OA13.06 Surgical Outcomes Following Neoadjuvant Nivolumab or Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - NEOSTAR Study

Surgical Techniques for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy: State of Art and Review of the Literature

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80-85% of all lung cancers. Approximately 20% of patients with NSCLC are diagnosed with stage IIIA-IIIB disease, for which the optimal treatment remains unclear. Meta-analyses reveal that neoadjuvant/perioperative ICI-chemotherapy significantly improves pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS), major pathological response (MPR), and R0 rate compared to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Resectability is achieved when R0 resection can be performed after surgery. Radiographic downstaging often does not correspond to surgical downstaging. In fact, intra-operative fibrosis due to chemo-immunotherapy (synonymous with ICI-chemotherapy) can create adhesions and consequent difficult planes for dissection. Thus, pneumonectomy cannot be avoided. Even the suspicion of N2 after neoadjuvant treatment is considered a limitation of upfront surgery because of the risk of pneumonectomy. The aim of this review is to explore the literature on the technical strategies for surgical excision of NSCLC after chemo-immunotherapy, addressing even the most challenging scenarios.

An Observational Study Evaluating the Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to investigate the safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients undergoing surgery for resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Overall, 68 surgical patients with stage III NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy at the Thoracic Surgery Department of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from June 2019 to September 2021 were included, including 19 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy and 49 who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Both groups of patients were diagnosed with NSCLC before treatment and had resectable stage III tumors. The surgical duration, blood loss volume, average postoperative hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and complication rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The group treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy demonstrated higher values than the group treated with chemotherapy alone for surgical duration, blood loss volume, and rate of conversion to thoracotomy; however, the differences were not statistically significant. The incidence of postoperative complications in the group treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy was significantly higher than that of the group treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy was safe and effective and did not increase the difficulty of surgery for NSCLC; however, it was associated with a higher incidence of complications than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (p < 0.05).

What is the ideal endpoint in early-stage immunotherapy neoadjuvant trials in lung cancer?

Numerous clinical trials investigating neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been performed over the last 5 years. As the number of neoadjuvant trials increases, attention must be paid to identifying informative trial endpoints. Complete pathologic response has been shown to be an appropriate surrogate endpoint for clinical outcomes, such as event-free survival or overall survival, in breast cancer and bladder cancer, but it is less established for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The simultaneous advances reported with adjuvant ICI make the optimal strategy for early-stage disease debatable. Considering the long time required to conduct trials, it is important to identify optimal endpoints and discover surrogate endpoints for survival that can help guide ongoing clinical research. Endpoints can be grouped into two categories: medical and surgical. Medical endpoints are measures of survival and drug activity; surgical endpoints describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant approaches at a surgical level as well as perioperative attrition and complications. There are also several exploratory endpoints, including circulating tumor DNA clearance and radiomics. In this review, we outline the advantages and disadvantages of commonly reported endpoints for clinical trials of neoadjuvant regimens in NSCLC.

Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive lobectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and perioperative outcomes following neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with stage I to III NSCLC treated with immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone prior to lobectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2010-2018). The percentage of operations performed minimally invasively, conversion rates, and perioperative outcomes were evaluated using propensity-score matching. Propensity-score matching was also used to compare perioperative outcomes between patients who underwent an open lobectomy and those who underwent an MIS lobectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the 4229 patients identified, 218 (5%) received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 4011 (95%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. There was no difference in the rate of MIS lobectomy among patients who received immunotherapy compared with those who received chemotherapy alone in propensity score-matched analysis (60.8% vs 51.6%; P = .11). There also were no significant differences in the rate of conversion from MIS to open lobectomy (14% vs 15%, P = .83; odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-2.24) or in nodal downstaging, margin positivity, 30-day readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality between the 2 groups. In a subgroup analysis of only patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy, there were no differences in pathologic or perioperative outcomes between patients who underwent open lobectomy and those who underwent MIS lobectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis, neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC was not associated with an increased likelihood of the need for thoracotomy, conversion from MIS to open lobectomy, or inferior perioperative outcomes.

The oncologic efficacy of extended resections for lung cancer

Extended lung resections for T3-T4 non-small-cell lung cancer remain challenging. Multimodal management is mandatory in multidisciplinary tumor boards, and here the determination of resectability is key. Long-term oncologic efficacy depends mostly on complete resection (R0) and the extent of N2 disease. The development of novel innovative treatments (targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors) sets interesting perspectives to reinforce current therapeutic options in the induction and adjuvant setting.

