- Department of Biostatistics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Departments of Radiation Oncology, Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gideon Blumenthal
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Alex A Adjei
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David H Harpole
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Fred R Hirsch
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Mount Sinai Cancer, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
| | - Harvey I Pass
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Rosenzweig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Bryan Burt
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Dean A Fennell
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Tobias Peikert
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Aaron S Mansfield
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ravi Salgia
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Haining Yang
- Department of Pathology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Department of Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Aston WJ, Hope DE, Cook AM, Boon L, Dick I, Nowak AK, Lake RA, Lesterhuis WJ. Dexamethasone differentially depletes tumour and peripheral blood lymphocytes and can impact the efficacy of chemotherapy/checkpoint blockade combination treatment. Oncoimmunology 2019; 8:e1641390. [PMID: 31646089 PMCID: PMC6791454 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2019.1641390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Dexamethasone is a synthetic glucocorticoid commonly used for the prevention and management of side effects in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. While it is effective as an anti-emetic and in preventing hypersensitivity reactions, dexamethasone depletes peripheral blood lymphocytes and impacts immune responses. The effect of dexamethasone on the number and quality of tumour-infiltrating leukocytes has not been reported. To address this, we calibrated the dose in two different strains of mice to achieve the same extent of peripheral blood lymphocyte depletion observed in patients with cancer. Doses that caused analogous depletion of T and B lymphocytes and NK cells from the peripheral blood, elicited no change in these populations within the tumour. The expression of immune checkpoint molecules PD-1, OX40, GITR and TIM3 on tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes was not altered. We found that dexamethasone had a small but significant deleterious impact on weakly efficacious chemoimmunotherapy but had no effect when the protocol was highly efficacious. Based on these results, we predict that dexamethasone will have a modest negative influence on the overall effectiveness of chemoimmunotherapy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne J. Aston
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Danika E. Hope
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Alistair M. Cook
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | | | - Ian Dick
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Anna K. Nowak
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Richard A. Lake
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - W. Joost Lesterhuis
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Combination chemotherapy is currently standard care for advanced mesothelioma. Checkpoint blockade is a promising new treatment. AREAS COVERED This review covers clinical use and biomarkers of checkpoint blockade. Medline search used keywords 'mesothelioma' combined with 'checkpoint blockade' OR 'PD-L1' OR 'PD1' OR 'anti-CTLA4'; the search terms AND 'clinical trial' or AND 'biomarker*' were added. Handsearching covered abstracts from relevant meetings from 2016 to 2018 and reference lists. Data informed a narrative review. EXPERT OPINION Single agent anti-CTLA4 blockade is inactive in mesothelioma. Single agent PD-1 blockade as second or subsequent treatment gives 20-29% partial responses; no randomized comparisons against placebo or chemotherapy are available. Biomarkers of response have been difficult to identify. There is no consensus as to whether tumor PD-L1 expression predicts outcomes. Combination checkpoint inhibitors (CTLA4 and PD1 blockade) provide a small incremental increase in response rates and progression-free survival. Chemoimmunotherapy is the next frontier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Nowak
- a National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases , University of Western Australia , Crawley , Australia
- b Institute for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia , Nedlands , Australia
- c Medical School , University of Western Australia , Crawley , Australia
| | - Alison McDonnell
- a National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases , University of Western Australia , Crawley , Australia
- b Institute for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia , Nedlands , Australia
- c Medical School , University of Western Australia , Crawley , Australia
| | - Alistair Cook
- a National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases , University of Western Australia , Crawley , Australia
- b Institute for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia , Nedlands , Australia
- c Medical School , University of Western Australia , Crawley , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Scherpereel A, Mazieres J, Greillier L, Lantuejoul S, Dô P, Bylicki O, Monnet I, Corre R, Audigier-Valette C, Locatelli-Sanchez M, Molinier O, Guisier F, Urban T, Ligeza-Poisson C, Planchard D, Amour E, Morin F, Moro-Sibilot D, Zalcman G. Nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (IFCT-1501 MAPS2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-comparative, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:239-253. [PMID: 30660609 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30765-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 304] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no recommended therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma that has progressed after first-line pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy. Disease control has been less than 30% in all previous studies of second-line drugs. Preliminary results have suggested that anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody could be efficacious in these patients. We thus aimed to prospectively assess the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody alone or in combination with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibody in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS This multicentre randomised, non-comparative, open-label, phase 2 trial was done at 21 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma progressing after first-line or second-line pemetrexed and platinum-based treatments, measurable disease by CT, and life expectancy greater than 12 weeks. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg bodyweight) every 2 weeks, or intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus intravenous ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks), given until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Central randomisation was stratified by histology (epithelioid vs non-epithelioid), treatment line (second line vs third line), and chemosensitivity to previous treatment (progression ≥3 months vs <3 months after pemetrexed treatment) and used a minimisation method with a 0·8 random factor. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved 12-week disease control, assessed by masked independent central review; the primary endpoint would be met if disease control was achieved in at least 40% of patients. The primary endpoint was assessed in the first 108 eligible patients. Efficacy analyses were also done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02716272. FINDINGS Between March 24 and August 25, 2016, 125 eligible patients were recruited and assigned to either nivolumab (n=63) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=62). In the first 108 eligible patients, 12-week disease control was achieved by 24 (44%; 95% CI 31-58) of 54 patients in the nivolumab group and 27 (50%; 37-63) of 54 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group. In the intention-to-treat population, 12-week disease control was achieved by 25 (40%; 28-52) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 32 (52%; 39-64) of 62 patients in the combination group. Nine (14%) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 16 (26%) of 61 patients in the combination group had grade 3-4 toxicities. The most frequent grade 3 adverse events were asthenia (one [2%] in the nivolumab group vs three [5%] in the combination group), asymptomatic increase in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase (none vs four [7%] of each), and asymptomatic lipase increase (two [3%] vs one [2%]). No patients had toxicities leading to death in the nivolumab group, whereas three (5%) of 62 in the combination group did (one fulminant hepatitis, one encephalitis, and one acute kidney failure). INTERPRETATION Anti-PD-1 nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab plus anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab combination therapy both showed promising activity in relapsed patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, without unexpected toxicity. These regimens require confirmation in larger clinical trials. FUNDING French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Scherpereel
- Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, University of Lille, University Hospital (CHU) of Lille, Lille, France; French National Network of Clinical Expert Centers for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Management (MESOCLIN), Lille, France.
| | - Julien Mazieres
- Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Laurent Greillier
- Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Sylvie Lantuejoul
- Department of BioPathology, MESOPATH, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Pascal Dô
- Department of Pneumology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Olivier Bylicki
- Department of Pneumology, Hôpital d'instruction des Armées, Percy, Clamart, France
| | - Isabelle Monnet
- Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Romain Corre
- Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Olivier Molinier
- Department of Pneumology, Le Mans Regional Hospital, Le Mans, France
| | - Florian Guisier
- Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Thierry Urban
- Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of CHU Angers, Angers, France
| | | | - David Planchard
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Elodie Amour
- Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique IFCT, Paris, France
| | - Franck Morin
- Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique IFCT, Paris, France
| | - Denis Moro-Sibilot
- Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Gérard Zalcman
- University Hospital Bichat Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Diderot University Paris, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|