Socioeconomic Inequalities in Novel NSCLC Treatments During the Era of Tumor Biomarker-Guided Therapy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in a Publicly Funded Health Care System

Characteristics of interventions aimed at reducing inequalities along the cancer continuum: A scoping review

Cancer inequalities are wide and enduring, within countries between socio-demographic groups and between countries. These are generated and sustained throughout the key phases of the cancer pathway, from investigation, clinical assessment, decision and access to treatment, and follow-up care. We aimed to describe the characteristics of implemented interventions, evaluated in published controlled experiments in the medical literature, specifically designed to target reductions in inequalities along the cancer pathway. We searched the Ovid Medline and Embase databases from January 2005 to April 2024 for controlled experiments reporting on interventions tackling inequalities. We extracted information on the publication, the aim and type of intervention, its setting, the characteristics of the sample and of the interventions, and summarised their results and limitations. We identified 56 articles reporting on 57 interventions. Of these, 51 (89.5%) focused on access to screening; 56 (98.2%) focused on colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers; 37 (64.9%) concentrated on ethnic inequalities and 48 (84.2%) were based in the USA. In addition, the majority of interventions sought to change individual knowledge, beliefs, and behaviour rather than issues at the system-level. The importance of addressing how healthcare is delivered equitably to all individuals is widely recognised, and there is evidence that individual factors account for only a small part of cancer pathway inequalities. Yet, this scoping review reports a lack of diversity in the implementation of interventions addressing cancer inequalities, and a minority of them target health system issues.

Emerging molecular testing paradigms in non-small cell lung cancer management-current perspectives and recommendations

Advances in molecular testing and precision oncology have transformed the clinical management of lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer, enhancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Practical guidelines offer insights into selecting appropriate biomarkers and assays, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive testing. However, real-world data reveal the underutilization of biomarker testing and consequently targeted therapies. Molecular testing often occurs late in diagnosis or not at all in clinical practice, leading to delayed or inadequate treatment. Enhancing precision requires adherence to best practices by all health care professionals involved, which can ultimately improve lung cancer patient outcomes. The future of precision oncology for lung cancer will likely involve a more personalized approach, starting increasingly from earlier disease settings, with novel and more complex targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and combination regimens, and relying on liquid biopsies, muti-detection advanced genomic technologies and data integration, with artificial intelligence as a central orchestrator. This review presents the currently known actionable mutations in lung cancer and new upcoming ones that are likely to enter clinical practice soon and provides an overview of established and emerging concepts in testing methodologies. Challenges are discussed and best practice recommendations are made that are relevant today, will continue to be relevant in the future, and are likely to be relevant for other cancer types too.

Investigating socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer diagnosis, treatment and mortality: an Italian cohort study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide and patient clinical outcomes seem influenced by their socioeconomic position (SEP). Since little has been investigated on this topic in the Italian context, our aim was to investigate the role of SEP in the care pathway of lung cancer patients in terms of diagnosis, treatment and mortality.

METHODS

This observational retrospective cohort study included patients discharged in the Lazio Region with a lung cancer diagnosis between 2014 and 2017. In the main analysis, educational level was used as SEP measure. Multivariate models, adjusted for demographic and clinical variables, were applied to evaluate the association between SEP and study outcomes, stratified for metastatic (M) and non-metastatic (NM) cancer. We defined a diagnosis as 'delayed' when patients received their initial cancer diagnosis after an emergency department admission. Access to advanced lung cancer treatments (high-cost, novel and innovative treatments) and mortality were investigated within the 24-month period post-diagnosis. Moreover, two additional indicators of SEP were examined in the sensitivity analysis: one focusing on area deprivation and the other on income-based exemption.

RESULTS

A total of 13,251 patients were identified (37.3% with metastasis). The majority were males (> 60%) and over half were older than 70 years. The distribution of SEP levels among patients was as follow: 31% low, 29% medium-low, 32% medium-high and 7% high. As SEP increased, the risks of receiving a delayed diagnosis ((high vs low: M: OR = 0.29 (0.23-0.38), NM: OR = 0.20 (0.16-0.25)) and of mortality ((high vs low M: OR = 0.77 (0.68-0.88) and NM: 0.61 (0.54-0.69)) decreased. Access to advanced lung cancer treatments increased in accordance with SEP only in the M cohort (high vs low: M: OR = 1.57 (1.18-2.09)). The primary findings were corroborated by sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlighted the need of public health preventive and educational programs in Italy, a country where the care pathway of lung cancer patients, especially in terms of diagnosis and mortality, appears to be negatively affected by SEP level.

Barriers and Unequal Access to Timely Molecular Testing Results: Addressing the Inequities in Cancer Care Delays across Canada

Genomic medicine is a powerful tool to improve diagnosis and outcomes for cancer patients by facilitating the delivery of the right drug at the right dose at the right time for the right patient. In 2023, a Canadian conference brought together leaders with expertise in different tumor types. The objective was to identify challenges and opportunities for change in terms of equitable and timely access to biomarker testing and reporting at the education, delivery, laboratory, patient, and health-system levels in Canada. Challenges identified included: limited patient and clinician awareness of genomic medicine options with need for formal education strategies; failure by clinicians to discuss genomic medicine with patients; delays in or no access to hereditary testing; lack of timely reporting of results; intra- and inter-provincial disparities in access; lack of funding for patients to access testing and for laboratories to provide testing; lack of standardized testing; and impact of social determinants of health. Canada must standardize its approach to biomarker testing across the country, with a view to addressing current inequities, and prioritize access to advanced molecular testing to ensure systems are in place to quickly bring innovation and evidence-based treatments to Canadian cancer patients, regardless of their place of residence or socioeconomic status.

The association between marital status and treatment initiation in lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Lung cancer is associated with high mortality, and significant health burden. Marital status has been associated with lung cancer survival. This systematic review and meta-analysis set out to investigate the association between marital status and treatment receipt in lung cancer. The search was conducted across three databases: Medline (OVID), Embase and CINAHL, from inception to June 2022. Retrospective or prospective observational studies that quantified treatment receipt by marital status were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was assessed via a modified checklist for retrospective databased-based studies. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was undertaken by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and any treatment relative to married or not married. Pooled unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each type of treatment. 837 papers were screened and 18 met the inclusion criteria with eight being eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Studies were excluded from meta-analysis due to overlap in the data reported in papers; the mean quality score of the 18 included papers was 12/17. Being married was associated with increased odds of overall treatment OR 1.43 (95 % CI 1.14-1.79; I2 = 82 %; Tau2 = 0.07; six studies) and also increased receipt of: chemotherapy 1.40 (95 % CI 1.35-1.44; I2 = 82 %; Tau2 = 0.00); radiotherapy 1.29 (95 % CI 0.96-1.75; I2 = 100 %; Tau2= 0.09; four studies) and surgery (95 % CI 1.31-1.52; I2 = 86 %; Tau2 = 0.00; five studies). The results indicate that those who are married are more likely to receive treatment for lung cancer compared to those who are not married. This requires further investigation to better understand the explanations behind this finding and how we can work to combat this inequality.