Intraoperative challenges after induction therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Effect of nodal disease on technical complexity

Objectives

Neoadjuvant therapy has been theorized to increase complexity of non-small cell lung cancer resections; however, specific factors that contribute to intraoperative challenges after induction therapy have not been well described. We aimed to characterize the effect of nodal involvement and nodal treatment response on surgical complexity after neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

We identified patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by anatomic lung resection for cN + non-small cell lung cancer between 2010 and 2020. Patients were categorized according to clinical N1 versus N2 disease. To evaluate the effect of nodal response to therapy, thoracic radiologists measured clinically suspected and pathologically involved lymph nodes before and after induction therapy. Operative reports were reviewed to identify technical challenges specifically related to nodal disease. Categorical outcomes were compared using Fisher exact test.

Results

One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria, among whom 107 (86.3%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas chemoradiation (n = 8) and targeted therapy (n = 9) were less common. In cases with N1 disease, 8/38 (21.0%) required proximal pulmonary arterial control, whereas this was necessary in only 2/88 (2.3%) of N2 cases (P = .001). Likewise, sleeve resection and arterioplasty were needed more frequently during resection of N1 disease (7/38, 18.4%) versus N2 disease (0/88, P < .001). Increased nodal response to therapy was associated with greater likelihood of requiring change in vascular approach (P = .011).

Conclusions

After induction therapy, N1 disease was associated with greater need for complex surgical maneuvers than N2 disease. Likewise, substantial treatment response was associated with increased intraoperative technical challenges. Recognizing such factors enables surgical teams to engage in appropriate operative planning to ensure patient safety.

Surgical Complexity of Pulmonary Resections Performed for Oligometastatic NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary resection has been established as an important component of local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligometastatic NSCLC. However, technical aspects of such surgical procedures have not been well characterized. We sought to review the complexity of operations performed within a large cohort of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC.

METHODS

We identified patients treated at a single institution between 2000 and 2017 with stage IV NSCLC, with three or fewer synchronous metastases, and who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor. Medical records were reviewed, and aspects of surgical complexity were recorded. Descriptive analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Among 194 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC, 173 (89%) received LCT and 30 (15%) underwent resection of the primary tumor. Thoracotomy was performed in 25 patients (83%), and procedures included 25 (83%) lobectomies, three (10%) pneumonectomies, and two (7%) sublobar resections. Mean blood loss was 200 (50-600) mL, and operative time was 200 (72-492) minutes. Proximal pulmonary artery control was needed in four (15%). Sleeve resection was needed in four (15%). Unplanned procedural change was required in two patients (7%). Chest wall resection occurred in three patients (11%). Lymph nodes were characterized as hard or densely adherent in nine (33%), and operations were described as more difficult than usual in 16 cases (59%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery has emerged as a key strategy for LCT among patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. These operations can be performed safely, yet frequently require advanced techniques and complex resection strategies. As such, health care teams must be prepared for the technical challenges of these cases.

Important Surgical and Clinical End Points in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Trials in Resectable NSCLC

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy may improve outcomes in patients with resectable NSCLC and is being evaluated in phase 2 and 3 studies. Nevertheless, preoperative treatment postpones resection; the potential for increased surgical complexity and greater intra- and postoperative morbidity and mortality is an additional consideration. In studies primarily designed to evaluate efficacy, the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on surgery is based on parameters that are poorly defined and reported differently between studies. Defining and reporting common end points among trials would improve understanding and facilitate cross-comparison of different immunotherapy regimens and may facilitate wider adoption of induction therapies by surgeons and oncologists. We propose several surgical end points and related metrics for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC. These include the periods from screening to treatment initiation and from last neoadjuvant dose to surgery; reporting of the allowable window for surgery to preclude masking delays caused by induction treatment-related toxicity; complete resection (R0) rate; preoperative downstaging; a standardized list of immune-related adverse events and associated delay to surgery; preoperative attrition; postoperative attrition before adjuvant therapy; and postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality and morbidity rates. Intraoperative end points (blood loss, duration, and type of surgery) and our proposed system of grading complexity based on lymphadenopathy and fibrosis would allow quantitation of technical difficulty and quality of oncologic resection. In conclusion, the standardization, reporting, and prospective inclusion of these end points in study protocols would provide a comparative overview of the impact of different neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimens on surgery and ultimately clinical oncologic outcomes in resectable NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Worldwide, lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Despite a trend towards an escalating diagnosis of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable NSCLC remains poor. The incorporation of chemotherapy into the neoadjuvant setting has improved disease-free survival (DFS), time to distant recurrence, and OS. Furthermore, the incorporation of immunotherapy and the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy have improved pathological responses, which seems to be associated with increased survival. Therefore, immunotherapy represents a paradigm shift in treating resectable NSCLC. However, validation in large randomized trials is mandatory and a longer postoperative follow-up period is required. Additionally, neoadjuvant therapy trials offer an exceptional environment for testing predictive biomarkers. PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are the most helpful tools for predicting the likelihood of response with immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. However, in the neoadjuvant setting, PD-L1 expression and TMB have had opposite results until now. Recently, the immune profiling and some immune-related genes also appear to be involved in the prognosis and response to immunotherapy in NSCLC. Further prospective studies are needed to derive definitive conclusions.

