Two Patients Having NSCLC With Novel Duplication Mutation in Their EGFR Gene (p.I740_K745dupIPVAIK) and Their Response to Osimertinib

EGFR exon 19 insertion EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK and others with rare XPVAIK amino-acid insertions: Preclinical and clinical characterization of the favorable therapeutic window to all classes of approved EGFR kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-K745_E746insIPVAIK and others with XPVAIK amino-acid insertions are exon 19 insertion mutations, which, at the structural modeling level, resemble EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitizing mutants. An important unmet need is the characterization of therapeutic windows plus clinical outcomes of exon 19 XPVAIK amino-acid insertion mutations to available EGFR TKIs.

METHODS

We used preclinical models of EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK and more typical EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion, L858R, L861Q, G719S, A763_Y764insFQEA, other exon 20 insertion mutations) to probe representative 1st (erlotinib), 2nd (afatinib), 3rd generation (osimertinib), and EGFR exon 20 insertion active (mobocertinib) TKIs. We also compiled outcomes of EGFR exon 19 insertion mutated lung cancers-from our institution plus the literature-treated with EGFR TKIs.

RESULTS

Exon 19 insertions represented 0.3-0.8% of all EGFR kinase domain mutation in two cohorts (n = 1772). Cells driven by EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK had sensitivity to all classes of approved EGFR TKIs when compared to cells driven by EGFR-WT in proliferation assays and at the protein level. However, the therapeutic window of EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK driven cells was most akin to those of cells driven by EGFR-L861Q and EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA than the more sensitive patterns seen with cells driven by an EGFR exon 19 deletion or EGFR-L858R. The majority (69.2%, n = 26) of patients with lung cancers harboring EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK and other mutations with rare XPVAIK amino-acid insertions responded to clinically available EGFR TKIs (including icotinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib), with heterogeneous periods of progression-free survival. Mechanisms of acquired EGFR TKI resistance of this mutant remained underreported.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest preclinical/clinical report to highlight that EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK and other mutations with exon 19 XPVAIK amino-acid insertions are rare but sensitive to clinically available 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation as well as EGFR exon 20 active TKIs; in a pattern that mostly resembles the outcomes of models with EGFR-L861Q and EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA mutations. These data may help with the off-label selection of EGFR TKIs and clinical expectations of outcomes when targeted therapy is deployed for these EGFR mutated lung cancers.

Osimertinib-Centered Therapy Against Uncommon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer- A Mini Review

Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA). Osimertinib is currently the first line drug recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines against lung cancer harboring the EGFR TKI-sensitive mutation and acquired EGFR T790M resistance mutation. Osimertinib demonstrated some efficacy in clinical trials and case reports in patients bearing certain uncommon EGFR mutations, but it is not active in patients with other mutations such as C797S. This mini-review presents the mechanisms underlying the variations in patient responses, discusses the use of osimertinib against non-small-cell lung carcinomas with uncommon EGFR mutations, and addresses the future prospects of osimertinib-centered therapy.

Efficacy of EGFR-TKI sequential therapy in patients with EGFR exon 19 insertion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Insertions in exon 19 in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) is a rarely seen mutation in non-small cell lung cancer. These patients have been effectively treated with sequential EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we presented a case of non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB, with EGFR exon 19 insertion mutation as detected in the right lower lobe by next-generation sequencing. The patient was sequentially treated with first, second, and third-generation EGFR TKIs after the surgical operation. The overall survival of the patient was 21.3 mo. There was no dynamic analysis of drug resistance mechanisms in targeted therapy.

CONCLUSION

This case emphasized the importance of following the guidelines. In patients with EGFR mutations, repeated and dynamic next-generation sequencing monitoring is necessary to prescribe a personalized treatment plan.

A Nationwide Study on the Impact of Routine Testing for EGFR Mutations in Advanced NSCLC Reveals Distinct Survival Patterns Based on EGFR Mutation Subclasses

EGFR mutation analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is currently standard-of-care. We determined the uptake of EGFR testing, test results and survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients in the Netherlands, with the overall objective to characterize the landscape of clinically actionable EGFR mutations and determine the role and clinical relevance of uncommon and composite EGFR mutations. Non-squamous NSCLC patients diagnosed in 2013, 2015 and 2017 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and matched to the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Overall, 10,254 patients were included. Between 2013-2017, the uptake of EGFR testing gradually increased from 72.7% to 80.9% (p < 0.001). Multi-gene testing via next-generation sequencing (increased from 7.8% to 78.7% (p < 0.001), but did not affect the number of detected EGFR mutations (n = 925; 11.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0-12.4) nor the distribution of variants. For patients treated with first-line EGFR inhibitors (n = 651), exon 19 deletions were associated with longer OS than L858R (HR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.30-1.92; p < 0.001) or uncommon, actionable variants (HR 2.13; 95% CI, 1.60-2.84; p < 0.001). Interestingly, OS for patients with L858R was similar to those with uncommon, actionable variants (HR 1.31; 95% CI, 0.98-1.75; p = 0.069). Our analysis indicates that grouping exon 19 deletions and L858R into one class of 'common' EGFR mutations in a clinical trial may mask the true activity of an EGFR inhibitor towards specific mutations.