Prospective Blinded Laboratory Assessment of Prophylactic Antibiotic Compliance in a Pediatric Outpatient Setting

Adherence and Acceptability of an Oral Antibiotic Used for the Prevention of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infection in Japan

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common health care-associated adverse event and the leading nosocomial complication following pediatric urological surgery. While continuous antimicrobial prophylaxis effectively reduces the risk of UTI following such a surgery, non-adherence is common and represents a distinct clinical entity that is associated with renal scarring. Acceptability is likely to have a significant impact on patient adherence. Herein we used a validated data-driven approach-the ClinSearch acceptability score test (CAST)-to investigate the acceptability of cefaclor, an oral antibiotic widely used for the prevention of pediatric UTI in Japan. Standardized observer reports were collected for 58 intakes of cefaclor 10% fine granules in patients aged from 0 to 17 years. The medicine was classified as positively accepted on the acceptability reference framework. According to the percentage of the prescribed dose taken reported at the end of the treatment, patients exhibited good adherence to this well-accepted medicine. Nonetheless, requirements for greater dosing frequency or poor acceptability in certain patients could affect adherence. Acceptability should be established to ensure patient adherence to medicines used for long-term prophylaxis and consequently guarantee the safety and efficacy of the treatment.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis for urinary tract infections: implications for adherence assessment

BACKGROUND

Continuous antimicrobial prophylaxis (prophylaxis) is associated with a reduction in recurrent urinary tract infections in children with vesicoureteral reflux. However, adherence to daily medications has been shown to be poor.

OBJECTIVE

To determine patient/caregiver factors associated with non-adherence and to determine whether adherence alters the effect of prophylaxis on recurrent UTIs and renal scarring.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a secondary analysis of the Randomized Intervention for Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux trial. We stratified adherence scores into quartiles to assess trends within the data. We assessed predictors of non-adherence using ordinal logistic regression. We then examined the efficacy of prophylaxis stratified by adherence quartiles.

RESULTS

Six hundred patients were included in the analysis. The quartiles of adherence were as follows: 1st quartile-0-70% adherence; 2nd quartile-71-91% adherence; 3rd quartile-92-96% adherence; and 4th quartile->96% adherence. Neither demographic factors nor disease severity was associated with non-adherence. In the subanalysis of patients who were toilet trained at baseline, increasing bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) symptom score was associated with non-adherence (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.2). Patients least adherent were 2.5 times more likely (95%CI 1.1-5.6) to have a recurrent UTI compared with patients most adherent. After controlling for treatment arm, age, sex, degree of reflux, BBD, and number of UTIs, patients least adherent (taking the study medication less than <70% of the time) were at highest risk for renal scarring (aOR = 24.2, 95%CI 3.0-197). In contrast, among the most adherent quartile, the probability of renal scarring was highest in those assigned prophylaxis (16.2% compared with 1.7% in those most adherent to placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence is distinctly related to clinical outcomes in children with VUR. Non-adherence is common and represents a distinct clinical entity that is associated with renal scarring. Adherence should be assessed in prophylaxis management algorithms.

Urinary tract infections in children: EAU/ESPU guidelines

CONTEXT

In 30% of children with urinary tract anomalies, urinary tract infection (UTI) can be the first sign. Failure to identify patients at risk can result in damage to the upper urinary tract.

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and imaging of children presenting with UTI.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The recommendations were developed after a review of the literature and a search of PubMed and Embase. A consensus decision was adopted when evidence was low.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

UTIs are classified according to site, episode, symptoms, and complicating factors. For acute treatment, site and severity are the most important. Urine sampling by suprapubic aspiration or catheterisation has a low contamination rate and confirms UTI. Using a plastic bag to collect urine, a UTI can only be excluded if the dipstick is negative for both leukocyte esterase and nitrite or microscopic analysis is negative for both pyuria and bacteriuria. A clean voided midstream urine sample after cleaning the external genitalia has good diagnostic accuracy in toilet-trained children. In children with febrile UTI, antibiotic treatment should be initiated as soon as possible to eradicate infection, prevent bacteraemia, improve outcome, and reduce the likelihood of renal involvement. Ultrasound of the urinary tract is advised to exclude obstructive uropathy. Depending on sex, age, and clinical presentation, vesicoureteral reflux should be excluded. Antibacterial prophylaxis is beneficial. In toilet-trained children, bladder and bowel dysfunction needs to be excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of evidence is high for the diagnosis of UTI and treatment in children but not for imaging to identify patients at risk for upper urinary tract damage.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In these guidelines, we looked at the diagnosis, treatment, and imaging of children with urinary tract infection. There are strong recommendations on diagnosis and treatment; we also advise exclusion of obstructive uropathy within 24h and later vesicoureteral reflux, if indicated.