Surgical perspective on neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

With a 5% improvement in 5-year overall survival achieved with current neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, new treatments for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are urgently needed. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is established in metastatic NSCLC and is being evaluated in resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

Publications and conference databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for reports on clinical studies of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with early resectable NSCLC.

RESULTS

Potential advantages of neoadjuvant ICI include earlier treatment of micrometastatic disease; activation of a broader, potentially durable immune response by the whole tumor and associated lymph nodes; and pathologic assessment of neoadjuvant treatment response, which may guide adjuvant therapy. Surgical considerations include delays to surgery, potential disease progression preventing curative resection, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. Surrogate endpoints of efficacy (pathologic complete response, major pathologic response) and biomarkers predictive of outcome (programmed death ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden and circulating tumor DNA) can accelerate clinical trial completion and early-stage treatment development; their application in neoadjuvant ICI studies in NSCLC is reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant ICI alone or with chemotherapy showed encouraging safety and efficacy in patients with resectable NSCLC, warranting the ongoing phase 3 studies of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. Preoperative and intraoperative unresectability following neoadjuvant ICI appear comparable to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To help thoracic surgeons and medical oncologists to distinguish amongst ICI beyond efficacy as phase 3 data emerge, surgery-related endpoints for perioperative morbidity, mortality, and complexity should be defined, standardized, incorporated into trial designs, and reported.

Current and future drug combination strategies based on programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

ABSTRACT

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made breakthroughs in the field of lung cancer and have become a focal point for research. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor monotherapy was the first to break the treatment pattern for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, owing to the limited benefit of ICI monotherapy at the population level and its hyper-progressive phenomenon, it may not meet clinical needs. To expand the beneficial range of immunotherapy and improve its efficacy, several research strategies have adopted the use of combination immunotherapy. At present, multiple strategies, such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors, and radiotherapy, as well as combined treatment with new target drugs, have been evaluated for clinical practice. To further understand the current status and future development direction of immunotherapy, herein, we review the recent progress of ICI combination therapies for NSCLC.

Minimally invasive surgery versus thoracotomy for resectable stage II and III non-small-cell lung cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to compare the long-term oncological efficacy and perioperative outcomes of patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancers who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or thoracotomy.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMBASE databases, ClinicalTrials.gov and reference lists were searched for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the studies. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were synthesized. Random-effects models were used to summarize hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Twenty-three retrospective cohort studies were reviewed with a total of 3281 patients, of whom 1376 (41.9%) received MIS and 1905 (58.1%) received thoracotomy. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in both RFS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.17; P = 0.78) and OS (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.80-1.03; P = 0.15) between MIS versus thoracotomy approaches. Similar results were observed in propensity score matched studies (RFS, HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.20; P = 0.62; OS, HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.72-1.30; P = 0.81). No significant difference was found in lymph node clearance and margin positivity. As for perioperative outcomes, MIS was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative complications (relative risk, 0.83; P = 0.01), intraoperative blood loss (standardized mean difference, -0.68; P = 0.007), chest tube drainage (standardized mean difference, -0.38; P = 0.03) and length of hospital stay (standardized mean difference, -0.79; P = 0.002) when compared with thoracotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MIS for resectable stage II and III non-small-cell lung cancers is an eligible alternative to conventional thoracotomy without compromising the long-term survival and short-term outcomes.

Clinical recommendations for perioperative immunotherapy-induced adverse events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Perioperative adjuvant treatment has become an increasingly important aspect of the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In particular, the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as antibodies against PD-1 and PD-L1, in patients with lung cancer has increased our expectations for the success of these therapeutics as neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant therapy is widely used in patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC and can reduce primary tumor and lymph node stage, improve the complete resection rate, and eliminate microsatellite foci; however, complete pathological response is rare. Moreover, because the clinical benefit of neoadjuvant therapy is not obvious and may complicate surgery, it has not yet entered the mainstream of clinical treatment. Small-scale clinical studies performed in recent years have shown improvements in the major pathological remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy, suggesting that it will soon become an important part of NSCLC treatment. Nevertheless, neoadjuvant immunotherapy may be accompanied by serious adverse reactions that lead to delay or cancellation of surgery, additional illness, and even death, and have therefore attracted much attention. In this article, we draw on several sources of information, including (i) guidelines on adverse reactions related to immune checkpoint inhibitors, (ii) published data from large-scale clinical studies in thoracic surgery, and (iii) practical experience and published cases, to provide clinical recommendations on adverse events in NSCLC patients induced by perioperative immunotherapy.

Perioperative outcomes of pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Pembrolizumab is a programmed death receptor-1 masking antibody approved for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. This Phase 2 study (NCT02818920) of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer had a primary end point of safety and secondary end points of efficacy and correlative science.

METHODS

Patients with untreated clinical stage IB to IIIA non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled. Two cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) were administered before surgery. Standard adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation were encouraged but not required. Four cycles of adjuvant pembrolizumab were provided.

RESULTS

Of 35 patients enrolled, 30 received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and 25 underwent lung resection. Only 1 patient had a delay before surgery attributed to pembrolizumab; this was due to thyroiditis. All patients underwent anatomic resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection; the majority (18/25%, 72%) of patients underwent lobectomy. Of the 25 patients, 23 had an initial minimally invasive approach (92%); 5 of these were converted to thoracotomy (21.7%). R0 resection was achieved in 22 patients (88%), and major pathologic response was observed in 7 of 25 patients (28%). The most common postoperative adverse event was atrial fibrillation, affecting 6 of 25 patients (24%). Median chest tube duration and length of stay were 3 and 4 days, respectively. One patient required readmission to the hospital within 30 days. There was no mortality within 90 days of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, pembrolizumab was safe and well tolerated in the neoadjuvant setting, and its use was not associated with excess surgical morbidity or mortality. Minimally invasive approaches are feasible in this patient population, but may be more challenging than in cases without neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Pathologic response was higher than typically observed with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Canakinumab with and without pembrolizumab in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: CANOPY-N study design

Canakinumab is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody, with high affinity and specificity for IL-1β. The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study (CANTOS) trial, evaluating canakinumab for cardiovascular disease, provided the first signal of the potential of IL-1β inhibition on lung cancer incidence reduction. Here, we describe the rationale and design for CANOPY-N, a randomized Phase II trial evaluating IL-1β inhibition with or without immune checkpoint inhibition as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with stage IB to IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer eligible for complete resection will receive canakinumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy, or in combination. The primary end point is major pathological response by central review; secondary end points include overall response rate, major pathological response (local review), surgical feasibility rate and pharmacokinetics. Clinical trial registration: NCT03968419 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Operability and Pathological Response of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) after Neoadjuvant Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition]

BACKGROUND

 The blockade of immune escape mechanisms (e. g. PD1 /PD-L1) using immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) can significantly prolong survival and induce remission in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Less is known about neoadjuvant ICI in patients with resectable (UICC stage III) or oligometastatic (UICC stage IVa) NSCLC.

METHODS

 Tissue biopsies from patients with advanced or oligometastatic NSCLC were screened for PD-L1 expression. In case of PD-L1-expression > 50 %, ECOG status of 0 or 1 and expected operability, patients received ICI. After about four weeks, patients underwent thoracic surgical resection. In all patients, a complete staging, including PET-CT, cMRI, and endobronchial ultrasound, was performed. The tolerability, the radiological and the histopathological tumor response as well as the surgical and oncological outcomes were analyzed.

FINDINGS

 Four patients (2 male, 2 female, age 56 - 78 years, n = 3 adenocarcinoma, n = 1 squamous cell carcinoma) with local advanced tumors received ICI before surgical resection. In three cases the mediastinal lymph nodes were positive. One patient had a single cerebral metastasis which was treated with radiotherapy. All four patients underwent therapy with two to six cycles of ICI (3 × pembrolizumab, 1 × atezolizumab) without any complication, and ICI did not delay the time of surgical resection. According to iRECIST, three patients showed partial response (PR), one patient had stable disease (SD). All tumors were completely resected. The thoracic surgical procedures proved to be technically unproblematic despite inflammatory changes. There were neither treatment-related deaths nor perioperative complications. In the resectates, complete pathological response (CPR, regression grade III ) and regression grade IIb were detected twice. The average time of follow-up was 12 (1 - 24) months. Patients with PPR developed distant metastasis after six months or a local recurrence after four months. The CPR patient is relapse free to date.

CONCLUSION

 In selected patients, neoadjuvant therapy with ICI is well tolerated and can induce a complete remission of the tumor. Treatment with ICI has no negative impact on the surgical procedure. Prognosis seems to be promising in CPR and limited in PPR.

Current Panorama and Challenges for Neoadjuvant Cancer Immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may overcome cancer cells' ability to evade the immune system and proliferate. The long-term benefit of ICI in the metastatic setting led to evaluate neoadjuvant ICI approaches in several tumor types such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and breast and bladder cancer. We summarize the current evidence for the efficacy of neoadjuvant ICI in cancer and discuss several unresolved challenges, including the role of adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant ICI, the efficacy in oncogenic addicted tumors, and standardizing pathologic assessment.